Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 104
Filter
1.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 48(6): 804-809, nov.-dic. 2020. tab, mapas
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-199274

ABSTRACT

Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) is one of the most frequent causes of anaphylaxis following a bee, vespid or ant sting. Real-life data regarding the management of HVA in children are lacking. To address this unmet need, we carried out a survey defining the current management of HVA in children among pediatric allergists in Italy. Educational investments on the improvement of the management of pediatric patients with HVA are urgently needed, and our analysis represents a relevant instrument in targeting a roadmap with this aim. The time for pediatric allergists to take action has come, and a task force from the Rare Allergic Diseases Commission of the Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology is working on the topic to improve pediatricians' knowledge and optimize the care of these patients


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Wasp Venoms/adverse effects , Bee Venoms/adverse effects , Ant Venoms/adverse effects , Hypersensitivity/etiology , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Hymenoptera , Wasp Venoms/immunology , Bee Venoms/immunology , Ant Venoms/immunology , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Italy
2.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 48(6): 804-809, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32653226

ABSTRACT

Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) is one of the most frequent causes of anaphylaxis following a bee, vespid or ant sting. Real-life data regarding the management of HVA in children are lacking. To address this unmet need, we carried out a survey defining the current management of HVA in children among pediatric allergists in Italy. Educational investments on the improvement of the management of pediatric patients with HVA are urgently needed, and our analysis represents a relevant instrument in targeting a roadmap with this aim. The time for pediatric allergists to take action has come, and a task force from the Rare Allergic Diseases Commission of the Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology is working on the topic to improve pediatricians' knowledge and optimize the care of these patients.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Arthropod Venoms/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/statistics & numerical data , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Allergens/administration & dosage , Allergens/immunology , Allergists/standards , Allergists/statistics & numerical data , Allergy and Immunology/standards , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Animals , Arthropod Venoms/administration & dosage , Arthropod Venoms/immunology , Child , Clinical Competence/standards , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Desensitization, Immunologic/standards , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hymenoptera/immunology , Insect Bites and Stings/immunology , Insect Bites and Stings/therapy , Italy , Pediatricians/standards , Pediatricians/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data
3.
Ital J Pediatr ; 46(1): 5, 2020 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31924232

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions (DHRs) are considered adverse effects of medications that resemble allergy symptoms. The reported positive clinical history of pediatric drug reactions is about 10%, however, after allergy investigations, only a small percent is confirmed as hypersensitivity. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical history, allergy work-up results and sensitization profile of children and adolescents referred to our Allergy Unit for suspected DHRs. METHODS: The study evaluated data related to a group of children with a positive history of drug reactions during a two-year period. The allergy work-up consisted of in vivo and in vitro tests, in accordance with the recommendations of the ENDA/EAACI guidelines. RESULTS: Data from a group of 637 patients [348 M (54.6%); 289 F (45.4%)] were retrospectively analyzed. Beta lactams (BLs) were the most common drugs involved in the reported clinical history, followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) were most frequently observed during BL treatment. The confirmation of BL hypersensitivity was higher for immediate reactions (IRs) [9.4%; 5.1% through positive skin tests (STs) and 5.5% through drug provocation test (DPT)] compared to non-immediate reactions (non-IRs) (8.1%; 2.2% through STs and 6.2% through DPT). A higher number of positive results was obtained for BLs and macrolides when the tests were performed within 12 months after the index reaction (p < 0.05). During DPTs with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, four hypersensitivity reactions (including one anaphylaxis) occurred despite negative STs. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated that only 9.1% of patients resulted in being positive to allergy tests which is in line with the data in literature. An allergy work-up is mandatory for excluding suspected hypersensitivity.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Infant , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Retrospective Studies , Skin Tests , Tertiary Healthcare
4.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 29(3): 180-205, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30183660

ABSTRACT

Hymenoptera venom allergy is an epidemiologically underestimated condition and a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Preventing future allergic reactions in patients who experience a systemic reaction is based on the correct management of the emergency followed by an accurate diagnosis, prescription of adrenaline autoinjectors, and, where indicated, specific venom immunotherapy. Some epidemiological studies highlight our poor knowledge of this disease and the frequent inadequacy of its management. Moreover, they emphasize the importance of such a life-saving treatment as specific immunotherapy. The availability of high-quality hymenoptera venom extracts for diagnostic and therapeutic use has dramatically improved the prognosis and quality of life of allergic patients. Subcutaneous venom immunotherapy is currently the most effective form of allergen-based immunotherapy, with a carry-over effect lasting up to several years after its interruption. This report on the management of hymenoptera venom-allergic children and adults was prepared by a panel of Italian experts. The main objective of this consensus document is to review the scientific evidence related to diagnosis, therapy, and management of patients allergic to hymenoptera venom. Thus, we can improve our knowledge of the disease and promote good clinical practices. The present document provides practical suggestions for correct diagnosis, prescription of emergency therapy and immunotherapy, and strategies for patient care.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Arthropod Venoms/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Insect Bites and Stings/diagnosis , Adult , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Animals , Child , Humans , Hymenoptera/immunology , Hypersensitivity/complications , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Insect Bites and Stings/therapy , Italy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Life
5.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 29(3): 180-205, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-184085

ABSTRACT

Hymenoptera venom allergy is an epidemiologically underestimated condition and a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Preventing future allergic reactions in patients who experience a systemic reaction is based on the correct management of the emergency followed by an accurate diagnosis, prescription of adrenaline autoinjectors, and, where indicated, specific venom immunotherapy. Some epidemiological studies highlight our poor knowledge of this disease and the frequent inadequacy of its management. Moreover, they emphasize the importance of such a life-saving treatment as specific immunotherapy. The availability of high-quality hymenoptera venom extracts for diagnostic and therapeutic use has dramatically improved the prognosis and quality of life of allergic patients. Subcutaneous venom immunotherapy is currently the most effective form of allergen-based immunotherapy, with a carry-over effect lasting up to several years after its interruption. This report on the management of hymenoptera venom-allergic children and adults was prepared by a panel of Italian experts. The main objective of this consensus document is to review the scientific evidence related to diagnosis, therapy, and management of patients allergic to hymenoptera venom. Thus, we can improve our knowledge of the disease and promote good clinical practices. The present document provides practical suggestions for correct diagnosis, prescription of emergency therapy and immunotherapy, and strategies for patient care


La alergia al veneno de himenópteros es una condición subestimada epidemiológicamente que representa una causa importante de morbilidad en todo el mundo. La prevención de reacciones alérgicas futuras en pacientes que han desarrollado una reacción sistémica se basa en el manejo correcto de la emergencia, seguido de un diagnóstico correcto, la prescripción de autoinyectores de adrenalina y, en el caso de estar indicada, la prescripción de inmunoterapia específica con veneno (VIT). Varios estudios epidemiológicos destacan el escaso conocimiento de esta enfermedad y un frecuente tratamiento insuficiente. Además, enfatizan la importancia de la inmunoterapia específica, un tratamiento que puede salvar la vida del paciente. La disponibilidad de extractos de veneno de himenóptera de alta calidad para uso diagnóstico y terapéutico ha mejorado drásticamente el pronóstico y la calidad de vida de estos enfermos. La VIT subcutánea representa la forma más efectiva de inmunoterapia con alérgeno actualmente disponible, con una eficacia persistente que dura hasta varios años después de su interrupción. Este consenso sobre la evaluación clínica tanto de niños como de adultos alérgicos al veneno de himenópteros ha sido elaborado por un panel de expertos italianos. Su objetivo principal es revisar la evidencia científica disponible en el diagnóstico, la terapia y la evaluación clínica de los pacientes alérgicos al veneno de himenópteros con el propósito de mejorar el conocimiento sobre esta enfermedad y promover buenas prácticas clínicas. Se incluyen sugerencias prácticas para un diagnóstico correcto, la prescripción de terapia de emergencia e inmunoterapia, así como estrategias para el manejo de los pacientes


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adult , Arthropod Venoms/adverse effects , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hymenoptera/pathogenicity , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Patient Safety , Treatment Outcome
6.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 46(5): 447-453, sept.-oct. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-177879

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transplantation-acquired food allergies (TAFA) are frequently reported and considered to be caused by immunosuppressive therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the allergic and immunologic responses in children who had liver or kidney transplantations. METHODS: Twelve children receiving liver transplantations and 10 children receiving kidney transplantations were investigated. All children underwent the allergy work-up and in most of them, lymphocyte screening and serum cytokine measurements were also performed. RESULTS: TAFA were found in 7/12 (58%) children with liver transplantations and in none of the 10 children with kidney transplantations. The mean age at transplantation was significantly lower in children who underwent liver transplantations (p < 0.001). The immunosuppressive therapy administered to children with liver transplantation was tacrolimus in 11 patients and cyclosporine in one patient, while all 10 children with kidney transplantation received tacrolimus plus mycophenolate. The most common antigenic food was egg. The natural killer (NK) cell numbers were significantly higher in liver-transplant children than in kidney-transplant children. No significant differences were found in the serum cytokine levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that liver-transplant children treated with tacrolimus alone have a higher risk of developing TAFA than kidney-transplant children treated with tacrolimus plus mycophenolate. NK cells might be involved in this difference


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Immunosuppression Therapy/adverse effects , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology , Liver Transplantation , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppression Therapy/methods , Mycophenolic Acid/adverse effects , Tacrolimus/adverse effects
8.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 46(5): 447-453, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29456038

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transplantation-acquired food allergies (TAFA) are frequently reported and considered to be caused by immunosuppressive therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the allergic and immunologic responses in children who had liver or kidney transplantations. METHODS: Twelve children receiving liver transplantations and 10 children receiving kidney transplantations were investigated. All children underwent the allergy work-up and in most of them, lymphocyte screening and serum cytokine measurements were also performed. RESULTS: TAFA were found in 7/12 (58%) children with liver transplantations and in none of the 10 children with kidney transplantations. The mean age at transplantation was significantly lower in children who underwent liver transplantations (p<0.001). The immunosuppressive therapy administered to children with liver transplantation was tacrolimus in 11 patients and cyclosporine in one patient, while all 10 children with kidney transplantation received tacrolimus plus mycophenolate. The most common antigenic food was egg. The natural killer (NK) cell numbers were significantly higher in liver-transplant children than in kidney-transplant children. No significant differences were found in the serum cytokine levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that liver-transplant children treated with tacrolimus alone have a higher risk of developing TAFA than kidney-transplant children treated with tacrolimus plus mycophenolate. NK cells might be involved in this difference.


Subject(s)
Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Immunosuppression Therapy/adverse effects , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology , Liver Transplantation , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy/methods , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Infant , Male , Mycophenolic Acid/adverse effects , Tacrolimus/adverse effects
12.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 28(3): 411-4, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26157064

ABSTRACT

Artemisia vulgaris L and Artemisia annua L (Chinese: qinghao) are similar plants of the Asterbaceae family. Artesunate, a semi-synthetic derivate of artemisin which is the active principle extract of the plant qinghao, has antimalarial properties. Some cases of severe allergic reactions to artesunate have been described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between positive skin tests to Artemisia vulgaris L allergen and a preparation of injectable artesunate. A total of 531 children were skin prick tested with inhalants (including Artemisia vulgaris L), foods, and artesunate. Among the 59 patients positive to Artemisia vulgaris L only one child was also positive to artesunate. No child was positive to artesunate in those negative to Artemisia vulgaris L. We conclude that Artemisia vulgaris L sensitization is not associated with sensitization to artesunate; consequently, skin test to artesunate should not be carried out before using the drug considering the rare allergic reactions.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Artemisia/immunology , Artemisinins/immunology , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Adolescent , Artesunate , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Skin Tests/methods
14.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 25(2): 128-32, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25997306

