ABSTRACT
Bolus serves as a tissue equivalent material that shifts the 95-100% isodose line towards the skin and subcutaneous tissue. The need for bolus for all breast cancer patients planned for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) has been questioned. The work was initiated by the faculty of the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) breast cancer courses and represents a multidisciplinary international breast cancer expert collaboration to optimize PMRT. Due to the lack of randomised trials evaluating the benefits of bolus, we designed a stepwise project to evaluate the existing evidence about the use of bolus in the setting of PMRT to achieve an international consensus for the indications of bolus in PMRT, based on the Delphi method.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mastectomy , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Female , Humans , Radiotherapy, AdjuvantABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Post mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) reduces locoregional recurrence (LRR) and breast cancer mortality for selected patients. Bolus overcomes the skin-sparing effect of external-beam radiotherapy, ensuring adequate dose to superficial regions at risk of local recurrence (LR). This systematic review summarizes the current evidence regarding the impact of bolus on LR and acute toxicity in the setting of PMRT. RESULTS: 27 studies were included. The use of bolus led to higher rates of acute grade 3 radiation dermatitis (pooled rates of 9.6% with bolus vs. 1.2% without). Pooled crude LR rates from thirteen studies (n = 3756) were similar with (3.5%) and without (3.6%) bolus. CONCLUSIONS: Bolus may be indicated in cases with a high risk of LR in the skin, but seems not to be necessary for all patients. Further work is needed to define the role of bolus in PMRT.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Radiodermatitis , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Mastectomy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effectsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The potential benefits from respiratory gating (RG) compared to free-breathing (FB) regarding target coverage and dose to organs at risk for breast cancer patients receiving post-operative radiotherapy (RT) in the DBCG HYPO multicentre trial are reported. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients included in the DBCG HYPO trial were randomized between 50 Gy in 25 fractions (normofractionated) versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions (hypofractionated). A tangential forward field-in-field dose planning technique was used to cover the clinical target volume (CTV) with the intent to limit dose to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) to 20 Gy and 17 Gy in the normo- and hypofractionated arms, respectively. Treatment plan data for 1327 patients from four Danish centres was retrospectively analyzed. FB right-sided patients served as control group for the left-sided patients regarding CTV V95% (relative volume receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose), mean heart dose (MHD) and mean lung dose (MLD). RESULTS: Median CTV V95% was for FB right-sided, FB left-sided and RG left-sided patients 94.6, 92.6 and 94.7% for normofractionated therapy, respectively, and 94.6, 91.8 and 94.4% for hypofractionated therapy and did not differ significantly for RG left-sided plans compared to FB right-sided in either study arm. CTV V95% was significantly lower for FB versus RG for left-sided plans in both arms. Median MHD was 0.7, 1.8 and 1.5 Gy (normofractionated therapy) versus 0.6, 1.5 and 1.2 Gy (hypofractionated therapy), respectively. The corresponding median MLD was 9.0, 8.3 and 7.3 Gy versus 7.3, 6.4 and 5.8 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RG for left-sided breast cancer patients ensured similar CTV V95% as for FB right-sided patients. MLD was lower for RG due to the increased lung volume. MHD was generally low due to strict protocol-defined maximum dose to LADCA, but for left-sided patients RG led to significantly lower MHD.
Subject(s)
Organs at Risk , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Unilateral Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breath Holding , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Heart/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Middle Aged , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aims at evaluating the effect of deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) on target coverage and dose to organs at risk in a large series of breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical dose plans for 319 breast cancer patients were evaluated: 144 left-sided patients treated with DIBH and 175 free-breathing (FB) patients (83 left-sided and 92 right-sided). All patients received whole breast irradiation with tangential fields, based on a forward-planned intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique. Dose to heart, ipsi-lateral lung and ipsi-lateral breast were assessed and median values compared between patient groups. RESULTS: Comparing group median values, DIBH plans show large reductions of dose to the heart compared with left-sided FB plans; V(20 Gy) (relative volume receiving ≥ 20 Gy) for the heart is reduced from 7.8% to 2.3% (-70%, p < 0.0001), V(40 Gy) from 3.4% to 0.3% (-91%, p < 0.0001) and mean dose from 5.2 to 2.7 Gy (-48%, p < 0.0001). Lung dose also shows a small reduction in V(20 Gy) (p < 0.04), while median target coverage is slightly improved (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: In a large series of clinical patients we find that implementation of DIBH in daily clinical practice results in reduced irradiation of heart and lung, without compromising target coverage.
