Juvenile Angiofibroma: What Is on Stage?

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the present study is to validate and compare four of the most widely used staging systems for juvenile angiofibroma on a homogeneous cohort of patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated with endoscopic or endoscopic-assisted surgical resection between 1999 and 2020 was carried out. Each case was classified according to the following staging systems: Andrews-Fisch (1989), Radkowski (1996), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (2010), and Janakiram (2017). Spearman's rank correlation test and areas under the curve of receiver operator curves were used to assess the correlation between outcomes of interests (blood loss, surgical time, need for transfusion, and persistence of disease) and stage of disease. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 25 months (range 12-127 months). Median surgical time was 217 minutes (range 52-625). Median blood loss was 500 mL (range 40-5200) and 27 patients (34.2%) required blood transfusions. Seven patients (8.9%) showed persistence of disease. All classification systems showed a similar association with blood loss, surgical time, persistence of disease, and need for transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Involvement of the infratemporal fossa and intracranial extension was identified as red flags for surgical planning and preoperative counseling, as associated with increased risk for transfusion and persistent/recurrent disease, respectively. No classification system was found to be better than the others in predicting the most important outcomes. Therefore, the simplest and most easily applicable system would be the preferred one to be used in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:1160-1165, 2022.

Intravascular foreign bodies: what the radiologist needs to know.

The intravascular foreign bodies (IFBs) can originate from many sources both iatrogenic and noniatrogenic; as the frequency of endovascular therapies increases, the incidence of lost or embolized iatrogenic foreign bodies is also increasing. As IFB can cause significant complications such as thrombosis, pulmonary and peripheral embolism, etc. It is therefore necessary to remove them, and this may be accomplished through surgery or by means of percutaneous radiologic techniques. Percutaneous approach is widely perceived as the best way to retrieve IFB. We provide an overview of recent literature, clarifying what devices are being lost, what symptoms occur as a result, and how retrieval is being performed.

Errors and malpractice in interventional radiology.

Interventional radiology is an invasive specialty with the potential for errors as with other invasive specialties. A critical analysis of the different types of errors may help radiologist undertake the corrective measures. Standardize interventional procedures with protocols applicable to clinical practice are necessary to avoid the malpractice and, therefore, the related medical-legal issues. In this article, we present an overview of principal differences between errors and malpractice with particular regard to the issues in interventional radiology. Specific topics discussed in this article are the approaches to preventing errors and, thus, to avoiding the malpractice in interventional radiology.

Current role of interventions in metastatic kidney tumors: single center experience.

This study on the treatment of kidney tumor metastases aims to expose our experience in different interventional therapies for renal cell carcinomas metastasis in different organs, broaching their complications and comparing our results with the literature. In the last 5 years, after informed consent, 22 patients with metastatic kidney tumors were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. According to lesion sites, different interventional procedures may be performed: RFA for pancreas, lung, adrenal gland and liver lesions; TAE and RFA for bone lesions and IVC filter positioning for thrombosis of renal vein. There were mainly satisfactory results: complete necrosis of pancreas, lung and adrenal gland metastasis with a technical success rate of 100%; after TAE and RFA of bone lesions, an acceptable blood loss was registered during surgical intervention; no recurrences after liver metastasis ablation were observed in a period of 3 months; positioning of IVC filter was technically correct in 100% of patients; few complications, such as diffuse abdominal pain for pancreas, pneumothorax in the lung RCC metastasis and a post-RFA syndrome for the adrenal. There was a nodular recurrence along the ablation margin in one liver RCC metastasis. Inclusion criteria were relatively strict and only 22 patients were included in this study. The follow-up has been relatively short to date, so we are not certain of the long-term results, though these are comparable to those found in literature. It is possible to conclude that Interventional radiology plays an important role in RCC metastasis treatment, if we have few complications and improved outcomes.