Minimal clinically important differences on the DyNaChron questionnaire after surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To determine minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the DyNaChron chronic rhinosinusitis quality-of-life questionnaire. INTRODUCTION: MCIDs are the smallest changes in a quality-of-life score that are of clinical relevance for the patient. They allow treatment benefit to be estimated. MCIDs have not previously been determined for DyNaChron. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective study analyzed DyNaChron questionnaires filled out between June 2016 and December 2021 by all patients consulting for chronic nasal dysfunction. Five hundred and thirteen of the 2390 patients were operated on for nasal polyposis (NP; n=282) or septo(rhino)plasty+inferior turbinoplasty (SPIT; n=231). Standard error of measurement was used to determine MCIDs. RESULTS: MCID for DyNaChron global score was 60 in NP and 58 in SPIT. MCIDs per symptom domain in NP and SPIT respectively were: 15 and 13 for nasal obstruction, 21 and 21 for anterior rhinorrhea, 20 and 19 for posterior rhinorrhea, and 17 and 17 for olfaction. In agreement with global MCID, 257 NPs (91%) and 149 SPITs (65%) showed clinical improvement. CONCLUSION: MCID helps assess response to treatment. In the DyNaChron questionnaire, MCIDs enable global and symptom-specific assessment of chronic nasal dysfunction and its impact on quality of life in a single patient or in groups.

Recommendations for nutritional care after bariatric surgery: Recommendations for best practice and SOFFCO-MM/AFERO/SFNCM/expert consensus.

Nutritional care after bariatric surgery is an issue of major importance, especially insofar as risk of deficiency has been extensively described in the literature. Subsequent to the deliberations carried out by a multidisciplinary working group, we are proposing a series of recommendations elaborated using the Delphi-HAS (official French health authority) method, which facilitates the drawing up of best practice and consensus recommendations based on the data of the literature and on expert opinion. The recommendations in this paper pertain to dietary management and physical activity, multivitamin and trace element supplementation and the prevention and treatment of specific deficiencies in vitamins B1, B9, B12, D and calcium, iron, zinc, vitamins A, E and K, dumping syndrome and reactive hypoglycemia.

Effectiveness of Omalizumab in Severe Allergic Asthma and Nasal Polyposis: A Real-Life Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Omalizumab is a human anti-IgE antibody approved for the treatment of severe allergic asthma (SAA). However, its effectiveness in SAA associated with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSNP+) is less well documented. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with SAA and CRSNP+ who tolerated and did not tolerate aspirin. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational, multicenter, real-life study of patients with SAA and CRSNP+ treated with omalizumab for 6 months. Asthma outcome parameters (symptoms, number of salbutamol rescues/wk, number of moderate/severe exacerbations, Asthma Control Test score, and lung function), sinonasal outcome parameters (symptoms, number of episodes of acute rhinosinusitis, sinus computed tomography images, nasal polyps endoscopy score), and serum eosinophil levels were analyzed 6 months before and after treatment with omalizumab. RESULTS: Twenty-four adult patients were included (9 with documented aspirin intolerance). All respiratory parameters were significantly improved by the treatment. In parallel, a significant improvement was observed in sinonasal clinical outcomes and sinus computed tomography images, with no major effect on the nasal polyps endoscopy score. The serum eosinophil count decreased significantly after 6 months of treatment with omalizumab. CONCLUSION: Treatment of SAA with omalizumab improves the outcome of associated CRSNP+, thus supporting the concept of a "one airway disease".

Epidemiological Data on Anaphylaxis in French Emergency Departments.

BACKGROUND: Although anaphylaxis has been considered a priority public health issue in the world allergy community, epidemiological data on morbidity and mortality remain suboptimal. We performed the first multicenter epidemiological study in French emergency departments (EDs). The study covered 7 EDs over a period of 1 year. The objectives were to identify areas that are amenable to change and to support ongoing national and international efforts for better diagnosis, management, and prevention of anaphylaxis. METHODS: Ours was a descriptive study based on data routinely reported to French institutional administrative databases from 7 French public health institutions in the Lorraine region between January and December 2015. Data were collected based on the anaphylaxisrelated codes of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10, and cases were clinically validated as anaphylaxis. RESULTS: Of the 202 079 admissions to the EDs, 4817 had anaphylaxis-related codes; of these, 323 were clinically validated as anaphylaxis. Although 45.8% were severe, adrenaline was prescribed in only 32.4% of cases. Of the 323 cases, 57.9% were subsequently referred for an allergy work-up or evaluation (after or during hospitalization), and 17.3% were prescribed autoinjectable epinephrine. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight an urgent need for improved public health initiatives with respect to recognition and treatment of anaphylaxis. We flag key problems that should be managed in the coming years through implementation of national and international actions.

