ABSTRACT
Homologous recombination (HR) is a highly conserved pathway that can facilitate the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB). Several Deubiquitinases (DUB) have been implicated as key players in DNA damage repair (DDR) through HR. Here, we report USP22, a DUB that is highly overexpressed in multiple cancer types, is necessary for HR through a direct interaction with PALB2 through its C-terminal WD40 domain. This interaction stimulates USP22 catalytic activity in vitro. Furthermore, we show USP22 is necessary for BRCA2, PALB2, and Rad51 recruitment to DSBs and this is, in part, through USP22 stabilizing BRCA2 and PALB2 levels. Taken together, our results describe a role for USP22 in DNA repair. IMPLICATIONS: This research provides new and exciting mechanistic insights into how USP22 overexpression promotes chemoresistance in lung cancer. We believe this study, and others, will help aid in developing targeted drugs toward USP22 and known binding partners for lung cancer treatment.
Subject(s)
DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group N Protein/metabolism , Homologous Recombination , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/metabolism , Ubiquitin Thiolesterase/metabolism , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Humans , Neoplasms/genetics , TransfectionABSTRACT
Loss of monoubiquitination of histone H2B (H2Bub1) was found to be associated with poor-differentiation and enhanced malignancy of lung adenocarcinoma. This study investigated the association and impact of the ubiquitin-specific peptidase 22 (USP22), an H2Bub1 deubiquitinase, on stem cell-like characteristics and cisplatin resistance in cancer-initiating cells (CIC) from primary lung adenocarcinoma. CICs were isolated, enriched, and characterized from patient-derived cancer tissues using both in vitro tumorsphere formation and in vivo xenograft assays. USP22 was determined to be predominantly expressed in CICs, a subpopulation of cells with high expression of the stem cell biomarkers, CD133 and CD44. The expression of USP22 in CICs is markedly reduced upon FBS/retinoic acid-induced differentiation. Moreover, knockdown of USP22 significantly suppressed tumorsphere formation and xenograft growth in NOD-SCID gamma (NSG) mice. Notably, USP22 and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity were elevated in tumorsphere cells that survived cisplatin treatment, whereas knockdown of USP22 significantly sensitizes tumorsphere cells to cisplatin. Interestingly, ALDH1A3, a predominant ALDH isozyme implicated in enhancing cisplatin resistance in lung adenocarcinoma, is significantly downregulated upon knockdown of USP22 in tumorsphere cells. Furthermore, knockdown of ALDH1A3 significantly sensitizes tumorsphere cells to cisplatin. Combined, these data demonstrate that USP22, predominantly expressed in CD133+ CICs, plays a critical role in tumorigenicity and cisplatin resistance in lung adenocarcinoma.Implications: Targeting USP22 represents a potential therapeutic approach to suppress CICs in lung adenocarcinoma partially through downregulation of ALDH1A3 expression. Mol Cancer Res; 16(7); 1161-71. ©2018 AACR.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma of Lung/drug therapy , Aldehyde Oxidoreductases/genetics , Carcinogenesis/genetics , Thiolester Hydrolases/genetics , AC133 Antigen/drug effects , AC133 Antigen/genetics , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/genetics , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/pathology , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Cisplatin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Humans , Mice , Ubiquitin Thiolesterase , Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysABSTRACT
The Mis18 complex specifies the site of new CENP-A nucleosome assembly by recruiting the CENP-A-specific assembly factor HJURP (Holliday junction recognition protein). The human Mis18 complex consists of Mis18α, Mis18ß, and Mis18 binding protein 1 (Mis18BP1/hsKNL2). Although Mis18α and Mis18ß are highly homologous proteins, we find that their conserved YIPPEE domains mediate distinct interactions that are essential to link new CENP-A deposition to existing centromeres. We find that Mis18α directly interacts with the N terminus of Mis18BP1, whereas Mis18ß directly interacts with CENP-C during G1 phase, revealing that these proteins have evolved to serve distinct functions in centromeres of higher eukaryotes. The N terminus of Mis18BP1, containing both the Mis18α and CENP-C binding domains, is necessary and sufficient for centromeric localization. Therefore, the Mis18 complex contains dual CENP-C recognition motifs that are combinatorially required to generate robust centromeric localization that leads to CENP-A deposition.
Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/metabolism , Centromere/metabolism , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/chemistry , Cell Cycle , Cell Cycle Proteins , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/chemistry , Conserved Sequence , Cysteine/metabolism , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Protein Binding , Protein DomainsABSTRACT
Centromeres are specialized chromatin domains specified by the centromere-specific CENP-A nucleosome. The stable inheritance of vertebrate centromeres is an epigenetic process requiring deposition of new CENP-A nucleosomes by HJURP. We show HJURP is recruited to centromeres through a direct interaction between the HJURP centromere targeting domain and the Mis18α-ß C-terminal coiled-coil domains. We demonstrate Mis18α and Mis18ß form a heterotetramer through their C-terminal coiled-coil domains. Mis18α-ß heterotetramer formation is required for Mis18BP1 binding and centromere recognition. S. pombe contains a single Mis18 isoform that forms a homotetramer, showing tetrameric Mis18 is conserved from fission yeast to humans. HJURP binding disrupts the Mis18α-ß heterotetramer and removes Mis18α from centromeres. We propose stable binding of Mis18 to centromeres in telophase licenses them for CENP-A deposition. Binding of HJURP deposits CENP-A at centromeres and facilitates the removal of Mis18, restricting CENP-A deposition to a single event per cell cycle.
Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/metabolism , Centromere/metabolism , Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Telophase , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/genetics , Amino Acid Sequence , Autoantigens/genetics , Autoantigens/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins , Cell Line, Tumor , Centromere Protein A , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Protein Binding , Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs , Protein Multimerization , Signal Transduction , TransfectionABSTRACT
Spindle assembly, establishment of kinetochore attachment, and sister chromatid separation must occur during mitosis in a highly coordinated fashion to ensure accurate chromosome segregation. In most vertebrate cells, the nuclear envelope must break down to allow interaction between microtubules of the mitotic spindle and the kinetochores. It was previously shown that nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB) is not coordinated with centrosome separation and that centrosome separation can be either complete at the time of NEB or can be completed after NEB. In this study, we investigated whether the timing of centrosome separation affects subsequent mitotic events such as establishment of kinetochore attachment or chromosome segregation. We used a combination of experimental and computational approaches to investigate kinetochore attachment and chromosome segregation in cells with complete versus incomplete spindle pole separation at NEB. We found that cells with incomplete spindle pole separation exhibit higher rates of kinetochore misattachments and chromosome missegregation than cells that complete centrosome separation before NEB. Moreover, our mathematical model showed that two spindle poles in close proximity do not "search" the entire cellular space, leading to formation of large numbers of syntelic attachments, which can be an intermediate stage in the formation of merotelic kinetochores.
Subject(s)
Centrosome/physiology , Chromosome Segregation , Mitosis , Spindle Apparatus/physiology , Animals , Cell Line , Computer Simulation , Epithelial Cells/physiology , Epithelial Cells/ultrastructure , Kinetochores/physiology , Time FactorsABSTRACT
The mitotic spindle self-assembles in prometaphase by a combination of centrosomal pathway, in which dynamically unstable microtubules search in space until chromosomes are captured, and a chromosomal pathway, in which microtubules grow from chromosomes and focus to the spindle poles. Quantitative mechanistic understanding of how spindle assembly can be both fast and accurate is lacking. Specifically, it is unclear how, if at all, chromosome movements and combining the centrosomal and chromosomal pathways affect the assembly speed and accuracy. We used computer simulations and high-resolution microscopy to test plausible pathways of spindle assembly in realistic geometry. Our results suggest that an optimal combination of centrosomal and chromosomal pathways, spatially biased microtubule growth, and chromosome movements and rotations is needed to complete prometaphase in 10-20 min while keeping erroneous merotelic attachments down to a few percent. The simulations also provide kinetic constraints for alternative error correction mechanisms, shed light on the dual role of chromosome arm volume, and compare well with experimental data for bipolar and multipolar HT-29 colorectal cancer cells.
Subject(s)
Chromosomes/physiology , Chromosomes/ultrastructure , Computer Simulation , Models, Biological , Spindle Apparatus/physiology , Spindle Apparatus/ultrastructure , Cell Line, Tumor , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Kinetochores/physiology , Kinetochores/ultrastructure , Microtubules/physiology , Microtubules/ultrastructure , Movement , RotationABSTRACT
Many cancer cells display a CIN (Chromosome Instability) phenotype, by which they exhibit high rates of chromosome loss or gain at each cell cycle. Over the years, a number of different mechanisms, including mitotic spindle multipolarity, cytokinesis failure, and merotelic kinetochore orientation, have been proposed as causes of CIN. However, a comprehensive theory of how CIN is perpetuated is still lacking. We used CIN colorectal cancer cells as a model system to investigate the possible cellular mechanism(s) underlying CIN. We found that CIN cells frequently assembled multipolar spindles in early mitosis. However, multipolar anaphase cells were very rare, and live-cell experiments showed that almost all CIN cells divided in a bipolar fashion. Moreover, fixed-cell analysis showed high frequencies of merotelically attached lagging chromosomes in bipolar anaphase CIN cells, and higher frequencies of merotelic attachments in multipolar vs. bipolar prometaphases. Finally, we found that multipolar CIN prometaphases typically possessed gamma-tubulin at all spindle poles, and that a significant fraction of bipolar metaphase/early anaphase CIN cells possessed more than one centrosome at a single spindle pole. Taken together, our data suggest a model by which merotelic kinetochore attachments can easily be established in multipolar prometaphases. Most of these multipolar prometaphase cells would then bi-polarize before anaphase onset, and the residual merotelic attachments would produce chromosome mis-segregation due to anaphase lagging chromosomes. We propose this spindle pole coalescence mechanism as a major contributor to chromosome instability in cancer cells.