Late-onset toxic anterior segment syndrome after possible aluminum-contaminated and silicon-contaminated intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE: To describe an outbreak of late-onset toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) after the implantation of a specific hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: University Hospitals of Leuven, Belgium. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center, observational study. METHODS: All eyes undergoing cataract surgery with a monofocal, toric, or enhanced depth-of-focus (EDoF) Synthesis (Cutting Edge) IOL between August 2019 and March 2020 were reviewed. Data were collected on the surgical procedure, postoperative course, time until onset of symptoms, clinical features, and additional treatments. A laboratory surface analysis of all 3 IOL subtypes was performed in the Intermountain Ocular Research Center at the University of Utah, USA. Furthermore, other possible causes of prolonged postoperative inflammation rather than the IOL itself were investigated. RESULTS: Among the 203 eyes included, 28 TASS cases were identified (13.8%), among which 25 received a monofocal IOL, and 3 received an EDoF IOL. The mean time until onset was 28.9 (±19.9) days. Patients presented with anterior chamber cells (92.9%), deposits on the IOL (57.1%), or fibrinous inflammation (35.7%). 4 eyes (14.3%) underwent a surgical intervention, whereas 24 eyes showed a resolution of inflammation with topical therapy alone. Laboratory analysis showed the presence of both aluminum and silicon particles on the monofocal IOL, silicon particles only on the EDoF IOL, and no particles on the toric IOL surface. CONCLUSIONS: This report describes an outbreak of atypical, late-onset TASS after cataract surgery, possibly correlated with aluminum and silicon contamination of the IOL surfaces.

Efficacy of Multiple Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants for Refractory Retinal Vein Occlusion-Related Macular Edema and Effect of Prior Vitrectomy.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implants (DEX implant) in patients with treatment-resistant macular edema (ME) owing to branch and central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO/CRVO), and the influence of prior vitrectomy on this treatment. Methods: Multicenter retrospective chart review was performed on 40 CRVO and 32 BRVO eyes with persistent ME despite intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents and/or intravitreal triamcinolone, and/or laser therapy. Each patient received ≥1 dexamethasone 700 µg implant between March 2011 and December 2015. Thirteen patients underwent prior vitrectomy. Data were collected on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), time to relapse, and adverse events. Results: At the end of follow-up, BRVO eyes had a lesser CMT reduction from baseline compared to CRVO eyes (-122.50 ± 152.47 µm and -202.26 ± 194.09 µm, respectively). Neither BRVO nor CRVO eyes had a sustained BCVA benefit (P = 0.7041 and P = 0.7027, respectively). Vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes overall had a sustained significant CMT reduction throughout the study with -192.46 ± 172.62 µm and -164.02 ± 180.36 µm, respectively, at final follow-up. Similar time to relapse of 24.4 ± 6.5 and 23.3 ± 13.5 weeks, respectively, was observed. By the end of follow-up, BCVA had only improved in vitrectomized eyes. However, multivariable regression analyses showed no significant association between vitrectomy status and CMT or BCVA change after the first and last injection. Cataract formation and ocular hypertension occurred in 25% and 17%, respectively. Conclusions: Multiple DEX implant are effective in reducing CMT in patients resistant to previous treatments and appear to be similarly effective in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes.

Eye lens dosimetry in anesthesiology: a prospective study.

The eye lens is one of the most sensitive organs for radiation injury and exposure might lead to radiation induced cataract. Eye lens dosimetry in anesthesiology has been published in few clinical trials and an active debate about the causality of radiation induced cataract is still ongoing. Recently, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended a reduction in the annual dose limit for occupational exposure for the lens of the eye from 150 to 20 mSv, averaged over a period of 5 years, with the dose in a single year not exceeding 50 mSv. This prospective study investigated eye lens dosimetry in anesthesiology practice during a routine year of professional activity. The radiation exposure measured represented the exposure in a normal working schedule of a random anesthesiologist during 1 month and this cumulative eye lens dose was extrapolated to 1 year. Next, eye lens doses were measured in anesthesiology during neuro-embolisation procedures, radiofrequency ablations or vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty procedures. The eye lens doses are measured in terms of the dose equivalent H p(3) with the Eye-D dosimeter (Radcard, Poland) close to the right eye (on the temple). In 16 anesthesiologists, the estimated annual eye lens doses range from a minimum of 0.4 mSv to a maximum of 3.5 mSv with an average dose of 1.33 mSv. Next, eye lens doses were measured for nine neuro-embolisation procedures, ten radiofrequency ablations and six vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty procedures. Average eye lens doses of 77 ± 76 µSv for neuro-embolisations, 38 ± 34 µSv for cardiac ablations and 40 ± 44 µSv for vertebro-/kyphoplasty procedures were recorded. The maximum doses were respectively 264, 97 and 122 µSv. This study demonstrated that the estimated annual eye lens dose is well below the revised ICRP's limit of 20 mSv/year. However, we demonstrated high maximum and average doses during neuro-embolisation, cardiac ablation and vertebro-/kyphoplasty procedures. With radiation induced cataract being explained as a possible stochastic effect, without a threshold dose, anesthesiologists who regularly work in a radiological environment should remain vigilant and maintain radiation safety standards at all times. This includes adequately protective equipment (protection shields, apron, thyroid shield and leaded eye wear), keeping distance, routine monitoring and appropriate education.

Bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation with good clinical response to plasmapheresis and treatment of the primary tumor.

PURPOSE: To report successful treatment of bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation. METHODS: Case report of a patient with clinical diagnosis of bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation, imaged with fluorescein angiography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and with follow-up data after treatment with plasmapheresis, radiation, and chemotherapy. RESULTS: A 67-year-old white man presented with a history of bilateral rapidly declining vision. The ophthalmoscopic examination, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography showed in both eyes an exudative retinal detachment and subretinal lesions highly suggestive for bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation. Further investigation demonstrated a large cell lung carcinoma. Subsequently, the patient was treated with plasmapheresis, radiation, and chemotherapy. In a few weeks, the exudative retinal detachments resolved with gain of vision, and the retina remained flat during the 5-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Plasmapheresis and treatment of the primary tumor are valuable treatment options for visually impaired patients with bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation.