ABSTRACT
Insomnia is a common feature of depression; however, depression treatment guidelines provide limited recommendations regarding hypnotic drugs. Few studies have thoroughly investigated the use of hypnotic drugs in depression. In this cohort study using national Swedish registers, we included all patients ≥18 years with incident unipolar depression during 2007-2017. Patients were followed for 3 years, noting the annual and quarterly prevalence of hypnotic drug use from prescription fills. Prevalence ratios (PR) comparing 2017 to 2007 were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 222,077 patients with depression were included (mean age 41 years, 59% women). In the year following diagnosis, 44.1% used any hypnotic drug in 2017, compared with 46.7% in 2007 (PR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.97). The most commonly used drugs were Z-drugs (zopiclone, zolpidem, and zaleplon) with a prevalence of 27.6% in 2017 and 35.6% in 2007 (PR 0.78, 95% CI 0.75-0.80). Melatonin use increased sharply to 12.0% in 2017 from 0.4% in 2007 (PR 28.9, 95% CI 23.5-35.7). Hypnotic drug use was most prevalent in the first two quarters after diagnosis; however, after 3 years, the quarterly prevalence was still 19.2%. Hypnotics were more common among women, older patients, those with somatic comorbidities, more severe depression, or a history of suicide attempt. Evidence from this large register-based study demonstrates that hypnotics were used to a large extent in depression in Sweden 2007-2017. Z-drugs use declined and melatonin use increased dramatically. Hypnotic drug use remained high even 3 years after diagnosis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have not investigated response rates after electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in patients with non-psychotic treatment-resistant depression (TRD). AIMS: To assess and compare the response rate of ECT for patients with TRD and non-TRD, in a large and clinically representative patient sample. METHOD: Patients aged ≥18 years, who were treated for a unipolar, non-psychotic depressive episode with at least one ECT session as part of a first-time, index ECT series between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2017 were included from the Swedish National Quality Register for ECT. Patients who had initiated a third consecutive trial of antidepressants or add-on medications before start of ECT were classified as having TRD. Patients not meeting criteria for TRD were classified as non-TRD. The main outcome was response to ECT according to the Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement Scale (CGI-I), scored as 1 or 2 ('very much' or 'much improved' after ECT, respectively). Logistic regression was used to compare outcome measures between TRD and non-TRD, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 4244 patients were included. Of these, 1121 patients had TRD and 3123 patients had non-TRD. The CGI-I response rate was 65.9% in the TRD group compared with 75.9% in the non-TRD group (adjusted odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.75). Older age and more severe depression were predictors of response in patients with TRD. CONCLUSIONS: A clear majority of patients with TRD, as well as patients with non-TRD, responded to ECT, although the response rate was somewhat lower for TRD.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the health care utilisation (HCU) among patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) compared to patients with depression not meeting TRD criteria. METHODS: Nationwide Swedish registers were used to identify patients 18-69 years old with incident depression and antidepressant treatment. Patients were followed prospectively and defined as having TRD at start of the third distinct consecutive treatment episode. Each of the 16,329 identified TRD patients were matched with five comparators with depression not meeting criteria for TRD. Main outcome measure was total number of inpatient days and outpatient visits, and secondary outcome was HCU in connection with a main diagnosis of depression or suicide attempt. RESULTS: TRD patients had a significantly higher risk of all-cause inpatient care than comparators (first year adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 3.03 [95%CI 3.01-3.05], years 1-3 aRR 2.15 [2.13-2.16]). This was more pronounced when the main diagnosis was depression (first year aRR 4.41 [4.36-4.45]), and after suicide attempt (first year aRR 4.43 [4.26-4.60]). Outpatient visits were also markedly more frequent for patients with TRD (first year aRR 2.05 [2.03-2.07]). Higher HCU among TRD patients persisted throughout follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with TRD may have a twofold to fourfold higher HCU than other patients with depression.KEYPOINTSThis register-based prospective study investigated health care utilisation (HCU) among patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) compared to other patients with depression.Patients with TRD had a two to fourfold higher HCU regarding all measured outcomes, including inpatient hospital days and outpatient visits.The elevated HCU persisted for more than three years, although decreasing gradually. This should correspond to increased costs and individual burden for patients with TRD.
