The role of multidetector computed tomography in predicting the site of gastroduodenal perforation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the value of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in detecting the location of gastroduodenal perforation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with 47 patients who underwent contrast-enhancing MDCT and were diagnosed with gastroduodenal perforation during surgery between July 2021 and June 2022. Radiologic findings included pneumoperitoneum (distribution and quantity) and analyzed the image findings for localizing the site of gastroduodenal perforation. RESULTS: Pneumoperitoneum was the most common finding [95.74% (45 out of 47 patients)]. Regarding air distribution, the sensitivity (Se) and negative predictive value (NPV) of abdominal free air and supramesocolic free air were the highest (100% for both). The accuracy (Acc) of supramesocolic free air was the highest (93.6%), followed by abdominal free air (89.4%). Subphrenic free air also had a high Acc value (89.4%), with Se, specificity (Sp), and positive predictive value (PPV) being 90%, 85,7%, and 97.3%, respectively. The Sp PPV of falciform ligament/ligamentum teres sign, and periportal free air were also high (100% for both). In contrast, retroperitoneal free air was valuable in determining retroperitoneal duodenal perforation with an Sp, Se of 100%, and Acc of 89.4%. The thickness of abdominal free air was ≥5.5 mm, suggesting gastroduodenal perforation with a Se, Sp, PPV, NPV, and Acc of 82.5%, 100%, 100%, 50%, and 85.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Subphrenic free air, periportal free air, falciform ligament sign, and the air above transverse mesocolon were correlated to gastric and duodenal bulb perforation. Retroperitoneal air indicates the perforation at the retroperitoneal duodenum. The thickness of abdominal free air ≥5.5 mm indicates gastric and duodenal bulb perforation.

Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing acute appendicitis during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for identifying acute appendicitis during pregnancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled a total of 46 pregnant patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis who underwent 1.5 T MRI and received a final pathological diagnosis. We evaluated the imaging characteristics associated with patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis, including the appendix diameter, the appendix wall thickness, intra-appendiceal fluid collection, and peri-appendiceal fat infiltration. A bright appendix on T1-weighted 3-dimensional imaging was identified as a negative sign for appendicitis. RESULTS: Peri-appendiceal fat infiltration had the highest specificity of 97.1% for diagnosing acute appendicitis, whereas increasing appendiceal diameter had the highest sensitivity of 91.7%. The cut-off values for increasing appendiceal diameter and appendiceal wall thickness were 6.55 mm and 2.7 mm, respectively. Using these cut-off values, appendiceal diameter had a sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.7%, 91.2%, 78.4%, and 96.9%, respectively, whereas these values for appendiceal wall thickness were 75.0%, 91.2%, 75.0%, and 91.2%. The combination of increasing appendiceal diameter and appendiceal wall thickness resulted in an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.958 with Se, Sp, PPV, and NPV values of 75.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 91.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All five MRI signs examined in this study had significant diagnostic value for detecting acute appendicitis during pregnancy, with p-values <0.01. The combined use of increasing appendiceal diameter and appendiceal wall thickness displayed the excellent ability to diagnose acute appendicitis in pregnant women.

Diagnostic performance of quantitative signal intensity measurements on magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing cerebellopontine angle meningioma from acoustic schwannoma.

OBJECTIVE: Our study investigated magnetic resonance imaging measurements for differentiating cerebellopontine angle (CPA) meningioma from vestibular schwannoma (VS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study compared 36 meningioma and 36 VS patients. The tumor volume (Vtumor) and peritumor edema index (EI) relationship was analyzed. T2-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo image signal intensity (T23D) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) differentiation cutoff values were defined. Mann-Whitney U test, independent-samples t-test, receiver operating characteristic curve, and Spearman's correlation analyses were applied. RESULTS: Meningioma had higher Vtumor (p=0.009) and EI (p=0.031) values than VS. Meningioma had significantly (p<0.001) lower values than VS for mean ADC (ADCmean: 0.841±0.083×10-3 vs.1.173±0.190×10-3 mm2/s), minimum ADC (ADCmin: 0.716±0.078×10-3 vs.1.045±0.178×10-3 mm2/s), tumor:white matter ADC ratio (rADC: 1.198±0.19 vs. 1.59±0.30), mean T23D (T23Dmean: 142.91±19.9 vs. 218.72±84.73), and tumor:adipose T23D ratio (rT23d: 0.19±0.06 vs. 0.30±0.28) Cutoff, sensitivity (Se), and specificity (Sp) values were ADCmin, 0.856×10-3 mm2/s (Se: 96.6%, Sp: 100%); ADCmean, 0.963×10-3 mm2/s (Se: 96.6%, Sp: 95.5%); rADC, 1.3189 (Se: 93.1%, Sp: 81.8%), T23Dmean (Se: 96.6%, Sp: 100%); rT23D, 0.1951 (Se: 89.7%, Sp: 100%), Vtumor, 14828.65 mm3 (Se: 75.0%, Sp: 66.7%), and EI, 1.1025 (Se: 47.2%, Sp: 100%). CONCLUSIONS: ADCmin, ADCmean, rADC, T23Dmean, rT23D, Vtumor, and EI, effectively discriminated meningioma from VS.

