Implementation and operational management of marketed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T Cell) therapy-a guidance by the GoCART Coalition Pharmacist Working Group.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) are a type of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) classified as ex-vivo (cell-based) gene therapy. CAR-T cells constitute an immunotherapy that works by enabling T cells to specifically recognise cancer cells and destroy them [1]. CAR-T cells are currently licensed to treat certain blood cancers including relapsed or refractory lymphomas, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or multiple myeloma [2]. The indications for their use are expanding and are expected to encompass other therapeutic areas. CAR-T cells are used both in children and adults [2]. CAR-T cells are biologic drugs and are therefore more complex than traditional medicinal products. T cells collected from the patient (or donor) are sent to a Good manufacturing Practice (GMP) manufacturing facility where they are genetically modified to contain a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). This receptor is designed to recognise and target a specific protein on cancer cells. Once manufactured, they are delivered to the hospital where they are administered to the designated patient. Hospital pharmacies are central in the process of ensuring appropriate organisational governance, operational handling, clinical suitability, and pharmacovigilance [1, 3]. The GoCART Coalition Pharmacist working group's mission was to develop standards of care to advance the field of cellular therapies in Europe. The purpose of this document is to provide practical guidance on the implementation and safe operational use of marketed CAR-T cell products within hospital pharmacies primarily throughout Europe. This document outlines the key areas where pharmaceutical expertise should focus and the key considerations for the hospital pharmacy. Countries may have different requirements and there may be variation in practice between hospitals. This document is intended as a guide and the recommendations should be adapted to meet local requirements. This document does not provide clinical information relating to the use of CAR-T cell products. The Summary of medicinal Product Characteristics (SmPC) [4, 5], and national and international clinical guidelines (where in place) should be followed for the most up-to-date clinical management of CAR-T cell patients. An example is the UK "institutional readiness documents" for pharmacy which includes detailed checklists for each stage of the pathway [6]. Spain developed the Plan of Advanced Therapies in the National Health System: CAR medicines published in November 2018 [7], the CAR-T Medicines Management Procedure of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy [8] or the Hospital pharmacist's roles and responsibilities with CAR-T medicines article published also by the Spanish Oncology group of the Spanish Society of Pharmacy [9]. This guide has been designed to support the implementation of marketed CAR-T products; however, the principles may also be applicable to clinical trials. For CAR-T cell products being used in clinical trials, additional trial regulation and clinical trial protocols must be followed. This document is divided into two sections. Section 1 outlines considerations for hospital pharmacies during the implementation of a CAR-T cell service. Section 2 outlines the key operational considerations for hospital pharmacies in the patient and product pathway.

Co-administration of Intravenous Drugs: Rapidly Troubleshooting the Solid Form Composition of a Precipitate in a Multi-drug Mixture Using On-Site Raman Spectroscopy.

Intravenous drugs are often co-administrated in the same intravenous catheter line due to which compatibility issues, such as complex precipitation processes in the catheter line, may occur. A well-known example that led to several neonatal deaths is the precipitation due to co-administration of ceftriaxone- and calcium-containing solutions. The current study is exploring the applicability of Raman spectroscopy for testing intravenous drug compatibility in hospital settings. The precipitation of ceftriaxone calcium was used as a model system and explored in several multi-drug mixtures containing both structurally similar and clinically relevant drugs for co-infusion. Equal molar concentrations of solutions containing ceftriaxone and calcium chloride dihydrate were mixed with solutions of cefotaxime, ampicillin, paracetamol, and metoclopramide. The precipitate formed was collected as an "unknown" material, dried, and analyzed. Several solid-state analytical methods, including X-ray powder diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis, were used to characterize the precipitate. Raman microscopy was used to investigate the identity of single sub-visual particles precipitated from a mixture of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and calcium chloride. X-ray powder diffraction suggested that the precipitate was partially crystalline; however, the identity of the solid form of the precipitate could not be confirmed with this standard method. Raman spectroscopy combined with multi-variate analyses (principal component analysis and soft independent modelling class analogy) enabled the correct detection and identification of the precipitate as ceftriaxone calcium. Raman microscopy enabled the identification of ceftriaxone calcium single particles of sub-visual size (around 25 µm), which is in the size range that may occlude capillaries. This study indicates that Raman spectroscopy is a promising approach for supporting clinical decisions and especially for compatibility assessments of drug infusions in hospital settings.

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in hospitalized adults with severe or critical COVID-19 (Bari-SolidAct): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Baricitinib has shown efficacy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, but no placebo-controlled trials have focused specifically on severe/critical COVID, including vaccinated participants. METHODS: Bari-SolidAct is a phase-3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, enrolling participants from June 3, 2021 to March 7, 2022, stopped prematurely for external evidence. Patients with severe/critical COVID-19 were randomised to Baricitinib 4 mg once daily or placebo, added to standard of care. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 60 days. Participants were remotely followed to day 90 for safety and patient related outcome measures. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine patients were screened, 284 randomised, and 275 received study drug or placebo and were included in the modified intent-to-treat analyses (139 receiving baricitinib and 136 placebo). Median age was 60 (IQR 49-69) years, 77% were male and 35% had received at least one dose of SARS-CoV2 vaccine. There were 21 deaths at day 60 in each group, 15.1% in the baricitinib group and 15.4% in the placebo group (adjusted absolute difference and 95% CI - 0.1% [- 8·3 to 8·0]). In sensitivity analysis censoring observations after drug discontinuation or rescue therapy (tocilizumab/increased steroid dose), proportions of death were 5.8% versus 8.8% (- 3.2% [- 9.0 to 2.7]), respectively. There were 148 serious adverse events in 46 participants (33.1%) receiving baricitinib and 155 in 51 participants (37.5%) receiving placebo. In subgroup analyses, there was a potential interaction between vaccination status and treatment allocation on 60-day mortality. In a subsequent post hoc analysis there was a significant interaction between vaccination status and treatment allocation on the occurrence of serious adverse events, with more respiratory complications and severe infections in vaccinated participants treated with baricitinib. Vaccinated participants were on average 11 years older, with more comorbidities. CONCLUSION: This clinical trial was prematurely stopped for external evidence and therefore underpowered to conclude on a potential survival benefit of baricitinib in severe/critical COVID-19. We observed a possible safety signal in vaccinated participants, who were older with more comorbidities. Although based on a post-hoc analysis, these findings warrant further investigation in other trials and real-world studies. Trial registration Bari-SolidAct is registered at NCT04891133 (registered May 18, 2021) and EUClinicalTrials.eu ( 2022-500385-99-00 ).

Exploring a case of incompatibility in a complex regimen containing Plasma-Lyte 148 in the pediatric intensive care.

BACKGROUND: In the local pediatric intensive care unit, precipitation was observed in the intravenous catheter upon co-administration of four drugs together with the buffered electrolyte solution (Plasma-Lyte 148, Baxter). Co-infusion of incompatible combinations represents a safety concern. AIMS: To reproduce the clinical case of precipitation. To further explore and understand the risk of precipitation, different combinations of the components as well as the corresponding electrolyte solution with 5% glucose (Plasma-Lyte 148 with 5% glucose) should be investigated. METHODS: Physical compatibility of fentanyl, ketamine, midazolam, and potassium chloride was tested in combination with the buffered electrolyte solutions. The concentrations and infusion rates representative of children 10-40 kg were used to estimate mixing ratios. Analyses detecting visual particles (Tyndall beam) and sub-visual particles (light obscuration technology) were undertaken. Measured turbidity and pH in mixed samples were compared with unmixed controls. RESULTS: Both midazolam and ketamine showed formation of visual and sub-visual particles upon mixing with Plasma-Lyte 148, respectively. Particle formation was confirmed by increased turbidity and a distinct Tyndall effect. pH in mixed samples mirrored the pH of the buffered electrolyte, suggesting that the solubility limits of midazolam, and in some ratios also ketamine, were exceeded. Midazolam also precipitated in combination with the glucose-containing product that held a lower pH, more favorable for keeping midazolam dissolved. CONCLUSIONS: Replication of the case revealed that both midazolam and ketamine contributed to the precipitation. Midazolam and ketamine were both evaluated as incompatible with the buffered electrolyte solution and midazolam also with the buffered electrolyte-glucose solution and should not be co-administered in the same i.v.-catheter line. Fentanyl and potassium chloride were interpreted as compatible with both buffered electrolytes.

Frequently acquired drugs in neonatal intensive care and their physical compatibility.

AIM: Incompatibility of intravenous drugs is dangerous and therefore undesirable. The aim of this study was to identify the most commonly acquired intravenous drugs in five neonatal intensive care units and test these for compatibility. METHODS: The most frequently acquired drugs in five key hospitals in the South-Eastern district of Norway for 2019 and 2020 served as a proxy for the prevalence of use. Representatives were selected from the three most prevalent groups based on the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. Co-administration of drug pairs was simulated using clinically relevant concentrations and infusion rates representing mixing ratios in the catheter. Particle formation was assessed by particle counting and size measurement, by visual examination using Tyndall beam, by turbidity and by measuring pH of mixed samples. RESULTS: The most frequently acquired drug groups were anti-infectives, neurological agents and cardiovascular drugs. Compatibility testing revealed that both ampicillin and benzylpenicillin were incompatible with morphine. Flecainide and fluconazole showed no signs of incompatibility with morphine. No information on these combinations in a neonatal-relevant setting is available. CONCLUSION: We recommend to abstain from co-administering ampicillin and benzylpenicillin with morphine in neonatal intensive settings. Morphine co-administered with flecainide and fluconazole in neonatal patients were evaluated as safe.

Co-administration of drugs with parenteral nutrition in the neonatal intensive care unit-physical compatibility between three components.

There is a lack of compatibility data for intravenous therapy to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients, and the purpose of this study was to contribute with documented physical compatibility data to ensure safe co-administration. We selected Numeta G13E, the 3-in-1 parenteral nutrition (PN) used at our NICU, together with the frequently used drugs morphine, dopamine and cefotaxime in two- but also three-component combinations. Incompatibility may lead to particle formation (precipitation) and oil-droplet growth (emulsion destabilisation), both which are undesirable and pose a safety risk to already unstable patients. We assessed potential particle formation of three mixing ratios for each combination (always including 1 + 1 ratio) using light obscuration, turbidity and pH measurements combined with visual inspection by focused Tyndall beam. Potential droplet-growth and emulsion destabilisation was assessed by estimating PFAT5 from droplet size measurements and counts, mean droplet diameter and polydispersity index from dynamic light scattering, and pH measurements. Mixed samples were always compared to unmixed controls to capture changes as a result of mixing and samples were analysed directly after mixing and after 4 h to simulate long contact time. None of the samples showed any sign of precipitation, neither in the drug-drug nor in the two- or three-component mixture with PN. Neither did we detect any form of emulsion destabilisation. CONCLUSION: Dopamine, morphine and cefotaxime were found to be compatible with NumetaG13E, and it is safe to co-administer these drugs together with this PN in NICU patients. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The need for co-administration of drugs and complex PN admixtures occurs frequently in NICU due to limited venous access. • Available compatibility data are scarce and for combinations of more than two components non-existent. WHAT IS NEW: • Here we report physical compatibility data of two- as well as three-component combinations of frequently used NICU drugs and a 3-in-1 PN admixture. • Co-administration of Numeta G13E with dopamine and morphine, but also with morphine and cefotaxime is safe in NICU.

Anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies in COVID-19 patients are associated with disease severity and pulmonary pathology.

