Rilzabrutinib, an Oral BTK Inhibitor, in Immune Thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Rilzabrutinib, an oral, reversible covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, may increase platelet counts in patients with immune thrombocytopenia by means of dual mechanisms of action: decreased macrophage (Fcγ receptor)-mediated platelet destruction and reduced production of pathogenic autoantibodies. METHODS: In an international, adaptive, open-label, dose-finding, phase 1-2 clinical trial, we evaluated rilzabrutinib therapy in previously treated patients with immune thrombocytopenia. We used intrapatient dose escalation of oral rilzabrutinib over a period of 24 weeks; the lowest starting dose was 200 mg once daily, with higher starting doses of 400 mg once daily, 300 mg twice daily, and 400 mg twice daily. The primary end points were safety and platelet response (defined as at least two consecutive platelet counts of ≥50×103 per cubic millimeter and an increase from baseline of ≥20×103 per cubic millimeter without the use of rescue medication). RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled. At baseline, the median platelet count was 15×103 per cubic millimeter, the median duration of disease was 6.3 years, and patients had received a median of four different immune thrombocytopenia therapies previously. All the treatment-related adverse events were of grade 1 or 2 and transient. There were no treatment-related bleeding or thrombotic events of grade 2 or higher. At a median of 167.5 days (range, 4 to 293) of treatment, 24 of 60 patients (40%) overall and 18 of the 45 patients (40%) who had started rilzabrutinib treatment at the highest dose met the primary end point of platelet response. The median time to the first platelet count of at least 50×103 per cubic millimeter was 11.5 days. Among patients with a primary platelet response, the mean percentage of weeks with a platelet count of at least 50×103 per cubic millimeter was 65%. CONCLUSIONS: Rilzabrutinib was active and associated with only low-level toxic effects at all dose levels. The dose of 400 mg twice daily was identified as the dose for further testing. Overall, rilzabrutinib showed a rapid and durable clinical activity that improved with length of treatment. (Funded by Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03395210; EudraCT number, 2017-004012-19.).

A thorough QTc study to evaluate the effects of oral rilzabrutinib administered alone and with ritonavir in healthy subjects.

This study aimed to define the clinically relevant supratherapeutic dose of rilzabrutinib, an oral Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, and evaluate potential effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic exposures on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects. This was a two-part phase I study (anzctr.org.au ACTRN12618001036202). Part A was a randomized, open-label, three-period, single-dose crossover study (n = 12) with rilzabrutinib 100 mg ± ritonavir 100 mg or rilzabrutinib 1200 mg. Part B was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way, single-dose crossover study (n = 39) with matched placebo, rilzabrutinib 400 mg ± ritonavir 100 mg, or moxifloxacin (positive control). Primary objectives: part A - pharmacokinetics (PK) of rilzabrutinib ± ritonavir, safety, and optimal dose for Part B; Part B - effect of rilzabrutinib therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentration on electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters. ECGs and PK samples were serially recorded before and post-dose. In part A, rilzabrutinib 100 mg + ritonavir led to 17-fold area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞ ) and 7-fold maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) increases over rilzabrutinib alone. Rilzabrutinib 1200 mg was discontinued due to mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal intolerance. In Part B, rilzabrutinib 400 mg + ritonavir increased rilzabrutinib mean AUC0-∞ from 454 to 3800 ng h/mL and Cmax from 144 to 712 ng/mL. The concentration-QTc relationship was slightly negative, shallow (-0.01 ms/ng/mL [90% CI -0.016 to -0.001]), and an effect >10 ms on QTcF could be excluded within the observed range of plasma concentrations, up to 2500 ng/mL. Safety was similar to other studies of rilzabrutinib. In conclusion, rilzabrutinib, even at supratherapeutic doses, had no clinically relevant effects on ECG parameters, including the QTc interval.

Attenuation of Insulin Action by an Allosteric Insulin Receptor Antibody in Healthy Volunteers.

Background: XOMA 358 (X358) is a fully human monoclonal antibody to the insulin receptor that acts as a negative allosteric modulator of insulin signaling. It is being developed as a novel treatment of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. This report describes pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data from a first-in-human clinical trial. Methods: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose study was performed with 29 healthy adult males randomized to intravenous infusion of placebo or X358 at 0.1-, 0.3-, 1-, 3-, 6-, or 9-mg/kg dose levels. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability, and secondary objectives included PK and PD analyses. A short insulin tolerance test (ITT) was implemented in the 3- to 9-mg/kg dose cohorts at baseline and postinfusion. Results: There were no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs), or subject discontinuations due to AEs. There were no clinically meaningful safety findings. X358 exhibited dose-proportional PK with a half-life of 21 days. Dose-dependent elevations of circulating insulin levels, likely related to reduced insulin clearance via monoclonal antibody action at receptors, represented a sensitive biomarker of X358 exposure. X358-dependent increases in postprandial glucose levels and fasting homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance values were observed and persisted for at least 1 week at the higher dose levels. In all the ITT cohorts, the slope for glucose lowering was substantially attenuated after X358 infusion of a similar magnitude, but with increasing duration with rising dose level. Conclusion: Single X358 infusions were well tolerated and resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in insulin sensitivity. Clinical development of X358 in hyperinsulinemic, hypoglycemic conditions is proceeding.

Evaluation of the dopamine ß-hydroxylase (DßH) inhibitor nepicastat in participants who meet criteria for cocaine use disorder.

In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that the potent and selective dopamine-ß-hydroxylase (DßH) inhibitor nepicastat would have minimal effects on cardiovascular and pharmacokinetic parameters associated with cocaine administration and would reduce the positive subjective effects produced by cocaine. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, inpatient study of oral nepicastat (0, 80 and 160mg) concurrent with intravenous (IV) cocaine (0, 10, 20 and 40mg) in non-treatment seeking participants who metcriteria for cocaine use disorder. Safety analyses revealed that nepicastat was well-tolerated and there were no differences in adverse events observed after nepicastat plus cocaine vs. cocaine alone. In addition, the pharmacokinetic properties of cocaine administration were not altered by nepicastat treatment. Cocaine-induced cardiovascular and subjective effects were evaluated for completers in the cohort randomized to nepicastat (n=13) using a within-subjects statistical analysis strategy. Specifically, the cardiovascular and subjective effects of cocaine were assessed in the presence of placebo (0mg), 80mg of nepicastat or 160mg of nepicastat on study Days 4, 8 and 12, respectively. Analyses revealed a main effect of nepicastat to reduce several cocaine-induced positive subjective effects. Taken together, these data indicate that nepicastat is safe when co-administered with cocaine and may suppress its positive subjective effects, and may be viable as a pharmacotherapy for treatment of cocaine use disorder.

Tozadenant (SYN115) in patients with Parkinson's disease who have motor fluctuations on levodopa: a phase 2b, double-blind, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with Parkinson's disease have motor fluctuations despite treatment with available drugs. Tozadenant (SYN115) is an oral, selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist that improves motor function in animal models of Parkinson's disease. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of tozadenant as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease who have motor fluctuations on levodopa. METHODS: We did an international, multicentre, phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding clinical trial of tozadenant in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease who had motor fluctuations (at least 2·5 h off-time per day). Eligible patients were randomly assigned via a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive tozadenant 60, 120, 180, or 240 mg or matching placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. All study management, site personnel, and patients were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was change from baseline to week 12 in hours per day spent in the off-state (assessed from Parkinson's disease diaries completed by patients). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01283594. FINDINGS: Of 420 randomised patients (mean age 63·3 [SD 8·3] years; mean duration of Parkinson's disease 8·7 [4·7] years), 403 provided post-baseline diary data and 337 completed study treatment. Compared with placebo, mean daily off-time was significantly reduced in the combined tozadenant 120 mg twice-daily and 180 mg twice-daily group (-1·1 h, 95% CI -1·8 to -0·5; p=0·0006), the tozadenant 120 mg twice-daily group (-1·1 h, -1·8 to -0·4; p=0.0039), and the tozadenant 180 mg twice-daily group (-1·2 h, -1·9 to -0·4; p=0·0039). The most common adverse events in these groups were dyskinesia (seven [8%] of 84 patients in the placebo group, 13 [16%] of 82 in the 120 mg twice-daily group, and 17 [20%] of 85 in the 180 mg twice-daily group), nausea (three [4%], 9 [11%], and ten [12%]), and dizziness (one [1%], four [5%], and 11 [13%]). Tozadenant 60 mg twice daily was not associated with a significant reduction in off-time, and tozadenant 240 mg twice daily was associated with an increased rate of discontinuation because of adverse events (17 [20%] of 84 patients). INTERPRETATION: Tozadenant at 120 or 180 mg twice daily was generally well tolerated and was effective at reducing off-time. Further investigation of tozadenant treatment in phase 3 trials is warranted. FUNDING: Biotie Therapies.

Who really wants health care justice?

