Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nutrients ; 12(8)2020 Aug 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32784847

ABSTRACT

This randomized trial compared pea protein, whey protein, and water-only supplementation on muscle damage, inflammation, delayed onset of muscle soreness (DOMS), and physical fitness test performance during a 5-day period after a 90-min eccentric exercise bout in non-athletic non-obese males (n = 92, ages 18-55 years). The two protein sources (0.9 g protein/kg divided into three doses/day) were administered under double blind procedures. The eccentric exercise protocol induced significant muscle damage and soreness, and reduced bench press and 30-s Wingate performance. Whey protein supplementation significantly attenuated post-exercise blood levels for biomarkers of muscle damage compared to water-only, with large effect sizes for creatine kinase and myoglobin during the fourth and fifth days of recovery (Cohen's d > 0.80); pea protein versus water supplementation had an intermediate non-significant effect (Cohen's d < 0.50); and no significant differences between whey and pea protein were found. Whey and pea protein compared to water supplementation had no significant effects on post-exercise DOMS and the fitness tests. In conclusion, high intake of whey protein for 5 days after intensive eccentric exercise mitigated the efflux of muscle damage biomarkers, with the intake of pea protein having an intermediate effect.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Muscle, Skeletal/drug effects , Myalgia/prevention & control , Pea Proteins/pharmacology , Whey Proteins/pharmacology , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , C-Reactive Protein/drug effects , Creatine Kinase/blood , Double-Blind Method , Exercise Test , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myoglobin/blood , Physical Fitness/physiology , Weight Lifting/physiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...