[Complementary and alternative medicine use by lung cancer patients]. / Le recours aux médecines « complémentaires et alternatives ¼ par les patients atteints d'un cancer bronchique.

INTRODUCTION: Complementary and alternative medicine (CMA) use is frequent among cancer patients. Only few results are available about lung cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate how often the CMA were used by lung cancer patients and to define the type of CMA used. METHODS: Every lung cancer patients with an ongoing chemotherapy in the respiratory department of the University Hospital of Nancy were approached between November 2014 to July 2015. A detailed and anonymous survey was conducted and the socioeconomic characteristics were collected from medical records. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were questioned. On 82 patients having answered, 19.5 % had used at least a CMA. The main CMA used was the physical exercise in 50 % of the patients. CMA users were significantly younger with a mean age of 56.4 years versus 65.4 years (P=0.0007). More than half patients did not indicate to their specialist that they used a CMA. The main information source was the circle of acquaintances. CONCLUSIONS: CMA use is frequent among lung cancer patients. The physical exercise is quoted most of the time among the various CMA. There is a real lack of communication on the subject between the physician and the patient. It is thus imperative that the pulmonologists give much interest to these practices in order to give better advices and to reinforce the patient-physician relationship.

Sinonasal symptom-related sleep disorders before and after surgery for nasal polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with nasal polyposis (NP) complain of several sinonasal symptoms that impact their sleep and quality of life. However, data on sleep disorders related to NP symptoms, before and after surgery, is poor. The aim of the present study was to analyze sleep complaints related to each NP symptom, before and after surgery, using the Dynachron questionnaire. METHODOLOGY: 63 patients operated for NP were included in this prospective study. They filled the DyNaChron questionnaire one day before surgery (V0), 6 weeks (V1) and 7 months (V2) after surgery. The self-ratings (0-10 point visual analog scale) of nasal obstruction, anterior rhinorrhea, postnasal discharge, cough and 5 items related to sleep disturbances, due to each symptom of chronic nasal dysfunction, were extracted from the questionnaire and analyzed. RESULTS: There was significant improvement of symptoms and symptom-related sleep disturbance scores at V1 and V2 compared to baseline scores. Before surgery, moderate/severe sleep disorders that patients attributed to nasal obstruction (the patient thinks it is due to nasal obstruction rather than a clinical test to show nasal obstruction) or anterior rhinorrhea were reported in two thirds of patients, postnasal discharge in one half, and chronic cough in one third. After surgery, less than 10% of patients reported moderate/severe sleep disorders at V1. There was a mild increase of patients who rated moderate/severe sleep disorders at V2 in comparison to V1. The correlation between scores of nasal obstruction and its impacts on sleep quality was weak before surgery and strong afterwards. CONCLUSION: Nasalization improved sleep quality significantly at 6 weeks and at 7 months after surgery. However, there was a mild increase of complaints related to postnasal discharge and cough at 7 months after surgery.

Extensive lymph node dissection during pancreaticoduodenectomy: a risk factor for hepatic steatosis?

PURPOSE: The first reports of hepatic steatosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) were published several years ago; however, clear risk factors remain to be identified. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for hepatic steatosis post-PD. METHODS: We studied 90 patients who had undergone PD between September 2005 and January 2015. The inclusion criteria were as follows: available unenhanced CT within one month before PD and at least one unenhanced CT acquisition between PD and chemotherapy initiation. Using scanners, we studied the liver and spleen density as well as the surface areas of visceral (VF) and subcutaneous fat (SCF). These variables were previously identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Hepatic steatosis occurred in 25.6% of patients at 45.2 days, on average, post-PD. Among the patients with hepatic steatosis, the average liver density was 52 HU before PD and 15.1 HU post-PD (p < 0.001). The Patients with hepatic steatosis lost more VF (mean, 28 vs. 11 cm2) and SCF (28.8 vs. 13.7 cm2) (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). Portal vein resection and extensive lymph node dissection were independent risk factors in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] 5.29, p = 0.009; OR 3.38, p = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: Portal vein resection and extensive lymph node dissection are independent risk factors for post-PD hepatic steatosis.

Sinonasal symptom assessment by the self-reported DyNaChron questionnaire: Before or after consultation?

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of sinonasal symptoms on a self-reported questionnaire is thoroughly subjective, but indispensable for quantifying symptoms. The present study sought to compare responses on the DyNaChron questionnaire just before and just after consultation for chronic sinonasal dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 78 patients (mean age, 43.1±16.9 years) consulting for chronic sinonasal dysfunction took part in a prospective study, responding to the computerized version of the DyNaChron self-reported questionnaire, in a dedicated room, just before and just after medical interview and physical examination. RESULTS: Most patients tended to grade symptoms as less severe after consultation. Significant differences in mean score were found for nasal obstruction (difference of 0.94/10), anterior (0.40) and posterior rhinorrhea (0.26), olfactory disorder (0.65), and facial pain and headache (0.65), but not for chronic cough. CONCLUSION: Self-reported scores for chronic sinonasal dysfunction differ slightly from before to after consultation. They are therefore to be interpreted with caution, taking account of possible factors of bias.

Assessment of facial pain and headache before and after nasal polyposis surgery with the DyNaChron questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES: Facial pain/headache is reported in 16-67% of nasal polyposis (NP) patients. This wide range may be due to differences in assessment methods. The present prospective study assessed facial pain/headache and quality-of-life (QoL) impact before and after NP surgery. METHODS: Pain was assessed on the DyNaChron self-administered questionnaire in patients undergoing NP surgery, the day before the procedure (V0) and 6 weeks (V1) and 7 months (V2) after. All patients underwent the same nasalization procedure, sparing the middle turbinates when possible. The questionnaire extract comprised 1 item assessing pain, 13 assessing physical impact and 4 assessing psychosocial impact, with responses on visual analog scales (VAS) graded 0 (no discomfort) to 10 (unbearable discomfort). RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (mean age: 50.6±12.8 years; 32 male [50.8%], 31 female [49.2%]) were included. Thirty-seven patients (58.7%) had history of NP surgery. Fifty-two percent reported moderate to severe pain before surgery, 17.5% at 6 weeks, and 22.2% at 7 months. One-third reported no pain preoperatively, versus a half at 6 weeks and 7 months. Scores for the physical and psychosocial impact of pain were improved after surgery. CONCLUSION: Headache/facial pain is frequent in patients for whom NP surgery is indicated. Endoscopic surgery relieves the symptom and its physical and psychosocial impacts. However, one-fifth of patients reported residual postoperative pain.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Morbidity After Totally Robotic Gastric Bypass in 302 Consecutive Patients.

BACKGROUND: Totally robotic gastric bypass (robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, R-RYGBP) has been adopted in some centers on the basis of large retrospective studies. In view of some data showing higher morbidity and higher costs, some authors have considered that robotic gastric bypass may no longer be justified with the existing system. Although low postoperative complication rates after R-RYGBP have been reported, risk factors for postoperative morbidity have never been evaluated. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity after R-RYGBP. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed and included 302 consecutive patients after R-RYGBP performed between 2007 and 2013. This subset of patients represented 34 % of all gastric bypass procedures performed during this study period. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in order to identify risk factors for postoperative overall morbidity (Clavien scores 1-4 versus 0) and major morbidity (Clavien score ≥3 versus 0-1-2). RESULTS: Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 24.4 and 0.6 %, respectively. In multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for overall morbidity were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3 (odds ratio (OR) 2.0) and previous bariatric surgery (revisional gastric bypass) (OR 2.0). Independent risk factors for major morbidity (Clavien ≥3) were previous bariatric surgery (revisional gastric bypass) (OR 3.7), low preoperative hematocrit level (OR 0.9), and revisional gastric bypass procedure with concomitant gastric banding removal (OR 5.7). CONCLUSIONS: R-RYGBP is prone to increased complications in the setting of a high preoperative ASA score and revisional surgery. This should be taken into consideration by clinicians when evaluating R-RYGBP.

[Evaluation of requests for a second medical opinion by patients with lung cancer]. / Évaluation de la demande de deuxième avis par les patients atteints de cancer bronchique.

