ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: An endoilluminated infusion cannula has been designed to enhance visualization when performing a bimanual anterior chamber vitrectomy. Although routinely used in posterior vitreous surgery, endoillumination has been sparingly described and used in complex anterior segment procedures. This instrument, with or without the use of triamcinolone staining, may add to the safety and efficacy when the cataract surgeon must perform an anterior vitrectomy. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Subject(s)
Anterior Eye Segment/surgery , Catheters , Lighting/instrumentation , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Equipment Design , HumansABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the precision of laser anterior capsulotomy compared with that of manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC). SETTING: Asociación Para Evitar La Ceguera en México IAP, Hospital Dr. Luis Sánchez Bulnes, Mexico City, Mexico. DESIGN: Nonrandomized single-center clinical trial. METHODS: In patients presenting for cataract surgery, the LensAR Laser System was used to create a laser anterior capsulotomy of the surgeon's desired size. Capsule buttons were retrieved and measured and then compared with buttons retrieved from eyes having a manually torn CCC. Deviation from the intended diameter and the regularity of shape were assessed. When removing the capsule buttons at the start of surgery, the surgeon rated the ease of removal on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = required manual capsulorhexis around the whole diameter; 10 = button free floating or required no manual detachment from remaining capsule during removal). RESULTS: The mean deviation from the intended diameter was 0.16 mm ± 0.17 (SD) for laser anterior capsulotomy and 0.42 ± 0.54 mm for CCC (P=.03). The mean absolute deviation from the intended diameter was 0.20 ± 0.12 mm and 0.49 ± 0.47 mm, respectively (P=.003). The mean of the average squared residuals was 0.01 ± 0.03 and 0.02 ± 0.04, respectively (P=.09). The median rating of the ease of removal was 9 (range 5 to 10). CONCLUSIONS: Laser anterior capsulotomy created a more precise capsule opening than CCC, and the buttons created by the laser procedure were easy to remove at the beginning of cataract surgery.
Subject(s)
Capsulorhexis/methods , Laser Therapy , Lens Capsule, Crystalline/surgery , Phacoemulsification/methods , Humans , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Lens Implantation, IntraocularABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of twice-daily, preservative-free ketorolac 0.45% (Acuvail; Allergan, Inc, Irvine, California, USA) administration for treatment of inflammation and pain after cataract surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial. METHODS: Two multicenter, double-masked studies randomized 511 cataract surgery patients (2:1) to receive twice-daily ketorolac 0.45% or vehicle in the operative eye for 16 days, beginning 1 day before surgery. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with a summed ocular inflammation score of 0 for anterior chamber cell and flare on postoperative day 14. The main secondary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with no pain on postoperative day 1. RESULTS: On day 14, 52.5% of ketorolac patients and 26.5% of vehicle patients had an summed ocular inflammation score of 0 (P < .001). On day 1, 72.4% of ketorolac patients and 39.7% of vehicle patients had a pain score of 0 (P < .001). Median time to pain resolution was 1 day in the ketorolac group and 2 days in the vehicle group (P < .001). The percentage of ketorolac and vehicle patients who had a +3-line or more improvement in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline was 60.5% versus 44.0% on day 14 (P = .002). Overall, adverse events were more prevalent in the vehicle group than in the ketorolac group (48.5% vs 35.2%; P = .004). Burning or stinging (per a composite Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities) was reported by 1.5% of ketorolac patients and 0.6% of vehicle patients. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-daily ketorolac 0.45% was well tolerated and effectively treated inflammation and pain following cataract surgery.
Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Eye Pain/drug therapy , Ketorolac/administration & dosage , Phacoemulsification , Uveitis, Anterior/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Eye Pain/etiology , Female , Humans , Ketorolac/adverse effects , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Uveitis, Anterior/etiology , Visual Acuity/physiologyABSTRACT
The iStent trabecular micro-bypass system (Glaukos Corp. Laguna Hills, CA) was developed to address the limitations of current medical and surgical therapies for glaucoma treatment. The iStent((R)) is inserted ab interno through a small temporal clear corneal incision, bypassing the trabecular meshwork and placed in Schlemm's canal at the lower nasal quadrant. Implantation of this stent into Schlemm's canal allows aqueous humor to drain directly from the anterior chamber into Schlemm's canal bypassing the obstructed trabecular meshwork. For this review, a Medline search was performed using the terms "trabecular micro-bypass stent" and "trabecular bypass stent." The online abstract database for the American Academy of Ophthalmology was also reviewed. Abstracts which duplicated published articles were excluded. All relevant papers (n is equal to three) and abstracts (n is equal to one) were included in this review. Multiple, prospective multi-country, clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of iStent in reducing IOP, when compared to traditional treatment modalities, while reducing/ eliminating the need for ocular antihypertensive drugs when implanted in OAG patients during combined cataract surgery or in patients with glaucoma refractory to traditional treatment modalities.
ABSTRACT
Intraoperative floppy-iris syndrome (IFIS) is associated with the use of systemic alpha(1)-antagonists, and tamsulosin in particular. The incidence and severity of IFIS are variable; however, the syndrome is associated with a higher rate of cataract surgical complications, especially when the condition is not recognized or anticipated. Questioning cataract patients preoperatively about current or previous use of alpha(1)-antagonists is therefore important. Intraoperative floppy-iris syndrome surgical management strategies include pharmacologic measures, the use of high-viscosity ophthalmic viscosurgical devices, and mechanical dilating devices. However, sphincterotomies and pupil stretching are ineffective. Whether used alone or in combination, these small-pupil techniques improve the surgical success rate in these cases. Stopping the alpha(1)-antagonist preoperatively is of questionable value.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/adverse effects , Cataract Extraction , Intraoperative Complications , Iris Diseases/chemically induced , Pupil/drug effects , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists , Humans , Iris Diseases/metabolism , Iris Diseases/prevention & control , Male , Muscle, Smooth/metabolism , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1/metabolism , Syndrome , TamsulosinABSTRACT
According to an online survey, most members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery believe that tamsulosin makes cataract surgery more difficult (95%) and increases the risks of surgery (77%). Commonly reported complications of intraoperative floppy-iris syndrome (IFIS) were significant iris trauma and posterior capsule rupture, with 52% and 23% of respondents, respectively, reporting these complications at a higher rate than in non-IFIS eyes. There was no single preferred surgical method for managing IFIS; 33% of respondents routinely used multiple strategies. Of respondents with sufficient experience, 90% believe that IFIS is more likely with tamsulosin than with nonspecific alpha1-antagonists. Ninety-one percent believe that physicians prescribing alpha1-antagonists should become better educated about IFIS, and 59% would recommend a pretreatment ophthalmic evaluation for patients with cataracts or decreased vision. If they themselves had mildly symptomatic cataracts, 64% of respondents would avoid taking tamsulosin or would have their cataract removed first.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists , Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/adverse effects , Cataract Extraction , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Iris Diseases/prevention & control , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Health Surveys , Humans , Iris Diseases/chemically induced , Male , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Societies, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Syndrome , United StatesSubject(s)
Astigmatism/surgery , Cataract Extraction/methods , Cataract/complications , Corneal Diseases/surgery , Limbus Corneae/surgery , Nomograms , Astigmatism/complications , Astigmatism/physiopathology , Cataract/etiology , Cataract Extraction/adverse effects , Corneal Diseases/complications , Corneal Diseases/physiopathology , Eyeglasses , Humans , Ocular Hypertension/etiology , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
An online survey of members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery indicated a strong preference for preoperative and postoperative topical antibiotic prophylaxis, with most surgeons favoring latest generation topical fluoroquinolones. A significant percentage of surgeons reported being concerned about the risks of homemade intracameral antibiotic preparations, and there was a strong desire to have a commercially available antibiotic approved for intracameral injection. This is reflected in the fact that 77% of respondents were still not injecting intracameral antibiotics, but 82% would likely do so if a reasonably priced commercial preparation were available.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Cataract Extraction , Endophthalmitis/prevention & control , Eye Infections, Bacterial/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Anterior Chamber/drug effects , Endophthalmitis/microbiology , Eye Infections, Bacterial/microbiology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/microbiology , Societies, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
Refractive cataract surgery has become a reality for the modern phacosurgeon, and control of astigmatism plays a vital role in this quest for optical refractive outcomes. Fortunately, a number of effective options exist to minimize postoperative cylinder. These include placing the cataract incision on the steep corneal meridians; use of adjunctive corneal or limbal relaxing incisions; or even using advanced technology, such as the excimer laser. Careful attention must be directed to the measurement of pre-existing astigmatism, and a detailed surgical strategy must then be formulated. Finally, one must be able to avail themselves of enhancement techniques to address residual astigmatism.
