A phase 1/2 clinical trial of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NMMA and taxane for treating chemoresistant triple-negative breast cancer.

The inducible nitric oxide signaling (iNOS) pathway is associated with poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Prior studies using in vivo models showed that inhibition of the iNOS signaling pathway using the pan-NOS inhibitor NG-monomethyl-l-arginine (L-NMMA) reduced tumor growth and enhanced survival in patients with TNBC. Here, we report a first-in-class phase 1/2 trial of L-NMMA combined with taxane for treating patients with chemorefractory, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or metastatic TNBC. We also examined immune cell correlates of chemotherapy response. 35 patients with metastatic TNBC were recruited: 15 in the phase 1 trial and 24 in the phase 2 trial (including 4 recommended phase 2 dose patients from the phase 1 trial). The overall response rate was 45.8% (11 of 24): 81.8% (9 of 11) for patients with LABC and 15.4% (2 of 13) for patients with metastatic TNBC. Among the patients with LABC, three patients had a pathological complete response at surgery (27.3%). Grade ≥3 toxicity was noted in 21% of patients; however, no adverse events were attributed to L-NMMA. Immune cells analyzed by CyTOF indicated that chemotherapy nonresponders showed greater expression of markers associated with M2 macrophage polarization and increased concentrations of circulating IL-6 and IL-10 cytokines. In contrast, chemotherapy responders showed an increase in CD15+ neutrophils in blood, as well as a decrease in arginase (a marker of protumor N2 neutrophils) in tumor biopsies obtained at the end of treatment. L-NMMA combined with taxane warrants further investigation in larger clinical studies of patients with breast cancer.

The impact of HER2-directed targeted therapy on HER2-positive DCIS of the breast.

BACKGROUND: In invasive breast cancer, HER2 is a well-established negative prognostic factor. However, its significance on the prognosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is unclear. As a result, the impact of HER2-directed therapy on HER2-positive DCIS is unknown and is currently the subject of ongoing clinical trials. In this study, we aim to determine the possible impact of HER 2-directed targeted therapy on survival outcomes for HER2-positive DCIS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to retrieve patients with biopsy-proven DCIS diagnosed from 2004-2015. Patients were divided into two groups based on the adjuvant therapy they received: systemic HER2-directed targeted therapy or no systemic therapy. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors predictive of receiving systemic therapy, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS. RESULTS: Altogether, 1927 patients met inclusion criteria; 430 (22.3%) received HER2-directed targeted therapy; 1497 (77.7%) did not. Patients who received HER2-directed targeted therapy had a higher 5-year OS compared to patients that did not (97.7% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.043). This survival benefit remained on multivariable analysis. Factors associated with worse OS on multivariable analysis included Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Score ≥ 2 and no receipt of hormonal therapy. CONCLUSION: In this large study evaluating HER2-positive DCIS patients, the receipt of HER2-directed targeted therapy was associated with an improvement in OS. The results of currently ongoing clinical trials are needed to confirm this finding.

Interventions to improve endocrine therapy adherence in breast cancer survivors: what is the evidence?

PURPOSE: Endocrine therapy reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrences and mortality in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer survivors. However, non-adherence to treatment remains a significant problem. The aim of this study was to review current literature and ongoing trials to identify interventions employed to improve adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) in breast cancer survivors. METHODS: We searched PubMed and the National Library of Medicine registry of clinical trials using the terms "breast cancer" and "adherence" or "compliance" and "intervention" and "medication" or "endocrine therapy" or "hormone therapy" to identify published studies as well as ongoing clinical trials. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-three studies were identified; five studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies enrolled postmenopausal women diagnosed with early stage HR+ breast cancer. Providing educational materials was the most common intervention implemented to improve adherence to one or more aromatase inhibitors. None of the studies found a significant improvement in adherence with the intervention evaluated. Twelve clinical trials investigating various interventions, mostly based on technology, to improve AET adherence were also identified. CONCLUSIONS: Improving adherence to AET in HR+ breast cancer survivors is an urgent medical need. While newer clinical trials are overcoming some of the limitations seen with published studies, tailored interventions led by clinicians need further investigation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Our study highlights the unmet clinical need to develop and test feasible interventions to improve AET adherence in HR+ breast cancer survivors to extend their long-term survival.

Systematic Literature Review of the Impact of Endocrine Monotherapy and in Combination with Targeted Therapy on Quality of Life of Postmenopausal Women with HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: A major treatment goal for advanced breast cancer (ABC) is to maintain or ideally improve patient quality of life (QoL). Given the changing disease landscape, this systematic literature review (SLR) aims to assess the impact of endocrine therapies (ET), including ET monotherapy (ET mono) and ET combined with targeted therapy (ET + TT), on QoL of women with HR+/HER2- ABC. METHODS: A SLR was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the following criteria: (1) included ET mono or ET + TT, (2) reported QoL outcomes, (3) focused on women with HR+/HER2- ABC, and (4) published after 2007 (when standardized HER2 testing became available). The databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and key conference proceedings from 2013 to 2016. QoL outcomes for ET mono, ET + TT, and comparisons between the two were summarized from the identified trials. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies (representing 6 RCTs) were identified. The study populations included first-line (5 studies) and ET-failure settings (6 studies). Across settings, global health status (GHS) maintained or deteriorated slightly on these treatments during the trial period. Time to deterioration (TTD) in QoL measured by GHS was analyzed in 6 studies and 4 RCTs. In the first-line setting, reported median TTD in GHS was similar between ET mono and ET + TT (7.2-13.8 months in ET mono; 11.1 months in ET + TT). In the ET-failure setting, ET + TT showed significantly longer TTD vs. ET mono in GHS (median 5.6-8.4 months in ET mono and 8.3-11.7 months in ET + TT) and some additional domains. CONCLUSIONS: ET + TT users experienced similar QoL in the first-line and ET-failure setting relative to patients on ET mono. Moreover, ET + TT users experienced better QoL outcomes in some domains in the ET-failure setting relative to ET mono users. FUNDING: Novartis.

Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 022: A Phase II Trial of Neratinib for Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases.

PURPOSE: Evidence-based treatments for metastatic, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer in the CNS are limited. Neratinib is an irreversible inhibitor of erbB1, HER2, and erbB4, with promising activity in HER2-positive breast cancer; however, its activity in the CNS is unknown. We evaluated the efficacy of treatment with neratinib in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases in a multicenter, phase II open-label trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were those with HER2-positive brain metastases (≥ 1 cm in longest dimension) who experienced progression in the CNS after one or more line of CNS-directed therapy, such as whole-brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and/or surgical resection. Patients received neratinib 240 mg orally once per day, and tumors were assessed every two cycles. The primary endpoint was composite CNS objective response rate (ORR), requiring all of the following: ≥ 50% reduction in volumetric sum of target CNS lesions and no progression of non-target lesions, new lesions, escalating corticosteroids, progressive neurologic signs/symptoms, or non-CNS progression--the threshold for success was five of 40 responders. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled between February 2012 and June 2013; 78% of patients had previous whole-brain radiotherapy. Three women achieved a partial response (CNS objective response rate, 8%; 95% CI, 2% to 22%). The median number of cycles received was two (range, one to seven cycles), with a median progression-free survival of 1.9 months. Five women received six or more cycles. The most common grade ≥ 3 event was diarrhea (occurring in 21% of patients taking prespecified loperamide prophylaxis and 28% of those without prophylaxis). Patients in the study experienced a decreased quality of life over time. CONCLUSION: Although neratinib had low activity and did not meet our threshold for success, 12.5% of patients received six or more cycles. Studies combining neratinib with chemotherapy in patients with CNS disease are ongoing.