ABSTRACT
Agrobacterium was identified as the agent causing the plant tumor, crown gall over 100 years ago. Since then, studies have resulted in many surprising observations. Armin Braun demonstrated that Agrobacterium infected cells had unusual nutritional properties, and that the bacterium was necessary to start the infection but not for continued tumor development. He developed the concept of a tumor inducing principle (TIP), the factor that actually caused the disease. Thirty years later the TIP was shown to be a piece of a tumor inducing (Ti) plasmid excised by an endonuclease. In the next 20 years, most of the key features of the disease were described. The single-strand DNA (T-DNA) with the endonuclease attached is transferred through a type IV secretion system into the host cell where it is likely coated and protected from nucleases by a bacterial secreted protein to form the T-complex. A nuclear localization signal in the endonuclease guides the transferred strand (T-strand), into the nucleus where it is integrated randomly into the host chromosome. Other secreted proteins likely aid in uncoating the T-complex. The T-DNA encodes enzymes of auxin, cytokinin, and opine synthesis, the latter a food source for Agrobacterium. The genes associated with T-strand formation and transfer (vir) map to the Ti plasmid and are only expressed when the bacteria are in close association with a plant. Plant signals are recognized by a two-component regulatory system which activates vir genes. Chromosomal genes with pleiotropic functions also play important roles in plant transformation. The data now explain Braun's old observations and also explain why Agrobacterium is nature's genetic engineer. Any DNA inserted between the border sequences which define the T-DNA will be transferred and integrated into host cells. Thus, Agrobacterium has become the major vector in plant genetic engineering.
ABSTRACT
Genes can be transferred horizontally between prokaryotes and eukaryotes in nature. The best-studied examples occur between Agrobacterium rhizogenes and certain Nicotiana spp. To investigate possible additional cases of horizontal gene transfer in nature between Agrobacterium and plants, a real-time polymerase chain reaction-based approach was employed to screen 127 plant species, belonging to 38 families of Dicotyledones, for the presence of oncogenes homologous to the transfer DNA fragments (T-DNA) from both A. tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes. Among all of the analyzed plant species, we found that only Linaria vulgaris contained sequences homologous to the T-DNA of A. rhizogenes. All screened L. vulgaris plants from various parts of Russia contained the same homologous sequences, including rolB, rolC, ORF13, ORF14, and mis genes. The same opine gene is found in the species of Nicotiana which contain genes of A. rhizogenes. In L. vulgaris, there are two copies of T-DNA organized as a single tandem imperfect direct repeat. The plant DNA sequence of the site of integration shows similarity to a retrotransposon. This site is most likely silent, suggesting that the T-DNA is not expressed. Attempts to demonstrate expression of the T-DNA genes were negative. Our study indicates that the frequency of gene transfer and fixation in the germline from Agrobacterium to plant hosts is rare in the natural environment.
Subject(s)
Agrobacterium/genetics , Gene Transfer, Horizontal , Genes, Bacterial/genetics , Linaria/genetics , Agrobacterium/isolation & purification , Base Sequence , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Plant/genetics , Linaria/microbiology , Molecular Sequence Data , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Regeneration , Russia , Sequence Alignment , Sequence Analysis, DNAABSTRACT
The family Rhizobiaceae contains plant-associated bacteria with critical roles in ecology and agriculture. Within this family, many Rhizobium and Sinorhizobium strains are nitrogen-fixing plant mutualists, while many strains designated as Agrobacterium are plant pathogens. These contrasting lifestyles are primarily dependent on the transmissible plasmids each strain harbors. Members of the Rhizobiaceae also have diverse genome architectures that include single chromosomes, multiple chromosomes, and plasmids of various sizes. Agrobacterium strains have been divided into three biovars, based on physiological and biochemical properties. The genome of a biovar I strain, A. tumefaciens C58, has been previously sequenced. In this study, the genomes of the biovar II strain A. radiobacter K84, a commercially available biological control strain that inhibits certain pathogenic agrobacteria, and the biovar III strain A. vitis S4, a narrow-host-range strain that infects grapes and invokes a hypersensitive response on nonhost plants, were fully sequenced and annotated. Comparison with other sequenced members of the Alphaproteobacteria provides new data on the evolution of multipartite bacterial genomes. Primary chromosomes show extensive conservation of both gene content and order. In contrast, secondary chromosomes share smaller percentages of genes, and conserved gene order is restricted to short blocks. We propose that secondary chromosomes originated from an ancestral plasmid to which genes have been transferred from a progenitor primary chromosome. Similar patterns are observed in select Beta- and Gammaproteobacteria species. Together, these results define the evolution of chromosome architecture and gene content among the Rhizobiaceae and support a generalized mechanism for second-chromosome formation among bacteria.
