Urban Churches Show an Increase in Attendance, Donations, and Finances During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the USA: Evidence from the United Methodist Church.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on religion and its practice. This paper aims to examine how the pandemic affects religious activities, donations, and finances over time and across regions within the United Methodist Church (UMC) in the USA. To address this question, we analyze survey data collected during the pandemic from 2963 churches in the USA by United Methodist Communications. Our analysis utilizes several quantitative techniques, including Z-tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multinomial logistic regressions. The results indicate a decrease in church attendance over time, with a more pronounced effect observed in non-urban areas (suburban, small town, and rural). Similarly, while church donations and finances mitigate over time across churches, churches in urban areas experience a quicker rebound compared to those in non-urban areas. Lastly, we find that church attendance and donations positively affect finances. These findings hold important implications for churches in various regions, offering insights to develop strategies for navigating the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

A universal ratiometric method for Micro-RNA detection based on the ratio of electrochemical/electrochemiluminescence signal, and toehold-mediated strand displacement amplification.

An ultra-selective and reproductive ratiometric platform was introduced based on the ratio of Ru(phen)32+ electrochemiluminescence (ECL) signal and methylene blue (MB) electrochemistry (EC) signal, which was amplified using a specific and efficient toehold-mediated strand displacement (TMSD). The stable DNA nanoclews (NCs) were efficiently loaded with MB (MB-NCs) as EC signal tags after being synthesized utilizing a simple rolling circle amplification reaction. Besides, Ti3C2-based nanocomposite could apply as a superb carrier for both Ru(phen)32+ and gold nanoparticles (Ti3C2-Au-Ru), resulting in a nearly constant ECL internal reference to eliminate the possible interferences. The Ti3C2-Au-Ru was attached to the surface of the electrode using Nafion, which exhibited excellent conductivity, and hairpin DNAs (hDNAs) were fixed on AuNPs via an Au-S bond. The designed biosensor was finally applied for miRNA-18a detection as a target model. The TMSD method made it possible to concurrently convert and amplify a single miRNA-18ainput into a large amount of output DNAs with high selectivity. These output DNAs were designed to unfold the stem-locked area of hDNAs. The opened hDNAs then hybridized with the MB-NCs to produce an EC signal. In the proposed biosensing system, by raising the target concentration of miRNA, the EC signal gradually rose, the ECL signal remained nearly constant, and the ratiometric detection method markedly promoted biosensor accuracy. Linear correlations of the ratio value of the EC/ECL with miRNA-18a concentrations between 20 aM and 50 pMwere observed, with the limit of detection of 9 aM. The biosensor was applied to detect miRNA-18a in real serum samples with satisfactory results.

Pathway Analysis of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Coronaviruses are emerging threats for human health, as demonstrated by the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). SARS-CoV-2 is closely related to SARS-CoV-1, which was the cause of the 2002-2004 SARS outbreak, but SARS-CoV-1 has been the subject of a relatively limited number of studies. Understanding the potential pathways and molecular targets of SARS-CoV-1 will contribute to current drug repurposing strategies by helping to predict potential drug-disease associations. METHODS: A microarray dataset, GSE1739, of 10 SARS patients and 4 healthy controls was downloaded from NCBI's GEO repository, and differential expression was identified using NCBI's GEO2R software. Pathway and enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes was carried out using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, respectively. RESULTS: Our findings show that the drugs dexamethasone, filgrastim, interferon alfacon-1, and levodopa were among the most significant upstream regulators of differential gene expression in SARS patients, while neutrophil degranulation was the most significantly enriched pathway. CONCLUSION: An enhanced understanding of the pathways and molecular targets of SARS-CoV-1 in humans will contribute to current and future drug repurposing strategies, which are an essential tool to combat rapidly emerging health threats.

Ticagrelor vs placebo for the reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in pediatric sickle cell disease: the HESTIA3 study.

