ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In Romania, there is no acromegaly national register and there are no nationwide data available. However, some studies have reported the control rates in the country's main referral centres. Our aim was to assess the overall control rate in our tertiary referral centre. Also, we assessed the control rate in the last three years, and we compared the results with our previous reports. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 186 patients with acromegaly assessed in our department between January 1st, 2012 and May 31st, 2019. We also compared the control rates for patients treated between April 1st, 2016 and May 31st, 2019 with historical controls (assessed between January 1st, 2012 and March 31st, 2016). RESULTS: Primary analysis: There were 19 untreated and 167 treated patients, mean age 52.46 years, surgery being the most commonly used treatment. The surgical cure rate was 14.8%, and disease control with medical treatment was 35.3%. Secondary analysis: In the first group there were 45 patients, surgery also being the most commonly used treatment. The surgical cure rate was 26.9%, and disease control was 30.4%. In the second group (historical controls) there were 42 patients, surgery being the most commonly used treatment. The surgical cure rate was 9.7%, and disease control with medical treatment was 15.4%. Random GH and IGF-1 after surgery were lower in the first group (p < 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the Romanian protocol and highly specialised pituitary centres has improved the cure rate and disease control in patients with acromegaly.
Subject(s)
Acromegaly/drug therapy , Acromegaly/surgery , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Acromegaly/blood , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Management , Female , Human Growth Hormone/blood , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Romania , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patients with impaired renal function, particularly those on dialysis, frequently exhibit high blood pressure and hemodynamic instability, which often lead to pheochromocytoma assessment. Our objective was to assess plasma free metanephrine (MN) and normetanephrine (NMN) in chronic kidney disease patients (CKD) with or without dialysis. METHODS: In this prospective observational study we performed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to evaluate plasma free MN and NMN in 48 CKD patients (15 with stage 3-5 CKD without dialysis, 26 on hemodialysis [HD], and 7 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis [CAPD]), 30 patients with histologically proven pheochromocytoma, and 43 hypertensive patients. Adrenal masses were ruled out by abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans in all CKD and control hypertensive patients. RESULTS: All 3 CKD groups (HD, CAPD, and CKD without dialysis) had significantly higher plasma free MN and NMN levels than the control hypertensive group (P<.0055). HD and CAPD patients had significantly lower plasma free NMN (P<.0055), but free MN levels were not significantly different than those observed in pheochromocytoma patients. In patients with HD, CAPD, and CKD without dialysis, plasma free MN and NMN were higher than manufacturer's upper limits of normal in 57.7% and 28.5%, 13.3% and 61.5%, and 85.7% and 26.6%, respectively. Regression models showed that the number of dialysis years was significantly correlated with plasma free MN (r = 0.615, P<.001) but not free NMN. CONCLUSION: Plasma free MN and NMN levels are frequently elevated in CKD patients, particularly in those on dialysis. Plasma free MN levels significantly overlap with the range in pheochromocytoma patients and correlate with the number of years on dialysis.