Subject(s)
DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Genome, Bacterial , Rhizobium/genetics , Computational Biology/methods , Conserved Sequence , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , Gene Order , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , Sequence Analysis, DNA , SyntenyABSTRACT
Despite the widespread use of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to transfer genes into plant systems, host responses to this plant pathogen are not well understood. The present study shows that disarmed strains of Agrobacterium induce distinct host responses when infiltrated into leaves of Nicotiana tabacum. The responses are limited to the infiltrated zone and consist of i) induction of pathogenesis-related (PR) gene PR-1 expression and resistance to subsequent infection with tobacco mosaic virus, ii) chlorosis and loss of chloroplast rRNAs, and iii) inhibition of leaf expansion. Induction of the latter two sets of responses depends on the age of the leaf and is most apparent in young leaves. Strains with or without binary vectors induce all the responses, showing that DNA transfer is neither required nor inhibitory. A. tumefaciens cured of the tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid is slightly defective for induction of the three responses, showing that Ti plasmid-encoded factors produced by the disarmed strains contribute only slightly. However, T-DNA-encoded factors alter at least one of the host responses, because infiltration with the oncogenic strain C58 induced more pronounced chlorosis than the disarmed control. Auxin is one of the T-DNA products responsible for disease induction by oncogenic A. tumefaciens. We found that C58-infiltrated zones-but not those infiltrated with the disarmed control-have increased levels of miR393, a microRNA that represses auxin signaling and contributes to antibacterial resistance.
Subject(s)
Agrobacterium tumefaciens/pathogenicity , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Nicotiana/genetics , Nicotiana/microbiology , Plant Proteins/metabolism , Tobacco Mosaic Virus/pathogenicity , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , Indoleacetic Acids/metabolism , Plant Diseases/microbiology , Plant Leaves/genetics , Plant Leaves/metabolism , Plant Leaves/microbiology , Plant Leaves/virology , Plant Proteins/genetics , Plant Tumor-Inducing Plasmids , RNA, Plant/genetics , Nicotiana/metabolism , Nicotiana/virologyABSTRACT
Agrobacterium has evolved sophisticated strategies to perceive and transduce plant-derived cues. Recent studies have found that numerous plant signals, including salicylic acid (SA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA), profoundly affect Agrobacterium-plant interactions. Here we determine and compare the transcriptome profiles of Agrobacterium in response to these three plant signals. Collectively, the transcription of 103, 115 and 95 genes was significantly altered by SA, IAA and GABA respectively. Both distinct cellular responses and overlapping signalling pathways were elicited by these three plant signals. Interestingly, these three plant compounds function additively to shut off the Agrobacterium virulence programme and activate the quorum-quenching machinery. Moreover, the repression of the virulence programme by SA and IAA and the inactivation of quorum-sensing signals by SA and GABA are regulated through independent pathways. Our data indicate that these plant signals, while cross-talk in plant signalling networks, also act as cross-kingdom signals and play redundant roles in tailoring Agrobacterium regulatory pathways, resulting in intensive signalling cross-talk in Agrobacterium. Our results support the notion that Agrobacterium has evolved the ability to hijack plant signals for its own benefit. The complex signalling interplay between Agrobacterium and its plant hosts reflects an exquisite co-evolutionary balance.