Subject(s)
Astigmatism/surgery , Cataract Extraction/methods , Cataract/complications , Astigmatism/complications , Humans , Refraction, Ocular , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To study the theoretical optical performance of 3 intraocular lens (IOL) designs in the presence of IOL decentration. SETTING: Optics Center, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York, USA. METHODS: A ray-tracing program was used to evaluate the effect of IOL decentration on the optical performance of 3 silicone IOLs (LI61U, Bausch & Lomb; Tecnis Z9000, Advanced Medical Optics; and a new aberration-free IOL [SofPort AO, Bausch & Lomb]) in an experimental model eye. The study was done using pupil diameters of 3.0 mm, 4.0 mm, and 5.0 mm and IOL decentrations of 0 mm, 0.25 mm, 0.50 mm, 0.75 mm, and 1.00 mm. The modulation transfer functions were computed and plotted. A Monte Carlo simulation analysis with 1000 trials with IOL decentration randomly varying for each pupil size was performed. RESULTS: Decentration of LI61U and Tecnis Z9000 IOLs led to asymmetrical higher-order aberrations that adversely affected the optical performance of the model eye; performance was not affected with the aberration-free IOL because it lacks inherent spherical aberration. Optical performance with the aberration-free IOL was better than with the LI61U IOL as the former has less spherical aberration and did not introduce other aberrations when decentered. Performance with the aberration-free IOL was better than with the Tecnis Z9000 IOL for 3.0 mm, 4.0 mm, and 5.0 mm pupils when decentration exceeded 0.15 mm, 0.30 mm, and 0.38 mm, respectively. Performance with the LI61U IOL was better than with the Tecnis Z9000 IOL for 3.0 mm, 4.0 mm, and 5.0 mm pupils when decentration exceeded 0.3 mm, 0.5 mm, and 0.5 mm, respectively. Monte Carlo simulations showed the expected postoperative results of the LI61U IOL and aberration-free IOL would be repeatable and predictable, whereas the outcomes with the Tecnis Z9000 IOL would vary widely. CONCLUSIONS: The optical performance of the model eye was not affected by decentration of an aspheric IOL designed to have no inherent spherical aberration. With decentration, the performance with the new IOL was better than with a conventional spherical IOL and an aspheric IOL designed to offset the spherical aberration of an average cornea.
Subject(s)
Foreign-Body Migration/physiopathology , Lenses, Intraocular , Optics and Photonics , Biocompatible Materials , Humans , Models, Biological , Monte Carlo Method , Prosthesis Design , Pupil/physiology , Silicone ElastomersABSTRACT
An increasingly important goal of modern cataract and implant surgery is to obtain the most desirable refractive outcome for our patients, and in so doing, decrease their dependence upon spectacle correction. Refined spherical outcomes are now achieved by directing close attention to biometry technique, through the use of third generation intraocular lens (IOL) power formulae, and refinements in technology such as partial coherence interferometry. Similarly, improvements in astigmatic outcomes are now possible by focusing upon and obtaining more accurate preoperative cylinder measurements, careful surgical planning particularly in regard to incision(s) design, use of toric IOLs, and employing advanced postoperative enhancement techniques. Because of these refinements in technique and technology, the field of cataract and implant surgery has emerged as a true and recognized form of refractive surgery.