Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 19(8): 596-603, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30758273

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The prevalence of Francisella tularensis in Minnesota ticks is unknown. Ticks collected at seven sites were tested to determine the infection prevalence of F. tularensis in Dermacentor variabilis in Minnesota. Materials and Methods: Ticks were collected from two properties at an epizootic site and at five long-term tick research sites. Ticks were pooled by species, sex, date, and site with a maximum of 10 ticks per pool. Ticks were bisected and homogenized; DNA from supernatant was extracted and tested by real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Twice, additional ticks were collected for bacterial culture and isolation of F. tularensis. Proportion of positive pools and minimum infection rate (MIR) were calculated. Results: A total of 3527 ticks were tested for F. tularensis including 1601 male D. variabilis and 1926 female D. variabilis. Across all sites, 128 (34%) of 378 pools were RT-PCR positive for F. tularensis. Of 128 positive pools, F. tularensis from 96 (75%) was identified as type A; F. tularensis from 32 pools was unable to be subtyped. The overall MIR was 3.6%. The MIR was significantly lower at the epizootic site compared with Morrison County 1 (3.9% vs. 7.2%; p = 0.02) but did not differ between the epizootic site and Pine County 1 (3.9% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.49). Within the epizootic site, the MIR was significantly higher at Washington County 2 compared with the adjacent property (5.7% vs. 2.3%; p < 0.001). F. tularensis was cultured from 6 (15%) of 40 pools. Conclusions:F. tularensis was found in ticks at a majority of sites tested. The MIR of F. tularensis in D. variabilis ticks in Minnesota varied geographically. Our findings support the hypothesis that D. variabilis plays an important role in the natural history of tularemia in Minnesota. Further ecologic studies are needed to fully understand the importance of tick species in the maintenance and transmission of F. tularensis in Minnesota.


Subject(s)
Dermacentor/microbiology , Francisella tularensis/isolation & purification , Animals , Arachnid Vectors/microbiology , Female , Francisella tularensis/genetics , Male , Minnesota/epidemiology , Prevalence , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Tularemia/epidemiology
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(7): 194, 2017 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28231234

ABSTRACT

On June 27, 2016, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Public Health Laboratory (PHL) was notified of a suspected Francisella tularensis isolate cultured at a hospital laboratory. The isolate was confirmed as F. tularensis type B at MDH PHL by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, culture, and direct fluorescent antibody testing. Francisella tularensis subspecies tularensis (type A) and holarctica (type B) bacteria are the causative agents of tularemia.


Subject(s)
Francisella tularensis/isolation & purification , Tularemia/diagnosis , Tularemia/microbiology , Aged , Female , Finger Injuries/etiology , Humans , Lakes/microbiology , Minnesota , Recreation , Tularemia/therapy , Wounds, Penetrating/etiology
3.
Minn Med ; 100(3): 40-43, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30452140

ABSTRACT

Tularemia is a rare but often serious infectious disease caused by Francisella tularensis, a bacterium with an extremely low infectious dose and the ability to cause illness through several routes including arthropod bites, contact with infected animals and exposure to contaminated water, food or soil. Tularemia is found throughout the northern hemisphere, and cases have occurred in all U.S. states except Hawaii. Thirteen cases have been reported to the Minnesota Department of Health since 1994, including 3 in 2016. This article presents the 2016 cases as well as data on all the reported cases. Clinicians should consider tularemia in patients with a compatible clinical illness and exposure history, particularly those who present with acute fever and regional lymphadenopathy. Treatment should be initiated early in highly suspect cases, without waiting for laboratory results.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Tularemia/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthropod Vectors , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , Early Medical Intervention , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Minnesota , Risk Factors , Tularemia/drug therapy , Tularemia/transmission , United States , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...