Advancing cardiotomy suction practices for coronary surgery via multidisciplinary collaborative learning.

Objective: Professional standards recommend stopping cardiotomy suction at the termination of cardiopulmonary bypass before protamine administration based on perceived safety concerns. This study evaluated a multidisciplinary collaborative quality-improvement intervention promoting this agreed-upon cardiotomy suction practice during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: A statewide intervention (eg, unblinded surgeon and perfusionist feedback, evidence-based lectures, evaluating barriers to change) involved 32 centers participating in the PERForm (ie, Perfusion Measures and Outcomes) Registry to standardize cardiotomy suction practices at cardiopulmonary bypass termination during CABG. Four non-Michigan registry participating centers were not exposed to collaborative learning. Cardiotomy suction practice was defined as the absence of or stopping cardiotomy suction before protamine administration. The practice changes attributed to the intervention, including Michigan and non-Michigan comparisons, were evaluated with the change of time effect modeled using splines. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the intervention's associated impact (eg, mortality, reoperation, transfusion). Results: Among 10,394 patients undergoing CABG at Michigan centers, 80.7% achieved agreed-upon cardiotomy suction practices. The Michigan centers had nonsignificant changes in agreed-upon cardiotomy suction practices during the preintervention period (P = .24), with significant increased monthly change in practice thereafter, absent adjusted morbidity and mortality increases. The Michigan centers achieved a significantly greater adjusted monthly improvement in agreed-upon practices relative to non-Michigan centers within 7 months after the intervention (adjusted odds ratio for change of trends: 2.53, P < .001). Conclusions: This initiative demonstrates the effectiveness of multidisciplinary collaborative quality improvement in advancing agreed-upon cardiotomy suction practices without negatively impacting clinical outcomes.

del Nido versus blood cardioplegia in cardiac surgery: A multicenter analysis of over 40,000 patients.

OBJECTIVES: The use of del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery is rising in popularity. The objective of this large multicenter study was to evaluate the use and associated outcomes of del Nido versus blood cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valve (mitral, aortic), and/or nondescending thoracic aortic surgery (July 2014 to March 2022) across 39 centers were extracted from the Perfusion Measures and Outcomes registry. Patients were stratified by cardioplegia type for unadjusted analysis and multivariable mixed-effects models were used for risk adjustment. RESULTS: Of 44,175 patients, 42.5% used del Nido, with use increasing 48% over time. Overall, the del Nido group had shorter median crossclamp time (74 minutes vs 87 minutes, P < .001) and lower median peak intraoperative glucose levels (161 mg/dL vs 180 mg/dL, P < .001). Use of del Nido was not associated with operative mortality (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj], 1.16; P = .075) nor major morbidity (ORadj, 1.05; P = .25). Findings for valve cases were similar, except crossclamp time differences were variable by type of valve procedure. Within the CABG subgroup there was a trend toward increased operative mortality with del Nido (ORadj, 1.24; P = .069), whereas the risk of renal failure approaches statistical significance in the aortic subgroup (ORadj, 1.54; P = .056). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, multicenter study, the use of del Nido was associated with variable crossclamp time differences, lower intraoperative glucose levels, and no significant difference in major morbidity or mortality. Efficiency benefits of del Nido may be limited in valve cases, whereas outcomes in CABG and aortic cases warrant further study.

The Role of Race on Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently complicates cardiac surgery and is more common among Black patients. We evaluated determinants of race-based differences in AKI rates. METHODS: Serum creatinine-based criteria were used to identify adult cardiac surgical patients having postoperative AKI in the Perfusion Measures and Outcomes (PERForm) Registry (July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2019). Patient characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were compared by race (Black vs White) after excluding patients with preoperative dialysis, missing preoperative or postoperative creatinine, or other races. A mixed effects model (adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, surgical factors) used hospital as a random effect to predict postoperative stage 2 or 3 AKI. Propensity score analyses were conducted to evaluate robustness of the primary analyses. RESULTS: The study cohort included 34 520 patients (8% Black). More Black patients than White patients were female (43% vs 27%, P < .001), and had hypertension (93% vs 87%, P < .001) and diabetes mellitus (51% vs 41%, P < .001). Acute kidney injury of stage 2 or greater occurred in 1697 patients (5%), more often among Black than White patients (8% vs 5%, P < .001). Intraoperatively, Black patients had lower nadir hematocrits (23 vs 26, P < .001), and were more likely to be given transfusions (22% vs 14%, P < .001). After adjustment, Black race (compared with White) independently predicted odds for postoperative AKI (adjusted odds ratio 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.26 to 1.78). The multivariable findings were similar in propensity score analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Despite accounting for differences in risk factors and intraoperative practices, Black patients had a 50% increased odds for having moderate-severe postoperative AKI compared with White patients. Additional evaluations are warranted to identify potential targets to address racial disparities in AKI outcomes.

Evaluating Changes in del Nido Cardioplegia Practices in Adult Cardiac Surgery.

There has been a rapid adoption of the use of del Nido cardioplegia (DC) among adults undergoing cardiac surgery. We leveraged a multicenter database to evaluate differences over time in the choice and impact of cardioplegia type (DC vs. blood) among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We evaluated 26,373 patients undergoing non-emergent coronary artery bypass and/or valve surgery between 2014-2015 (early period) and 2017-2018 (late period) at 31 centers. DC was compared with blood-based cardioplegia (BC: 1:1, 2:1, 4:1, 8:1, and variable ratio). We evaluated whether treatment choice differed across prespecified patient characteristics, procedure type, and perfusion practices by time period. We evaluated increased DC use with clinical outcomes (major morbidity and mortality, prolonged intubation, and renal failure), after adjusting for baseline characteristics, procedure type, center, and year. DC use increased from 19.6% in 2014-2015 to 41.5% in 2017-2018, p < .001. Increased DC use occurred among coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valve, and CABG + valve procedures, all p < .001. Differences in median procedural duration increased over time (DC vs. BC): 1) bypass duration was 11.0 minutes shorter with DC in the early period and 27.0 minutes shorter in the late period, and 2) cross-clamp duration was 7.0 minutes shorter with DC in the early period and 17.0 minutes shorter in the late period, all p < .001. There were no statistical differences in adjusted odds of major morbidity and mortality (odds ratio [OR]adj: 1.01), prolonged intubation (ORadj: .99), or renal failure (ORadj: .80) by DC use (p > .05). In this large multicenter experience, DC use increased over time and was associated with reduced bypass and ischemic time absent any significant differences in adjusted outcomes.