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Macrolides are considered safe antibiotics with reduced allergenic activity. However, studies on the safety of macrolides are scarce, particularly in children. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of hypersensitivity reactions to clarithromycin and azithromycin in a group of children referred to our allergy unit for suspected macrolide allergy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 90 children aged 1-17 years with symptoms suggestive of hypersensitivity reaction to clarithromycin or azithromycin between December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2013. The allergy workup included skin tests (ie, skin prick tests and/or intradermal tests), determination of serum specific IgE (sIgE) to clarithromycin and azithromycin, and, if necessary to reach a diagnosis, oral provocation tests. RESULTS: Seventy-seven children completed the allergy workup. A reaction to clarithromycin was recorded in 58 children (75.3%): 21 (36.2%) had a history of immediate reactions, and 37 (63.8%) had a history of nonimmediate reactions. A reaction to azithromycin was recorded in 19 children (24.6%): 6 (31.5%) had a history of immediate reaction, and 13 (68.42%) had a history of nonimmediate reaction. Positive results in skin tests and oral provocation tests with the suspect drug confirmed the diagnosis in 15.5% of reactions to clarithromycin (9 of 58) and in 47.3% of reactions to azithromycin (9 of 19) (P = .004). CONCLUSION: A complete allergy workup enabled us to confirm a diagnosis of clarithromycin and azithromycin allergy in 15.5% and 47.3% of cases, respectively. Azithromycin was more allergenic than clarithromycin in children.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Azithromycin/adverse effects , Clarithromycin/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Biomarkers/blood , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Hypersensitivity/blood , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Infant , Intradermal Tests , Italy , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
15.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 25(2): 128-132, 2015. ilus, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-135502

ABSTRACT

Background: Macrolides are considered safe antibiotics with reduced allergenic activity. However, studies on the safety of macrolides are scarce, particularly in children. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of hypersensitivity reactions to clarithromycin and azithromycin in a group of children referred to our allergy unit for suspected macrolide allergy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 90 children aged 1-17 years with symptoms suggestive of hypersensitivity reaction to clarithromycin or azithromycin between December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2013. The allergy workup included skin tests (ie, skin prick tests and/or intradermal tests), determination of serum specific IgE (sIgE) to clarithromycin and azithromycin, and, if necessary to reach a diagnosis, oral provocation tests. Results: Seventy-seven children completed the allergy workup. A reaction to clarithromycin was recorded in 58 children (75.3%): 21 (36.2%) had a history of immediate reactions, and 37 (63.8%) had a history of nonimmediate reactions. A reaction to azithromycin was recorded in 19 children (24.6%): 6 (31.5%) had a history of immediate reaction, and 13 (68.42%) had a history of nonimmediate reaction. Positive results in skin tests and oral provocation tests with the suspect drug confirmed the diagnosis in 15.5% of reactions to clarithromycin (9 of 58) and in 47.3% of reactions to azithromycin (9 of 19) (P=.004). Conclusion: A complete allergy workup enabled us to confirm a diagnosis of clarithromycin and azithromycin allergy in 15.5% and 47.3% of cases, respectively. Azithromycin was more allergenic than clarithromycin in children (AU)


