European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on the Use of Non-invasive Biomarkers for Cardiothoracic Transplant Rejection Surveillance.

While allograft rejection (AR) continues to threaten the success of cardiothoracic transplantation, lack of accurate and repeatable surveillance tools to diagnose AR is a major unmet need in the clinical management of cardiothoracic transplant recipients. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) have been the cornerstone of rejection monitoring since the field's incipience, but both suffer from significant limitations, including poor concordance of biopsy interpretation among pathologists. In recent years, novel molecular tools for AR monitoring have emerged and their performance characteristics have been evaluated in multiple studies. An international working group convened by ESOT has reviewed the existing literature and provides a series of recommendations to guide the use of these biomarkers in clinical practice. While acknowledging some caveats, the group recognized that Gene-expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) may be used to rule out rejection in heart transplant recipients, but they are not recommended for cardiac allograft vasculopathy screening. Other traditional biomarkers (NT-proBNP, BNP or troponin) do not have sufficient evidence to support their use to diagnose AR. Regarding lung transplant, dd-cfDNA could be used to rule out clinical rejection and infection, but its use to monitor treatment response is not recommended.

Feasibility of Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Sparing Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Efforts to mitigate radiotherapy (RT) associated cardiotoxicity have focused on constraining mean heart dose (MHD). However, recent studies have shown greater predictive power with cardiac substructure dose metrics such as the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery volume (V) receiving 15Gy (V15Gy) ≥10%. Herein, we investigated the feasibility of LAD radiation sparing in contemporary IMRT/VMAT lung cancer plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Single institution retrospective analysis of 54 locally advanced lung cancer patients treated with thoracic RT between February 2018-August 2021. After excluding 33 (5=non-IMRT/VMAT or intentionally LAD-optimized; 28=LAD V15Gy<10%), 21 plans with LAD V15Gy ≥10% were identified for LAD re-optimization with intent to meet LAD V15Gy <10% while maintaining meeting organ-at-risk (OAR) metrics and target coverage with original plan parameters. Dosimetric variables were compared using paired t tests. RESULTS: Most (57.1%, 12/21) were treated with definitive RT, 8/21 (38.1%) with post-operative RT, and one with neoadjuvant RT. The median prescribed RT dose was 60Gy (range 50.4-66Gy) in 30 fractions (range 28-33). LAD re-optimized plans (vs original) led to significant reductions in mean LAD V15Gy (39.4% ±13.9% vs 9.4% ±13.0%; p<0.001) and mean LAD dose (12.9Gy ± 4.6Gy vs 7.6Gy ±2.8Gy; p<0.001). Most (85.7%; 18/21) LAD re-optimized plans achieved LAD V15Gy <10%. There were no statistically significant differences in overall lung, esophageal, or spinal cord dose metrics. Only one re-optimization (1/21) exceeded an OAR constraint that was initially met in the original plan. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the feasibility of LAD-optimized lung cancer RT planning using the newly identified LAD V15 Gy constraint. We observed that LAD V15Gy <10% is achievable in more than 85% of plans initially exceeding this constraint, with minimal dosimetric tradeoffs. Our results support the feasibility of routine incorporation of the LAD as an OAR in modern thoracic IMRT/VMAT planning.

A practical guide for assessing and managing cardiovascular risk during androgen-deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men worldwide, and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is a mainstay of treatment. There are observational data demonstrating an increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients who receive ADT, particularly those who have an elevated baseline cardiovascular risk. Because, for most patients with prostate cancer, death is predominantly from noncancer-related causes, cardiovascular disease and its risk factors should be optimized during cancer treatment. This review provides an overview of the landscape of ADT treatment and serves as a guide for appropriate cardiovascular screening and risk-mitigation strategies. The authors emphasize the importance of shared communication between the multidisciplinary cancer team and primary care to improve baseline cardiovascular screening and treatment of modifiable risk factors within this higher risk population.

Does bortezomib influence pre-transplant desensitization therapy or benefit post-heart transplant outcomes for highly sensitized patients?

BACKGROUND: The use of bortezomib which is a proteasome inhibitor has been demonstrated to be efficacious in small number of patients as a desensitization strategy in heart transplant. We reviewed our single center's experience using Bortezomib along with plasmapheresis as desensitization therapy for highly sensitized patients to assess pre- and post-transplant outcomes. METHOD: We assessed 43 highly sensitized patients awaiting HTx (defined as cPRA > 50%) between 2010 and 2021 who underwent desensitization therapy with bortezomib. Only those patients who subsequently underwent HTx were included in this study. Enrolled patients received up to four doses of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 ) over 2 weeks in conjunction with plasmapheresis. The efficacy of PP/BTZ was assessed by comparing the calculated panel reactive antibodies to HLA class I or class II antigens. Post-transplant outcomes including overall survival and incidence of rejection were compared to those of non-sensitized patients (PRA < 10%, n = 649) from the same center. RESULTS: The average cPRA prior to PP/BTZ was 94.5%. Post-PP/BTZ there was no statistically significant decline in mean cPRA, class I cPRA, or class II cPRA, though the average percentage decrease in class I cPRA (8.7 ± 17.0%) was higher than the change in class II cPRA (4.4 ± 13.3%). Resulted were also replicated with C1q-binding antibodies showing more effect on I class compared to class II (15.0 ± 37.4% vs. 6.8 ± 33.6%) as well as with 1:8 dilutional assay (14.0 ± 23.0% vs. 9.1 ± 34.9%). Additionally, PP/BTZ treated patients and the control group of non-sensitized patients had similar overall 1 year survival (95.4 vs. 92.5%) but patients with PP/BTZ had increased incidence of AMR (79.1% vs. 97.1%, p = < .001), any treated rejection (62.8% vs. 86.7%, p = < .001) and de novo DSA development (81.4% vs. 92.5%, p = .007). Major side effects of PP/BTZ included thrombocytopenia (42%), infection requiring antibiotics (28%), and neuropathy (12%). CONCLUSION: The use of bortezomib in highly sensitized patients does not significantly lower circulating antibodies prior to heart transplantation. However, its use may improve the chances of obtaining an immuno-compatible donor heart and contribute to acceptable post-transplant outcomes.

Understanding and Investigating Sex-Based Differences in Heart Transplantation: A Call to Action.

Women represent only about 25% of heart transplant recipients annually. Although the number of women living with advanced heart failure remains unknown, epidemiologic research suggests that more women should be receiving advanced heart failure therapies. Sex differences in risk factors, presentation, response to pharmacotherapy, and outcomes in heart failure have been well described. Yet, less is known about sex differences in heart transplant candidate selection, waitlist management, donor selection, perioperative considerations, and post-transplant management and outcomes. The purpose of this review was to summarize the existing published reports related to sex differences in heart transplantation, highlighting areas in which sex-based considerations are well described and supported by available evidence, and emphasizing topics that require further study.

The End of Endomyocardial Biopsy?: A Practical Guide for Noninvasive Heart Transplant Rejection Surveillance.

Noninvasive heart transplant rejection surveillance using gene expression profiling (GEP) to monitor immune activation is widely used among heart transplant programs. With the new development of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) assays, more programs are transitioning to a predominantly noninvasive rejection surveillance protocol with a reduced frequency of endomyocardial biopsies. As a result, many practical questions arise that potentially delay implementation of these valuable new tools. The purpose of this review is to provide practical guidance for clinicians transitioning toward a less invasive acute rejection monitoring protocol after heart transplantation, and to answer 10 common questions about the GEP and dd-cfDNA assays. Evidence supporting GEP and dd-cfDNA testing is reviewed, as well as guidance on test interpretation and future directions.

Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Radiation Dose Association With All-Cause Mortality in NRG Oncology Trial RTOG 0617.

PURPOSE: A left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery volume (V) receiving 15 Gy (V15 Gy) ≥10% has been recently observed to be an independent risk factor of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiation therapy. However, this dose constraint has not been validated in independent or prospective data sets. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0617 data set from the National Clinical Trials Network was used. The LAD coronary artery was manually contoured. Multivariable Cox regression was performed, adjusting for known prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) were calculated. For assessment of baseline cardiovascular risk, only age, sex, and smoking history were available. RESULTS: There were 449 patients with LAD dose-volume data and clinical outcomes available after 10 patients were excluded owing to unreliable LAD dose statistics. The median age was 64 years. The median LAD V15 Gy was 38% (interquartile range, 15%-62%), including 94 patients (21%) with LAD V15 Gy <10% and 355 (79%) with LAD V15 Gy ≥10%. Adjusting for prognostic factors, LAD V15 Gy ≥10% versus <10% was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.99; P = .037), whereas a mean heart dose ≥10 Gy versus <10 Gy was not (adjusted HR, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.43; P = .36). The median OS for patients with LAD V15 Gy ≥10% versus <10% was 20.2 versus 25.1 months, respectively, with 2-year OS estimates of 47% versus 67% (P = .004), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a reanalysis of RTOG 0617, LAD V15 Gy ≥10% was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. These findings underscore the need for improved cardiac risk stratification and aggressive risk mitigation strategies, including implementation of cardiac substructure dose constraints in national guidelines and clinical trials.

Induction Therapy and Therapeutic Antibodies.

Prevention of allograft rejection is one of the crucial goals in solid organ transplantation to ensure durability of the graft and is chiefly mediated by cellular and humoral pathways targeting cell surface alloantigens. The risk of rejection is highest in the first post-transplant year and wanes with time albeit the risk always exists and varies with the type of organ transplanted. Induction therapies refer to the use of high-intensity immunosuppression in the immediate post-operative period to mitigate the highest risk of rejection. This term encompasses chiefly the use of antibody therapies directed against one of the key pathways in T-cell activation or abrogating effects of circulating alloantibodies. These antibodies carry more potent immunomodulatory effect than maintenance immunosuppressive therapy alone and many of them lead to durable immune cell depletion. A variety of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies have been utilized for use not only for induction therapy, but also for treatment of allograft rejection when it occurs and as components of desensitization therapy before and after transplantation to modulate circulating alloantibodies.

Donor-specific antibodies in heart transplantation: can we afford the price or is it too steep to pay?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: One-third of patients awaiting heart transplant are sensitized and 25-35% of heart allograft recipients develop de novo DSAs. Solid phase assays for DSA measurement have facilitated wider use of antibody monitoring and as such, our experience with DSAs is continuously evolving. RECENT FINDINGS: DSAs continue to exhibit poor correlation with biopsy-proven rejection. Novel molecular technologies, such as cell-free DNA and the molecular microscope (MMDx, which detects rejection-associated intragraft mRNA transcripts), are emerging as more sensitive methods to capture subclinical graft injury. High-resolution typing techniques are providing insight into the differential immunogenicity of HLA classes through epitope and eplet analysis. As sensitization of the transplant population is continuing to rise, our repertoire of desensitization strategies is also expanding. However, there is an acute need of predictive algorithms to help forecast the responders and the durability of desensitization. Novel immunomodulatory therapies have allowed safely transplanting across a positive crossmatch with good short-term survival but reported greater degree of rejection and lower long-term graft survival. SUMMARY: Our experience of outcomes as pertaining to DSAs still originates primarily from single-center studies. Our field is confronted with the challenge to establish common practice algorithms for the monitoring and treatment of DSAs.

cBIN1 Score (CS) Identifies Ambulatory HFrEF Patients and Predicts Cardiovascular Events.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac Bridging Integrator 1 (cBIN1) is a membrane deformation protein that generates calcium microdomains at cardiomyocyte t-tubules, whose transcription is reduced in heart failure, and is released into blood. cBIN1 score (CS), an inverse index of plasma cBIN1, measures cellular myocardial remodeling. In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), CS diagnoses ambulatory heart failure and prognosticates hospitalization. The performance of CS has not been tested in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: CS was determined from plasma of patients recruited in a prospective study. Two comparative cohorts consisted of 158 ambulatory HFrEF patients (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, 57 ± 10 years, 80% men) and 115 age and sex matched volunteers with no known history of HF. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations were also analyzed for comparison. CS follows a normal distribution with a median of 0 in the controls, which increases to a median of 1.9 (p < 0.0001) in HFrEF patients. CS correlates with clinically assessed New York Heart Association Class (p = 0.007). During 1-year follow-up, a high CS (≥ 1.9) in patients predicts increased cardiovascular events (43% vs. 26%, p = 0.01, hazard ratio 1.9). Compared to a model with demographics, clinical risk factors, and NT-proBNP, adding CS to the model improved the overall continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI 0.64; 95% CI 0.18-1.10; p = 0.006). Although performance for diagnosis and prognosis was similar to CS, NT-proBNP did not prognosticate between patients whose NT-proBNP values were > 400 pg/ml. CONCLUSION: CS, which is mechanistically distinct from NT-proBNP, successfully differentiates myocardial health between patients with HFrEF and matched controls. A high CS reflects advanced NYHA stage, pathologic cardiac muscle remodeling, and predicts 1-year risk of cardiovascular events in ambulatory HFrEF patients. CS is a marker of myocardial remodeling in HFrEF patients, independent of volume status.

Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: The Enduring Enemy of Cardiac Transplantation.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy remains a major limiting factor in the long-term survival of the heart transplant recipient. Our understanding of its pathogenesis is continuously evolving as advances in imaging modalities have allowed a direct window into the natural history of the disease. Innovation in diagnostic modalities has spurred the proliferation of prognostic tools and biomarkers. And in parallel, pharmacological advances have emerged that have helped ameliorate the disease's progressive course.

Association of a Novel Diagnostic Biomarker, the Plasma Cardiac Bridging Integrator 1 Score, With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Cardiovascular Hospitalization.

Importance: Transverse tubule remodeling is a hallmark of heart failure. Cardiac bridging integrator 1 (cBIN1) is a circulating membrane scaffolding protein that is essential for transverse tubule health, and its plasma level declines with disease. Objective: To determine if a cBIN1-derived score can serve as a diagnostic biomarker of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, the cBIN1 score (CS) was determined from enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay-measured plasma cBIN1 concentrations from study participants in an ambulatory heart failure clinic at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%) were recruited from July 2014 to November 2015 and compared with age-matched and sex-matched healthy volunteers with no known cardiovascular diagnoses and participants with risk factors for heart failure but no known HFpEF. Baseline characteristics and 1-year longitudinal clinical information were obtained through electronic medical records. Data analysis occurred from November 2016 to November 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: The analysis examined the ability of the CS and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) results to differentiate among patients with HFpEF, healthy control participants, and control participants with risk factors for heart failure. We further explored the association of the CS with future cardiovascular hospitalizations. Results: A total of 52 consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HFpEF were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 57 [15] years; 33 [63%] male). The CS values are significantly higher in the patients with HFpEF (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 1.85 [1.51-2.28]) than in the 2 control cohorts (healthy control participants: median [IQR], -0.03 [-0.48 to 0.41]; control participants with risk factors only: median [IQR], -0.08 [-0.75 to 0.42]; P < .001). For patients with HFpEF, the CS outperforms NT-proBNP when the comparator group was either healthy control participants (CS: area under curve [AUC], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.96-1.00]; NT-proBNP level: AUC, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.99]; P < .001) or those with risk factors (CS: AUC, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-1.00]; NT-proBNP: AUC, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.99]; P < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis of 1-year cardiovascular hospitalizations adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and NT-proBNP levels reveals that patients with HFpEF with CS greater than or equal to 1.80 have a hazard ratio of 3.8 (95% CI, 1.3-11.2; P = .02) for hospitalizations compared with those with scores less than 1.80. Conclusions and Relevance: If further validated, the plasma CS, a marker of transverse tubule dysfunction, may serve as a biomarker of cardiomyocyte remodeling that has the potential to aide in the diagnosis of HFpEF.