U.S. health care is at a crossroads. It faces many challenges--the most evident being unsustainable cost increases and diminishing access. For decades, attempts at reform have been unsuccessful. One reason our traditional approaches have not worked is that we who serve the ministry have not brought to those efforts sufficient reflection concerning the deeper, values-level attitudes concerning reform. Instead, the reform movement has concentrated on promoting particular policy solutions. Ultimately, of course, we must agree on a delivery and financing system if we are to redress the situation. But first we must recognize that U.S. health care's fundamental challenge is moral and social in nature. Stakeholders will not let go of the status quo until a critical mass of people becomes convinced that there is a serious moral and social imperative to do so. Social change of this magnitude is not simply a matter of comprehensive new policy. To be effective, it must be accompanied by sustained individual and public conscience work that grounds a significant social movement comprising a critical mass of each of those stakeholders. Several principles from the Catholic tradition--the common good, solidarity, and stewardship--are particularly relevant to the individual and public conscience work necessary in the health care reform movement. Health care professionals and organizations are simultaneously part of the solution and part of the problem. By keeping this interior dialogue alive, in ourselves and in our work communities, we are much more likely to get at the root causes of our unjust health system and to contribute to the larger social movement that brings about more health care justice. This article contains a "conscience work exercise" that will help individuals and organizations examine and identify the values, attitudes, and dispositions that contribute to health care justice and those that keep us mired in the status quo.

Prolonged stimulation of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I secretion by CJC-1295, a long-acting analog of GH-releasing hormone, in healthy adults.

CONTEXT: Therapeutic use of GHRH to enhance GH secretion is limited by its short duration of action. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetic profile, pharmacodynamic effects, and safety of CJC-1295, a long-acting GHRH analog. DESIGN: The study design was two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, ascending dose trials with durations of 28 and 49 d. SETTING: The study was performed at two investigational sites. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy subjects, ages 21-61 yr, were studied. INTERVENTIONS: CJC-1295 or placebo was administered sc in one of four ascending single doses in the first study and in two or three weekly or biweekly doses in the second study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were peak concentrations and area under the curve of GH and IGF-I; standard pharmacokinetic parameters were used for CJC-1295. RESULTS: After a single injection of CJC-1295, there were dose-dependent increases in mean plasma GH concentrations by 2- to 10-fold for 6 d or more and in mean plasma IGF-I concentrations by 1.5- to 3-fold for 9-11 d. The estimated half-life of CJC-1295 was 5.8-8.1 d. After multiple CJC-1295 doses, mean IGF-I levels remained above baseline for up to 28 d. No serious adverse reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous administration of CJC-1295 resulted in sustained, dose-dependent increases in GH and IGF-I levels in healthy adults and was safe and relatively well tolerated, particularly at doses of 30 or 60 microg/kg. There was evidence of a cumulative effect after multiple doses. These data support the potential utility of CJC-1295 as a therapeutic agent.

A Phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of CJC-1008--a long-acting, parenteral opioid analgesic--in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia.

INTRODUCTION: CJC-1008 is a chemical modification of the opioid peptide dynorphin A (1-13) (Dyn A) that promotes dynorphin's covalent attachment to human serum albumin in vivo after administration, thus prolonging its duration of action. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and safety of CJC-1008 as compared with placebo in patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). METHODS: Patients with PHN were assigned 1:1 to receive active study medication or placebo. After dosing, measurements were made every 15 minutes for the first hour; at two, three, four, six, and eight hours postdose; and during return visits to the study site after two, seven, and 28 days (as necessary), as well as during precrossover and exit visits. These measurements examined: 1) overall pain intensity, 2) pain intensity for each individual PHN type, 3) categorical overall pain intensity, 4) categorical pain relief and 5) adverse events (AEs). When PHN pain intensity returned to baseline and/or at patients' first request for rescue analgesia other than acetaminophen (typically around 28 days after dosing but sometimes as soon as two days postdose), patients were to cross over to the alternative treatment and be monitored on the same schedule. RESULTS: A substantial placebo response was observed, but the analgesic effect observed in the active group was greater than that in the placebo group for the first eight hours. By 24 hours, the difference was not significant. A total of 29 out of 30 patients (96 percent) experienced at least one treatment-emergent AE during active drug treatment, while 14 of 27 patients (52 percent) reported such AEs during placebo treatment. Of the AEs occurring within the first eight hours after dosing, 97 percent were reported during treatment with active drug and 3 percent were reported during treatment with placebo. The majority of these AEs were mild in intensity. DISCUSSION: This study provides evidence of a greater analgesic effect when using CJC-1008 compared to placebo in patients with PHN. However, the effect only lasted through eight hours postdose and diminished by 24 hours. This study provides evidence of a peripheral action of dynorphin, since CJC-1008 does not cross the blood-brain barrier.