ABSTRACT
The Melbourne technique was described in 2008 as a novel method for complete correction of scaphocephaly. Since 2015, it has become our operation of choice for children with sagittal synostosis who are too old at presentation for minimally invasive techniques. Our modifications were 2-position (initially supine then prone) technique and undertaking a formal fronto-orbital remodeling to correct forehead contour. Retrospective chart review was used to record demographics, blood transfusion frequency and volumes, operating time, length of stay, clinical outcome, and complications. Eleven underwent modified Melbourne procedure between July 2015 and March 2017; 9 of 11 were male. All had a diagnosis of nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis. Mean age at surgery was 29 months. Mean surgical time was 6âhours. All patients required blood transfusion with a mean volume transfused of 29âmL/kg (range 13-83âmL/kg). For those 5 patients where preoperative and postoperative measurements were available, there was an increase in mean cephalic index (CI) from 0.64 to 0.75. All postoperative patients had a CI of over 0.70. Three-dimensional shape analysis indicated head shape change addressing all phenotypic aspects of scaphocephaly. In the 5 patients in which analysis could be undertaken, the mean intracranial volume increased from 1481âcm preoperatively to 1671âcm postoperatively, a mean increase in intracranial volume of 14%. The postoperative intracranial volume was higher than preoperative in all 5 patients. There were 4 minor and no major complications. Modified Melbourne procedure is safe and effective for the treatment of severe scaphocephaly in sagittal synostosis.
Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses/surgery , Craniotomy/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Blood Transfusion , Child, Preschool , Craniotomy/adverse effects , Female , Forehead/surgery , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay , Male , Operative Time , Postoperative Period , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Esthetics , Face/physiopathology , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Congenital Microtia/surgery , Craniofacial Abnormalities/surgery , Face/abnormalities , Face/surgery , Facial Paralysis/surgery , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Wounds and Injuries/surgery , Young AdultABSTRACT
Trigonocephaly in patients with metopic synostosis is corrected by fronto-orbital remodelling (FOR). The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess aesthetic outcomes of FOR by capturing 3D forehead scans of metopic patients pre- and post-operatively and comparing them with controls. Ten single-suture metopic patients undergoing FOR and 15 age-matched non-craniosynostotic controls were recruited at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children (UK). Scans were acquired with a three-dimensional (3D) handheld camera and post-processed combining 3D imaging software. 3D scans were first used for cephalometric measurements. Statistical shape modelling was then used to compute the 3D mean head shapes of the three groups (FOR pre-op, post-op and controls). Head shape variations were described via principal component analysis (PCA). Cephalometric measurements showed that FOR significantly increased the forehead volume and improved trigonocephaly. This improvement was supported visually by pre- and post-operative computed mean 3D shapes and numerically by PCA (p < 0.001). Compared with controls, post-operative scans showed flatter foreheads (p < 0.001). In conclusion, 3D scanning followed by 3D statistical shape modelling enabled the 3D comparison of forehead shapes of metopic patients and non-craniosynostotic controls, and demonstrated that the adopted FOR technique was successful in correcting bitemporal narrowing but overcorrected the rounding of the forehead.
Subject(s)
Cephalometry/methods , Craniosynostoses/surgery , Forehead/surgery , Head/anatomy & histology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Models, Anatomic , Craniosynostoses/diagnostic imaging , Female , Forehead/diagnostic imaging , Head/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Infant , MaleABSTRACT
The main indication for hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is to control menopausal symptoms and improve quality of life. Ideally, withdrawal of HRT should be attempted after 4-5 years of therapy. HRT reduces fracture risk and remains appropriate therapy for osteoporosis, particularly in women with symptoms. HRT is not appropriate for primary or secondary cardioprotection. HRT leads to a small increase in breast cancer incidence, which increases with duration of therapy and age. HRT increases the risk of thromboembolism. Patient management and therapy should be reviewed annually with risk-benefit counselling.