The phase 3 HESTIA3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of the reversible P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor vs placebo in preventing vaso-occlusive crises in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Patients aged 2 to 17 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive weight-based doses of ticagrelor or matching placebo. The primary end point was the rate of vaso-occlusive crises, a composite of painful crises and/or acute chest syndrome (ACS). Key secondary end points included number and duration of painful crises, number of ACS events, and number of vaso-occlusive crises requiring hospitalization or emergency department visits. Exploratory end points included the effect of ticagrelor on platelet activation. In total, 193 patients (ticagrelor, n = 101; placebo, n = 92) underwent randomization at 53 sites across 16 countries. The study was terminated 4 months before planned completion for lack of efficacy. Median ticagrelor exposure duration was 296.5 days. The primary end point was not met: estimated yearly incidence of vaso-occlusive crises was 2.74 in the ticagrelor group and 2.60 in the placebo group (rate ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.50; P = .7597). There was no evidence of efficacy for ticagrelor vs placebo across secondary end points. Median platelet inhibition with ticagrelor at 6 months was 34.9% predose and 55.7% at 2 hours' postdose. Nine patients (9%) in the ticagrelor group and eight patients (9%) in the placebo group had at least one bleeding event. In conclusion, no reduction of vaso-occlusive crises was seen with ticagrelor vs placebo in these pediatric patients with SCD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03615924.

Loading of Coal Tar in Polymeric Nanoparticles as a Potential Therapeutic Modality for Psoriasis.

Coal tar (CT) is a commonly used therapeutic agent in psoriasis treatment. CT formulations currently in clinical use have limitations such as toxicity and skin staining properties, leading to patient nonadherence. The purpose of this study was to develop a nanoparticle (NP) formulation for CT based on biocompatible poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA). CT was entrapped in PLGA NPs by nanoprecipitation, and the resulting NPs were characterized using dynamic light scattering and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to determine the particle size and CT loading efficiency, respectively. In vitro biocompatibility of the NPs was examined in human dermal fibroblasts. Permeation, washability, and staining experiments were carried out using skin-mimetic Strat-M membranes in Franz diffusion cells. The optimal CT-loaded PLGA NPs achieved 92% loading efficiency and were 133 nm in size with a polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.10 and a zeta potential of -40 mV, promoting colloidal stability during storage. CT NPs significantly reduced the cytotoxicity of crude CT in human dermal fibroblasts, maintaining more than 75% cell viability at the highest concentration tested, whereas an equivalent concentration of CT was associated with 28% viability. Permeation studies showed that only a negligible amount of CT NPs could cross the Strat-M membrane after 24 h, with 97% of the applied dose found accumulated within the membrane. The superiority of CT NPs was further demonstrated by the notably diminished staining ability and enhanced washability compared to those of crude CT. Our findings present a promising CT nanoformulation that can overcome its limitations in the treatment of psoriasis and other skin disorders.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of ticagrelor in infants and toddlers with sickle cell disease aged <24 months.

Inhibition of platelet activation may reduce vaso-occlusion rates in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). In the HESTIA4 (NCT03492931) study, 21 children with SCD received a single oral dose of the antiplatelet agent ticagrelor (0.1 mg/kg <6 months; 0.2 mg/kg ≥6 to <24 months). All patients had measurable ticagrelor plasma concentrations. Ticagrelor and active metabolite (AR-C124910XX) exposure were comparable across all groups (<6 months, ≥6 to <12 months and ≥12 to <24 months). Ticagrelor was well tolerated. Palatability was generally acceptable. These data will be used to enable dose selection for further investigations of ticagrelor efficacy and safety in children with SCD.

Development Strategy and Relative Bioavailability of a Pediatric Tablet Formulation of Ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ticagrelor is a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor approved as an antiplatelet drug for patients with acute coronary syndrome or a history of myocardial infarction. Ticagrelor is also being investigated for the reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease. A pediatric formulation suitable for this age range was developed; the development strategy is described. Primary objectives were determining the relative bioavailability of ticagrelor pediatric tablets and granules for oral suspension to the adult immediate-release tablet, and the pediatric tablets taken whole and dispersed/suspended in water to the granules for oral suspension. Bioequivalence between the pediatric tablet taken whole or suspended in water was also assessed. Secondary objectives were comparing the formulations' safety and tolerability. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, four-period, cross-over, single-dose study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed for ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals of the maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratios were contained completely within the 80.00-125.00% limits for ticagrelor/AR-C124910XX. RESULTS: Forty-four healthy adults (95% white; 57% male) were included. Similar bioavailability of ticagrelor (and AR-C124910XX) was demonstrated for all comparisons tested. Ticagrelor pediatric tablets taken whole were bioequivalent to pediatric tablets suspended in water. The plasma concentration-time profiles for ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX were similar, showing rapid ticagrelor absorption and AR-C124910XX formation. All formulations were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Similar bioavailability of a new pediatric dispersible tablet formulation of ticagrelor for use across a wide age range of pediatric patients was demonstrated compared with other oral ticagrelor formulations. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03126695. EUDRACT: 2017-000371-93.

Population Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Ticagrelor in Children with Sickle Cell Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ticagrelor, a reversible P2Y12 platelet inhibitor, is under investigation as a sickle cell disease (SCD) therapy in children. HESTIA1 (NCT02214121) was the first ticagrelor study generating pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD, P2Y12 reactivity units [PRU]), and safety data in 45 pediatric SCD patients. Population PK and PK/PD relationships for ticagrelor were quantified using a PK approach. METHODS: An adult population PK model was refined to describe ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX (active metabolite) plasma concentration and time data over a wide range of single/repeated ticagrelor doses (0.125-2.25 mg/kg). Population PK/PD modeling was used to describe the time course and extent of platelet inhibition. Demographic covariate relationships were investigated. RESULTS: The final population PK model adequately described ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX plasma concentrations over time. An allometric body weight relationship between ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX clearances and volumes of distribution was used. Significant covariates for ticagrelor were sex (relative bioavailability) and cholecystectomy (central volume of distribution). Estimated oral clearances (35 kg patient; median bodyweight) were 22.8 L/h (ticagrelor) and 9.97 L/h (AR-C124910XX). The final population PK/PD model well-described the time course and extent of platelet inhibition. Estimated baseline PRU was 283, maximum PRU effect was fixed at 1, and the ticagrelor concentration for half-maximum PRU effect was 233 nmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses offer the first quantitative characterization of the dose-exposure-response relationship for ticagrelor in pediatric SCD patients. This model-based approach may be used to inform dose selection and design of subsequent studies that aim to define ticagrelor safety and efficacy in pediatric SCD patients.

Bioequivalence of saxagliptin/metformin extended-release (XR) fixed-dose combination tablets and single-component saxagliptin and metformin XR tablets in healthy adult Chinese subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As compared with individual tablets, saxagliptin/metformin extended-release (XR) fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets offer the potential for increased patient compliance with the convenience of once daily dosing. The aim of the present study was to show that the FDC of saxagliptin and metformin XR is bioequivalent to co-administration of the individual components when given to Chinese subjects residing in China. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, cross-over pharmacokinetic study in two cohorts of healthy adult Chinese male subjects (n = 32 in each cohort) under fed conditions. In cohort 1, the pharmacokinetic properties of a saxagliptin/metformin XR 5/500 mg FDC tablet were compared with those of co-administration of a 5 mg saxagliptin tablet and a 500 mg metformin XR tablet. In cohort 2, the pharmacokinetic properties of a saxagliptin/metformin XR 5/1,000 mg FDC tablet were compared with those of co-administration of a 5 mg saxagliptin tablet and 2 × 500 mg metformin XR tablets. The two cohorts were independent of each other with respect to treatment and results. The pharmacokinetic properties of the active metabolite of saxagliptin (5-hydroxy-saxagliptin), as well as the safety and tolerability of each treatment, were also evaluated. RESULTS: For both cohorts, saxagliptin and metformin in the FDCs were bioequivalent to the individual components, as the limits of the 90 % confidence intervals of the geometric least squares mean ratios were contained within the 80-125 % bioequivalence limits for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve parameters and within the 70-143 % bioequivalence limits for the maximum plasma concentration. Similar exposures of 5-hydroxy-saxagliptin were observed with the two treatment regimens within each cohort. Co-administration of saxagliptin and metformin XR was generally safe and well tolerated as the FDCs or as individual tablets. CONCLUSION: Saxagliptin/metformin XR 5/500 mg and saxagliptin/metformin XR 5/1,000 mg FDCs were bioequivalent to individual tablets of saxagliptin and metformin XR of the same strengths and were generally well tolerated. These results in healthy Chinese subjects are consistent with those of previous assessments of saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC in the saxagliptin clinical development programme.

