Transfemoral TAVI using the self-expanding ACURATE neo prosthesis: one-year outcomes of the multicentre "CE-approval cohort".

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and performance of the ACURATE neo transcatheter heart valve and its transfemoral delivery system. METHODS AND RESULTS: The prospective, multicentre "CE-approval cohort" consists of a prospective series of the first 89 patients implanted with the ACURATE neo prosthesis. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Mean patient age was 83.7±4.4 years and logistic EuroSCORE I was 26.5±7.7%. Procedural success was obtained in 84 patients (94.4%). At 30 days, three patients had died, and two major strokes and one reintervention for a ventricular septal defect occurred, leading to a major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rate of 6.7%. Eight patients (10.3%) received a permanent pacemaker. At one year, 20 patients (22.5%) had died and the MACCE rate was 27%. Effective orifice area was 1.76±0.34 cm2, and mean gradient 7.5±2.8 mmHg. Only three patients (4.5%) had moderate paravalvular regurgitation. NYHA Class III/IV was present in 94.4% of patients at baseline, in 9.9% at 30 days and in 4.5% at one year post procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This first-in-human experience with a novel self-expanding heart valve showed low rates of procedural mortality, major stroke and pacemaker implantation, and good performance outcomes.

Transfemoral TAVI using the self-expanding ACURATE neo prosthesis: one-year outcomes of the multicentre “CE-approval cohort”

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and performance of the ACURATE neo transcatheter heart valve and its transfemoral delivery system.Methods and results: The prospective, multicentre “CE-approval cohort” consists of a prospective series of the first 89 patients implanted with the ACURATE neo prosthesis. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Mean patient age was 83.7±4.4 years and logistic EuroSCORE I was 26.5±7.7%.Procedural success was obtained in 84 patients (94.4%). At 30 days, three patients had died, and two major strokes and one reintervention for a ventricular septal defect occurred, leading to a major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rate of 6.7%. Eight patients (10.3%) received a permanent pacemaker.At one year, 20 patients (22.5%) had died and the MACCE rate was 27%. Effective orifice area was 1.76±0.34 cm2, and mean gradient 7.5±2.8 mmHg. Only three patients (4.5%) had moderate paravalvular regurgitation. NYHA Class III/IV was present in 94.4% of patients at baseline, in 9.9% at 30 days and in 4.5% at one year post procedure.Conclusions: This first-in-human experience with a novel self-expanding heart valve showed low rates of procedural mortality, major stroke and pacemaker implantation, and good performance outcomes.

Blood transfusion and the risk of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusion is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to elucidate in more detail the relation between blood transfusion and AKI and its effects on short- and long-term mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nine hundred ninety-five patients with aortic stenosis underwent TAVI with the Medtronic CoreValve or the Edwards Valve in 7 centers. AKI was defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium (absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL [≥26.4 µmol/L] or ≥50% increase ≤72 hours). Logistic and Cox regression was used for predictor and survival analysis. AKI occurred in 20.7% (n=206). The number of units of blood transfusion ≤24 hours was the strongest predictor of AKI (≥5 units, OR, 4.81 [1.45-15.95], 3-4 units, OR, 3.05 [1.24-7.53], 1-2 units, OR, 1.47 [0.98-2.22]) followed by peripheral vascular disease (OR, 1.48 [1.05-2.10]), history of heart failure (OR, 1.43 [1.01-2.03]), leucocyte count ≤72 hours after TAVI (OR, 1.05 [1.02-1.09]) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE; OR, 1.02 [1.00-1.03]). Potential triggers of blood transfusion such as baseline anemia, bleeding-vascular complications, and perioperative blood loss were not identified as predictors. AKI and life-threatening bleeding were independent predictors of 30-day mortality (OR, 3.15 [1.56-6.38], OR, 6.65 [2.28-19.44], respectively), whereas transfusion (≥3 units), baseline anemia, and AKI predicted mortality beyond 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: AKI occurred in 21% of the patients after TAVI. The number of blood transfusions but not the indication of transfusion predicted AKI. AKI was a predictor of both short- and long-term mortality, whereas blood transfusion predicted long-term mortality. These findings indicate that outcome of TAVI may be improved by more restrictive use of blood transfusions.

First-in-man use of a novel embolic protection device for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

AIMS: We describe the first-in-human experience with a novel cerebral embolic protection device used during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). One current challenge of TAVI is the reduction of procedural stroke. Procedural mobilisation of debris is a known source of cerebral embolisation. Mechanical protection by transient filtration of cerebral blood flow might reduce the embolic burden during TAVI. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the Claret CE Pro™ cerebral protection device in patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients scheduled for TAVI were prospectively enrolled at three centres. The Claret CE Pro™ (Claret Medical, Inc. Santa Rosa, CA, USA) cerebral protection device was placed via the right radial/brachial artery prior to TAVI and was removed after the procedure. The primary endpoint was technical success rate. Secondary endpoints encompassed procedural and 30-day stroke rates, as well as device-related complications. Deployment of the Claret CE Pro™ cerebral protection device was intended for use in 40 patients, 35 devices were implanted into the aortic arch. Technical success rate with delivery of the proximal and distal filter was 60% for the first generation device and 87% for the second-generation device. Delivery times for the first-generation device were 12.4±12.1 minutes and 4.4 ± 2.5 minutes for the second-generation device (p<0.05). The quantity of contrast used related to the Claret CE Pro System was 19.6 ± 3.8 ml. Captured debris was documented in at least 19 of 35 implanted devices (54.3%). No procedural transient ischaemic attacks, minor strokes or major strokes occurred. Thirty-day follow-up showed one minor stroke occurring 30 days after the procedure, and two major strokes both occurring well after the patient had completed TAVI. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Claret CE Pro™ system is feasible and safe. Capture of debris in more than half of the patients provides evidence for the potential to reduce the procedural cerebral embolic burden utilising this dedicated filter system during TAVI.

First-in-man use of a novel embolic protection device forpatients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Aims: We describe the first-in-human experience with a novel cerebral embolic protection device used duringtranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). One current challenge of TAVI is the reduction of proceduralstroke. Procedural mobilisation of debris is a known source of cerebral embolisation. Mechanicalprotection by transient filtration of cerebral blood flow might reduce the embolic burden during TAVI. Weaimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the Claret CE Pro™ cerebral protection device in patientsundergoing TAVI.Methods and results: Patients scheduled for TAVI were prospectively enrolled at three centres. The ClaretCE Pro™ (Claret Medical, Inc. Santa Rosa, CA, USA) cerebral protection device was placed via the right radial/brachial artery prior to TAVI and was removed after the procedure. The primary endpoint was technical successrate. Secondary endpoints encompassed procedural and 30-day stroke rates, as well as device-related complications.Deployment of the Claret CE Pro™ cerebral protection device was intended for use in 40 patients,35 devices were implanted into the aortic arch. Technical success rate with delivery of the proximal and distalfilter was 60% for the first generation device and 87% for the second-generation device. Delivery times for thefirst-generation device were 12.4±12.1 minutes and 4.4±2.5 minutes for the second-generation device (p<0.05).The quantity of contrast used related to the Claret CE Pro System was 19.6±3.8 ml. Captured debris was documentedin at least 19 of 35 implanted devices (54.3%). No procedural transient ischaemic attacks, minor strokesor major strokes occurred. Thirty-day follow-up showed one minor stroke occurring 30 days after the procedure,and two major strokes both occurring well after the patient had completed TAVI.Conclusions: The use of the Claret CE Pro™ system is feasible and safe.