A comparative study of hepatic steatosis using two different qualitative ultrasound techniques measured based on magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of attenuation measurement (ATT; dual-frequency method) and improved algorithm of ATT (iATT; reference method) for the assessment of hepatic steatosis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as the reference standard. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 427 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent ATT, iATT, or MRI-derived PDFF. Correlation coefficients were analyzed, and diagnostic values were evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The steatosis grade was categorized as S0 (<5.2%), S1 (≥5.2%, <11.3%), S2 (≥11.3%, <17.1%), and S3 (≥17.1%) according to MRI-derived PDFF values. RESULTS: The median ATT and iATT values were 0.61 dB/cm/MHz (interquartile range 0.55-0.67 dB/cm/MHz) and 0.66 dB/cm/MHz (interquartile range 0.57-0.77 dB/cm/MHz). ATT and iATT values increased significantly as the steatosis grade increased in the order S0, S1, S2, and S3 (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficients between ATT or iATT values and MRI-derived PDFF values were 0.533 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.477-0.610) and 0.803 (95% CI 0.766-0.834), with a significant difference between them (p < 0.001). For the detection of hepatic steatosis of ≥S1, ≥S2, and ≥S3, iATT yielded AUROCs of 0.926 (95% CI 0.901-0.951), 0.913 (95% CI 0.885-0.941), and 0.902 (95% CI 0.869-0.935), with significantly higher AUROC values than for ATT (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: iATT showed excellent diagnostic performance for hepatic steatosis, and was strongly correlated with MRI-derived PDFF, with AUROCs of ≥0.900.

Attenuation imaging based on ultrasound technology for assessment of hepatic steatosis: A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging-determined proton density fat fraction.

AIM: A new method has recently been developed for diagnosing hepatic steatosis based on attenuation measurement using ultrasound. We investigated the ability of attenuation imaging (ATI) to detect steatosis that was identified by proton density fat fraction (PDFF) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with chronic liver disease. METHODS: A total of 119 patients with chronic liver disease (non-B, non-C) were analyzed. The relationship between ATI values and steatosis grades determined by PDFF was evaluated. Additionally, the diagnostic ability of ATI was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and the correlation between ATI values and PDFF values was determined. RESULTS: The ATI values of steatosis grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 0.55, 0.61, 0.74, and 0.84 dB/cm/MHz, respectively (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant trend of higher ATI values with higher steatosis grades (P < 0.001). The correlation coefficient (r) between PDFF values and ATI values was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.78; P < 0.001), corresponding to a strong relationship. The diagnostic ability of ATI for steatosis grades ≥1, ≥2, and 3, as determined by PDFF, were 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.89), 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.96), and 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.98), respectively. The r between PDFF values and ATI values was 0.49 (95% CI 0.31-0.63; P < 0.001) for patients with mild or no steatosis (grade ≤1), and 0.75 (95% CI 0.57-0.86; P < 0.001) for obese patients (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 ). CONCLUSION: ATI values had an excellent diagnostic ability to detect hepatic steatosis.