Long-term effectiveness of eliglustat treatment: A real-world analysis from the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry.

Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) is known for phenotypic heterogeneity and varied natural history. Registrational clinical trials enrolled narrowly defined phenotypes, but greater diversity is encountered in clinical practice. We report real-world outcomes with long-term eliglustat treatment in adults with GD1 in the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry. Among 5985 GD1 patients in the Registry as of January 6, 2023, 872 started eliglustat at ≥18 years old; of these, 469 met inclusion criteria. We compared clinical parameters at eliglustat initiation (i.e., baseline) and follow-up in treatment-naïve patients and used linear mixed models to estimate annual change from baseline in parameters among patients who switched to eliglustat after ≥1 year on enzyme replacement therapy. Over 4 years of follow-up in non-splenectomized treatment-naïve patients, hemoglobin and platelet count increased, liver and spleen volume decreased, and total lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score decreased slightly. Among non-splenectomized switch patients, on average, hemoglobin decreased -0.030 (95% CI: -0.053, -0.008) g/dL (N = 272) and platelet count increased 2.229 (95% CI: 0.751, 3.706) × 103/mm3 (N = 262) annually up to 10 years; liver volume decreased (-0.009 [95% CI: -0.015, -0.003] MN) (N = 102) and spleen volume remained stable (-0.070 [95% CI: -0.150, 0.010] MN) (N = 106) annually up to 7 years; and total lumbar spine BMD Z-score increased 0.041 (95% CI: 0.015, 0.066) (N = 183) annually up to 8 years. Among splenectomized switch patients, clinical parameters were stable over time. These long-term, real-world outcomes are consistent with the eliglustat clinical trials and emerging real-world experience across the GD phenotypic spectrum.

Management, vaccination status and COVID-19 morbidity of patients with Gaucher disease in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Continuation of standard management of Gaucher disease (GD) has been challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in infrequent/missed infusions and follow-up appointments. Little data are available on the consequences of these changes and on the SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in German GD patients. METHODS: A survey with 22 questions about GD management during the pandemic was sent to 19 German Gaucher centres. It was answered by 11/19 centres caring for 257 GD patients (almost ¾ of the German GD population); 245 patients had type 1 and 12 had type 3 GD; 240 were ≥ 18 years old. RESULTS: Monitoring intervals were prolonged in 8/11 centres from a median of 9 to 12 months. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) was changed to home ERT in 4 patients and substituted by oral substrate reduction therapy (SRT) in 6 patients. From March 2020 to October 2021, no serious complications of GD were documented. Only 4 SARS-CoV-2 infections were reported (1.6%). Two infections were asymptomatic and two mild; all occurred in adult type 1, non-splenectomized patients on ERT. Vaccination rate in adult GD was 79.5% (95.3% mRNA vaccines). Serious vaccination complications were not reported. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has lowered the threshold for switching from practice- or hospital-based ERT to home therapy or to SRT. No major GD complication was documented during the pandemic. Infection rate with SARS-CoV-2 in GD may rather be lower than expected, and its severity is mild. Vaccination rates are high in GD patients and vaccination was well tolerated.

Long-term persistence of HCV resistance-associated substitutions after DAA treatment failure.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Data on the long-term persistence of HCV resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) after treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are limited. This study evaluated the persistence of NS3, NS5A, and NS5B RASs for up to 5 years after the end of treatment (EOT). METHODS: We included samples from 678 individuals with an HCV genotype (GT) 1 or 3 infection and virologic DAA treatment failure collected in the European Resistance Database. NS3, NS5A, and NS5B were sequenced, and clinical parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 242 individuals with HCV GT1a (36%), 237 with GT1b (35%), and 199 (29%) with GT3 and a DAA failure were included. After protease inhibitor failure, the frequencies of NS3 RASs were 40-90% after the EOT. NS3 RASs disappeared rapidly in GT1b and GT3 after follow-up month 3 but were stable (≥60%) in GT1a owing to Q80K. The SOF-resistant NS5B RAS S282T was only found in individuals with GT3a. Non-nucleoside NS5B RASs were frequent in GT1 (56-80%) and decreased to 30% in GT1a but persisted in GT1b. NS5A RASs were very common in all GTs after NS5A inhibitor failure (88-95%), and even after follow-up month 24, their frequency was 65% and higher. However, RASs in GT1b had a stable course, whereas RASs in GT1a and GT3 declined slightly after follow-up month 24 (GT1a, 68%; GT1b, 95%; and GT3, 65%), mainly because of the slow decline of high-level resistant Y93H. CONCLUSIONS: We found that low-to medium-level RASs persisted, whereas high-level resistant RASs disappeared over time. Different patterns of RAS persistence according to HCV subtype could have implications for retreatment with first-generation DAAs and for global HCV elimination goals. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: There are little data on the long-term persistence of HCV resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) after DAA treatment failure, and RASs could have an impact on the efficacy of a rescue treatment. Especially in countries with limited availability of VOX/VEL/SOF or G/P/SOF, different patterns of RAS persistence could have implications for retreatment with first-generation DAAs and for global HCV elimination goals. The different patterns of RAS persistence identified in this study can be used to derive general rules regarding the persistence of RASs after DAA failure that could be applied by physicians in less developed countries to plan individualized HCV retreatment.

Hepatitis C therapy with grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: data from the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R).

OBJECTIVES: Grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) are the two preferred treatment options for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min. Both therapies have been separately analyzed in different real-life cohorts; however, a direct comparison has not been performed so far. We, therefore, analyzed safety and effectiveness of both regimens in a concerted real-life population. METHODS: The Germany Hepatitis C-Registry is a prospective national real-world registry. The analysis is based on 2773 patients with documented GFR at baseline treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir (N = 1041), grazoprevir/elbasvir + ribavirin (N = 53) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (N = 1679). RESULTS: A total of 93 patients with GFR <30 mL/min were treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir (N = 56), grazoprevir/elbasvir + ribavirin (N = 4), and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (N = 33). They suffered significantly more frequent from diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary heart disease than individuals with GFR >30 mL/min and showed the following baseline characteristics: 20.4, 55.9, 3.2, 12.9, and 5.3% were infected with HCV-genotypes 1a, 1b, 2, 3, and 4; 12.9% suffered from liver cirrhosis; 80.1% were treatment-naïve. Baseline characteristics except distribution of HCV-genotype 1b (n = 43/52 treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir) and sustained virologic response rates (SVR12) did not differ significantly between glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (SVR12: 100%) and grazoprevir/elbasvir (SVR12: 97.9%).Fatigue, headache, abdominal discomfort, and arthralgia were the most frequently reported adverse events without a statistical difference between grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic hepatitis C and a baseline GFR ≤30 mL/min grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir show an equally favorable safety profile and antiviral efficacy and can both be recommended for real-life use.

Barriers to initiation of hepatitis C virus therapy in Germany: A retrospective, case-controlled study.

Despite the availability of highly effective and well-tolerated direct-acting antivirals, not all patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection receive treatment. This retrospective, multi-centre, noninterventional, case-control study identified patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection initiating (control) or not initiating (case) treatment at 43 sites in Germany from September 2017 to June 2018. It aimed to compare characteristics of the two patient populations and to identify factors involved in patient/physician decision to initiate/not initiate chronic hepatitis C virus treatment, with a particular focus on historical barriers. Overall, 793 patients were identified: 573 (72%) who received treatment and 220 (28%) who did not. In 42% of patients, the reason for not initiating treatment was patient wish, particularly due to fear of treatment (17%) or adverse events (13%). Other frequently observed reasons for not initiating treatment were in accordance with known historical barriers for physicians to initiate therapy, including perceived or expected lack of compliance (14.5%), high patient age (10.9%), comorbidities (15.0%), alcohol abuse (9.1%), hard drug use (7.7%), and opioid substitution therapy (4.5%). Patient wish against therapy was also a frequently reported reason for not initiating treatment in the postponed (35.2%) and not planned (47.0%) subgroups; of note, known historical factors were also common reasons for postponing treatment. Real-world and clinical trial evidence is accumulating, which suggests that such historical barriers do not negatively impact treatment effectiveness. Improved education is key to facilitate progress towards the World Health Organization target of eliminating viral hepatitis as a major public health threat by 2030.

[Problems in treating patients with chronic HCV infection due to the COVID-19 pandemic and during the lockdown phase in Germany]. / Versorgungsprobleme von Patienten mit chronischer Hepatitis C während der COVID-19-Pandemie und der Lockdown-Verordnungen.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare services were faced with unprecedented challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated lockdown regulations. In order to analyse the influence of the pandemic on the healthcare of patients with chronic hepatitis C in Germany, we carried out a structured questionnaire among all centres participating in the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R). METHODS: 320 centres of the DHC-R were invited to participate in an online survey. Of these, 74 centres had included ≥ 5 patients in the last 12 months. FINDINGS: A fully answered questionnaire was sent back by 64 centres. Due to the lockdown regulations, 11 % of the centres had stopped their regular consultation between March and May 2020; 58 % had reduced the consultations and 32 % did not change the consultations. More than 50 % of the appointment cancellations were done by the patients. 52 % of the centres offered a new or additional telephone consultation and 17 % offered a new video consultation. Between March and May 2020, the number of patients newly treated with antivirals was markedly lower when compared with the same period in 2019. All centres had returned to their usual consultation procedures in July 2020. Almost 80 % indicated that there were no significant limitations in patient's healthcare. However, 22 % of the centres stated that liver decompensation was diagnosed late and 9.4 % stated that diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma was delayed. An adequate amount of personal protective equipment (including disinfectants) was available in 56 % of the centres. Official information by public healthcare authorities was considered sufficient by 63 % of the centres. SUMMARY: Diagnosis, therapy and monitoring of patients with chronic hepatitis C were impaired during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, the majority of the centres did not see healthcare problems for these patients in the medium and long term. However, the fact that the diagnosis of liver decompensations with potential lethal consequences was delayed in a considerable number of patients causes major concern.

Treatment outcomes in hepatitis C virus genotype 1a infected patients with and without baseline NS5A resistance-associated substitutions.

BACKGROUND&AIMS: The presence of baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) reduced sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1a infected patients treated with Elbasvir/Grazoprevir (EBR/GZR). This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of NS5A RASs and treatment outcomes in patients for whom EBR/GZR was intended. METHODS: We sequenced NS5A in 832 samples from German genotype1a-infected DAA-naïve patients population-based, which were collected in the European Resistance Database. Treatment outcomes and clinical parameters were evaluated in 519 of these patients retrospectively. RESULTS: Overall, 6.5% of patients harbored EBR-specific NS5A RASs at baseline, including Q30H/R (3.3%), L31M (1.8%), Y93H (1.6%) and other individual variants. Antiviral treatment, including EBR/GZR, was initiated in 88% of patients. In the absence of RASs, the majority of patients received EBR/GZR for 12 weeks (57%) and the SVR rate was 97% compared to 99% SVR achieved using other DAA regimens (LDV/SOF±RBV, G/P, PrOD+RBV, VEL/SOF). Various regimens were used in the presence of RASs and SVR rates were high following treatment with LDV/SOF (100%), G/P (83%), PrOD/RBV (100%), VEL/SOF (100%), SMV/SOF (100%) and EBR/GZR+RBV for 16 weeks (100%). However, two patients received EBR/GZR for 16 weeks without RBV and one relapsed. CONCLUSIONS: EBR/GZR treatment with or without RBV for 12 or 16 weeks according to a baseline RAS analysis was highly effective with ≥97% SVR in patients with genotype 1a. EBR/GZR without RBV should be avoided in patients with RASs. High SVR rates were also achieved using other 8 or 12 weeks DAA regimens.

Resistance-associated substitutions in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection.

Data on the prevalence of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) and their implications for treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are sparse in European patients with HCV genotype 4. This study investigated RASs before and after DAA failure in different genotype 4 subtypes and evaluated retreatment efficacies. Samples of 195 genotype 4-infected patients were collected in the European Resistance Database and investigated for NS3, NS5A and NS5B RASs. Retreatment efficacies in DAA failure patients were analysed retrospectively. After NS5A inhibitor (NS5Ai) failure, subtype 4r was frequent (30%) compared to DAA-naïve patients (5%) and the number of NS5A RASs was significantly higher in subtype 4r compared to 4a or 4d (median three RASs vs no or one RAS, respectively, P < .0001). RASsL28V, L30R and M31L pre-existed in subtype 4r and were maintained after NS5Ai failure. Typical subtype 4r RASs were located in subdomain 1a of NS5A, close to membrane interaction and protein-protein interaction sites that are responsible for multimerization and hence viral replication. Retreatment of 37 DAA failure patients was highly effective with 100% SVR in prior SOF/RBV, PI/SOF and PI/NS5Ai failures. Secondary virologic failures were rare (n = 2; subtype 4d and 4r) and only observed in prior NS5Ai/SOF failures (SVR 90%). In conclusion, subtype 4r harboured considerably more RASs compared to other subtypes. A resistance-tailored retreatment using first- and second-generation DAAs was highly effective with SVR rates ≥90% across all subtypes and first-line treatment regimens.

Real-world effectiveness of eliglustat in treatment-naïve and switch patients enrolled in the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry.

Eliglustat is a first-line oral therapy for adults with Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) with extensive, intermediate, or poor CYP2D6-metabolizer phenotypes (90% of patients). We report real-world outcomes after 2 years of eliglustat therapy in the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry (NCT00358943). As of January 2019, baseline and 2-year data (±1 year) were available for 231 eliglustat-treated GD1 patients: 19 treatment-naïve (zero splenectomized) and 212 ERT patients who switched to eliglustat (36 splenectomized). Most patients (89%) were from the United States, where eliglustat was first approved. In treatment-naïve patients, mean hemoglobin increased from 12.4 to 13.4 g/dL (P = .004, n = 18), mean platelet count increased from 113 to 156 × 109 /L (P < .001, n = 17); mean spleen volume decreased from 7.4 to 3.5 multiples of normal (MN) (P = .02, n = 7); mean liver volume remained normal (n = 7), and median spine Z-score was unchanged (-1.3 to -1.2, n = 6). In non-splenectomized switch patients, mean hemoglobin remained stable/non-anemic (n = 167); mean platelet count remained stable/normal (n = 165); mean spleen volume decreased from 3.3 to 2.8 MN (P < .001, n = 64); mean liver volume remained normal (n = 63), and median lumbar spine Z-score improved from -0.7 to -0.4 (P = .014, n = 68). In splenectomized switch patients, mean hemoglobin remained stable/non-anemic (n = 31); mean platelet count increased from 297 to 324 × 109 /L (non-significant, n = 29); mean liver volume remained normal (n = 13); median spine Z-score improved from -0.8 to -0.6 (non-significant, n = 11). Median chitotriosidase decreased in all groups (P < .01 for all). These real-world results are consistent with eliglustat clinical trial results demonstrating long-term benefit in treatment-naïve patients and stability in ERT switch patients.

Treatment-failure to direct antiviral HCV regimens in real world: frequency, patient characteristics and rescue therapy - data from the German hepatitis C registry (DHC-R).

BACKGROUND: Virologic failure to approved combinations of direct antiviral agents (DAA) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is rare. Mostly it involves difficult to treat patients with advanced liver disease and prior interferon-experience. Before approval of VOX/VEL/SOF, a restricted number of patients received rescue treatment, and the choice of DAA combinations for re-treatment were selected on an individual basis. In the present analysis, patient characteristics and rescue-regimens after virologic failure mainly based on first generation DAAs are described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R), which is a national multicenter real-world cohort currently including about 16 500 patients recruited by more than 250 centers. The present analysis is based on 6683 patients who initiated a DAA therapy and for whom follow-up data (per-protocol analysis) were available. RESULTS: Among the patients, 188 (2.8 %) experienced a virologic relapse. Compared to SVR-patients, relapse patients were significantly more often male (77.7 % versus 56.9 %, respectively, p < 0.001), showed cirrhosis significantly more (48.4 % versus 28.1 %, respectively, p < 0.001) and a prior interferon-containing therapy (46.3 % versus 39.0 %, respectively, p = 0.049). The majority of patients who relapsed were infected with genotype 1 (47.4 %) followed by genotype 3 (29.8 %), and 95 relapse patients started DAA re-treatment. Characteristics of patients with rescue-treatment are similar to these of patients with relapse after initial DAA treatment. Thirty-one of 39 patients with complete follow-up data achieved SVR (79.5 %), and 8 patients had a relapse again (20.5 %). Patients who received rescue treatment including a new DAA class according to guidelines, except patients who received VOX/VEL/SOF, showed higher SVR rates than the entire group (21/25, 84 %). All patients who received VOX/VEL/SOF achieved SVR (n = 4, 100 %). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with failure with DAA combination therapies are a difficult but urgent to treat population with the frequent presence of cirrhosis and prior treatment failure with interferon-based therapies. Rescue therapy with inclusion of a new DAA class leads to high SVR rates, but multiple targeted therapy with VOX/VEL/SOF seems to be most effective.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection: data from the German Hepatitis C-Registry.

BACKGROUND: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is a pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral regimen approved for treating adults chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). There are limited real-world data on glecaprevir/pibrentasvir to date. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir under real-world conditions in the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R). METHODS: The DHC-R is an ongoing, non-interventional, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study that monitors patients with chronic HCV infection. Data were collected from patients who initiated glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and completed a screening visit on or after 2 August 2017. The primary effectiveness endpoint was sustained virological response at post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12). Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: As of 15 July 2018, 586 patients received glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and had documented SVR12 data, treatment discontinuation, loss to follow-up or HCV reinfection. Five hundred and fifty-two patients (94%) received on-label treatment. At baseline, most on-label patients were infected with HCV genotype 1 (53%) or 3 (33%), HCV treatment-naïve (90%), without cirrhosis (94%), and treated for 8 weeks (93%). Five hundred and thirty-four patients (96.7%) achieved SVR12 (intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis). By modified ITT analysis (excluding patients who discontinued and did not achieve SVR12 or patients lost to follow-up), the SVR12 rate was 99.4% (n/N = 534/537). There was one documented virological failure (relapse) and two documented HCV reinfections. One hundred and forty-two (26%) adverse events (AEs) and 9 (2%) serious AEs occurred; 2 (<1%) AEs led to treatment discontinuation. All patients treated off-label (N = 34) achieved SVR12. CONCLUSION: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was highly effective and well tolerated under real-world conditions. Clinical trial number: DRKS00009717 (German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS).

[4 years of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R)]. / Deutsches Hepatitis C-Register (DHC-R) ­ eine Zwischenbilanz 4 Jahre nach Zulassung direkt antiviraler Substanzen (DAAs).

BACKGROUND: More than 250 000 patients suffer from chronic hepatitis C in Germany. Several potent, direct-acting antiviral drugs have been approved since 2014. The aim of the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R) is to describe the epidemiology and patient care of hepatitis C and to investigate the efficacy and safety of new treatment options in real-world settings. METHODS: The DHC-R is a prospective multicenter non-interventional registry study that includes 327 centers throughout Germany. All approved treatment options have been documented. The current analysis differentiated 4 phases: 2/2014 - 12/2014, 1/2015 - 12/2015, 1/2016 - 7/2017 and 8/2017 - 7/2018. FINDINGS: Between February 2014 and July 2018, 12 170 patients were included in the registry (61.3 % male), and antiviral treatment was initiated in 11 268. The mean age declined from 52.3 years (phase 1) to 49.3 years (phase 4), while the proportion of patients with previous or ongoing drug abuse increased (26.3 % to 43.1 %). In 2014, 35.1 % of treated patients had liver cirrhosis, which declined to 16.5 % in phase 4. The HCV genotype distribution showed marked fluctuations, with most recent increases in HCV genotype 3 (30 % in phase 4). Per-protocol sustained virological response rates increased from 92.8 % in 2014 to 94.4 % in 2017/18 with excellent tolerability. SUMMARY: The DHC-R mirrors patient care of chronic hepatitis in the real-world setting in Germany and provides insights into epidemiology developments. It also confirms the high efficacy and safety of novel treatment options.

Real-world effectiveness of 8-week treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for 8 to 24 weeks is approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV). In the ION-3 study, 8 weeks of LDV/SOF was non-inferior to 12 weeks in previously untreated genotype 1 (GT1) patients without cirrhosis. According to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), 8-week treatment may be considered in naïve non-cirrhotic GT1-patients. However, there are only limited data on the effectiveness of an 8-week regimen of LDV/SOF under real-world conditions. The aim of the present study was to characterise patients receiving 8 weeks of LDV/SOF compared to those receiving 12 weeks of LDV/SOF, and to describe therapeutic outcomes in routine clinical practice. METHODS: The German Hepatitis C-Registry is a large national real-world cohort that analyses effectiveness and safety of antiviral therapies in chronic HCV. This data set is based on 2,404 patients. Treatment with SOF/LDV (without RBV) for 8 or 12 weeks was initiated on or before September 30, 2015. RESULTS: Overall, 84.6% (2,034/2,404) of the safety population (intention-to-treat-1 [ITT1]) and 98.2% (2,029/2,066) of the per protocol (PP) population achieved sustained virological response at week 12 (SVR12). In the 8-week group, 85.1% (824/968) of ITT1 and 98.3% (821/835) of PP patients achieved SVR12, while in the 12-week group, 85.5% (1,210/1,415) of ITT1, and 98.1% (1,208/1,231) of PP patients achieved SVR12. When treated according to the SmPC, 98.7% (739/749) of the patients achieved SVR12 (PP). Relapse was observed in 9.5% (2/21) of cirrhotic patients treated for 8 weeks (PP). CONCLUSIONS: Under real-world conditions a high proportion of eligible patients receiving 8-week LDV/SOF treatment achieved SVR12. Relapse occurred more frequently in patients who did not meet the selection criteria according to the SmPC. LAY SUMMARY: In a large real-world cohort of patients mainly treated by physicians in private practice in Germany, shorter HCV treatment (8-week) resulted in equivalent cure rates to 12-week treatment in genotype 1 HCV-infected patients. Thus, shorter treatment can be recommended in these patients which would substantially reduce costs of therapy. Clinical Trial number: DRKS00009717 (German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS).

