Profile of T cell recognition of HIV type 1 consensus group M Gag and Nef peptides in a clade A1- and D-infected Ugandan population.

Reagents for evaluating non-clade B HIV-specific T cell responses are uncommon. Peptides based on highly conserved HIV-1 consensus group M sequences that are phylogenetically closer to most circulating strains may provide potential alternative reagents in populations with diverse infections, and may be relevant for vaccine design. Recognition of such reagents in clade A1-and D-infected populations has not been previously evaluated. Interferon (IFN)-γ ELISpot assay was used to evaluate T cell recognition of Gag and Nef peptides based on consensus group M sequences in 50 treatment-naive adults predominantly infected with HIV-1 clades A1 and D. Gag-induced T cell responses were correlated with gag sequence diversity. Infecting clades were determined from gag sequences for 45 of the 50 subjects as 40% clade A1 (18/45), 45% clade D (20/45), 2% clade C (1/45), 2% A1/C recombinant (1/45), 2% A1/D (1/45), 7% CRF10_CD (3/45), and 2% U (unclassifiable) (1/45). The mean genetic divergence and diversity of clade A and D gag region compared to group M consensus sequences at synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide and amino acid levels were not always significant. Gag peptides were targeted at significantly higher frequency [88% (44/50)] than Nef [64% (32/50)]; p=0.014, although their mean IFN-γ magnitudes were comparable ([3703 (95% CI 2567-4839)] vs. [2120 (95% CI 478-3762)]), respectively. Measurable virus-induced IFN-γ responses were detected in 96% (48/50) individuals, primarily targeting the more conserved Gag p24 and Nef central core regions. Use of these reagents to screen for HIV-specific IFN-γ responses may mitigate the challenge of viral diversity; although this targeting is apparently biased toward a few highly conserved epitopes.

Transmitted antiretroviral drug resistance among newly HIV-1 diagnosed young individuals in Kampala.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the emergence of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance (TDR) in Kampala, Uganda, 10 years after the scale-up of antiretroviral treatment (ART) and to compare with a previous survey among antenatal clinic attendees in 2007 (reporting 0% TDR). DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among newly HIV-1 diagnosed, antiretroviral-naive young adults attending two large voluntary counseling and testing centers within the geographic area of Kampala. METHODS: Proxy criteria for recent HIV-1 infection were used as defined by the WHO. Population sequencing of the pol gene was performed on plasma samples with HIV-1 RNA at least 1000 copies/ml. Surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRMs) were identified according to the 2009 WHO list for surveillance of TDR. HIV-1 subtypes were designated using maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction. RESULTS: : Genotypic test results were obtained for 70 of 77 (90.9%) participants. SDRMs were identified in six samples yielding a prevalence of TDR of 8.6% (95% confidence interval 3.2-17.7%). Two had SDRMs to nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (D67G and L210W), three had SDRMs to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (G190A, G190S, and K101E), and one had SDRMs to protease inhibitors (N88D). Frequencies of HIV-1 subtypes were A (36/70, 51.4%), C ( two of 70; 2.9%), D (23/70, 32.9%), and unique recombinant forms (nine of 70, 12.9%). CONCLUSION: This repeated survey suggests an increase in TDR in Kampala, compared with a previous survey. This finding justifies increased vigilance with respect to surveillance of TDR in areas in Africa where ART programs are rolled-out.

Effect of single-dose anthelmintic treatment during pregnancy on an infant's response to immunisation and on susceptibility to infectious diseases in infancy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Helminth infections affect the human immune response. We investigated whether prenatal exposure to and treatment of maternal helminth infections affects development of an infant's immune response to immunisations and unrelated infections. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled 2507 women in the second or third trimester of pregnancy who were planning to deliver in Entebbe General Hospital, Entebbe, Uganda. With a computer-generated random number sequence in blocks of 100, we assigned patients to 440 mg albendazole and 40 mg/kg praziquantel (n=628), 440 mg albendazole and a praziquantel-matching placebo (n=625), 40 mg/kg praziquantel and an albendazole-matching placebo (n=626), or an albendazole-matching placebo and praziquantel-matching placebo (n=628). All participants and hospital staff were masked to allocation. Primary outcomes were immune response at age 1 year to BCG, tetanus, and measles immunisation; incidence of infectious diseases during infancy; and vertical HIV transmission. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN32849447. FINDINGS: Data were available at delivery for 2356 women, with 2345 livebirths; 2115 (90%) of liveborn infants remained in follow-up at 1 year of age. Neither albendazole nor praziquantel treatments affected infant response to BCG, tetanus, or measles immunisation. However, in infants of mothers with hookworm infection, albendazole treatment reduced interleukin-5 (geometric mean ratio 0·50, 95% CI 0·30-0·81, interaction p=0·02) and interleukin-13 (0·52, 0·34-0·82, 0·0005) response to tetanus toxoid. The rate per 100 person-years of malaria was 40·9 (95% CI 38·3-43·7), of diarrhoea was 134·1 (129·2-139·2), and of pneumonia was 22·3 (20·4-24·4). We noted no effect on infectious disease incidence for albendazole treatment (malaria [hazard ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·79-1.14], diarrhoea [1·06, 0·96-1·16], pneumonia [1·11, 0·90-1·38]) or praziquantel treatment (malaria [1·00, 0·84-1·20], diarrhoea [1·07, 0·98-1·18], pneumonia [1·00, 0·80-1·24]). In HIV-exposed infants, 39 (18%) were infected at 6 weeks; vertical transmission was not associated with albendazole (odds ratio 0·70, 95% CI 0·35-1·42) or praziquantel (0·60, 0·29-1·23) treatment. INTERPRETATION: These results do not accord with the recently advocated policy of routine antenatal anthelmintic treatment, and the value of such a policy may need to be reviewed. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust.