Influence of Higenamine on Exercise Performance of Recreational Female Athletes: A Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial.

The aim of this study was to determine the ergogenic effects and the safety profile of a one-component higenamine supplement in female recreational athletes. Twelve recreational female basketball players (age 29-41 years, oxygen consumption (VO2max) > 30 ml⋅kg-1⋅min-1, with training > 5 h wk-1) were randomized either to the higenamine group, or to the placebo group for 3 weeks. In order to determine ergogenic effects and safety profile of higenamine administration, we assessed the following variables before and after 3 weeks of supplementation: anthropometric parameters, resting metabolic rate (RMR), exercise testing variables, serum free fatty acids (FFAs), blood pressure, enzyme activity, urea, lipid profile, and complete blood count. There were no differences between groups in anthropometric parameters, including basal metabolic rate (BMR), RMR and body fat [p = 0.706 (Cohen's d 0.223), p = 0.169 (Cohen's d 0.857), and p = 0.223 (Cohen's d 0.750), respectively], FFAs [0.43 ± 0.03 vs. 0.54 ± 0.23, p = 0.206 (Cohen's d 0.540)], neither significant differences in cardiopulmonary parameters after the intervention period. Furthermore, all measured outcome variables in the safety assessment were not significant, with values remaining stable during the intervention period for participants in both groups. This is the first study to document the effects and the safety profile of higenamine-based dietary supplements at a specified dose in female recreational athletes. Our data indicate that 21-day of supplementation with 75 mg higenamine would not result in improving cardiopulmonary exercise fitness and weight loss in female recreational athletes. Moreover, supplementation with 75 mg higenamine is safe and well-tolerated in younger recreational female athletes.

Focal Myocarditis after Mild COVID-19 Infection in Athletes.

COVID-19 infection in athletes usually has a milder course, but in the case of complications, myocarditis and even sudden cardiac death may occur. We examined an athlete who felt symptoms upon returning to training after asymptomatic COVID-19 infection. Physical, laboratory, and echocardiography findings were normal. The cardiopulmonary exercise test was interrupted at submaximal effort due to severe dyspnea in the presence of reduced functional capacity in comparison to previous tests. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) detected the focal myocarditis. After three months of recovery, CMR still revealed the presence of focal myocarditis and the persistence of decreased functional capacity. This case raises the question of screening athletes even after asymptomatic forms of COVID-19 infection.

Impact of metabolic syndrome on clinical severity and long-term prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on clinical severity and long-term prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (STEMI). METHODS: We examined 507 patients with STEMI, who were admitted for primary percutaneous coronary intervention classified according to the presence of MetS using American Heart Association and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute definition. After applying these criteria, the patients were categorized into groups as patients with MetS and without MetS. We compared baseline characteristics, clinical findings, and outcomes between these groups. During the 48-month follow-up, we collected data about major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and mortality. RESULTS: The MetS group comprised 217 patients with MetS (mean age = 60.71 ± 11.52 years; 59 females), while the control group comprised 290 subjects (mean age = 57.50 ± 10.95 years; 54 females). The patients with and without MetS had similar parameters of clinical severity of STEMI but differed in severe coronary artery disease. During the follow-up period, a significantly higher percentage of myocardial infarction (6.91% vs 2.06%) and new revascularization (16.59% vs 8.97%) was recorded in the MetS group. On multivariate analysis, MetS was independently associated with MACE (HR = 1.834, 95% CI = 1.162-2.896, p = 0.009) but not with mortality (HR = 1.603, 95% CI = 0.864-2.973, p = 0.134). Among cardiovascular events that compose MACE, MetS was associated with new revascularization (HR = 2.204, 95% CI = 1.273-3.815, p=0.005). CONCLUSION: The presence of MetS in patients with STEMI is an independent risk factor for MACE, and this syndrome is strongly associated with new revascularization.

Coronary flow reserve in patients with aortic stenosis and nonobstructed coronary arteries.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with moderate and severe aortic stenosis (AS) and without obstructive epicardial coronary disease have been shown to have an impairment of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR). Recently, it has been shown that CFVR is an independent predictor for future cardiovascular events in AS patients. We investigated parameters representing left ventricular (LV) mass and wall thickness, diastolic dysfunction, LV workload and haemodynamic indexes of AS severity to determine which contributes the most to impaired CFVR in patients with AS and a nonobstructed coronary angiogram. METHOD AND RESULTS: A total of 77 patients with moderate or severe AS, mean age 65.66 +/- 11.02 y (57.14% males), were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients had standard Doppler-echo study, coronary angiography and adenosine-stress transthoracic Doppler-echo for CFVR measurement. We took 2.5 as a cut-off value for impaired CFVR. Univariate analysis showed that aortic valve area (AVA), maximal velocity (Vmax), mean pressure gradient (Pmean), energy loss index (ELI), aortic valve resistance (AVR) and stroke work loss (SWL) were associated (P = 0.05) with impaired CFVR. Multivariate analysis showed that AVR was the best predictor of impaired CFVR (RR 0.900, Cl: 0.983-0.997, P = 0.007). Using ROC analysis, the AVR value of 211.22 dynes x s x cm(-5) had the highest accuracy in predicting the impaired CFVR (AUC-0.681, P=0.007, sensitivity 72%, specificity 52%, CI: 0.561-0.800). CONCLUSION: Haemodynamic indices of AS severity, together with LV workload parameters, are the main determinants of CFVR. Among all parameters, AVR is the strongest predictor of CFVR in patients with moderate or severe AS and a nonobstructed coronary angiogram.