Coronary CT-based FFR in patients with acute myocardial infarction might predict follow-up invasive FFR: The XPECT-MI study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate whether invasive fractional flow reserve (FFRi) of non-infarction related (non-IRA) lesions changes over time in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Moreover, we assessed the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography-derived FFR(FFRCT) following the index event in predicting follow-up FFRi. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 38 STEMI patients (mean age 61.6 â€‹± â€‹9 years, 23.1% female) who underwent non-IRA baseline and follow-up FFRi measurements and a baseline FFRCT (within ≤10 days after STEMI). Follow-up FFRi was performed at 45-60 days (FFRi and FFRCT value of ≤0.8 was considered positive). RESULTS: FFRi values showed significant difference between baseline and follow-up (median and interquartile range (IQR) 0.85 [0.78-0.92] vs. 0.81 [0.73-0.90] p â€‹= â€‹0.04, respectively). Median FFRCT was 0.81 [0.68-0.93]. In total, 20 lesions were positive on FFRCT. A stronger correlation and smaller bias were found between FFRCT and follow-up FFRi (ρ â€‹= â€‹0.86,p â€‹< â€‹0.001,bias:0.01) as compared with baseline FFRi (ρ â€‹= â€‹0.68, p â€‹< â€‹0.001,bias:0.04). Comparing follow-up FFRi and FFRCT, no false negatives but two false positive cases were found. The overall accuracy was 94.7%, with sensitivity and specificity of 100.0% and 90.0% for identifying lesions ≤0.8 on FFRi. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 81.5%, 93.3%, and 73.9%, respectively, for identifying significant lesions on baseline FFRi using index FFRCT. CONCLUSION: FFRCT in STEMI patients close to the index event could identify hemodynamically relevant non-IRA lesions with higher accuracy than FFRi measured at the index PCI, using follow-up FFRi as the reference standard. Early FFRCT in STEMI patients might represent a new application for cardiac CT to improve the identification of patients who benefit most from staged non-IRA revascularization.

Comparison of Safety of RADial comPRESSion Devices: A Multi-Center Trial of Patent Hemostasis following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention from Conventional Radial Access (RAD-PRESS Trial).

Although radial access is the current gold standard for the implementation of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), post-procedural radial compression devices are seldom compared with each other in terms of safety or efficacy. Our group aimed to compare a cost effective and potentially green method to dedicated radial compression devices, with respect to access site complications combined in a device oriented complex endpoint (DOCE), freedom from which served as our primary endpoint. Patients undergoing PCI were randomized to receive either the cost effective or a dedicated device, either of which were removed using patent hemostasis. Twenty-four hours after the procedure, radial artery ultrasonography was performed to evaluate the access site. The primary endpoint was assessed using a non-inferiority framework with a non-inferiority margin of five percentage points, which was considered as the least clinically meaningful difference. The cost-effective technique and the dedicated devices were associated with a comparably low rate of complications (freedom from DOCE: 83.3% vs. 70.8%, absolute risk difference: 12.5%, one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11%). Composition of the DOCE (i.e., no complication, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, and radial artery occlusion) and compression time were also assessed in superiority tests as secondary endpoints. Both the cost-effective technique and the dedicated devices were associated with comparably low rates of complications: p = 0.1289. All radial compression devices performed similarly when considering the time to complete removal of the respective device (120.0 (inter-quartile range: 100.0-142.5) for the vial vs. 120.0 (inter-quartile range: 110.0-180) for the dedicated device arm, with a median difference of [95% CI]: 7.0 [-23.11 to 2.00] min, p = 0.2816). In conclusion, our cost-effective method was found to be non-inferior to the dedicated devices with respect to safety, therefore it is a safe alternative to dedicated radial compression devices, as well as seeming to be similarly effective.

Primary coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction / Primer coronariaintervenció ST-elevációs infarktusban.

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: Heveny myocardialis infarctusban a szívizommentés sikere, a beteg életkilátása nagymértékben függ a panasz kezdete és az elzáródott koszorúér rekanalizálása között eltelt ischaemiás idotol. Jelenleg az ér nyitása optimális esetben minden betegnél koszorúér-intervencióval történik. Célkituzés: Annak vizsgálata, hogy öt év alatt mennyit változtak az ischaemiás ido összetevoi, és miben változott az elzáródott ér nyitásának módszere ST-elevációs myocardialis infarctus (STEMI) miatt végzett primer coronariaintervencióban. Módszer: 2014. 01. 01. és 2018. 12. 31. között 1663, STEMI miatt koszorúér-intervencióval kezelt betegnél (1173 férfi és 490 no) vizsgáltuk évenkénti bontásban a panasztól a koszorúér nyitásáig eltelt ido összetevoit és a 30 napos halálozást. Eredmények: Öt év alatt a panasztól az elso egészségügyi kontaktusig medián 2:53 vs. 2:10 óra (p = 0,0132), ettol az intervenciós centrumba történt felvételig medián 1:17 vs. 1:03 óra (p = 0,009), a felvételtol a ballon nyitásáig medián 0:31 vs. 0:29 óra (p = ns) telt el. A panasztól a ballon nyitásáig eltelt ido (medián 5:29 vs. 4:07 óra, p = 0,0001) rövidült, döntoen 2014 és 2015 között. A gyógyszerkibocsátó stent beültetése 15%-ról 96%-ra nott. A vizsgált években a légzés/keringés támogatás aránya 8,2-10,6-13,9-7,6-8,4, a 30 napos halálozásé 4,1-6,8-11,1-7,4-5,7% volt; a két érték korrelációt mutat (p = 0,827). Következtetés: Öt év alatt a panasztól az elso egészségügyi kontaktusig és a kórházi beszállításig eltelt ido rövidült, de az Európai Kardiológiai Társaság ajánlásához képest hosszú; a kórházi felvételtol a ballon nyitásáig eltelt ido megfelelo. A négy órán belüli reperfúzió a betegek közel felében valósult meg. Az intervenciós centrumba való gyorsabb bekerülés javíthatna az eredményen. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(13): 497-503. INTRODUCTION: In acute myocardial infarction, the heart muscle salvage, the patient's life expectancy is highly dependent on the elapsed ischaemic time from the onset of complaint to target vessel recanalisation. Nowadays, target vessel recanalisation is performed with coronary intervention in all patients in optimal case. OBJECTIVE: To examine how the components of ischemic time and the opening procedure of the occluded coronary have changed over five years in primary intervention done in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHOD: Authors studied data of 1663 (1173 male and 480 female) STEMI patients in annual breakdowns treated with coronary intervention between 01. 01. 2014 and 31. 12. 2018, time from complaint to coronary artery opening, details of intervention and 30 days mortality rate. RESULTS: During the five years, time intervals were as follows: from onset of complaint to first medical contact: median 2:53 vs. 2:10 hours (p = 0.0132), from this to admission in the interventional centre: median 1:17 vs. 1:03 hours (p = 0.009), from hospital admission to balloon opening: median 0:31 vs. 0:29 hours (p = ns). In total, the complaint to balloon opening time (median 5:29 vs. 4:07 hours, p = 0.0001) diminished, decisively from 2014 to 2015. Ratio of drug-eluting stent implantation increased from 15% to 96%. In the investigated years, the need of respiratory and/or circulatory device support ratio was 8.2-10.6-13.9-7.6-8.4, 30-day mortality rate between 4.1-6.8-11.1-7.4-5.7%; these two values showed a correlation (p = 0.827). CONCLUSION: The time from complaint to first medical contact and transfer to hospital against the significant decrease is still longer than the recommendation of the European Society of Cardiology. The time from hospital admission to balloon opening is adequate. Reperfusion within four hours was achieved in half of the patients in total. Faster hospitalization may improve results. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(13): 497-503.

Plaque modification in the 21st century ­ the first Hungarian experiences with intravascular lithoplasty / Plakkmodifikáció a 21. században - az elso magyar tapasztalatok az intravascularis lithoplasticával.

