ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The finding of bundle branch block (BBB) in patients with syncope suggests that paroxysmal atrioventricular block (AVB) or ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) may be the cause of syncope. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy have been recommended to perform electrophysiological study (EPS) for confirming main cause of syncope. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the role of EPS in patients with syncope and BBB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 133 patients (mean age 63 ± 13.8 years) with past history of syncope and BBB from April 2002 to December 2010 who referred to Arrhythmia clinic in two tertiary care centers. All patients underwent EPS on admission time. The frequency distributions of AVB and VT in patients were determined. RESULTS: Left bundle branch block was diagnosed in 184 (82.1%) patients. 133 of them had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥45%) that in 91 (68.4%) of those, EPS finding was normal. In 41 (30.8%) patients AVB was reported. In 2 (1.5%) patients VT and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia were seen. Coronary artery disease was more common in patients with AVB and abnormal EPS finding (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Ventricular tachyarrhythmia was a rare electrophysiological finding in those with syncope, bifascicular block, and preserved LVEF. Considering cost-effect benefit, pacemaker or implantable loop recorder implantation is suggested; however, EPS may not be necessary to perform before permanent pacemaker implantation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Indications for the use of the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) have been greatly expanded in recent years, but the influence of sex on the efficacy of the ICD in eligible patients has still been remained unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of sex on the effectiveness of the ICD intervention for mortality and appropriate events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on the outcome of the ICD therapy in 443 patients, including 341 men with a mean age of 55 ± 16 years and 102 women with a mean age of 54 ± 17 years, in our center between April 2001 and February 2007. Sex-specific cumulative probabilities of outcomes concerning mortality and appropriate ICD intervention were evaluated for the patients. RESULTS: Among the 443 patients, enrolled in this study, the women and men had a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 35 ± 14.8% and 30 ± 13.5%, respectively (P = 0.03). Ischemic heart disease was more frequent in the men than the women (P = 0.0001).The average follow-up period was 3 years. Test for an interaction between sex and the ICD treatment regarding total mortality was not significant (23 men and 6 women). Additionally, there was no significant difference in appropriate events between the women and men (129 men and 33 women). CONCLUSIONS: While women were significantly less likely than the men to receive the ICD therapy, no conclusive evidence could be found for the impact of sex factor on the effectiveness of the ICD intervention with respect to mortality and appropriate events.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It is known that there is an association between elevated total plasma homocysteine level and restenosis after percutaneous coronary angioplasty. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of lowering plasma homocysteine levels on the rate of restenosis after stent-percutaneous coronary angioplasty. METHODS: Folic acid (1 mg) or placebo was administered to 200 patients (mean +/- SD age of 54 +/- 9 years) for 3 months, after successful coronary angioplasty in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. The primary end point was restenosis within six months, as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography after positive exercise tolerance test. The secondary end point was a composite of major cardiac events. RESULTS: Base line characteristics and initial angiographic results after stent-percutaneous coronary angioplasty were similar in the two study groups. The rate of restenosis showed no significant difference in the two groups (5% in placebo vs. 10% in folic acid groups; P = 0.141), as there was the need for revascularization of the target lesion (4% in both groups; P = 0.766). CONCLUSION: Treatment with folic acid does not decrease the rate of restenosis and need for revascularization of the target lesion after stent-percutaneous coronary angioplasty.