Management of combat vascular injuries using modern imaging: are we getting better?

Background. Vascular injuries often result in life threatening hemorrhage or limb loss. When they present with a single entry or exit wound, surgery is immediately indicated. With multiple injuries, however, imaging such as CTA is necessary for diagnosis and choice of treatment. Methods. For all combat-related vascular cases admitted to our medical center during the Lebanon wars in 1982 and 2006, we compiled and compared presenting signs and symptoms, means of diagnosis, treatments, and results. Results. 126 patients with vascular injuries were admitted (87 in 1982, 39 in 2006). 90% were male; mean age of 29 years (range 20-53). All injuries were accompanied by insult to soft tissue, bones, and viscera. 75% presented with injury to arteries in the extremities. 75% of these patients presented with limb ischemia, and 25% sustained massive blood loss. Treatments included venous interposition graft, end-to-end anastomosis, venous patch, endovascular technique (only in 2006), and ligation/observation. Complications included thrombosis and wound infections. Mortality and amputations occurred only in 1982, and this may be attributed to the use of imaging, advanced technique, and shorter average time from injury to hospital (7 hours). Conclusions. We recommend CTA as the first line modality for diagnosis of vascular injuries, as its liberal use allowed for early and appropriate treatment. Treatment outcomes improved with fast and effective resuscitation, liberal use of tourniquets and fasciotomies, and meticulous treatment by a multidisciplinary team.

Vascular injuries in an urban combat setting: experience from the 2006 Lebanon war.

UNLABELLED: Vascular injuries are manifested by life-threatening hemorrhage or limb loss and their diagnosis and treatment are challenging. Angiography is beyond the capability of available teams during wartime. Thus, computed tomographic angiography (CTA) may become a major triage tool. This study reports on the presentation, diagnosis, management and outcome of combat vascular injuries with emphasis on the utility of CTA. Presenting signs and symptoms, means of diagnosis, treatments and results of all combat sustained vascular cases were collected and compiled with follow-up. Of 511 patients, 39 patients (7.6%) with vascular injuries were admitted. Injuries were penetrating and accompanied by soft tissue and bone insult. Diagnosis was made by CTA in 62% and by surgical exploration in 38%. Extremity arteries were injured in 72% of cases. Treatment included surgical and endovascular techniques. COMPLICATIONS: one late amputation, 5% thrombosis, 24% wound infections with no mortalities or early amputations. Although similarities exist between this experience and recent wartime reports, differences are apparent including the effectiveness of CTA. High index of suspicion and liberal use of CTA allows for an early and accurate diagnosis of a vascular injury resulting in high rates of limb salvage and low mortality. CTA should be the first line modality for diagnosis of vascular injuries, reserving angiography for endovascular treatment.

Coping with war mass casualties in a hospital under fire: the radiology experience.

OBJECTIVE: We report the role of the imaging department at a level 1 trauma center during the Second Lebanon War (summer 2006). Our institution received 849 military and civilian casualties, an average of 25 war-injured patients per day, 338 with acute traumatic stress disorders and 511 physically injured, coming in waves after a rocket attack or a battle confrontation. About 12 potentially critical physically injured patients per day were referred to the imaging department for sometimes complex imaging procedures. The unpredictable waves of casualties and nature of the injuries forced us to reorganize our routine workflow to provide adequate care to casualties and to nonemergent patients. Our nurses' station was transformed into a small emergency department. The radiology staff was distributed into 12 diagnostic stations, providing 24-hour service. Communication was improved by means of walkie-talkies. Three ultrasound units were placed at the emergency department for immediate focused assessment with sonography for trauma performance enabling initial triage of patients. The site and extent of injuries were accurately diagnosed on CT and CT angiography. Digital angiography allowed definitive vascular diagnosis and interventional procedures. CONCLUSION: Adequate communication, strict workflow, and correct use of imaging protocols ensured optimal triage, diagnosis, and therapy of casualties while maintaining care for nonwar patients.

Venous trauma in the Lebanon War--2006.

OBJECTIVES: Reports on venous trauma are relatively sparse. Severe venous trauma is manifested by hemorrhage, not ischemia. Bleeding may be internal or external and rarely may lead to hypovolemic shock. Repair of major extremity veins has been a subject of controversy and the current teaching is to avoid venous repair in an unstable or multi-trauma patient. The aim of the current paper is to present our recent experience in major venous trauma during the Lebanon conflict, means of diagnosis and treatment in a level I trauma center. METHODS: All cases of major venous trauma, either isolated or combined with arterial injury, admitted to the emergency room during the 33-day conflict were reviewed. RESULTS: Out of 511 wounded soldiers and civilians who were admitted to our service over this period, 12 (2.3%) sustained a penetrating venous injury either isolated (5) or combined with arterial injury (7). All injuries were secondary to high velocity penetrating missiles or from multiple pellets stored in long-range missiles. All injuries were accompanied by additional insult to soft tissue, bone and viscera. The mean injury severity score was 15. Severe external bleeding was the presenting symptom in three cases of isolated venous injury (jugular, popliteal and femoral). The diagnosis of a major venous injury was made by a CTA scan in five cases, angiography in one and during surgical exploration in six cases. All injured veins were repaired: three by venous interposition grafts, four by end to end anastomosis, three by lateral suture and two by endovascular techniques. None of the injuries was treated by ligation of a major named vein. Immediate postoperative course was uneventful in all patients and the 30-day follow-up (by clinical assessment and duplex scan) has demonstrated a patent repair with no evidence of thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Without contradicting the wisdom of ligating major veins in the setup of multi-trauma or an unstable patient, our experience indicates that a routine repair of venous trauma can be safely and effectively performed in young patients. Postoperative course is not compromised and late sequelae of venous interruption may be prevented.

Inadvertent arterial injury secondary to treatment of venous insufficiency.

Arterial injury during treatment of varicose veins is a rare but devastating complication that can lead to leg amputation. Approximately 6,000 patients were treated by either surgery (4,800 patients treated by ligation, stripping, and stub avulsion) or ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (USGS) (1,200 patients) in the last 7 years for venous insufficiency at three medical centers. Six patients (0.1%) sustained inadvertent arterial injury. The incidence of arterial injury during surgery was 0.06% (3 of 4,800) and was of a mechanical nature amenable to repair. None of these patients had tissue loss. The injury during USGS (0.25%, 3 of 1,200) was of a chemical and irreversible nature. All three patients suffered tissue loss. In our experience, the incidence of arterial injuries during USGS is four times higher than during traditional surgery and carries a much higher risk of tissue loss. Although experience, technical skill, and awareness of this complication help reduce the incidence of arterial injury during surgery, they seem to offer no protection during USGS. Careful mapping of the arterial venous communications and avoidance of high-risk zones will help prevent this complication.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm in Behçet's disease: new treatment options for an old and challenging problem.

BACKGROUND: Arterial involvement in Behçet's syndrome is rare. Aneurysms are common among the arterial lesions, affecting various arteries but mostly the abdominal aorta. Surgical interposition graft insertion is the treatment of choice for large aneurysms. However, vasculitis in these patients is the reason for the notorious surgical complications that result in up to 50% false aneurysms in anastomotic sites. Recently, endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms has been established. OBJECTIVES: To learn more about vascular Behçet's and, specifically, to compare the results of surgical treatment and endovascular repair of AAA in patients with Behçet's syndrome. METHODS: We retrieved the medical records of all 53 patients with Behçet's disease admitted to Rambam Medical Center during the years 1985 and 2001, and analysed the results and follow-up of open surgery versus endovascular repair of AAA in patients with known Behçet's syndrome. RESULTS: Of the 53 patients with Behçet's disease 18 had vascular manifestations (34%). AAAs were encountered in 8 patients (15%) and 5 were treated. Open surgery (group 1), under general anesthesia, lasted less than 3 hours with an average aortic damping time of 34 minutes (range 26-41 min) after which the patients were transferred to the intensive care unit for 24-48 hours. Endovascular treatment (group 2), although lasting about the same time without the need for intensive care, necessitated contrast media and fluoroscopy. The length of hospital stay was considerably shorter for patients after endovascular repair compared to open surgery (3 days vs. 6 days). Combined mortality and morbidity was higher in patients who underwent open surgery compared to endovascular repair (one death, one major amputation and three anastomotic pseudoaneurysms compared to one temporary contrast-induced nephropathy). CONCLUSIONS: Vasculo-Behçet's patients with AAA are better candidates for endovascular treatment than atherosclerotic patients. Combined morbidity (especially anastomotic pseudoaneurysms) and mortality of Behçet's patients after endovascular repair is considerably lower than after open surgery.

Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of CT angiography using a multidetector scanner in the evaluation of patients with peripheral vascular disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with peripheral vascular disease who were referred for elective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) also underwent CT angiography. We scanned patients from the level of the superior mesenteric artery to the pedal arteries in a single helical scan. CT angiograms were produced using maximum-intensity-projection reconstructions. Findings were graded according to six categories: 1, normal (0% stenosis); 2, mild (1-49% stenosis); 3, moderate (50-74% stenosis); 4, severe (75-99% stenosis); 5, occluded; and 6, nondiagnostic. CT angiography findings were compared with DSA findings for each arterial segment. RESULTS: We found agreement for the degree of stenosis in 77.7% of the arteries and discrepancy for 22.3% of the arteries when all categories were considered. Grouping the six categories according to the threshold for treatment (categories 1 and 2 as one group and categories 3, 4, and 5 as the second group) resulted in an agreement of 91.95%. Compared with DSA, CT angiography yielded a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 92.4%. CONCLUSION: Multidetector CT angiography is an accurate, noninvasive technique for the imaging of peripheral vascular disease.