Obesity and the risk of stillbirth - A reappraisal - A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Studies have noted an inconsistent risk of stillbirth in women with high BMI. There are no reports on obese women specifically selected without any pre-existing or current medical or obstetric conditions. We aimed to document the risk of stillbirth, specifically in this group of women. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 182,362 singleton pregnancies at gestation ≥28 weeks in Queensland, Australia between 2008 and 2016 with no pre-existing or current medical or obstetric conditions. RESULTS: We found no significant association on rates of stillbirth with increasing BMI ; odds ratios for stillbirth were 1.10, 95% CI; 0.90, 1.36 in overweight and 1.09, 95% CI; 0.87-1.37 in obese women compared to women with normal BMI. There was increasing trend in stillbirth from 37 weeks and more specifically after 40 weeks with increasing BMI. Independent of BMI, there was a statistically significant increased risk of stillbirth for women with poor antenatal care and current smokers. CONCLUSIONS: There is no firm evidence for an effect of BMI on stillbirth at ≥28 weeks gestation among women with uneventful pregnancies. Our care should focus on surveillance for early detection and monitoring of co-morbidities associated with obesity with consideration to birthing prior to 40 weeks gestation.

Utilizing a Hospital-based Setting to Increase Organ Donor Registrations.

BACKGROUND: Shortages of organs for transplantation are a concern for many countries. In Australia's "opt-in" system, people register their donation decision on the Australian Organ Donor Register (AODR) in their own time, yet <30% of the population have done so. Consent registrations are honored by the next-of-kin in 90% of cases, so increasing registrations will increase donated organs for transplantation. This study investigated the efficacy of offering an immediate registration opportunity in 2 hospitals, and the role that beliefs about organ donation play in registration behavior. METHODS: An immediate registration opportunity was offered at a public and a private hospital in New South Wales, Australia. Participants (N = 168) categorized as medical/healthcare (eg, doctor and nurse) and nonhealthcare (eg, teacher and chef) completed a measure of beliefs about organ donation, were encouraged to discuss their fears and concerns about organ donation, and given an immediate opportunity to register on the AODR. RESULTS: A total of 81.5% of medical/healthcare participants who were eligible registered, and 71.5% of all eligible participants registered on the spot. Beliefs about the negative consequences of donation and concerns over the medical care given to potential donors predicted (non)registration. Medical/healthcare participants reported lower levels of fears and concerns than nonhealthcare participants. Although both groups reported strong positive beliefs about donation, these did not predict registration. CONCLUSIONS: Offering an immediate registration opportunity in 2 hospitals notably increased the number of registrations on the AODR, suggesting this is a strategy that could potentially increase registrations in opt-in donation systems.