ABSTRACT
We examined responsiveness to ripasudil as a potential factor for predicting the effect of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) when performed for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). A total of 70 eyes with no history of glaucoma surgery underwent SLT between January 2015 and June 2019. Patients were divided into two groups, with an intraocular pressure (IOP) decrease of 15% or more due to ripasudil administration before SLT defined as the effective group, while an IOP decrease of less than 15% was defined as the non-effective group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. A Cox proportional hazards model assessed the influence of baseline factors on the success. Of the 70 eyes evaluated, treatments were effective in 22 and non-effective in 48. Postoperatively, both groups exhibited IOP reductions for up to 24 months. Success ratios at 12 and 24 months after SLT were 43.5% and 18.5% in the effective versus 24.9% and 9.3% in the non-effective group, which were significantly higher in the effective group (P = 0.03). Presence of a ripasudil effective eye (P = 0.03) was associated with treatment success. Responsiveness to ripasudil may be useful in predicting the therapeutic effect of SLT.
Subject(s)
Glaucoma, Open-Angle/therapy , Isoquinolines/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Trabeculectomy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/drug therapy , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/surgery , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Laser Therapy , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the ocular-surface safety of a 0.001% benzalkonium chloride-containing tafluprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension who have inadequate intraocular pressure (IOP) control with latanoprost monotherapy. METHODS: This study is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, open-label clinical study. Patients with POAG or ocular hypertension who have inadequate IOP control with latanoprost monotherapy were considered eligible. After providing informed consent, patients continued latanoprost monotherapy for 12 weeks, followed by a switch to TTFC. We evaluated the extent of ocular-surface damage using superficial punctate keratopathy (SPK) score, tear breakup time (TBUT), hyperemia score, IOP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate at 0, 4, and 12 weeks after switching. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were enrolled, of whom, 64 patients were included in the final analysis. No significant changes in SPK score, TBUT, or hyperemia score were observed at 4 and 12 weeks compared with week 0. IOP decreased significantly at 4 (13.9±2.5 mmHg) and 12 (14.1±2.5 mmHg) weeks, relative to week 0 (15.3±2.7 mmHg). No significant changes in either SBP or DBP were observed during the study, although patients' mean heart rate decreased significantly after switching to TTFC. Adverse drug reactions to TTFC occurred in seven patients including two incidences of asthma and one of arrhythmia, and no events were serious. CONCLUSION: The ocular-surface safety of TTFC is not significantly different to that of latanoprost. Furthermore, switching from latanoprost to TTFC in patients with insufficient IOP control has additive IOP-lowering effects. TTFC is an effective approach for patients receiving latanoprost monotherapy who require more intensive IOP reduction.