Összefoglaló. A nagy mésztartalmú plakkok által okozott szukületek percutan intervenciója az esetek egy részében a jelenleg széles körben elérheto megoldások alkalmazásával technikailag nem kivitelezheto. A procedurális sikertelenség vezeto oka a meszes laesiók kalciumtartalom miatti fokozott ellenállása a ballonos dilatációkkal szemben, mely lehetetlenné teszi a szükséges sztentek levezetését is. Az ilyen laesiók mésztartalmának csökkentését célzó hagyományos plakkmodifikációs eljárások - mint a rotablatio, a vágó- és ultranagy nyomású ballonok - sem jelentenek megoldást minden esetben, különösen az érfal átmérojének legalább 50%-át eléro, akár körkörösen jelen lévo meszesedés fennállása esetén. A közelmúltban éppen ezen laesiók mésztartalmának feltördelésére, így a sztentek deponálásának elosegítésére kifejlesztett módszert a szakirodalom intravascularis lithoplastica néven említi. A jelen közleményben a Klinikánkon eddig 4 beteg rendkívül meszes laesióinak jó angiológiai eredményu ellátása során az eszközzel szerzett tapasztalatokat foglaljuk össze. A végeredményt tekintve az intravascularis lithoplastica ígéretes új intervenciós lehetoség a masszívan meszes coronarialaesiók ellátására. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(2): 69-73. Summary. Percutaneous intervention of stenoses caused by highly calcified plaques utilizing the currently widely available methods is not possible due to technical difficulties in several cases. Increased resistance of calcified plaques against balloon dilation due to their calcium content plays a leading role in procedural failure, as stent crossing becomes impossible as well. Classical methods of plaque modification for debulking the calcification of such lesions - such as rotablation, cutting and ultra-high pressure non-compliant balloons - do not resolve this issue, especially when calcification exceeds 50% of the vessel diameter. A new method, referred to as intravascular lithoplasty in the literature, has recently been developed to break the calcium and thus promote stent deployment in such lesions. In our current work, we summarize the experience gathered with this method during the treatment of extremely calcified lesions of 4 patients with good angiographic result. As a conclusion, intravascular lithoplasty is a promising new interventional method in the treatment of massively calcified coronary lesions. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(2): 69-73.

Acute, total occlusion of the left main stem: coronary intervention options, outcomes, and recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: Acute, total occlusion of the unprotected left main stem (uLMo) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients is a catastrophic event often accompanied by sudden cardiac death (SCD) and/or cardiogenic shock (CS) with high mortality rates and limited methods of successful treatment. Emergent, surgical and percutaneous revascularization has been reported before, yet comprehensive data remains scarce. AIM: To examine emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes in ACS cases presenting with uLMo. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data on 23 subjects undergoing primary PCI in uLMo cases were analyzed. The primary end-point was in-hospital death; secondary end-points were successful salvage of coronary anatomy and 90-day major cardiac adverse events (MACE). RESULTS: About 40% of LM occlusion cases presented following successful on-site cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Of all patients arriving for treatment the occluded LM was successfully opened and stented in ~90% of cases. CS was present in > 85% of cases, and circulatory support in the form of intra-aortic balloon pump and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation systems was applied in every eligible case (~80%). The in-hospital death rate was 56%, mostly including individuals requiring prior CPR. At 6 months, additional MACE rates were low at 8.7%. CONCLUSIONS: We found that uLMo ACS cases often present with preceding CPR and mostly in manifest CS. Coronary salvage is generally successful, yet uLMo even with optimal present day complex treatment yields quite high mortality rates. This is especially true for patients receiving prior CPR. In surviving patients, however, 6-month MACE rates are acceptable.

Rotational atherectomy of undilatable coronary stents: stentablation, a clinical perspective and recommendation.

AIMS: Our aim was to examine procedural viability and midterm outcomes following the use of rotational atherectomy (RA) on malapposed, crippled, otherwise non-salvageable metallic stents (i.e., stentablation [SA]), and convey important procedural pointers for practitioners encountering such situations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on twelve SA subjects were analysed. The primary endpoint was procedural success: effective ablation of the malapposed stent and successful implantation of a new device. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause death at six months following the index procedure were examined as a secondary endpoint. All twelve patients underwent successful SA and novel stent implantation, with sufficient salvage of coronary anatomy (residual stenosis <30%). At six-month follow-up, however, MACE amounted to 50% and all-cause mortality to 25% in the inspected subjects. CONCLUSIONS: We found that, although feasible as an acute salvage option, SA distinctively increases post-procedural midterm MACE and mortality rates. This places emphasis on the importance of avoiding eventual SA situations, underlining the importance of ample lesion preparation prior to stent implantation.