ABSTRACT
The goal of this study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with positioning-related SSEP changes (PRSC). The study investigated the association between 18 plausible risk factors and the occurrence of intraoperative PRSC. Risk factors investigated included demographic variables, comorbidities, and procedure related variables. All patients were treated by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 2010 to 2012. We used univariate and multivariate statistical methods. 69 out of the 3946 (1.75%) spinal surgeries resulted in PRSC changes. The risk of PRSC was increased for women (p < 0.001), patients older than 65 years of age (p = 0.01), higher BMI (p < 0.001) patients, smokers (p < 0.001), and patients with hypertension (p < 0.001). No associations were found between PRSC and age greater than 80 years, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease. Three surgical situations were associated with PRSC including abnormal baselines (p < 0.001), patients in the "superman" position (p < 0.001), and patients in surgical procedures that extended over 200 min (p = 0.03). Patients with higher BMIs and who are undergoing spinal surgery longer than 200 min, with abnormal baselines, must be positioned with meticulous attention. Gender, hypertension, and smoking were also found to be risk factors from their odds ratios.
Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Spine/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hemodynamic Monitoring , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neurosurgical Procedures , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lumbar interbody spinal fusion (LIF) surgeries are performed to treat or prevent back pain in patients with degenerated intervertebral discs and a variety of spinal diseases. However, post-operative neurological complications may ensue. Intraoperative monitoring techniques have been used to predict and potentially reduce the risk of complications. METHODS: This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of significant changes of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) to evaluate and predict post-operative neurological deficits after LIF. All patients underwent LIF at UPMC from 2010 to 2012. One thousand fifty-seven patients had pre-operative baseline and continuous intraoperative SSEP monitoring. Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS version 22. No relevant disclosure. RESULTS: Patient outcomes were not significantly affected by age over 65, gender, obesity, and abnormal baselines. Lower extremity (LE) significant changes in SSEPs and LE loss of responses resulted in a sensitivity/specificity of 0.03/0.99 and 0.03/0.99; they had an AUC of 0.54/0.73 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [0.34, 0.74]/[0.29, 1.00]. CONCLUSIONS: Significant SSEP changes during LIF are a very specific but poorly sensitive indicator of perioperative neurological deficits. The odds ratio for LE loss of responses was 29.14 with a 95% CI of 1.79-475.5, so LE SSEP loss of responses can serve as a biomarker of perioperative neurological deficits after LIF.
Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring/standards , Spinal Fusion/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring/methods , Lumbosacral Region/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of significant changes of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) to evaluate and predict postoperative neurological deficits after posterior cervical fusions (PCF). Eight hundred forty six eligible patients underwent PCF at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), from 2010 to 2012. OBJECTIVE: To assess the specificity and sensitivity of intraoperative monitoring in predicting postoperative neurological deficits during PCF. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: We calculated the predictive value, including sensitivity and specificity, of changes in SSEPs to identify neurological deficits postoperatively. We used a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with SSEP categories as cutoff values to further evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of change in SSEPs and postoperative neurological deficit. METHODS: All patients had preposition baselines and continuous SSEP monitoring throughout the surgery. Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). RESULTS: Age and sex did not influence outcomes. Obesity affected patient outcome. The SSEP categories of significant changes and loss of responses resulted in a sensitivity/specificity of 0.30/0.96 and 0.16/0.98, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve has an area under the curve for significant change in/loss of SSEPs of 0.62/0.65 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.525 to 0.714/0.509 to 0.797. CONCLUSION: Significant SSEP changes during PCF are a very specific but poorly sensitive indicator of postoperative neurological deficits. The odds ratio for significant changes in SSEPs and loss of waveforms was 9.80 and 11.82, respectively, with a 95% confidence interval of 4.695 to 20.46 and 4.45 to 31.41, respectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.