Antecedentes: A los macrólidos se les considera antibióticos seguros, con una reducida capacidad alergénica. Sin embargo, los estudios sobre este tema son insuficientes, especialmente en los niños. Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio ha sido el evaluar la frecuencia de reacciones hipersensibilidad (HR) a claritromicina (clarithromycin) y a azitromicina (azithromycin) en un grupo de niños, estudiados en nuestra Unidad de Alergia, por sospecha de alergia a los macrólidos. Métodos: Se han estudiado restrospectivamente, 90 niños (de 1-17 años) con síntomas sugestivos de HR a clarithromycin o azithromycin, entre el 31 de diciembre de 2008 y 31 de diciembre de 2013. En el protocolo de estudio se incluyeron la realización de pruebas cutáneas intraepidérmicas (prick, SPT) y/o pruebas intradérmicas (ID)], la determinación de IgE sérica específica (sIgE) a clarithromycin y azithromycin y, si se consideraba necesario para llegar a un diagnóstico, pruebas de provocación oral (OPT). Resultados: Setenta y siete niños completaron el estudio. Cincuenta y ocho (75,3%) referían haber presentado reacciones a clarithromycin: 21 (36,2%) tenían antecedentes de reacciones inmediatas (IR), y 37 (63,8%) tenían antecedentes de reacciones no inmediatas (RIN). Diecinueve de los 77 niños (24,6%) habían presentado una reacción a azithromycin: 6 (31,5%) con una historia de IR y 13 (68,42%) con historia de NIR. Mediante pruebas cutáneas o por positividad en la OPT con el fármaco sospechoso, permitió confirmar el diagnóstico en 15,5% (9 de 58) de los casos de clarithromycin y en 47,3% (9 de 19) de los casos de azithromycin (p= 0,004). Conclusión: Un estudio alergológico completo permitió realizar un correcto diagnóstico de alergia a clarithromycin y azithromycin en 15,5% y 47,3% de los casos, respectivamente. En este trabajo, en niños, la azithromycin fue más alergénica que la clarithromycin (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Azithromycin/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Clarithromycin/adverse effects , Macrolides/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
16.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 27(1): 121-6, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24674687

ABSTRACT

Allergic reactions associated to the use of macrolides are uncommon; in particular only two cases of anaphylaxis with erithromycin and clarithromycin have been reported to date. The aim of this study was to investigate macrolide-induced anaphylaxis. Between December 2007 and December 2011, 136 consecutive children were referred to the Allergy Unit of A. Meyer Children's Hospital because of a past history of reactions to macrolides. Allergy work-ups were carried out according to the European Network for Drug Allergy protocol. Anaphylaxis was diagnosed according to the clinical criteria proposed by Sampson et al. and graded according to Brown SGA et al. Sixty-six out of 136 patients completed the allergologic work-up and among them we investigated three cases of anaphylaxis due to azithromycin which included one child with anaphylaxis to both clarithromycin and azithromycin. In two of the children with anaphylaxis, the diagnosis was only confirmed with the skin prick test, the third was positive to the Intradermal Test. The azithromycin allergy shows a surprisingly high sensitivity to the in-vivo tests. Moreover, this study shows that cross-reactivity may occur between different macrolidic molecules; it has even been suggested that macrolide allergies are unlikely to be class allergies.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Azithromycin/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Adolescent , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/immunology , Azithromycin/immunology , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Infant , Skin Tests
19.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 42(8): 1257-65, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22805473

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated paediatric disorder triggered by the ingestion of specific food proteins. Many features of this syndrome are not yet well defined. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to describe demographic features, causative agents, clinical features, treatments and outcomes of children suffering from acute FPIES at three Italian of Pediatric Allergology Centers. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed over a 7-year period (2004-2010). Hospital medical record databases and hospital outpatient electronic charts were screened for the diagnosis of FPIES. Information on the first and subsequent FPIES' episodes was collected. RESULTS: We diagnosed 66 children with FPIES. The number of diagnoses significantly increased between 2008 and 2010 (P < 0.001). We collected a total of 165 FPIES episodes (median per child 2, range 1-10). Cow's milk was the most common trigger food (65%), followed by fish, egg, rice, soy, corn, poultry and goat's milk. Fifty-six (85%) children reacted to a single food. Mean documented time from ingestion to symptom onset was 2.4 h (SD 0.7 h). Vomiting was the most common symptom (98%). Among patients diagnosed with OFC, 78% reacted after eating a whole serving size of the trigger food per age. Skin prick tests (SPT) for trigger foods were negative in 97% of cases. Thirty-two/66 children (48%) achieved tolerance at a mean age of 29 months (SD 17 months). Age of achieved tolerance for cow's milk was significantly lower compared to that of other foods (24 ± 8 vs. 53 ± 17 months, P < 0.0006). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This article provides new insights on FPIES in Italy by describing its largest series, and shows how a significant increase in the FPIES diagnosis has been observed in the last few years. We also discussed selected management aspects of this syndrome where different phenotypes can be found.


