ABSTRACT
Treating patients with DLBCL remains a challenge, as the response to first-line immunochemotherapy is somewhat unpredictable. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is one of the most widely used methods for assessing prognosis. Interim PET/CT (iPET/CT) can play an important role in the early identification of 'non-responder' patients before the end of treatment examination. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 104 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP-like regimens who underwent iPET/CT imaging during therapy. There was a significant difference in 2-year OS between patients with negative iPET/CT and those with positive iPET/CT. Patients who had positive iPET/CT showed inferior 2-year PFS compared to those with negative iPET/CT. According to IPI, there was a statistically significant difference in 2-year OS and PFS between patients in the lower and higher risk groups. However, these patients can be further subdivided according to iPET/CT. The iPET/CT results in the present study clearly separate good- and poor-prognosis patients according to differences in 2-year OS, both in the lower and higher IPI risk groups. These results are in agreement with those of previous studies that demonstrated that iPET/CT has high negative predictive value, clearly identifying good-prognosis patients even within the poor-prognosis IPI group.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/diagnostic imaging , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/mortality , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Disease-Free Survival , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Rituximab/administration & dosage , Survival Rate , Vincristine/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Treatment of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia is still a challenge to clinicians. Even today it may be lethal. Half of the cases are secondary due to an underlying disease, and the others are primary or idiopathic cases. According to the specificity and type of autoantibodies there are warm and cold type forms of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. The hallmark of the diagnosis is to detect the presence of haemolysis by clinical and laboratory signs and detect the underlying autoantibodies. Treatment of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia is still a challenge to clinicians. We still loose patients due to excessive haemolysis or severe infections caused by immunosuppression. First line treatment is corticosteroids. Other immunosuppressive agents like: cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, cyclosporine or the off label rituximab can be used in case of corticosteroid refractoriness. Splenectomy is a considerable option in selective cases. The authors discuss treatment options and highlight difficulties by presenting 4 cases.