Thromboembolic events are frequent and associated with poor outcome in severe COVID-19 disease. Anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies are related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombus formation, but data on these antibodies in unselected COVID-19 populations are scarce. We assessed the presence of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies in prospectively collected serum from an unselected cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients and evaluated if elevated levels could give prognostic information on ICU admission and respiratory failure (RF), were associated with markers of inflammation, endothelial activation, platelet activation, coagulation and fibrosis and were associated with long-term pulmonary CT changes. Five out of 65 patients had anti-PF4/polyanion reactivity with OD ≥0.200. These patients had more severe disease as reflected by ICU admission without any evidence of HIT. They also had signs of enhanced inflammation and fibrinogenesis as reflected by elevated ferritin and osteopontin, respectively, during the first 10 days of hospitalization. Increased ferritin and osteopontin persisted in these patients at 3 months follow-up, concomitant with pulmonary CT pathology. Our finding shows that the presence of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies in unselected hospitalized COVID-19 patients was not related to HIT, but was associated with disease severity, inflammation, and pulmonary pathology after 3 months.

Evaluation of the Effects of Remdesivir and Hydroxychloroquine on Viral Clearance in COVID-19 : A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: New treatment modalities are urgently needed for patients with COVID-19. The World Health Organization (WHO) Solidarity trial showed no effect of remdesivir or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) on mortality, but the antiviral effects of these drugs are not known. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of remdesivir and HCQ on all-cause, in-hospital mortality; the degree of respiratory failure and inflammation; and viral clearance in the oropharynx. DESIGN: NOR-Solidarity is an independent, add-on, randomized controlled trial to the WHO Solidarity trial that included biobanking and 3 months of clinical follow-up (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04321616). SETTING: 23 hospitals in Norway. PATIENTS: Eligible patients were adults hospitalized with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. INTERVENTION: Between 28 March and 4 October 2020, a total of 185 patients were randomly assigned and 181 were included in the full analysis set. Patients received remdesivir (n = 42), HCQ (n = 52), or standard of care (SoC) (n = 87). MEASUREMENTS: In addition to the primary end point of WHO Solidarity, study-specific outcomes were viral clearance in oropharyngeal specimens, the degree of respiratory failure, and inflammatory variables. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between treatment groups in mortality during hospitalization. There was a marked decrease in SARS-CoV-2 load in the oropharynx during the first week overall, with similar decreases and 10-day viral loads among the remdesivir, HCQ, and SoC groups. Remdesivir and HCQ did not affect the degree of respiratory failure or inflammatory variables in plasma or serum. The lack of antiviral effect was not associated with symptom duration, level of viral load, degree of inflammation, or presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 at hospital admittance. LIMITATION: The trial had no placebo group. CONCLUSION: Neither remdesivir nor HCQ affected viral clearance in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Clinical Therapy Research in the Specialist Health Services, Norway.

Y-Site Physical Compatibility of Numeta G13E with Drugs Frequently Used at Neonatal Intensive Care.

Preterm neonates require parenteral nutrition (PN) in addition to intravenous drug therapy. Due to limited venous access, drugs are often co-administered with PN via the same lumen. If incompatible, precipitation and emulsion destabilization may occur with the consequent risk of embolism and hyper-immune reactions. Information on intravenous compatibility is scarce. Our aim was to analyse the compatibility of Numeta G13E with paracetamol, vancomycin and fentanyl because of the frequency of their use. A panel of methods was chosen to assess precipitation (sub-visual particle counting, turbidity measurement, Tyndall beam effect and pH measurement) and emulsion destabilization (mean droplet diameter measurement and sub-visual counting of oil droplets, followed by estimation of PFAT5 (percentage of fat residing in globules larger than 5 µm) and pH measurement). Samples in clinically relevant mixing ratios were tested immediately and after 4 h. All samples of drugs mixed with Numeta G13E were compared to unmixed controls. None of the tested drugs precipitated in contact with Numeta G13E, and we did not see any sign of emulsion destabilization when clinically relevant mixing ratios were applied. These results are reassuring. However, when contact time exceeds the established norm, caution in the form of filter utilisation and close inspection is advised.

Association of Prenatal Ibuprofen Exposure with Birth Weight and Gestational Age: A Population-Based Sibling Study.

