ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess: (1) lower limb primary lymphedema or post-thrombotic syndrome patient's pathway in terms of health care professional use and (2) if aetiology of edema has an impact on this pathway. METHODS: Ancillary survey of the transversal prospective CHROEDEM pilot study. Forty patients with either lower limb primary lymphedema or post-thrombotic syndrome were invited to participate. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of primary lymphedema patients and 50% of post-thrombotic patients benefited from a multidisciplinary management (P=0.10) including the general practitioner, the vascular medicine physician and either a physiotherapist (particularly in case of primary lymphedema), a registered nurse (particularly in case of post-thrombotic syndrome). Main ambulatory health care professionals' correspondent of hospital-based vascular medicine physicians were general practitioners (80%) in post-thrombotic patients, and general practitioners (60%) and physiotherapists (45%) in primary lymphedema patients. Pharmacists were also involved in patient education. CONCLUSION: Management of primary lymphedema and post-thrombotic related chronic edema is usually multidisciplinary. General practitioners and vascular medicine physicians are the cornerstones of this management, that also involves the physiotherapist in case of primary lymphedema and in a lesser extent the registered nurse and the pharmacist. This suggests that these five healthcare professional should play a key role in case of development of standardized patient pathways for primary lymphedema and post-thrombotic syndrome.
Subject(s)
Critical Pathways , Lymphedema/therapy , Patient Care Team , Postthrombotic Syndrome/therapy , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Lower Extremity , Lymphedema/diagnosis , Lymphedema/epidemiology , Lymphedema/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Postthrombotic Syndrome/diagnosis , Postthrombotic Syndrome/epidemiology , Postthrombotic Syndrome/physiopathology , Prognosis , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
The quality standards of the French Society of Vascular Medicine for the ultrasonographic assessment of vascular malformations are based on the two following requirements: (1) technical know-how: mastering the use of ultrasound devices and the method of examination; (2) medical know-how: ability to adapt the methods and scope of the examination to its clinical indication and purpose, and to rationally analyze and interpret its results. AIMS OF THE QUALITY STANDARDS: To describe an optimal method of examination in relation to the clinical question and hypothesis. To homogenize practice, methods, glossary, and reporting. To provide good practice reference points, and promote a quality process. ITEMS OF THE QUALITY STANDARDS: The 3 levels of examination; their clinical indications and goals. The reference standard examination (level 2), its variants according to clinical needs. The minimal content of the examination report; the letter to the referring physician (synthesis, conclusion and proposal for further investigation and/or therapeutic management). Commented glossary (anatomy, hemodynamics, semiology). Technical bases. Setting and use of ultrasound devices. Here, we discuss ultrasonography methods of using of ultrasonography for the assessment of peripheral vascular malformations and tumors (limbs, face, trunk).