Subject(s)
Agrobacterium tumefaciens/metabolism , Biological Evolution , Gene Expression Profiling , Indoleacetic Acids/metabolism , Salicylic Acid/metabolism , Signal Transduction/physiology , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/metabolism , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/genetics , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/pathogenicity , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Citric Acid Cycle/physiology , Energy Metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial , Microarray Analysis , Plants/genetics , Plants/metabolism , Plants/microbiology , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
Agrobacterium tumefaciens transferred DNA (T-DNA) transfer requires that the virulence genes (vir regulon) on the tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid be induced by plant phenolic signals in an acidic environment. Using transcriptome analysis, we found that these acidic conditions elicit two distinct responses: (i) a general and conserved response through which Agrobacterium modulates gene expression patterns to adapt to environmental acidification and (ii) a highly specialized acid-mediated signaling response involved in Agrobacterium-plant interactions. Overall, 78 genes were induced and 74 genes were repressed significantly under acidic conditions (pH 5.5) compared to neutral conditions (pH 7.0). Microarray analysis not only confirmed previously identified acid-inducible genes but also uncovered many new acid-induced genes which may be directly involved in Agrobacterium-plant interactions. These genes include virE0, virE1, virH1, and virH2. Further, the chvG-chvI two-component system, previously shown to be critical for virulence, was also induced under acid conditions. Interestingly, acidic conditions induced a type VI secretion system and a putative nonheme catalase. We provide evidence suggesting that acid-induced gene expression was independent of the VirA-VirG two-component system. Our results, together with previous data, support the hypothesis that there is three-step sequential activation of the vir regulon. This process involves a cascade regulation and hierarchical signaling pathway featuring initial direct activation of the VirA-VirG system by the acid-activated ChvG-ChvI system. Our data strengthen the notion that Agrobacterium has evolved a mechanism to perceive and subvert the acidic conditions of the rhizosphere to an important signal that initiates and directs the early virulence program, culminating in T-DNA transfer.
Subject(s)
Agrobacterium tumefaciens/physiology , Gene Expression Profiling , Plants/microbiology , Signal Transduction/physiology , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/genetics , Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/biosynthesis , Bacterial Proteins/biosynthesis , Catalase/biosynthesis , Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial , Genes, Bacterial/genetics , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Membrane Transport Proteins/biosynthesis , Molecular Chaperones/biosynthesis , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Protein Kinases/biosynthesis , Signal Transduction/genetics , Transcription Factors/biosynthesisABSTRACT
Agrobacterium tumefaciens is capable of transferring and integrating an oncogenic T-DNA (transferred DNA) from its tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid into dicotyledonous plants. This transfer requires that the virulence genes (vir regulon) be induced by plant signals such as acetosyringone in an acidic environment. Salicylic acid (SA) is a key signal molecule in regulating plant defense against pathogens. However, how SA influences Agrobacterium and its interactions with plants is poorly understood. Here we show that SA can directly shut down the expression of the vir regulon. SA specifically inhibited the expression of the Agrobacterium virA/G two-component regulatory system that tightly controls the expression of the vir regulon including the repABC operon on the Ti plasmid. We provide evidence suggesting that SA attenuates the function of the VirA kinase domain. Independent of its effect on the vir regulon, SA up-regulated the attKLM operon, which functions in degrading the bacterial quormone N-acylhomoserine lactone. Plants defective in SA accumulation were more susceptible to Agrobacterium infection, whereas plants overproducing SA were relatively recalcitrant to tumor formation. Our results illustrate that SA, besides its well known function in regulating plant defense, can also interfere directly with several aspects of the Agrobacterium infection process.
Subject(s)
4-Butyrolactone/analogs & derivatives , Arabidopsis/microbiology , Down-Regulation/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant/physiology , Regulon/genetics , Rhizobium/genetics , Salicylic Acid/metabolism , Signal Transduction/physiology , 4-Butyrolactone/metabolism , 4-Butyrolactone/physiology , Arabidopsis/genetics , Arabidopsis/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial/physiology , Rhizobium/metabolism , Rhizobium/pathogenicity , Salicylic Acid/pharmacology , Signal Transduction/genetics , Virulence/geneticsABSTRACT
Penicillins are widespread in nature and lethal to growing bacteria. Because of the severe threat posed by these antibiotics, bacteria have evolved a wide variety of strategies for combating them. Here, we describe one unusual strategy that involves the activity of a catalytic carbohydrate. We show that the cyclic oligosaccharide, beta-cyclodextrin (betaCD), can hydrolyze, and thereby inactivate, penicillin in vivo. Moreover, we demonstrate that this catalytic activity contributes to the antibiotic resistance of a bacterium that synthesizes this oligosaccharide in the laboratory. Taken together, these data not only expand our understanding of the biochemistry of penicillin resistance, but also provide the first demonstration of natural carbohydrate-mediated catalysis in a living system.
Subject(s)
Ampicillin/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacillus subtilis/drug effects , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Penicillin Resistance , beta-Cyclodextrins/metabolism , Ampicillin/metabolism , Anti-Bacterial Agents/metabolism , Bacillus subtilis/growth & development , Bacillus subtilis/metabolism , Catalysis , Escherichia coli/growth & development , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Hydrolysis , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Starch/metabolism , beta-Lactamases/metabolismABSTRACT
The pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens infects a broad range of plants, introducing the T-DNA into their genome. Contrary to all known bacterial phytopathogens, A. tumefaciens lacks the hypersensitive response-inducing hrp genes, although it introduces numerous proteins into the plant cell through a type IV secretion system. To understand the timing and extent of the plant transcriptional response to this unusual pathogen, we used an Arabidopsis 26,000-gene oligonucleotide microarray. We inoculated Arabidopsis cell cultures with an oncogenic Agrobacterium strain and analyzed four biological replicates to identify two robust sets of regulated genes, one induced and the other suppressed. In both cases, the response was distinct at 48 h after infection, but not at 24 h or earlier. The induced set includes genes encoding known defense proteins, and the repressed set is enriched with genes characteristic of cell proliferation even though a growth arrest was not visible in the inoculated cultures. The analysis of the repressed genes revealed that the conserved upstream regulatory elements Frankiebox (also known as "site II") and Telobox are associated with the suppression of gene expression. The regulated gene sets should be useful in dissecting the signaling pathways in this plant-pathogen interaction.
Subject(s)
Agrobacterium tumefaciens/physiology , Arabidopsis Proteins/metabolism , Arabidopsis/metabolism , Arabidopsis/microbiology , Plant Diseases/microbiology , Amino Acid Motifs , Arabidopsis/genetics , Arabidopsis Proteins/classification , Arabidopsis Proteins/genetics , Cells, Cultured , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Regulatory Elements, Transcriptional , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionABSTRACT
Agrobacterium tumefaciens induces crown gall tumors by transferring a piece of its tumor-inducing plasmid into plant cells. This transferred DNA encodes the synthesis of indole acetic acid (IAA) and cytokinin, and their overproduction results in tumor formation. The transfer is initiated by a two-component regulatory system, VirA/G recognizing plant signal molecules in the plant rhizosphere and activating a regulon on the tumor-inducing plasmid, which is required for the processing and transfer of DNA and protein. Although a great deal is known about vir gene activation, nothing is known about whether or how the vir gene regulon is inactivated after plant cell transformation. Presumably, just as a mechanism exists for activating the vir gene regulon only when a plant is in the immediate environment, a mechanism should exist for inactivating the same regulon once it has fulfilled its mission to transferred DNA into plant cells. We now show that IAA inactivates vir gene expression by competing with the inducing phenolic compound acetosyringone for interaction with VirA. IAA does not inhibit the vir genes in cells containing a constitutive sensor virA locus, which does not require any signal molecules to become phosphorylated. At higher concentrations, IAA inhibits the growth of Agrobacterium and many other plant-associated bacteria but not the growth of bacteria that occupy other ecological niches. These observations provide the missing link in the cycle of vir gene activation and inactivation.
Subject(s)
Agrobacterium tumefaciens/drug effects , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/genetics , Gene Expression/drug effects , Indoleacetic Acids/pharmacology , Virulence Factors/genetics , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/growth & development , Cell Cycle/drug effects , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Indoleacetic Acids/metabolismABSTRACT
The pckA gene, encoding phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, catalyzes the reversible decarboxylation and phosphorylation of oxaloacetate to form phosphoenolpyruvate. Located on the circular chromosome of Agrobacterium, this locus is adjacent to the loci chvG and chvI, encoding a two-component regulatory system that has been shown to be important in virulence. Using a reporter gene fusion, studies showed that the pckA gene is induced by acidic pH but not by acetosyringone. This acid induction is regulated by the chvG-chvI regulatory system, which controls acid-inducible genes. A pckA mutant had no demonstrable PckA enzyme activity and grew on AB minimal medium with glucose but did not grow on the same medium with succinate as the sole carbon source and was more inhibited in its growth than the wild-type strain by an acidic environment. A pckA mutant was highly attenuated in tumor-inducing ability on tobacco leaf disks and was severely attenuated in vir gene expression. Although vir gene induction was completely restored when a constitutive virG gene was introduced into the mutant strain, virulence was only partially restored. These results suggest that avirulence may be due to a combination of the inhibition of this mutant in the acidic plant wound environment and the poor induction of the vir genes.
