ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The use of del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery is rising in popularity. The objective of this large multicenter study was to evaluate the use and associated outcomes of del Nido versus blood cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valve (mitral, aortic), and/or nondescending thoracic aortic surgery (July 2014 to March 2022) across 39 centers were extracted from the Perfusion Measures and Outcomes registry. Patients were stratified by cardioplegia type for unadjusted analysis and multivariable mixed-effects models were used for risk adjustment. RESULTS: Of 44,175 patients, 42.5% used del Nido, with use increasing 48% over time. Overall, the del Nido group had shorter median crossclamp time (74 minutes vs 87 minutes, P < .001) and lower median peak intraoperative glucose levels (161 mg/dL vs 180 mg/dL, P < .001). Use of del Nido was not associated with operative mortality (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj], 1.16; P = .075) nor major morbidity (ORadj, 1.05; P = .25). Findings for valve cases were similar, except crossclamp time differences were variable by type of valve procedure. Within the CABG subgroup there was a trend toward increased operative mortality with del Nido (ORadj, 1.24; P = .069), whereas the risk of renal failure approaches statistical significance in the aortic subgroup (ORadj, 1.54; P = .056). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, multicenter study, the use of del Nido was associated with variable crossclamp time differences, lower intraoperative glucose levels, and no significant difference in major morbidity or mortality. Efficiency benefits of del Nido may be limited in valve cases, whereas outcomes in CABG and aortic cases warrant further study.
ABSTRACT
There has been a rapid adoption of the use of del Nido cardioplegia (DC) among adults undergoing cardiac surgery. We leveraged a multicenter database to evaluate differences over time in the choice and impact of cardioplegia type (DC vs. blood) among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We evaluated 26,373 patients undergoing non-emergent coronary artery bypass and/or valve surgery between 2014-2015 (early period) and 2017-2018 (late period) at 31 centers. DC was compared with blood-based cardioplegia (BC: 1:1, 2:1, 4:1, 8:1, and variable ratio). We evaluated whether treatment choice differed across prespecified patient characteristics, procedure type, and perfusion practices by time period. We evaluated increased DC use with clinical outcomes (major morbidity and mortality, prolonged intubation, and renal failure), after adjusting for baseline characteristics, procedure type, center, and year. DC use increased from 19.6% in 2014-2015 to 41.5% in 2017-2018, p < .001. Increased DC use occurred among coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valve, and CABG + valve procedures, all p < .001. Differences in median procedural duration increased over time (DC vs. BC): 1) bypass duration was 11.0 minutes shorter with DC in the early period and 27.0 minutes shorter in the late period, and 2) cross-clamp duration was 7.0 minutes shorter with DC in the early period and 17.0 minutes shorter in the late period, all p < .001. There were no statistical differences in adjusted odds of major morbidity and mortality (odds ratio [OR]adj: 1.01), prolonged intubation (ORadj: .99), or renal failure (ORadj: .80) by DC use (p > .05). In this large multicenter experience, DC use increased over time and was associated with reduced bypass and ischemic time absent any significant differences in adjusted outcomes.