INTRODUCTION: Getting a second opinion seems common in oncology, even though the management of these serious diseases results from a multidisciplinary approach. Our aim was to determine the incidence of requests for a second opinion in thoracic oncology at the university hospital of Nancy, since the establishment of the Cancer Plan in 2003. This plan formalized multidisciplinary staff meetings, which should help to reassure patients and therefore reduce the recourse to additional consultations. METHODS: A detailed and anonymous questionnaire was conducted on 77 patients suffering from lung cancer, followed-up over 2years in the respiratory department of the University Hospital of Nancy. The socio-economic characteristics were collected from the medical records. RESULTS: Recourse to a second practitioner was reported by 14 % of the patients suffering from lung cancer. It concerned more women than men and more patients with a higher educational level and socio-professional category. CONCLUSION: Requests for a second opinion by patients with lung cancer are not as frequent as expected. However, when they are made, it is more frequently by women and patients with a higher socio-economic status.

Which generic health related Quality of Life questionnaire should be used in older inpatients: comparison of the Duke Health Profile and the MOS Short-Form SF-36?

OBJECTIVES: The objective of our study was to compare advantages and limitations of two generic Quality of Life questionnaires administered in older inpatients. DESIGN: Two validated generic health-related Quality of Life instruments : the MOS Short-Form 36 (9 dimensions, 36 items) and the Duke Health Profile (6 dimensions, 4 dysfunctions, 17 items) were administered to inpatients over 65 years. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The sample was drawn from the CliniQualVie program that assessed systematically Quality of Life among hospitalized inpatients (18-79 years) in 10 medical and surgical wards at Nancy University Hospital. RESULTS: The two self-administered questionnaires were completed by 701 patients over 65 years at admission (mean age 71 +/- 4, 63% men). The proportion of patients who completed all items were 72.5% for the Duke and 66.9% for the SF-36 (p < .001). The Duke's internal consistency was low as compared with the SF-36, but other psychometric properties were comparable. Good correlations (Spearman) were observed between the two questionnaires for physical health (0.59, p < .0001), mental health (0.68, p < .0001) and health perception (0.56, p < .0001) scores. Low correlations were observed for the social score. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to our knowledge to assess the interest of using the Duke Health Profile in a general elderly inpatients population as compared with the SF-36 questionnaire. Although these two questionnaires have four comparable dimensions, they differ in their content and psychometric properties. The Duke questionnaire, due to its better completion rate and despite some psychometric limitations may be useful in this population, particularly in the more frail patients.

[Satisfaction of patients hospitalized in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam]. / Satisfaction des patients hospitalisés à Hô Chi Minh-Ville, Viet Nam.

This study aims to describe the level of satisfaction of patients and their families, according to the type of hospital and the sociodemographic characteristics of patients hospitalised within Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), Vietnam. The study is supported by a sample of 538 patients and their families from all of the hospitals in HCMC to whom an evaluation questionnaire was given to be filled out on the day of their release. The average age is 39, and 64.4% are women. The scores measuring the level of satisfaction vary from 57.7 to 90.7 points (on a scale of 0 to 100). The section under the heading "treatment provided by the doctors" received the highest scores (90.7/100). Dissatisfaction was primarily associated with factors such as the amount of time spent waiting, the behaviour of the hospital staff, cleanliness, the cafeteria and parking for motorbikes. Almost 100% of the patients spoke about their experiences during their stay in the hospital, and 50.2% had some negative opinions (1.042 complaints registered). The older patients, having a lower level of education and living either in other cities or in the rural region of HCMC, tented to be more satisfied than the younger patients, possessing higher levels of education and generally residing in the sub-urban or urban regions of HCMC. The patients who judged their condition to be very serious and their problems bad enough to justify hospitalisation, and who also felt that their health and condition had improved at the time of release compared to the time of admission were more satisfied than the other patients. Patients hospitalised who had an individual private room in a specialised hospital tended to be more satisfied that those who had a room sharing many beds for several patients in either a general hospital or in the emergency area of a specialised hospital. The authors observed no correlation between the level of satisfaction and the patient's gender. The results of this study have highlighed that certain domains, notably hat of the hospital's environment, should be reviewed and examined by health care administrators and managers in order to ensure the quality of the patient's care and coverage.