Effect of esomeprazole with/without acetylsalicylic acid, omeprazole and lansoprazole on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel was assessed in two healthy volunteer crossover studies. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Study 1: subjects received clopidogrel alone (300-mg loading dose, then 75 mg/day for 28 days) and two of three PPIs (omeprazole 80 mg, esomeprazole 40 mg or lansoprazole 60 mg) plus clopidogrel for 29 days in three treatment periods (randomized treatment sequence assignment). Study 2: subjects received clopidogrel alone (75 mg/day for 9 days) and clopidogrel alone for 4 days followed by clopidogrel plus fixed-combination esomeprazole 20 mg/low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 81 mg for 5 days in two treatment periods (randomized treatment sequence assignment). Pharmacokinetic effects were estimated by measuring active metabolite of clopidogrel, and pharmacodynamic effects by inhibition of adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation. RESULTS: There was a relative decrease of up to 50 % in exposure to the active metabolite of clopidogrel with the different PPIs (study 1), and close to 40 % with esomeprazole/low-dose ASA (study 2), compared with clopidogrel alone. There was an absolute decrease of up to 17 % in inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation with co-administration of different PPIs, compared with clopidogrel alone; however, no differences in platelet inhibition were observed during co-administration with the esomeprazole/low-dose ASA fixed-dose combination. CONCLUSION: Omeprazole, esomeprazole and lansoprazole decreased systemic exposure to the active metabolite of clopidogrel in healthy volunteers, leading to modest decreases in its antiplatelet effect. However, no apparent differences in platelet inhibition were observed when esomeprazole was co-administered with low-dose ASA as a fixed-dose combination.

Effect of food on the bioavailability of lesogaberan given as an oral solution or as modified-release capsules in healthy male volunteers.

The novel Type B gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAB)-receptor agonist lesogaberan (AZD3355) has been evaluated as an add-on to proton pump inhibitor treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease, but the effect of food on the bioavailability of this compound has not been assessed. In this openlabel crossover study, healthy males received single 100 mg doses of lesogaberan (oral solution (A) or oral modified release (MR) capsules with a dissolution rate of 50% (B) or 100% (C) over 4 h) with and without food. Blood plasma concentrations of lesogaberan were assessed over 48 h. A log-transformed geometric mean Cmax and AUC ratio within the 90% confidence interval (CI) range (0.80 - 1.25) was defined as excluding a clinically relevant food effect. Overall, 57 subjects completed the study. Only the oral lesogaberan solution had a fed/fasting Cmax ratio outside the 90% CI range (Cmax ratio: 0.76). AUC ratios were within the 90% CI limits for all three lesogaberan formulations. The only substantial change in tmax associated with food intake was observed for the oral solution (1.0 h without food, 1.8 h with food). In conclusion, a clinically relevant food effect could be excluded for the lesogaberan MR formulations, but not for the oral lesogaberan solution.

Pharmacokinetic profile of lesogaberan (AZD3355) in healthy subjects: a novel GABA(B)-receptor agonist reflux inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: Lesogaberan (AZD3355) is a novel reflux inhibitor developed as an add-on treatment to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for symptom relief in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who have a partial response to PPI therapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of lesogaberan in healthy subjects after single oral and intravenous administration of (14)C-labeled lesogaberan and non-(14)C-labeled lesogaberan. STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label, single-center, randomized, two-way crossover, phase I study. PARTICIPANTS: Ten healthy male subjects took part in the study. INTERVENTION: Volunteers were randomized to receive a single dose of either orally dosed (100 mg) or intravenously infused (20 mg) non-(14)C-labeled lesogaberan, and then orally (100 mg) or intravenously (20 mg) administered (14)C-labeled lesogaberan in a crossover design. Treatment periods were separated by a washout period of at least 7 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Analyses of the rate and route of excretion, dose recovery, area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC), AUC to the last quantifiable concentration, maximal plasma concentration (C(max)), time to C(max), the apparent elimination half-life, bioavailability, total clearance, renal clearance, fraction of the bioavailable dose excreted unchanged in the urine, cumulative amount of drug excreted unchanged in urine, and the apparent volume of distribution at steady state of lesogaberan. RESULTS: Lesogaberan was rapidly and extensively absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and C(max) was achieved within 1-2 hours of oral dosing. The terminal half-life of lesogaberan was between 11 and 13 hours. Renal clearance accounted for approximately 22% of total body clearance. Based on the recovery of administered radioactivity, approximately 84% of the dose was excreted into the urine either as the parent compound or as water-soluble metabolite(s). There were no safety concerns raised during the study. CONCLUSION: Orally administered lesogaberan is rapidly absorbed with high bioavailability and the majority of the dose is excreted by the kidneys either as the parent compound or as metabolites. The major elimination pathway for lesogaberan in man is metabolism.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between lesogaberan (AZD3355) and esomeprazole in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) have been identified as a primary cause of reflux events in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). GABA(B) receptor agonists such as lesogaberan (AZD3355) have been shown to inhibit TLESRs in healthy subjects and patients with GERD, and, therefore, offer a novel therapeutic add-on strategy to acid suppression for the management of GERD. As lesogaberan is being developed as an add-on treatment for the management of patients with GERD who have a partial response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, it is important to rule out any clinically important pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between lesogaberan and PPIs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics and safety of lesogaberan and vice versa. STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label, randomized, three-way crossover study. The study was open to healthy adult male and female subjects. The study subjects received treatment with, in random order, lesogaberan (150 mg twice daily [dose interval 12 hours]), esomeprazole (40 mg once daily), and a combination of both, during 7-day treatment periods. MAIN OUTCOME: The presence or absence of pharmacokinetic interactions between lesogaberan and esomeprazole was assessed by measuring the steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curves during the dosing interval (AUC(τ)) and the maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) for lesogaberan and esomeprazole. RESULTS: Thirty male subjects (mean age 23.2 years, 97% Caucasian) were randomized to treatment and 28 subjects completed the study (one subject was lost to follow-up, and one subject discontinued due to an adverse event). The 95% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for AUC(τ) and C(max) of lesogaberan and esomeprazole administered alone and concomitantly were within the recognized boundaries of bioequivalence (0.8-1.25). No new safety concerns were raised during this study. The number of patients with adverse events during treatment with lesogaberan alone (n = 17) and concomitantly with esomeprazole (n = 18) were comparable but higher than with esomeprazole alone (n = 10). Paresthesia (episodic, mild, and transient), pharyngitis, and flatulence were the most frequently reported adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: There was no observed pharmacokinetic interaction between lesogaberan and esomeprazole when concomitantly administered to healthy subjects, and concomitant therapy was well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (clinicaltrials.gov): NCT00684190.

A new esomeprazole packet (sachet) formulation for suspension: in vitro characteristics and comparative pharmacokinetics versus intact capsules/tablets in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: A packet (sachet) formulation of esomeprazole for suspension has been developed for use in patients who have difficulty swallowing. OBJECTIVES: This article reports the in vitro characteristics of the new esomeprazole formulation, including stability in suspension and suitability for administration orally or via enteral tubes. It also describes the pharmacokinetic profile of the esomeprazole 40-mg packet compared with that of existing solid dosage forms (capsules and tablets) in a clinical bioequivalence study. METHODS: The stability in suspension of the packet formulation was assessed after reconstitution at various strengths (2.5, 10, and 40 mg) and a different pH (3.4-5.0) in strength-appropriate volumes of water held at temperatures ranging from 5 degrees C to 37 degrees C for up to 60 minutes. Suitability for oral administration was examined in terms of reconstitution time and the actual dose delivered after simulated oral administration, as well as in terms of the actual dose delivered by enteral tubes ranging in diameter from 6 to 20 Fr. Chemical stability and suspension characteristics were also analyzed using alternative reconstitution vehicles (applesauce, apple juice, and orange juice). The comparative pharmacokinetics of the packet, capsule, and tablet formulations of esomeprazole were evaluated in a randomized, open-label, 3-way crossover study in healthy volunteers, who received single 40-mg doses of each formulation. Bioequivalence was assumed if the 90% CIs for the ratios of the geometric mean AUC and CmaX were between 0.80 and 1.25. Reversephase liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection was used to assess the esomeprazole content and/or degradation products of esomeprazole in the tests for in-suspension stability, dose delivery, and acid resistance. Normal-phase liquid chromatography was used to assess the esomeprazole content of the plasma samples in the bioequivalence study. RESULTS: At the pH and temperature ranges investigated, the packet formulation was stable for up to 60 minutes after reconstitution. Chemical degradation was low (<0.1%) for all reconstitution vehicles investigated. Reconstitution time was 2 minutes with water and 9 to 10 minutes with apple or orange juice. Dose delivery was >/=98% after simulated oral administration and was generally >/=96% after administration via enteral tubes. Ninety-six healthy volunteers (56 women, 40 men; mean age, 24.9 years; mean weight, 68.9 kg) participated in the randomized, crossover, comparative pharmacokinetic study of the packet and capsule/tablet formulations. The estimated ratios of the geometric mean AUC and C(max) for the packet:capsule and packet: tablet formulations were 0.98 (90% CI, 0.93-1.03) and 0.99 (90% CI, 0.94-1.04), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In these analyses, the packet (sachet) formulation of esomeprazole was chemically stable in suspension and when administered orally and via enteral tubes. The formulation had a short reconstitution time, remaining fully dispersed in water for at least 30 minutes, and was dispersed in applesauce, apple juice, or orange juice without compromising its stability or dispersion characteristics. The packet formulation met the regulatory definition for bioequivalence to the tablet and capsule formulations.

Pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole following varying intravenous administration rates.

There are situations where the use of an oral proton pump inhibitors is not possible. In such situations an intravenous route is the preferred alternative. An intravenous formulation of esomeprazole has recently been developed. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of single-dose intravenous esomeprazole using different rates of administration. The study was an open randomised, cross-over design in healthy male and female (n = 24). Esomeprazole 40 mg intravenously was administrated as an infusion over 10, 15, 20 or 30 min., or esomeprazole 20 mg intravenously as an injection over 3 min. There was a wash-out period of at least 6 days between dose regimens. It was demonstrated that increasing the rate of intravenous infusion of esomeprazole 40 mg resulted in higher Cmax values (geometric means; 5.2-7.6 micromol/l), but the AUC values remained relatively constant (7.1-7.2 micromor/l). As expected esomeprazole 20 mg administered as a 3 min. intravenous injection had lower Cmax (3.6 micromol/l) and AUC (2.9 micromol.r/l) values than any of the infusions of esomeprazole 40 mg. Intravenous esomeprazole was well tolerated in this study. In conclusion, any variation in the infusion rate of esomeprazole 40 mg intravenously has little effect on the pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole in healthy volunteers, which provides flexibility in the choice of dosing regimens.

Intravenous esomeprazole (40 mg and 20 mg) inhibits gastric acid secretion as effectively as oral esomeprazole: results of two randomized clinical studies.

OBJECTIVES: Two studies compared the effects of intravenous (i.v.) and oral esomeprazole (40 mg and 20 mg) on gastric acid suppression and pharmacokinetics after both single (day 1) and repeated (day 5) dosing. METHODS: Two randomized, two-way, cross-over, comparative studies of similar design were performed in healthy male and female volunteers. In both studies, subjects received esomeprazole as a 30-min i.v. infusion or orally once-daily for 5 days, separated by a wash-out period of at least 13 days. In one study, which was double-blind (double dummy), subjects received 40 mg esomeprazole. In the other open study, subjects were given 20 mg esomeprazole. RESULTS: In total, 40 and 24 subjects were randomized for treatment with 40 mg and 20 mg esomeprazole, respectively. No significant differences were found between i.v or oral administration of esomeprazole with respect to the amount of time with mean intragastric pH>4 throughout day 1 or day 5 of treatment in the 40 mg study (day 1, 10.1 h and 8.8 h versus day 5, 15.9 h and 15.3 h, respectively) and the 20 mg study (day 1, 7.3 h and 6.6 h versus day 5, 11.9 h and 12.3 h, respectively). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve values were higher following i.v. relative to oral administration on day 1 of dosing, with less pronounced differences after repeated (day 5) dosing. Both administration routes were similarly well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole, 40 mg and 20 mg i.v., provides similar levels of intragastric acid control on both day 1 and day 5 of treatment compared with oral administration.

Intravenous Esomeprazole 40mg is Effective for the Control of Intragastric Acid Levels Whether Given as a 3-Minute Injection or a 30-Minute Infusion.

BACKGROUND: An intravenous (IV) formulation of esomeprazole has been developed as an alternative to oral administration. To meet the needs of different clinical situations it would be preferable if an IV dose could be administered as either an injection or an infusion, while producing similar effects. AIM: To compare the effects of IV esomeprazole 40mg given as a 3-minute injection or a 30-minute infusion on intragastric pH during single and repeated once-daily dosing in healthy subjects. METHODS: In this single-centre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, two- way crossover study, subjects were randomised to receive either a 3-minute IV injection or a 30-minute IV infusion of esomeprazole 40mg. Both regimens were given once daily for 10 days. After a washout period of at least 13 days, subjects were crossed over to the other treatment. Intragastric pH monitoring was performed on days 1 and 10. Blood samples were also taken throughout days 1 and 10. RESULTS: Data were available from 41 subjects. Time with intragastric pH >4 was 3.1h/24h at baseline, increasing to almost 8h in association with IV esomeprazole injection or infusion on day 1, and to >13h on day 10. Geometric mean time with pH >4/24h ratios (injection/infusion) were 0.99 on day 1 and 1.03 on day 10. Mean esomeprazole AUC values were approximately 15% higher with the injection than the infusion, but 90% CI limits for geometric mean AUC ratios ranged from 1.07 to 1.23, indicating bioequivalence. CONCLUSIONS: IV esomeprazole 40mg provides similarly potent acid control whether administered by injection or infusion.