ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Bone marrow examination is valuable for identifying the cause of fever of unknown origin (FUO) in HIV-infected patients. Based on the outcomes of bone marrow examination of patients with FUO, we aimed to develop a predictive model for identifying the factors that can increase the diagnostic yield of bone marrow examination. DESIGN: For this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled HIV-infected patients, aged more than 15âyears and diagnosed with FUO, at Songklanakarind Hospital in Southern Thailand, between January 2009 and December 2019. METHODS: Evaluations were based on bone marrow aspiration, biopsy, and culture; any missing data were imputed with regression imputation. RESULTS: Among the final 108 included patients, 44 (40.74%) showed positive bone marrow results. The diagnoses mainly comprised histoplasmosis, penicilliosis, and tuberculosis. Bone marrow examination led to treatment modifications in approximately 33% patients. Platelet count less than 150â000âcells/µl, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level at least 200âU/l, and no previous antibiotic treatment were significantly associated with higher diagnostic yields. The HIV bone marrow (HIVBM) model, comprising of spleen size, hematocrit (Hct), platelet count before bone marrow examination, ALP level at admission, and previous antibiotic treatment, was generated as a nomogram to predict the diagnostic yield of bone marrow examination in HIV-infected patients with FUO. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the HIVBM model can be used to predict the diagnostic yield of bone marrow examination, and therefore assist in clinical decision-making regarding bone marrow procedures, to be performed for identifying the origin of fever in HIV-infected patients.
Subject(s)
Fever of Unknown Origin , HIV Infections , Humans , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/pathology , Bone Marrow Examination/adverse effects , Fever of Unknown Origin/diagnosis , Fever of Unknown Origin/etiology , Fever of Unknown Origin/pathology , Retrospective Studies , HIV , Anti-Bacterial AgentsABSTRACT
Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) is a challenging condition to treat, and there is an unmet clinical need for effective therapies. Recently, polatuzumab vedotin (Pola), an anti-CD79b antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC), combined with bendamustine-rituximab (BR), has been approved for R/R DLBCL patients. However, real-world data on Pola-based regimens in R/R DLBCL patients, especially in Thailand, are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Pola-based salvage treatment in R/R DLBCL patients in Thailand. Thirty-five patients who received Pola-based treatment were included in the study, and their data were compared to 180 matched patients who received non-Pola-based therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) in the Pola group was 62.8%, with complete remission and partial remission rates of 17.1% and 45.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.6 months and 12.8 months, respectively. The study found a significantly higher ORR in Pola-based salvage treatments compared to non-Pola-based therapy (62.8% vs. 33.3%). The survival outcomes were also significantly superior in the Pola group, with longer median PFS and OS than the control group. Grades 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were mainly hematological, and they were tolerable. In conclusion, this study provides real-world evidence of the efficacy and safety of Pola-based salvage treatment in R/R DLBCL patients in Thailand. The results of this study are promising and suggest that Pola-based salvage treatment could be a viable option for R/R DLBCL patients who have limited treatment options.
Subject(s)
Immunoconjugates , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin , Humans , Southeast Asian People , Thailand , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/drug therapy , Immunoconjugates/therapeutic use , RituximabABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using cryopreserved grafts is time-consuming, expensive treatment, and may associated with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) toxicity. Here, we assess the clinical utility and safety of non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cell graft in autologous HSCT. MATERIAL AND METHODS Medical data of multiple myeloma or lymphoma patients who underwent autologous non-cryopreserved HSCT were reviewed. RESULTS A total of 58 patients (40 myeloma and 18 lymphoma) were reviewed. The median myeloma and lymphoma CD34⺠cell doses were 7.59 and 6.9 million/kg, respectively, with good viability after storage. The median times in neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 9 and 13 days and 11 and 14 days in myeloma and lymphoma, respectively. Only 5 patients in this cohort developed serious post-transplant complications. After transplantation, the cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years was 34.4% in myeloma versus 19.1% in lymphoma patients. Notably, the mortality incidence rate rapidly increased within the first year and reached a plateau after 4 years, with cumulative incidence of 5.9% and 30.9% in myeloma and lymphoma, respectively. With a median follow-up time of 60 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for lymphoma patients was 123.8 and 130 months, respectively. For the myeloma group, the median follow-up time was 38.6 months, the median PFS was 99.5 months, and OS was 157 months. CONCLUSIONS Non-cryopreserved HSCT is effective and safe. The long-term survival outcomes could be achieved by the shortening the duration of neutrophil and platelet engraftments and the complication rates are acceptable.