OBJECTIVES: Three studies so far have investigated the effect of prenatal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) exposure on birth weight and gestational age. The aim in this study was to evaluate the association of prenatal ibuprofen with birth weight and gestational age at birth, using a sibling design in an attempt to adjust for the possibility of familial confounding. DESIGN: Using data from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN), we identified 28 597 siblings, of whom 1080 were prenatally exposed to ibuprofen and 26 824 were not exposed to any NSAID. Random and fixed effects models with propensity score adjustment were used to evaluate the effects of ibuprofen exposure on birth weight and gestational age. RESULTS: Ibuprofen exposure during the first trimester was associated with a decrease in birth weight of 79 grams (95% confidence interval -133 to -25 grams). In contrast, second and/or third trimester exposure, and duration of exposure had no impact on the effect estimates. We found no association between ibuprofen exposure and gestational age at birth. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that prenatal exposure to ibuprofen during the first trimester is associated with a slight decrease in birth weight. The association does not seem to be attributable to shared genetics and family environment, and could be explained by either exposure to ibuprofen, or to non-shared confounding between pregnancies.

Effect of prenatal selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) exposure on birthweight and gestational age: a sibling-controlled cohort study.

Background: Up to 10% of women are exposed to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) during pregnancy. Information on their effect on birthweight and gestational age remains conflicting. The aim of this sibling-controlled prospective cohort study is to address shared geneticand family-level confounding to investigate the effects of prenatal SSRI exposure and maternal depression on birthweight and gestational age. Methods: We used the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN). Our study population consisted of 27 756 siblings; 194 were prenatally exposed to SSRIs and 27 500 were unexposed to any antidepressant medication. Random and fixed effects analysis with propensity score adjustment was used to evaluate the effectson birthweight and gestational age. Results: SSRI exposure during two or more trimesters was associated with a decrease in birthweight of 205 g [95% confidence interval (CI) -372 to - 38] and a decrease in gestational length of 4.9 days (95% CI - 9.1 to - 1.4). Neither maternal SSRI use in one trimester, lifetime history of major depression nor depressive symptoms during pregnancy were associated with these pregnancy outcomes (for non-pharmacologically treated depression in two periods in pregnancy, +5 g (95% CI - 56 to + 67) and +4.9 days (95% CI - 4.7 to + 14.7), respectively). Conclusions: Prenatal exposure to SSRIs during two or more trimesters may decrease birthweight and gestational length. Our results indicate that neither maternal depression nor shared genetics and family environment fully explain this association.

Pharmacological treatment of migraine during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Migraine affects up to 25% of women of reproductive age. In the majority of these women, migraine improves progressively during pregnancy, but symptoms generally recur shortly after delivery. As suboptimally treated migraine in pregnancy could have negative consequences for both mother and fetus, the primary aim of clinicians should be to provide optimal treatment according to stage of pregnancy, while minimising possible risks related to drug therapy. Nonpharmacological approaches are always first-line treatment, and should also be used to complement any required drug treatment. Paracetamol is the preferred drug for acute treatment throughout pregnancy. If paracetamol is not sufficiently effective, sporadic use of sumatriptan can be considered. NSAIDs such as ibuprofen can also be used under certain circumstances, though their intake in the first and third trimesters is associated with specific risks and contraindications. Preventive treatment should only be considered in the most severe cases. In women contemplating pregnancy, counselling is essential to promote a safe and healthy pregnancy and postpartum period for the mother and child, and should involve a dialogue addressing maternal concerns and expectations about drug treatment. This Review summarizes current evidence of the safety of the most common antimigraine medications during pregnancy and breastfeeding, and provides treatment recommendations for use in clinical practice.

Triptan safety during pregnancy: a Norwegian population registry study.

