Unexpected Clinical Outcome for Myxoinflammatory Fibroblastic Sarcoma, When Should They Be Considered High Grade?

Myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma (MIFS) is a rare tumor of soft tissue. It typically presents as a low-grade sarcoma with myxoid stroma, has a predilection for distal extremities, and displays a high propensity for local recurrence, but low metastatic potential. The risk factors associated with high-risk lesions metastasizing are poorly defined. In cases where the tumor metastasizes, therapeutic options are few, and death is rare. Our case discusses an aggressive MIFS that progressed from a painless lesion on a patient's calf, to her death from a malignant pleural effusion within 21 months. The 58-year-old woman presented with a mass on her left calf. It was excised and was originally thought to be a benign process. It re-grew quickly after the initial resection, and she underwent re-excision of the mass. The pathologic examination was consistent with an MIFS. Despite negative margins on her second resection and an attempt at local control with radiotherapy, it metastasized to her lungs within less than 2 years. This resulted in a malignant pleural effusion that caused her death. An MIFS is typically benign but can metastasize in atypical cases. Even if the disease is metastatic, it is unlikely to be the cause of death. Treatment of metastatic MIFS is poorly defined, but there are suggested therapies beyond surgical resection and radiotherapy. Successful treatment of an MIFS should include a high index of suspicion in extremity lesions, screening for metastasis, and possible targeted therapies based on tumor genomics.

Pilot clinical trial and phenotypic analysis in chemotherapy-pretreated, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with oral TAK-228 and TAK-117 (PIKTOR) to increase DNA damage repair deficiency followed by cisplatin and nab paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: A subset of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) have homologous recombination deficiency with upregulation of compensatory DNA repair pathways. PIKTOR, a combination of TAK-228 (TORC1/2 inhibitor) and TAK-117 (PI3Kα inhibitor), is hypothesized to increase genomic instability and increase DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiency, leading to increased sensitivity to DNA-damaging chemotherapy and to immune checkpoint blockade inhibitors. METHODS: 10 metastatic TNBC patients received 4 mg TAK-228 and 200 mg TAK-117 (PIKTOR) orally each day for 3 days followed by 4 days off, weekly, until disease progression (PD), followed by intravenous cisplatin 75 mg/m2 plus nab paclitaxel 220 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Patients received subsequent treatment with pembrolizumab and/or chemotherapy. Primary endpoints were objective response rate with cisplatin/nab paclitaxel and safety. Biopsies of a metastatic lesion were collected prior to and at PD on PIKTOR. Whole exome and RNA-sequencing and reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) were used to phenotype tumors pre- and post-PIKTOR for alterations in DDR, proliferation, and immune response. RESULTS: With cisplatin/nab paclitaxel (cis/nab pac) therapy post PIKTOR, 3 patients had clinical benefit (1 partial response (PR) and 2 stable disease (SD) ≥ 6 months) and continued to have durable benefit in progression-free survival with pembrolizumab post-cis/nab pac for 1.2, 2, and 3.6 years. Their post-PIKTOR metastatic tissue displayed decreased mismatch repair (MMR), increased tumor mutation burden, and significantly lower levels of 53BP1, DAG Lipase ß, GCN2, AKT Ser473, and PKCzeta Thr410/403 compared to pre-PIKTOR tumor tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Priming patients' chemotherapy-pretreated metastatic TNBC with PIKTOR led to very prolonged response/disease control with subsequent cis/nab pac, followed by pembrolizumab, in 3 of 10 treated patients. Our multi-omics approach revealed a higher number of genomic alterations, reductions in MMR, and alterations in immune and stress response pathways post-PIKTOR in patients who had durable responses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered on June 21, 2017, at ClinicalTrials.gov using identifier NCT03193853.

Is autophagy induction by PARP inhibitors a target for therapeutic benefit?

PARP inhibitors have proven to be effective in conjunction with conventional therapeutics in the treatment of various solid as well as hematologic malignancies, particularly when the tumors are deficient in DNA repair pathways. However, as the case with other chemotherapeutic agents, their effectiveness is often compromised by the development of resistance. PARP inhibitors have consistently been reported to promote autophagy, a process that maintains cellular homeostasis and acts as an energy source by the degradation and reutilization of damaged subcellular organelles and proteins. Autophagy can exhibit different functional properties, the most prominent being cytoprotective. In addition, both cytotoxic and non-protective functions forms have also been identified. In this review, we explore the available literature regarding the different roles of autophagy in response to clinically-used PARP inhibitors, highlighting the possibility of targeting autophagy as an adjuvant therapy to potentially increase the effectiveness of PARP inhibition and to overcome the development of resistance.