Subject(s)
Dietary Proteins/adverse effects , Enterocolitis/diagnosis , Enterocolitis/etiology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Phenotype , Child, Preschool , Enterocolitis/immunology , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans , Immune Tolerance , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Italy , Male , Retrospective Studies , Syndrome , White People
20.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 23(3): 865-71, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20943058

ABSTRACT

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a chronic and potentially sight-threatening disease. Topical corticosteroids (Cs) seem to be the only effective treatment for this condition, although severe side effects may occur owing to their prolonged use. More recently, cyclosporine (Cyc) eye drops have been reported as a valid alternative, but so far such treatment has only been successfully experimented for a short time and in small numbers of patients. The aim of our study is to evaluate the long term safety and efficacy of topical cyclosporine eye drops in children suffering from VKC. Over a period of 7 years we followed a large group of children suffering from severe VKC. They were selected to start cyclosporine eye drop treatment, because of the prompt relapse of their disease as soon as they stopped topical corticosteroids administration. All patients were followed-up in an ambulatory care assessment. A total of 156 children with VKC were treated with topical cyclosporine eye drops over a period ranging from two to seven years [mean time 3.8 +/- 1.09 years] during the seasonal relapse [range 9-66 months; mean time 24.7+/-10.4 months]. Two formulations, at 1% and 2% (82% and 18%, respectively) concentrations, of cyclosporine eye drops were made. The dosage administered was one drop in each eye from two to four times a day, depending on the severity of the disease and the season. The ocular objective scores were determined and compared every year, at the beginning and at the end of each treatment period. Blood samples were collected once a year in order to check both kidney and liver functions, as well as cyclosporine serum levels. We enrolled 156 patients (mean age 8.31+/-2.79 years; 116 males and 40 females) who were followed-up over a period of 7 years [156 (100%) children during the first and the second year; 138 (88.5%) patients until the third year; 90 (57.7%) until the fourth year; 32 (20.5%) until the fifth year; 10 (6.4%) until the sixth year and 2 (1.3%) until the seventh year]. The ocular objective scores significantly improved (p less than 0.001) over the years when comparing them at the beginning and the end of each seasonal treatment period, except for the last year. Over the treatment period, non-significant changes were recorded in terms of kidney and liver enzymatic activities and also in terms of cyclosporine serum levels. Cyclosporine eye drops, either at 1% or 2% concentrations, resulted safe and effective for long-term treatment of VKC in 156 children. The lack of significance of the score results during the seventh year can be explained by the small number of subjects treated for such a long period. A systematic ocular examination and both liver and kidney functional investigations allowed us to exclude the possibility of local or systemic side effects due to cyclosporine. If either transient or long-lasting, the occurrence of burning was referred by some of the patients treated, but none of them required to discontinue the drug. In conclusion, this is the first study showing that topical cyclosporine is easily handled even by children, with safe and effective results even when it is used over a long period of time. Our findings, though encouraging, need to be confirmed by further studies.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Allergic/drug therapy , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Administration, Topical , Adolescent , Alanine Transaminase/blood , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , Child , Child, Preschool , Conjunctiva/pathology , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/pathology , Creatine/blood , Cyclosporine/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Long-Term Care , Male , Ophthalmic Solutions , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...