Treatment of HCV genotype 2 with sofosbuvir and ribavirin results in lower sustained virological response rates in real life than expected from clinical trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections with genotype 2 (GT2) are generally considered as easy to treat. The current standard therapy is 12 weeks of sofosbuvir and ribavirin. However, sustained virological response (SVR) rates varied substantially in distinct subgroups. Therefore, re-assessing the efficacy of interferon-free therapy in cohorts with larger patient numbers is warranted. METHODS: The German Hepatitis C registry is a national multicenter cohort. Patients are treated at the discretion of the physician. Data are collected by a web-based data system and confirmed by plausibility checks and on-site monitoring. RESULTS: A total of 265 (4.3%) of 6034 patients enrolled in the registry were infected with GT2, and 236 had initiated treatment (60% males, 98% Caucasian, median age 54 years). Treatment with sofosbuvir and ribavirin for 12 weeks achieved SVR at week 12 post-treatment (SVR12) in 136/164 (83%) patients. SVR12 rates for this regimen were 80% (35/44) in treatment-experienced patients, 74% (20/27) in cirrhotics and 75% (21/28) in patients with HCV-RNA ≥6 million IU/mL. The overall SVR rate in patients treated with sofosbuvir/ribavirin 12 weeks per protocol (PP), excluding therapy discontinuation or lost to follow-up, was 135/151 (89%). PP SVR12 rates were 91% for treatment naïve, 83% for cirrhotic and 80% for treatment-experienced patients respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this large GT2 cohort, sofosbuvir and ribavirin for 12 weeks achieved lower SVR rates compared to treatment outcomes expected from phase 3 trials. These findings highlight the need for establishing alternative treatment strategies for GT2 patients, especially in patients with unfavourable outcome factors.

Management and monitoring recommendations for the use of eliglustat in adults with type 1 Gaucher disease in Europe.

PURPOSE: In Gaucher disease, diminished activity of the lysosomal enzyme, acid ß-glucosidase, leads to accumulation of glucosylceramides and related substrates, primarily in the spleen, liver, and bone marrow. Eliglustat is an oral substrate reduction therapy approved in the European Union and the United States as a first-line treatment for adults with type 1 Gaucher disease who have compatible CYP2D6 metabolism phenotypes. A European Advisory Council of experts in Gaucher disease describes the characteristics of eliglustat that are distinct from enzyme augmentation therapy (the standard of care) and miglustat (the other approved substrate reduction therapy) and recommends investigations and monitoring for patients on eliglustat therapy within the context of current recommendations for Gaucher disease management. RESULTS: Eliglustat is a selective, potent inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase, the enzyme responsible for biosynthesis of glucosylceramides which accumulate in Gaucher disease. Extensive metabolism of eliglustat by CYP2D6, and, to a lesser extent, CYP3A of the cytochrome P450 pathway, necessitates careful consideration of the patient's CYP2D6 metaboliser status and use of concomitant medications which share metabolism by these pathways. Guidance on specific assessments and monitoring required for eliglustat therapy, including an algorithm to determine eligibility for eliglustat, are provided. CONCLUSIONS: As a first-line therapy for type 1 Gaucher disease, eliglustat offers eligible patients a daily oral therapy alternative to biweekly infusions of enzyme therapy. Physicians will need to carefully assess individual Gaucher patients to determine their appropriateness for eliglustat therapy. The therapeutic response to eliglustat and use of concomitant medications will require long-term monitoring.