Routine Rehabilitation as a Treatment Component for Patients With Pulmonary Arterial or Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertensions.

PURPOSE: Patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) have long been advised to avoid exercise in fear of deterioration in right-sided heart function. Since the 2009 European Society of Cardiology guidelines, rehabilitation in expert centers is considered to have a specific role in care of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We report routine rehabilitation effects in patients with PH as a component of real-life multimodal treatment. METHODS: Patients with PAH or CTEPH were recommended for either in- or outpatient rehabilitation in addition to their usual care, unless there were practical problems or the patient declined. Assessment was conducted according to New York Heart Association classes, adverse events, 6 min-walk test, hemodynamics, and risk stratification after rehabilitation. RESULTS: Forty-one patients, 61% female, age 60 ±18 yr were included between March 2010 and May 2019. No major adverse events or deaths related to progression of right-sided heart failure were reported. Nevertheless, 22% of participants suffered adverse events in most cases not linked with physical activity. Rehabilitation as add-on to medical therapy and/or arterial deobstruction improved New York Heart Association class: mean difference, -0.39 (95% CI, -0.68 to -0.10), 6-min walk test: mean difference, 80 m (95% CI, 46-114), and was associated with improved right-sided heart hemodynamics. The risk assessment grade improved by -0.25 points (95% CI, -0.44 to -0.06) after rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with PAH or CTEPH, supervised rehabilitation as add-on to medical therapy and/or arterial deobstruction is safe and effective in improving patient and clinically related outcomes.

[Isolated coronary surgery in the octogenarian. Immediate results and analysis of long-term survival rate and quality of life]. / Chirurgie coronaire isolée chez l'octogenaire: Résultats immédiats et analyse du taux de survie et de la qualité de vie à long terme.

BACKGROUND: There are almost three million octogenarians living in France, many of whom present with a coronaropathy. Moreover, it appears that life expectancy at 80 years of age is still important. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of coronary surgery among these patients. METHODS: Eighty-eight consecutive octogenarians who had an isolated coronary artery bypass surgery between 1996 and 2002 were compared with 165 patients 60 to 70 years of age; the two groups had been paired according to the main risk factors. Patients were contacted by telephone and then received a quality-of-life-related questionnaire. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 2.3% in the octogenarian versus 1.2% in the 60- to 70-year-old group (P not significant). There was more low cardiac output syndrome, postoperative acute renal failure and transfusion in octogenarians. Long-term survival (average duration of follow-up was 3.8 years) was higher in the 60- to 70-year-old group: 89.7% versus 77.9% (P=0.025). Four independent risk factors of long-term increased mortality were found: age, diabetes, history of stroke and postoperative blood transfusion. Finally, the long-term survival in the octogenarians who had this surgery was higher than in the octogenarians of the general French population to a significant degree, with a quality of life considered to be satisfactory. CONCLUSION: For selected octogenarians, an isolated coronary surgery can be proposed, with short- and long-term results comparable with those of a younger population.

Coronary artery bypass grafting with left internal mammary artery and right gastroepiploic artery, with and without bypass.

BACKGROUND: Total arterial and off-pump revascularization are increasingly used in coronary artery bypass grafting. This study describes our experience with the exclusive use of both left internal thoracic artery and gastroepiploic artery by means of a median sternotomy, with and without cardiopulmonary bypass, in a subgroup of patients with two-vessel disease. METHODS: From January 1995 to July 2000, 171 consecutive patients were reviewed in a prospective database. Ninety-one patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass (group A), and 80 patients were operated on under cardiopulmonary bypass with aortic cross-clamp and cardioplegia (group B). RESULTS: Patient data were similar in both groups except for the Euroscore (mean; 3.4+/-6.1, group A versus 2.5+/-4.5, group B; Euroscore > 6: 26.4%, group A versus 10%, group B; p < 0.05) and ejection fraction (mean, 54.6%+/-15.8%, group A versus 63.1%+/-12.7%, group B; p < 0.001). Severe aortic calcification was present in 6 group A patients, versus no patient in group B. Operative time was shorter in group A (185 versus 213 minutes, p < 0.0001), with less distal anastomoses (2.26 versus 2.5, p < 0.05). Conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass occurred in 1 patient, who was excluded from the study. Bleeding was higher in group A (852.6+/-288 mL versus 712.4+/-274 mL, p < 0.05), but transfusion was similar in both groups. Atrial fibrillation, postoperative inotropic support, and hospital stay were similar in both groups. Myocardial infarction was less frequent in group A (1 versus 4). Postoperative intraaortic balloon pump was used in 2 patients (group B). One patient died (group A) and 1 had an embolic stroke (group B). After discharge, 2 more patients died (group A, day 91; group B day 141), and 1 patient suffered an embolic stroke (group B). One patient in each group presented with dysfunction of the gastroepiploic artery graft requiring successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty on the right posterolateral artery. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting using the left internal thoracic artery and gastroepiploic artery is safe even in high-risk patients. This approach allows an absolute no-touch technique of the aorta.