The ALERT model of care for the assessment and personalized management of patients with lymphoedema.

BACKGROUND: This study documents the development and evaluation of a comprehensive multidisciplinary model for the assessment and personalized care of patients with lymphoedema. METHODS: The Australian Lymphoedema Education Research and Treatment (ALERT) programme originated as an advanced clinic for patients considering surgery for lymphoedema. The programme commenced liposuction surgery in May 2012 and then introduced lymph node transfer in 2013 and lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) in 2016. An outpatient conservative treatment clinic was established in 2016. ALERT commenced investigations with indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography in late 2015, leading to the creation of a diagnostic assessment clinic offering ICG in 2017. RESULTS: Since 2012, 1200 new patients have been referred to ALERT for assessment of lymphoedema for a total of 5043 episodes of care. The introduction of ICG lymphography in 2015 initially allowed better screening for LVA, but is now used not only to guide surgical options, but also as a diagnostic tool and to guide manual lymphatic drainage massage. The total number of new patients who attended the surgical assessment clinic to December 2018 was 477, with 162 patients (34·0 per cent) undergoing surgery. CONCLUSION: The ALERT programme has developed a multidisciplinary model of care for personalized lymphoedema treatment options based on clinical, imaging and ICG lymphography. Patients are selected for surgery based on several individual factors.

ANTECEDENTES: Este estudio presenta el desarrollo y valoración de un modelo multidisciplinario integral para la evaluación y atención personalizada de pacientes con linfedema. MÉTODOS: El programa australiano de educación en investigación y tratamiento del linfedema (Australian Lymphoedema Education Research and Treatment, ALERT) se originó como un centro clínico avanzado para pacientes que consideran la cirugía como tratamiento para el linfedema. El programa se inició en mayo del 2012 con la cirugía de liposucción, introduciendo la cirugía de transferencia ganglionar (lymph node transfer, LNT) en 2013 y la anastomosis linfovenosa (lymphovenous anastomosis, LVA) en 2016. En 2016 se estableció una clínica de tratamiento conservador ambulatorio. ALERT comenzó las investigaciones con la linfografía con verde de indocianina (indocyanine green, ICG) a fines del 2015, lo que se siguió de la creación de una clínica de evaluación diagnóstica que ofrece ICG en 2017. RESULTADOS: Desde el 2012, 1.200 pacientes nuevos han sido referidos a ALERT para la evaluación de un linfedema, con un total de 5.043 episodios atendidos. La introducción inicialmente de linfografía con ICG en 2015 permitió un mejor cribaje para LVA, pero actualmente se utiliza no solo como guía de las opciones quirúrgicas, sino también como herramienta diagnóstica y como guía del masaje de drenaje linfático manual (manual lymphatic drainage, MLD). El número total de pacientes nuevos atendidos en la clínica de evaluación quirúrgica hasta diciembre de 2018 fue de 477, con 122 pacientes (34%) tratados quirúrgicamente. El modelo tal como se ha descrito, ha atraído a pacientes de toda Australia y Nueva Zelanda. CONCLUSIÓN: El programa ALERT ha desarrollado un modelo multidisciplinario de atención para las opciones de tratamiento personalizado del linfedema basado en la evaluación clínica, por imagen (MRI y LSG) y linfografía con ICG. Los pacientes se seleccionan cuidadosamente para el tratamiento quirúrgico en función de varios factores relacionados con el paciente, el tumor, los linfáticos y las opciones terapéuticas, y se someten a una evaluación detallada después de cualquier procedimiento.