Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 941, 2024 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39252007

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of neonatal infections in various anatomical sites, resulting in high morbidity and mortality in The Gambia. These clinical infections are often preceded by nasal carriage of S. aureus, a known risk factor. To determine whether potential sources of newborn S. aureus infections were from carriage, and to characterize S. aureus present in different anatomical sites (blood, ear, eye, umbilical cord, skin, pus, oropharynx, breast milk and vagina), we performed whole-genome sequencing of 172 isolates from clinical sites as well as from healthy and unhealthy carriage. A random selection of mothers (n = 90) and newborns (n = 42) participating in a clinical trial and testing positive for S. aureus were considered for this study. Sequence data were analyzed to determine S. aureus multilocus sequence types and selected antimicrobial and virulence gene profiles. Our findings revealed that in The Gambia, ST15 is the dominant sequence type associated with both carriage and clinical infection. In addition, S. aureus isolates causing clinical infection among neonates were genetically similar to those colonizing their oropharynx, and the different anatomical sites were not found to be uniquely colonized by S. aureus of a single genomic profile. Furthermore, while S. aureus associated with clinical infection had similar antimicrobial resistance gene profiles to carriage isolates, only hemolysin and adhesive factor virulence genes were significantly higher among clinical isolates. In conclusion, this study confirmed S. aureus oropharyngeal colonization among neonates as a potential source of clinical infection in The Gambia. Hence, interventions aiming to reduce neonatal clinical infections in The Gambia should consider decreasing oropharyngeal S. aureus carriage.Trial registration The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03199547.


Subject(s)
Carrier State , Staphylococcal Infections , Staphylococcus aureus , Humans , Gambia/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Carrier State/microbiology , Carrier State/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Female , Whole Genome Sequencing , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Genomics , Virulence Factors/genetics , Genome, Bacterial , Male , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 2024 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38752311

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited data exists on effects of intrapartum azithromycin on prevalence of carriage and antibiotic resistance of Enterobacterales. METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial in Gambia and Burkina Faso where women received intrapartum azithromycin (2g) or placebo. We determined impact of treatment on prevalence of carriage and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae by analysing rectal swabs (RS), nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS), breast milk and recto-vaginal swabs (RVS). Bacteria were isolated microbiologically; antibiotic susceptibility was confirmed with an E-test. Prevalence ratios (PR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI's) were used for comparison between arms. RESULTS: In infants, E. coli carriage in RS was lower in the intervention than placebo arm at days 6 (63.0% vs. 75.2%, PR, 0.84; CI, 0.75-0.95) and 28 (52.7% vs. 70.4%, 0.75; 0.64-0.87) post-intervention. Prevalence of azithromycin-resistant E. coli was higher in the azithromycin arm at days 6 (13.4% vs. 3.6%, 3.75; 1.83-7.69) and 28 (16.4% vs. 9.6%, 1.71; 1.05-2.79). For K. pneumoniae, carriage in RS was higher in the intervention than placebo arm at days 6 (49.6% vs. 37.2%, 1.33; 1.08-1.64) and 28 (53.6% vs. 32.9%, 1.63; 1.31-2.03). Prevalence of azithromycin-resistant K. pneumoniae was higher in the azithromycin arm at day 28 (7.3% vs. 2.1%, 3.49; 1.30-9.37). No differences were observed for other sample types. CONCLUSION: Intrapartum azithromycin decreased E. coli carriage but increased both K. pneumoniae carriage and azithromycin resistance in both bacteria. These data need to be considered together with efficacy results to balance the potential short- and long-term impact of the intervention. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03199547.

3.
JAMA ; 329(9): 716-724, 2023 03 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36881034

ABSTRACT

Importance: Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of neonatal mortality. New interventions are needed to decrease neonatal sepsis and mortality in regions with highest burden. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of intrapartum azithromycin to reduce neonatal sepsis or mortality, as well as neonatal and maternal infections. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial enrolled and followed up birthing parents and their infants at 10 health facilities in The Gambia and Burkina Faso, West Africa, between October 2017 and May 2021. Interventions: Participants were assigned at random to receive oral azithromycin (2 g) or placebo (ratio 1:1) during labor. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal sepsis or mortality, with the former defined based on microbiologic or clinical criteria. Secondary outcomes were neonatal infections (skin, umbilical, eye and ear infections), malaria, and fever; postpartum infections (puerperal sepsis, mastitis), fever, and malaria; and use of antibiotics during 4-week follow-up. Results: The trial randomized 11 983 persons in labor (median age, 29.9 years). Overall, 225 newborns (1.9% of 11 783 live births) met the primary end point. The incidence of neonatal mortality or sepsis was similar in the azithromycin and placebo groups (2.0% [115/5889] vs 1.9% [110/5894]; risk difference [RD], 0.09 [95% CI, -0.39 to 0.57]), as was the incidence of neonatal mortality (0.8% vs 0.8%; RD, 0.04 [95% CI, -0.27 to 0.35]) and neonatal sepsis (1.3% vs 1.3%; RD, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.38 to 0.43]). Newborns in the azithromycin group compared with the placebo group had lower incidence of skin infections (0.8% vs 1.7%; RD, -0.90 [95% CI, -1.30 to -0.49]) and need for antibiotics (6.2% vs 7.8%; RD, -1.58 [95% CI, -2.49 to -0.67]). Postpartum parents in the azithromycin group had lower incidence of mastitis (0.3% vs 0.5%; RD, -0.24 [95% CI, -0.47 to -0.01]) and puerperal fever (0.1% vs 0.3%; RD, -0.19 [95% CI, -0.36 to -0.01]). Conclusions and Relevance: Azithromycin administered orally during labor did not reduce neonatal sepsis or mortality. These results do not support routine introduction of oral intrapartum azithromycin for this purpose. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03199547.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Azithromycin , Neonatal Sepsis , Adult , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/administration & dosage , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Labor, Obstetric , Neonatal Sepsis/drug therapy , Neonatal Sepsis/mortality , Neonatal Sepsis/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Administration, Oral , Postpartum Period
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL