Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on subjective sleep during lockdown: relation with resilience characteristics.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had a considerable impact on both the physical and mental health of people. Resilience is a psychological characteristic reflecting the ability to overcome or adapt to difficulties such as adversity, trauma, or extremely stressful situations. People with high resilience have been shown to exhibit lower levels of anxiety, stress and depression when faced with a stressful event. Sleep is particularly sensitive to anxiety and stress. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sleep quantity, quality, and habits, while considering resilience as a factor. A total of 1260 individuals were recruited through an online survey. The variables that were assessed were socio-demographic, sleep habits and sleep disorders history, the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), the 25-item version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and any work/financial consequences during the first COVID-19 lockdown. The results showed that sleep habits during the lockdown changed for many of the participants. Their sleep schedule moving towards earlier or later for 9% and 67% of them, respectively; 38% of the participants were found to suffer from insomnia, based on the AIS score. A higher score on the CD-RISC was associated with better sleep. In conclusion, our study confirmed previous studies identifying quantitative and qualitative changes in sleep during the COVID-19 lockdown. It also expanded on the previous findings by identifying the correlation between sleep and resilience during the stressful period of the COVID-19 lockdown.

The potential of biomarkers for diagnosing insomnia: Consensus statement of the WFSBP Task Force on Sleep Disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Thus far, the diagnosis of insomnia is based on purely clinical criteria. Although a broad range of altered physiological parameters has been identified in insomniacs, the evidence to establish their diagnostic usefulness is very limited. Purpose of this WFSBP Task Force consensus paper is to systematically evaluate a series of biomarkers as potential diagnostic tools for insomnia. METHODS: A newly created grading system was used for assessing the validity of various measurements in establishing the diagnosis of insomnia; these measurements originated from relevant studies selected and reviewed by experts. RESULTS: The measurements with the highest diagnostic performance were those derived from psychometric instruments. Biological measurements which emerged as potentially useful diagnostic instruments were polysomnography-derived cyclic alternating pattern, actigraphy, and BDNF levels, followed by heart rate around sleep onset, deficient melatonin rhythm, and certain neuroimaging patterns (mainly for the activity of frontal and pre-frontal cortex, hippocampus and basal ganglia); yet, these findings need replication, as well as establishment of commonly accepted methodology and diagnostic cut-off points. Routine polysomnography, EEG spectral analysis, heart rate variability, skin conductance, thermoregulation, oxygen consumption, HPA axis, and inflammation indices were not shown to be of satisfactory diagnostic value. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from psychometric instruments which are confirmed to be the gold standard in diagnosing insomnia, six biomarkers emerge as being potentially useful for this purpose.

Psycho-social factors associated with mental resilience in the Corona lockdown.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is not only a threat to physical health but is also having severe impacts on mental health. Although increases in stress-related symptomatology and other adverse psycho-social outcomes, as well as their most important risk factors have been described, hardly anything is known about potential protective factors. Resilience refers to the maintenance of mental health despite adversity. To gain mechanistic insights about the relationship between described psycho-social resilience factors and resilience specifically in the current crisis, we assessed resilience factors, exposure to Corona crisis-specific and general stressors, as well as internalizing symptoms in a cross-sectional online survey conducted in 24 languages during the most intense phase of the lockdown in Europe (22 March to 19 April) in a convenience sample of N = 15,970 adults. Resilience, as an outcome, was conceptualized as good mental health despite stressor exposure and measured as the inverse residual between actual and predicted symptom total score. Preregistered hypotheses (osf.io/r6btn) were tested with multiple regression models and mediation analyses. Results confirmed our primary hypothesis that positive appraisal style (PAS) is positively associated with resilience (p < 0.0001). The resilience factor PAS also partly mediated the positive association between perceived social support and resilience, and its association with resilience was in turn partly mediated by the ability to easily recover from stress (both p < 0.0001). In comparison with other resilience factors, good stress response recovery and positive appraisal specifically of the consequences of the Corona crisis were the strongest factors. Preregistered exploratory subgroup analyses (osf.io/thka9) showed that all tested resilience factors generalize across major socio-demographic categories. This research identifies modifiable protective factors that can be targeted by public mental health efforts in this and in future pandemics.

Update on nonpharmacological interventions in parasomnias.

Parasomnias are abnormal behaviors that occur during sleep and can be associated, in particular during adulthood, with impaired sleep quality, daytime dysfunction, and occasionally with violent and harmful nocturnal behaviors. In these cases, therapies are often considered. Longterm pharmacological treatments are not always well tolerated and often have limited efficacy. Therefore, behavioral approaches remain an important treatment option for several types of parasomnias. However, the evidence-based approaches are limited. In the current review, we highlight results from various nonpharmacological techniques on different types of parasomnias and provide a glimpse into the future of nonpharmacological treatments in this field.

Effects of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease with and without REM sleep behaviour disorder.

BACKGROUND: Although rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with increased non-motor symptoms, its impact on the deep brain stimulation (DBS) outcome remains unclear. This is the first study to compare the post-DBS outcome between PD patients with RBD (PD-RBD+) and without (PD-RBD-). METHODS: We analysed data from PD patients who were treated with bilateral DBS in the nucleus subthalamicus. Assessments included night-polysomnography (only pre-DBS), and motor and non-motor assessments pre-DBS and post-DBS. RESULTS: Among 50 PD patients (29 males, mean age 62.5 years, 11.8 mean PD years), 24 (48%) had RBD. Pre-DBS, the two groups were equal in respect to sociodemographic features, disease duration and PD medications. A multivariate analysis showed that the clinical profile linked to motor, non-motor and quality of life features differed significantly between PD patients with and without RBD. The most discriminative elements were Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III, apathy and depression scores. Post-DBS, UPDRS-III, Epworth sleepiness scale and PD questionnaire improved significantly in both groups. UPDRS-II scores significantly improved in the PD-RBD+ group (-45%) but remained unchanged in the PD-RBD- group (-14%). The depression score improved significantly in the PD-RBD+ (-34%) and remained unchanged in the PD-RBD- group. The apathy score remained unchanged in the PD-RBD+ group but increased significantly in the PD-RBD- group (+33%). CONCLUSION: While pre-DBS, PD patients with and without RBD showed different clinical profiles, post-DBS, the clinical profiles were comparable between the two groups. In respect to depressive symptoms, apathy and activities of daily living, PD-RBD+ patients show favourable post-DBS outcome. These findings highlight the importance of RBD assessment prior to DBS surgery.

Apathy in Parkinson's disease with REM sleep behavior disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with increased risk of non-motor symptoms. However, the association between RBD and apathy in PD remains unclear. AIMS: To compare the prevalence and severity of apathy symptoms in PD patients with RBD (PD-RBD+) and without (PD-RBD-). In addition, we explored the association between apathy, depressive symptoms and RBD, taking into consideration the concomitant influence of demographic, disease- and therapy-associated variables. METHODS: Sixty-four PD patients were evaluated with systematic motor (unified Parkinson's disease rating scale, UPDRS-III) and non-motor assessments. The diagnosis of RBD was based on the international consensus criteria using video-polysomnography. Apathy, sleepiness, depressive symptoms and cognitive performance were assessed using the Starkstein apathy (SAS, cut-off = 14), the Epworth sleepiness (ESS), the Hamilton depression (HAM-D, cut-off = 9) scales and the mini-mental state examination (MMSE), respectively. RESULTS: Among 64 patients, 26 (40%) had RBD. In the PD-RBD+ group, apathy symptoms were more frequent (52% vs 42%) and more severe (14.3 ±â€¯5.8 vs 11.2 ±â€¯4.9, p < 0.05), especially in the females (17.3 ±â€¯6.0 vs 11.4 ±â€¯5.8 in males, p < 0.05) compared to the PD-RBD- group. A high percentage of patients, especially in the PD-RBD+ group (53%), had isolated apathy without increased depressive symptoms. Increased depressive symptoms were also more frequent (50% vs 20%) and more severe in the PD-RBD+ group. The two groups were comparable in respect to demographic and clinical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: In PD, RBD is associated with isolated apathy and increased severity of depressive symptoms, independent of medication, motor and other non-motor symptoms. Potential mechanisms underlying this association are discussed.