Subject(s)
Agrobacterium tumefaciens/genetics , Chromosomes, Bacterial , Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase (ATP)/genetics , Virulence/genetics , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/enzymology , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/growth & development , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/pathogenicity , Base Sequence , Culture Media , DNA Primers , Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic , Genetic Complementation Test , Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase (ATP)/metabolism , Transcriptional ActivationABSTRACT
A citrate synthase (CS) deletion mutant of Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 is highly attenuated in virulence. The identity of the mutant was initially determined from its amino acid sequence, which is 68% identical to Escherichia coli and 77% identical to Brucella melitensis. The mutant lost all CS enzymatic activity, and a cloned CS gene complemented a CS mutation in Sinorhizobium. The CS mutation resulted in a 10-fold reduction in vir gene expression, which likely accounts for the attenuated virulence. When a plasmid containing a constitutive virG [virG(Con)] locus was introduced into this mutant, the level of vir gene induction was restored to nearly wild-type level. Further, the virG(Con)-complemented CS mutant strain induced tumors that were similar in size and number to those induced by the parental strain. The CS mutation resulted in only a minor reduction in growth rate in a glucose-salts medium. Both the CS mutant and the virG(Con)-complemented CS strain displayed similar growth deficiencies in a glucose-salts medium, indicating that the reduced growth rate of the CS mutant could not be responsible for the attenuated virulence. A search of the genome of A. tumefaciens C58 revealed four proteins, encoded on different replicons, with conserved CS motifs. However, only the locus that when mutated resulted in an attenuated phenotype has CS activity. Mutations in the other three loci did not result in attenuated virulence and any loss of CS activity, and none were able to complement the CS mutation in Sinorhizobium. The function of these loci remains unknown.
Subject(s)
Agrobacterium tumefaciens/genetics , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/pathogenicity , Citrate (si)-Synthase/genetics , Virulence/genetics , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/enzymology , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/growth & development , Amino Acid Sequence , Base Sequence , Conserved Sequence , DNA Primers , Escherichia coli/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial , Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic , Genome, Bacterial , Peptide Fragments/chemistry , Sequence Alignment , Sequence Homology, Amino Acid , Transcriptional ActivationABSTRACT
Display technologies link proteins with the genes that encode them, providing a means of selecting proteins with desired properties through the process of directed evolution. Here, we describe DNA/protein attachment and recovery tools (DARTs), a novel polypeptide display technology that utilizes the Agrobacterium tumefaciens protein VirD2 to generate DNA-protein hybrid molecules. The resulting DNA-protein hybrids are small, robust, and are not expected to be subject to the synthesis and selection biases associated with viral- and cell-based display systems. We demonstrated that these DNA-protein hybrids could be used to display a variety of peptides that bind to appropriate antibodies for immunodetection and immunopurification. Further, the DNA components of the hybrid molecules can hybridize to complementary DNA molecules in solution or on a solid substrate. Because full-length VirD2 self-associated, we constructed a truncation that did not self-associate but still exhibited DNA linking activity and efficiently displayed peptides. Finally, we purified DNA-protein hybrids using their displayed peptide epitopes and amplified their DNA components by polymerase chain reaction. We suggest that the DART polypeptide display system will be valuable for performing directed evolution and generating protein arrays.
Subject(s)
DNA/analysis , Genetic Techniques , Peptide Library , Proteomics/methods , Base Sequence , Blotting, Western , DNA/chemistry , DNA/metabolism , DNA, Complementary/metabolism , Directed Molecular Evolution , Genes, Bacterial , Molecular Sequence Data , Nucleic Acid Hybridization , Oligonucleotides/chemistry , Peptides/chemistry , Plasmids/metabolism , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Protein Binding , Proteins/chemistry , Rhizobium/geneticsABSTRACT
The bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens transforms eukaryotic hosts by transferring DNA to the recipient cell where it is integrated and expressed. Bacterial factors involved in this interkingdom gene transfer have been described, but less is known about host-cell factors. Using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model host, we devised a genetic screen to identify yeast mutants with altered transformation sensitivities. Twenty-four adenine auxotrophs were identified that exhibited supersensitivity to A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation when deprived of adenine. We extended these results to plants by showing that purine synthesis inhibitors cause supersensitivity to A. tumefaciens transformation in three plant species. The magnitude of this effect is large and does not depend on prior genetic manipulations of host cells. These data indicate the utility of yeast as a model for the transformation process and identify purine biosynthesis as a key determinant of transformation efficiency. These findings should increase the utility of A. tumefaciens in genetic engineering.