Knowledge on triptan safety during pregnancy remains limited to their class effect or studies on sumatriptan. Our aim was to evaluate the individual effect of four most frequently used triptans on several pregnancy outcomes. We used the Norwegian prescription database to access information on triptans redeemed by pregnant women living in Norway between 2004 and 2007. This database was linked to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway covering every institutional delivery in Norway and providing information on pregnancy, delivery, maternal and neonatal health. Estimates of associations with pregnancy outcomes were obtained by Generalised Estimation Equations analysis. Of the 181,125 women in our study, 1,465 (0.8%) redeemed triptans during pregnancy, and 1,095 (0.6%) redeemed triptans before pregnancy only (disease comparison group). The population comparison group comprised the remaining 178,565 women. Using this group as reference, we found no associations between triptan redemption during pregnancy and congenital malformations. Second trimester redemption was associated with postpartum haemorrhage (adjusted OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.19-2.07). The disease comparison group had an increased risk of major congenital malformations (adjusted OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.11-1.97), low birth weight (adjusted OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.08-1.81), and preterm birth (adjusted OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.06-1.60). The association of triptans with postpartum hemorrhage could be attributable to decreased platelet agreeability occurring in severe migraine. Likewise, the increased risk of major congenital malformations and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in the disease comparison group might be attributable to migraine severity.

Effects of codeine on pregnancy outcome: results from a large population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines on codeine safety during pregnancy rely on small studies with inconsistent results, and associations between codeine use during pregnancy and increased risk of congenital malformations remain unsubstantiated. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to analyze the effect of codeine on pregnancy outcome. METHODS: Pregnancy outcomes of 2,666 women who used codeine during pregnancy were compared with 65,316 women who used no opioids during pregnancy. Information on maternal sociodemographic and medical characteristics, potential confounders, and pregnancy outcome was obtained from The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study [den norske Mor & barn-undersøkelsen (MoBa)] data set and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN) data set. The data sets were linked via the maternal personal identification number. Associations between codeine therapy and pregnancy outcomes were identified using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the survival rate [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6-1.5] or the congenital malformation rate (adjusted OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-1.1) between codeine-exposed and unexposed infants. Codeine use anytime during pregnancy was associated with planned Cesarean delivery (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.7; P < 0.0001). Third-trimester use was associated with acute Cesarean delivery (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.8; P < 0.0001) and postpartum hemorrhage (adjusted OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5; P < 0.0001). No significant associations with other adverse pregnancy outcomes were found. CONCLUSIONS: No effects of maternal codeine intake during pregnancy were observed on infant survival or congenital malformation rate. Our findings are reassuring; however, the association with acute Cesarean delivery and postpartum hemorrhage may justify a certain level of caution when administering codeine toward the end of pregnancy.

Triptan exposure during pregnancy and the risk of major congenital malformations and adverse pregnancy outcomes: results from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of triptan therapy during pregnancy. BACKGROUND: Information on the safety of triptan therapy during pregnancy is scarce and only available for sumatriptan, naratriptan, and rizatriptan. No associations with congenital malformations have been detected so far, but one study found a significant association between sumatriptan exposure during pregnancy and prematurity. METHODS: The study population consisted of 69,929 pregnant women and their newborn children for whom data on drug exposure and pregnancy outcome were available. Information on triptan therapy and potential socio-demographic and medical confounding factors was obtained from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Information on congenital malformations and other adverse pregnancy outcomes was obtained from the Norwegian Medical Birth Registry. The datasets were linked via the women's personal identification number. Pearson's chi(2) tests and logistic regression analyses were used to identify associations between triptan therapy and pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: No significant associations between triptan therapy during the first trimester and major congenital malformations (unadjusted OR: 1.0; 95% CI 0.8-1.3, adjusted OR: 1.0; 95% CI 0.7-1.2) or other adverse pregnancy outcomes were found. Triptan therapy during the second and/or third trimesters was significantly associated with atonic uterus (unadjusted OR: 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-1.9, adjusted OR: 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.8), and blood loss >500 mL during labor (unadjusted OR: 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.5, adjusted OR: 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.5). CONCLUSIONS: Triptan therapy during pregnancy was not associated with an overall increased risk of congenital malformations. It cannot, however, be excluded that a difference in the risk between triptan use and individual or rare congenital malformations may exist. A slight increase in the risk of atonic uterus and hemorrhage was associated with triptan use during the second and/or third trimesters. Although the present findings are reassuring, confirmation in independent studies is warranted.