Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Work ; 54(2): 367-77, 2016 Jun 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27372892

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intervention programs for hospital nurses with musculoskeletal pain present a challenge for the health professions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a structured personalized ergonomic intervention program for hospital nurses with musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: In a randomised controlled trial, 31 nurses from one central hospital with musculoskeletal pain were observed at work. A multi-stage study that included the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, Karasek's questionnaire, The Rapid Entire Body Assessment, and an intervention program was completed with 14 nurses, while the remaining 17 were assigned to a control group. The intervention program was carried out by one physiotherapist and included four meetings over three months. The control group received only instruction sheets. Data on body posture and frequency and intensity of pain were collected before and at three months after the termination of the intervention program. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed an improvement in REBA scores and in posture that is considered risk factor for work-related musculoskeletal discomfort disorders [p < 0.001], but there were no significant differences in the number of body parts in pain or in the level of musculoskeletal pain. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was shown to be effective in reducing risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders over a short follow-up period. A long-term study is required to determine if this effect is preserved over a longer period and to determine whether the intervention can reduce musculoskeletal symptoms.


Subject(s)
Ergonomics/methods , Musculoskeletal Pain/prevention & control , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Posture , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
J Drug Issues ; 40(3): 537-551, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24198439

ABSTRACT

The study examined the prevalence and correlates of substance use disorders and treatment utilization among lifetime MDMA users. Secondary analyses were conducted on data from the 2001-2002 NESARC, a nationally representative survey of adults in the United States. Lifetime MDMA use was assessed, and MDMA users (n = 562) were compared to a matched sample of non-MDMA users. Substance use diagnoses were made using the AUDADIS - DSM-IV, and data on treatment utilization were collected. MDMA use was significantly related to lifetime and past year substance use disorders as well as treatment utilization in bivariate analyses. Multivariate analysis, however, showed that MDMA use was not related to lifetime substance use diagnosis or to treatment utilization. MDMA use still had the strongest association with past year substance use disorders.

3.
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci ; 35(4): 287-92, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9988986

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to validate the EDI-2 (1) in an Israeli population. The sample consisted of 29 anorectic patients and 18 recovering anorectics, recruited from six hospitals, and 67 female control subjects matched by age. Results of the validity study indicate that the translated EDI-2 was reliable and valid. Anorectic patients scored higher than the recovering anorectics on most scales. Recovering anorectics resembled the control subjects on most scales except Perfectionism.


Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Adolescent , Anorexia Nervosa/complications , Female , Humans , Israel , Male , Personality Disorders/complications , Personality Disorders/diagnosis , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Self Concept
4.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol ; 67(5): 573-7, 1989 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2717154

ABSTRACT

The accuracies of an analog-indicating electronic device, the Dentometer, and of an audio-indicating device, the Sono-Explorer, were compared to each other and to the radiographic method of tooth length determination. Readings obtained by the Dentometer were shorter, an average of 0.28 +/- 0.64 mm than those obtained by the Sono-Explorer (p less than 0.001) and 0.32 +/- 0.63 mm shorter than the results obtained by the calculated working length (p less than 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between the readings of the Sono-Explorer and the calculated radiographic working length. The results indicate that the measurements calculated by the radiographic method were longer than those obtained by the electronic method of tooth length determination. The statistically significant difference found between the two devices indicates that to determine the accuracy of electronic devices, they should be tested and compared to other methods or devices.


Subject(s)
Dental Pulp Cavity/anatomy & histology , Electronics, Medical/instrumentation , Root Canal Therapy/instrumentation , Dental Pulp Cavity/diagnostic imaging , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Odontometry/instrumentation , Radiography , Sound , Tooth Root/anatomy & histology , Tooth Root/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL