Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(8): ofac344, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35928506

ABSTRACT

Background: Pathogen detection has changed with increased use of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs). CIDTs do not yield isolates, which are necessary to detect outbreaks using whole-genome sequencing. The Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) monitors clinical laboratory testing practices to improve interpretation of surveillance data and assess availability of isolates. We describe changes in practices over 8 years. Methods: During 2012-2019, 10 FoodNet sites collected standardized data about practices in clinical laboratories (range, 664-723 laboratories) for select enteric pathogens. We assessed changes in practices. Results: During 2012-2019, the percentage of laboratories that used only culture methods decreased, with the largest declines for Vibrio (99%-57%) and Yersinia (99%-60%). During 2019, the percentage of laboratories using only CIDTs was highest for Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (43%), Campylobacter (34%), and Vibrio (34%). From 2015 to 2019, the percentage of laboratories that performed reflex culture after a positive CIDT decreased, with the largest declines for Shigella (75%-42%) and Salmonella (70%-38%). The percentage of laboratories that routinely submitted isolates to a public health laboratory decreased for all bacterial pathogens examined from 2015 to 2019. Conclusions: By increasing use of CIDTs and decreasing reflex culture, clinical laboratories have transferred the burden of isolate recovery to public health laboratories. Until technologies allow for molecular subtyping directly from a patient specimen, state public health laboratories should consider updating enteric disease reporting requirements to include submission of isolates or specimens. Public health laboratories need resources for isolate recovery.

2.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 5(7): ofy148, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30568988

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relationship between socioeconomic status and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is not well understood. However, recent studies in Connecticut and New York City found that as census tract poverty (CTP) decreased, rates of STEC increased. To explore this nationally, we analyzed surveillance data from laboratory-confirmed cases of STEC from 2010-2014 for all Foodborne Disease Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) sites, population 47.9 million. METHODS: Case residential data were geocoded and linked to CTP level (2010-2014 American Community Survey). Relative rates were calculated comparing incidence in census tracts with <20% of residents below poverty with those with ≥20%. Relative rates of age-adjusted 5-year incidence per 100 000 population were determined for all STEC, hospitalized only and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) cases overall, by demographic features, FoodNet site, and surveillance year. RESULTS: There were 5234 cases of STEC; 26.3% were hospitalized, and 5.9% had HUS. Five-year incidence was 10.9/100 000 population. Relative STEC rates for the <20% compared with the ≥20% CTP group were >1.0 for each age group, FoodNet site, surveillance year, and race/ethnic group except Asian. Relative hospitalization and HUS rates tended to be higher than their respective STEC relative rates. CONCLUSIONS: Persons living in lower CTP were at higher risk of STEC than those in the highest poverty census tracts. This is unlikely to be due to health care-seeking or diagnostic bias as it applies to analysis limited to hospitalized and HUS cases. Research is needed to better understand exposure differences between people living in the lower vs highest poverty-level census tracts to help direct prevention efforts.

3.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 13(12): 674-678, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27676287

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Molecular subtyping of pathogens is critical for foodborne disease outbreak detection and investigation. Many clusters initially identified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) are not confirmed as point-source outbreaks. We evaluated characteristics of clusters that can help prioritize investigations to maximize effective use of limited resources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multiagency collaboration (FoodNet) collected data on Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157 clusters for 3 years. Cluster size, timing, extent, and nature of epidemiologic investigations were analyzed to determine associations with whether the cluster was identified as a confirmed outbreak. RESULTS: During the 3-year study period, 948 PFGE clusters were identified; 849 (90%) were Salmonella and 99 (10%) were E. coli O157. Of those, 192 (20%) were ultimately identified as outbreaks (154 [18%] of Salmonella and 38 [38%] of E. coli O157 clusters). Successful investigation was significantly associated with larger cluster size, more rapid submission of isolates (e.g., for Salmonella, 6 days for outbreaks vs. 8 days for nonoutbreaks) and PFGE result reporting to investigators (16 days vs. 29 days, respectively), and performance of analytic studies (completed in 33% of Salmonella outbreaks vs. 1% of nonoutbreaks) and environmental investigations (40% and 1%, respectively). Intervals between first and second cases in a cluster did not differ significantly between outbreaks and nonoutbreaks. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular subtyping of pathogens is a rapidly advancing technology, and successfully identifying outbreaks will vary by pathogen and methods used. Understanding criteria for successfully investigating outbreaks is critical for efficiently using limited resources.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Escherichia coli O157/isolation & purification , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Models, Biological , Salmonella Food Poisoning/microbiology , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Disease Notification , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli O157/classification , Food Safety , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Gastroenteritis/microbiology , Humans , Molecular Typing , Prospective Studies , Public Health Practice , Salmonella/classification , Salmonella Food Poisoning/epidemiology , Spatio-Temporal Analysis , United States/epidemiology , United States Department of Agriculture , United States Food and Drug Administration
4.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 8(4): 555-60, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21186994

ABSTRACT

Clinical laboratory practices affect patient care and disease surveillance. It is recommended that laboratories routinely use both culture for Escherichia coli O157 and a method that detects Shiga toxins (Stx) to identify all Stx-producing E. coli (STEC) and that labs send broths or isolates to a public health laboratory. In 2007, we surveyed laboratories serving Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network sites that performed on-site enteric disease diagnostic testing to determine their culture and nonculture-based testing practices for STEC identification. Our goals were to measure changes over time in laboratory practices and to compare reported practices with published recommendations. Overall, 89% of laboratories used only culture-based methods, 7% used only Stx enzyme immunoassay (EIA), and 4% used both Stx EIA and culture-based methods. Only 2% of laboratories reported simultaneous culture for O157 STEC and use of Stx EIA. The proportion that ever used Stx EIA increased from 6% in 2003 to 11% in 2007. The proportion that routinely tested all specimens with at least one method was 66% in 2003 versus 71% in 2007. Reference laboratories were less likely than others to test all specimens routinely by one or more of these methods (48% vs. 73%, p=0.03). As of 2007, most laboratories complied with recommendations for O157 STEC testing by culture but not with recommendations for detection of non-O157 STEC. The proportion of laboratories that culture stools for O157 STEC has changed little since 2003, whereas testing for Stx has increased.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Typing Techniques , Enteritis/microbiology , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Sentinel Surveillance , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/classification , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Bacterial Typing Techniques/trends , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Escherichia coli Infections/diagnosis , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli O157/classification , Escherichia coli O157/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli O157/metabolism , Feces/microbiology , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Shiga Toxin/metabolism , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/metabolism , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL