Psychoeducational Interventions for Problematic Anger in Chronic Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Study of Treatment Enactment.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment enactment, a final stage of treatment implementation, refers to patients' application of skills and concepts from treatment sessions into everyday life situations. We examined treatment enactment in a two-arm, multicenter trial comparing two psychoeducational treatments for persons with chronic moderate to severe traumatic brain injury and problematic anger. METHODS: Seventy-one of 90 participants from the parent trial underwent a telephone enactment interview at least 2 months (median 97 days, range 64-586 days) after cessation of treatment. Enactment, quantified as average frequency of use across seven core treatment components, was compared across treatment arms: anger self-management training (ASMT) and personal readjustment and education (PRE), a structurally equivalent control. Components were also rated for helpfulness when used. Predictors of, and barriers to, enactment were explored. RESULTS: More than 80% of participants reported remembering all seven treatment components when queried using a recognition format. Enactment was equivalent across treatments. Most used/most helpful components concerned normalizing anger and general anger management strategies (ASMT), and normalizing traumatic brain injury-related changes while providing hope for improvement (PRE). Higher baseline executive function and IQ were predictive of better enactment, as well as better episodic memory (trend). Poor memory was cited by many participants as a barrier to enactment, as was the reaction of other people to attempted use of strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment enactment is a neglected component of implementation in neuropsychological clinical trials, but is important both to measure and to help participants achieve sustained carryover of core treatment ingredients and learned material to everyday life.

Analyzing the ingredients of a telephone counseling intervention for traumatic brain injury.

PURPOSE: To develop reliable coding for five treatment ingredients hypothesized to be "active" in a scheduled telephone intervention (STI) for traumatic brain injury (TBI); to examine factors associated with delivery of ingredients over the first year post-injury. METHOD: Operational definitions of directive and non-directive action planning; TBI education; reinforcement; and reframing, were refined until kappa >0.80 across multiple coders. Codes were assigned for presence/absence of ingredients in 253 recorded calls delivered to 49 participants in a randomized controlled trial on effects of STI versus usual care. Using multivariate analyses, we tested hypotheses about effects of TBI severity, time and other factors on delivery of ingredients. RESULTS: Longitudinal analyses revealed that TBI education decreased over time, as expected. Non-directive action planning increased over time, according to hypotheses; unexpectedly, directive action planning did not concurrently decline. Reinforcement and reframing both increased over time, with reframing also increasing with TBI severity. Therapist differences were pronounced, despite extensive supervision designed to promote uniform treatment delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable operational definitions of therapist behavior for each ingredient were achieved, but at the sacrifice of sensitivity in the coding scheme. Behavioral operational definitions of ingredients may be useful for treatment specification, for therapist training and supervision, and for testing hypotheses about the strength of specific components within the "black box" of rehabilitation. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Operationally defining active ingredients of rehabilitation can allow measurement of adherence to specified treatment protocols, and can facilitate the study of the relationship between delivery of specific ingredients and resulting outcomes. In this study, there were strong differences in delivery of ingredients by different clinicians despite frequent joint supervision and a shared treatment philosophy. Defining active ingredients in advance may help focus training and supervision on specific clinician behaviors that convey key ingredients of treatment. Complex treatments such as counseling, where the therapist's behavior is partly determined by the client's behavior and vice versa, are particularly challenging to define operationally since the opportunity to deliver certain ingredients varies with the problems the client presents and the way they are presented.