Subject(s)
Agrobacterium tumefaciens/genetics , Purines/biosynthesis , Transformation, Genetic , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/pathogenicity , DNA, Plant/genetics , Virulence/geneticsABSTRACT
Type IV secretion systems are virulence determinants in many bacteria and share extensive homology with many conjugal transfer systems. Although type IV systems and their homologues have been studied widely, the mechanism by which substrates are secreted remains unclear. In Agrobacterium, we show that type IV secretion substrates that lack signal peptides form a soluble complex in the periplasm with the virulence protein VirJ. Additionally, these proteins co-precipitate with constituents of the type IV transporter: the VirB pilus and the VirD4 protein. Our findings suggest that the substrate proteins localized to the periplasm may associate with the pilus in a manner that is mediated by VirJ, and suggest a two-step process for type IV secretion in Agrobacterium. Our analyses of protein-protein interactions in a variety of mutant backgrounds indicate that substrates are probably secreted independently of one another.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/physiology , Rhizobium/physiology , Rhizobium/pathogenicity , Virulence Factors , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/metabolism , Genes, Bacterial , Models, Biological , Mutation , Periplasm/physiology , Rhizobium/genetics , Virulence/genetics , Virulence/physiologyABSTRACT
A sensor protein ChvG is part of a chromosomally encoded two-component regulatory system ChvG/ChvI that is important for the virulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. However, it is not clear what genes ChvG regulates or what signal(s) it senses. In this communication, we demonstrate that ChvG is involved in the regulation of acid-inducible genes, including aopB and katA, residing on the circular and linear chromosomes, respectively, and the tumor-inducing (Ti)-plasmid-harbored vir genes, virB and virE. ChvG was absolutely required for the expression of aopB and very important for the expression of virB and virE. However, it was responsible only for the responsiveness of katA and, to a limited extent, the vir genes to acidic pH. ChvG appears to play a role in katA expression by repressing katA at neutral pH. ChvG had no effect on the expression of two genes that were not acid-inducible. Because ChvG regulates unlinked acid-inducible genes encoding different functions in different ways, we hypothesize that ChvG is a global sensor protein that can directly or indirectly sense extracellular acidity. We also analyzed the re-sequenced chvG and found that ChvG is more homologous to its Sinorhizobium meliloti counterpart ExoS than was previously thought. Full-length ChvG is conserved in members of the alpha-proteobacteria, whereas only the C-terminal kinase domain is conserved in other bacteria. Sensing acidity appears to enable Agrobacterium to coordinate its coping with the environment of wounded plants to cause tumors.
Subject(s)
Agrobacterium tumefaciens/genetics , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/pathogenicity , Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/genetics , Protein Kinases/genetics , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/metabolism , Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Chromosomes, Bacterial/genetics , Cloning, Molecular , Codon, Initiator/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial , Genes, Bacterial , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Plasmids/genetics , Protein Biosynthesis , Protein Kinases/metabolism , Virulence/genetics , Virulence/physiologyABSTRACT
Two DNA transfer systems encoded by the tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid have been previously identified in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The virB operon is required for the transfer of transferred DNA to the plant host, and the trb system encodes functions required for the conjugal transfer of the Ti plasmid between cells of Agrobacterium. Recent availability of the genome sequence of Agrobacterium allowed us to identify a third system that is most similar to the VirB type IV secretion system of Bartonella henselae. We have designated this system avhB for Agrobacterium virulence homologue virB. The avhB loci reside on pAtC58 and encode at least 10 proteins (AvhB2 through AvhB11), 7 of which display significant similarity to the corresponding virulence-associated VirB proteins of the Ti plasmid. However, the AvhB system is not required for tumor formation; rather, it mediates the conjugal transfer of the pAtC58 cryptic plasmid between cells of Agrobacterium. This transfer occurs in the absence of the Ti plasmid-encoded VirB and Trb systems. Like the VirB system, AvhB products promote the conjugal transfer of the IncQ plasmid RSF1010, suggesting that these products comprise a mating-pair formation system. The presence of plasmid TiC58 or plasmid RSF1010 reduces the conjugal transfer efficiency of pAtC58 10- or 1,000-fold, respectively. These data suggest that complex substrate interactions exist among the three DNA transfer systems of Agrobacterium.