The effects of intensive oral care before surgery for gastric cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Oral function management has been recognized as important strategy for preventing postoperative complications. In this historical cohort study, we focused on the patients who planed gastrectomy, and investigated the appropriate duration and frequency of preoperative oral care to prevent complications after surgery. METHODS: Patients who planed surgery for gastric cancer between 2012 and 2018 were enrolled. We defined intensive oral care (IOC) as initial intervention at least three weeks before surgery and follow-up intervention within a week before surgery. As the primary outcome, the incidence of postoperative infectious complications was compared between the IOC and non-intensive oral care groups. RESULTS: A total of 576 patients were enrolled, including 66 with IOC. The incidence of infectious complications was 2/66 (3.0%) in the IOC group and 64/510 (12.5%) in the non-intensive oral care group. After adjusting for confounding factors, patients with IOC exposure had a lower chance of developing postoperative infectious complications (odds ratio; 0.217, 0.051-0.927). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive oral care can help prevent postoperative infectious complications after gastrectomy. These findings suggest that appropriate preoperative oral care includes at least two interventions: three weeks or more before and within one week before surgery.

The bacterial association with oral cavity and intra-abdominal abscess after gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative oral management has been reported to be effective for preventing postoperative infectious complications. In addition, severe periodontal disease was identified as the significant risk factor for complications after gastrointestinal surgery. We investigated the bacteriological association between the periodontal pocket, stomach mucosa and drainage fluid to determine whether oral bacteria directly cause intra-abdominal infection after gastrectomy. METHODS: Patients who were scheduled to undergo surgery for gastric cancer were prospectively enrolled. We evaluated the similarity of bacterial strains in periodontal pocket, stomach mucosa and fluid from drainage tube. Gingival crevicular fluid and dental plaque were collected from the periodontal pocket and cultured to detect bacteria. Specimens from the resected stomach were collected and used for bacterial culturing. Drainage fluid from the abdominal cavity was also cultured. RESULTS: All of 52 patients were enrolled. In the periodontal pocket, α-Streptococcus spp., Neisseria sp., and Prevotella sp. were mainly detected. Bacterial cultures in the stomach mucosa were positive in 26 cases. In 20 cases (76.9%), the detected strains were the same as those in the periodontal pocket. Six patients had the postoperative intra-abdominal infection after gastrectomy, and the same bacterial strains was detected in both of drainage fluid and periodontal pocket in two patients with severe periodontal disease. CONCLUSIONS: We found the bacteriological association that same strain detected in periodontal pocket, stomach and in intra-abdominal drainage fluid after gastrectomy in patients with periodontal disease.

Clinical impact of periodontal disease on postoperative complications in gastrointestinal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of perioperative oral management in gastrointestinal surgery remains unclear. To elucidate the clinical significance of oral care, we investigated the relationship between the oral environment and postoperative infectious complications (POICs) in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: This was a single-institute and historical cohort study of 341 patients. The participants were isolated from consecutive patients undergoing planned radical resection for gastrointestinal carcinoma from January 2016 to June 2017. Dentists assessed the oral environment for periodontal disease, hygiene status, dry mouth, fur on tongue, and tooth stumps. All patients received scaling and tooth brushing instructions. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for POICs among the different oral statuses. RESULTS: The surgical procedures performed were gastrectomy in 123 (36.1%), colorectal resection in 185 (54.2%), and pancreatoduodenectomy or others in 38 (11.1%). POICs occurred in 48 patients (14.1%), including deep organ space infection in 20, surgical site infection in 11, anastomotic leakage in 5, urinary tract infection in 4, pneumonia in 2, and others in 6. After adjusting for confounding factors, periodontal disease was isolated as an independent risk factor for POICs (odds ratio 2.091, p = 0.037, 95% confidence interval 1.045-4.183). Other variables of oral environment such as hygiene status, dry mouth, fur on tongue, and tooth stumps did not have a significant impact on POICs. CONCLUSIONS: Periodontal disease is a risk factor for infectious complications after gastrointestinal surgery.