Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 63(1): 19-24, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26655940

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Electrolyte-free polyethylene glycol powder (PEG-3350) has been widely used for colonoscopy preparation (prep); however, limited safety data on electrolyte changes exists with 1-day prep regimens. The primary aim of this study was to determine the proportion of patients with significant serum chemistry abnormalities before and at the time of colonoscopy. Secondary aims included evaluation of prep tolerance and bowel cleansing efficacy. METHODS: We performed a prospective descriptive observational study of pediatric patients scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy who received our standard 1-day, weight-based 4 g/kg PEG-3350 prep with a single stimulant laxative dose and had serum chemistry testing within 60 days before and at the time of colonoscopy. A standardized bowel cleanliness tool (Aronchick scale) was completed by the endoscopist. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five patients had serum electrolytes data pre- and postprep. Comparison of each patient's chemistries demonstrated statistical equivalence with the 1 exception of blood urea nitrogen levels (P = 0.56). Hypokalemia was detected postprep in 37 subjects (24%), but none had a serum level <3.3 mmol/L, which was deemed to be of no clinical significance. Five patients were hypoglycemic post prep; 3 were 7 years or younger (P = 0.02). The colon cleanliness rating was excellent or good in 77% and suboptimal in 23% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: A 1-day, weight-based PEG-3350 bowel prep in children appears safe. Changes in electrolyte levels and renal function were not clinically significant. Children of 7 years or younger seem to be at a higher risk of hypoglycemia compared with older children.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy , Electrolytes/blood , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Surface-Active Agents/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Child , Child Health Services , Child, Preschool , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
2.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 65(2): 203-10, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17258977

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data on safety of intravenous sedation in pediatric GI endoscopy are sparse. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety of intravenous sedation for GI endoscopy. DESIGN/SETTING: Single-center prospective series of outpatient GI endoscopies performed from February 2003 to February 2004 at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. The recorded information included demographic, medication, and adverse event data. PATIENTS: A total of 1226 patients were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Description of adverse events relating to intravenous sedation. RESULTS: A total of 2635 endoscopies were performed, of which 1717 were outpatient procedures with the patient under intravenous sedation. Sedation data were available on 1578 procedures (92%, M/F 674/552): 758 esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD) alone, 116 colonoscopies (COL) alone, and 352 combined EGD and COL. The median dose of fentanyl was 2.77 microg/kg (SD 0.97, range 0-6.73), and of midazolam was 0.11 mg/kg (SD 0.06, range 0-0.39). The mean recovery time was 118 minutes (SD 47.3, range 31-375). Ten patients (0.8%) failed intravenous sedation. Serious adverse events (apnea) were noted in 2 patients (0.2%). Mild or moderate adverse events included desaturation below 92% for less than 20 seconds (100 patients, 9%), vomiting (64 patients, 5%), agitation (15 patients, 1%), desaturation below 92% for greater than 20 seconds (12 patients, 0.7%), and rash (8 patients, 0.7%). No cardiopulmonary resuscitation or sedation reversal was necessary. No patients required hospitalization. Patients younger than 6 years were more likely to develop respiratory adverse event (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous sedation with midazolam and fentanyl is safe for pediatric GI endoscopy. Serious adverse events are rare and no patient required hospitalization.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Intravenous/adverse effects , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Fentanyl/adverse effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Midazolam/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Infant , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL