"To Call or Not to Call" Communication Preferences Among Pediatric Hospital Medicine Team Leaders.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric Hospital Medicine fellowship programs need to abide by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements regarding communication and supervision. Effective communication is critical for safe patient care, yet no prior research has explored optimal communication practices between residents, fellows, and attending hospitalists. Our objective is to explore communication preferences among pediatric senior residents (SRs), Pediatric Hospital Medicine fellows, and hospitalists on an inpatient team during clinical decision-making. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study at 6 institutions nationwide. We developed 3 complementary surveys adapted from prior research, 1 for each population: 200 hospitalists, 20 fellows, and 380 SRs. The instruments included questions about communication preferences between the SR, fellow, and hospitalist during clinical scenarios. We calculated univariate descriptive statistics and examined paired differences in percent agreement using χ2 tests, accounting for clustering by institution. RESULTS: Response rates were: 53% hospitalists; 100% fellows; 39% SRs. Communication preferences varied based on role, scenario, and time of day. For most situations, hospitalists preferred more communication with the fellow overnight and when a patient or family is upset than expressed by fellows (P < .01). Hospitalists also desired more communication between the SR and fellow for an upset patient or family than SRs (P < .01), but all respondents agreed the SR should call the fellow for adverse events. More fellows and hospitalists felt that the SR should contact the fellow before placing a consult compared with SRs (95%, 86% vs 64%). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalists, fellows, and SRs may have differing preferences regarding communication, impacting supervision, autonomy, and patient safety. Training programs should consider such perspectives when creating expectations and communication guidelines.

TEAMwork! An Innovative Hospital Medicine Teaching Program to Enhance Learners' Educational Experience.

PROBLEM: Workplace-based learning and assessment are dependent on frequent observations, feedback, teaching, and evaluations. Yet high physician workload and multiple learners limit these efforts. A local needs assessment demonstrated insufficient direct observations, small-group teaching, and high-quality evaluations for learners. In response, the authors developed and implemented Teaching Excellence Among Medical providers (TEAM), a teaching program to enhance the educational experience of learners in pediatric hospital medicine (PHM). APPROACH: The TEAM program, grounded in a self-regulated learning framework, launched in 2019. The University of Colorado Department of Pediatrics provided salary support. TEAM hospitalists completed professional development for teaching and feedback skills. During their TEAM shifts, they observed, provided feedback, completed evaluations, and led teaching sessions for learners on PHM rotations. The program's impact was evaluated by using an electronic work tracking form and surveying learners, attending hospitalists, and TEAM hospitalists, leading to iterative program improvements. OUTCOMES: Over an 18-month period, TEAM hospitalists completed 1,573 direct observations, 265 teaching sessions attended by 1,921 learners, and more than 497 learner evaluations. Survey results showed that 95% of learners indicated TEAM was "very effective" or "somewhat effective" in helping achieve individualized learning goals, and a similar percentage "strongly agreed" or "agreed" that TEAM hospitalists were effective educators. Eighty-four percent of attending hospitalist survey respondents reported TEAM contributed "very much" or "somewhat" to learner education. Attending hospitalists particularly appreciated TEAM's ability to focus on learners identified as struggling, while TEAM hospitalists rated observation of rounds and small-group teaching sessions as the most valuable TEAM activities. NEXT STEPS: The TEAM program employed concepts of self-regulated learning to enhance education in PHM through direct observation, feedback, written evaluations, and teaching efforts. This program can mitigate many challenges facing attending physicians and can serve as a model for other institutions. Next steps include evaluation of higher-level learning outcomes.

The Norms and Corporatization of Medicine Influence Physician Moral Distress in the United States.

PhenomenonMoral distress, which occurs when someone's moral integrity is seriously compromised because they feel unable to act in accordance with their core values and obligations, is an increasingly important concern for physicians. Due in part to limited understanding of the root causes of moral distress, little is known about which approaches are most beneficial for mitigating physicians' distress. Our objective was to describe system-level factors in United States (U.S.) healthcare that contribute to moral distress among pediatric hospitalist attendings and pediatric residents.ApproachIn this qualitative study, we conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with pediatric hospitalist attendings and pediatric residents from 4 university-affiliated, freestanding children's hospitals in the U.S. between August 2019 and February 2020. Data were coded with an iteratively developed codebook, categorized into themes, and then synthesized.FindingsWe interviewed 22 hospitalists and 18 residents. Participants described in detail how the culture of medicine created a context that cultivated moral distress. Norms of medical education and the practice of medicine created conflicts between residents' strong sense of professional responsibility to serve the best interests of their patients and the expectations of a hierarchical system of decision-making. The corporatization of the U.S. healthcare system created administrative and financial pressures that conflicted with the moral responsibility felt by both residents and hospitalists to provide the care that their patients and families needed.InsightsThese findings highlight the critical role of systemic sources of moral distress. These findings suggest that system-level interventions must supplement existing interventions that target individual health care providers. Preventing and managing moral distress will require a broad approach that addresses systemic drivers, such as the corporatization of medicine, which are entrenched in the culture of medicine.

Defining Supervision Preferences and Roles Within a New Subspecialty: Pediatric Hospital Medicine.

OBJECTIVE: To describe supervision preferences among pediatric hospitalists, Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) fellows, and senior residents (SRs), and to better define the ideal role of a PHM fellow. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study at 6 institutions nationwide. We developed 3 complementary surveys, one for each population (hospitalists, fellows, SRs). We calculated univariate descriptive and bivariate statistics for categorical variables using Chi-square tests with the Rao-Scott correction to account for clustering by institution. RESULTS: Survey respondents included 106 of 200 hospitalists (53%), all 20 fellows (100%), and 149 of 380 SRs (39%). Most hospitalists and all fellows preferred the supervising hospitalist to have 3+ years of experience or be fellowship-trained. Nearly all fellows preferred the attending round in-person providing progressive independence; while hospitalists and SRs desired greater attending presence on rounds. Hospitalists and fellows wanted more frequent communication when the attending does not round with the team, and more hospitalists desired at least 2 points of contact regardless of attending presence on rounds. Fifty-five percent of SRs reported experiencing much less/less autonomy when on with a fellow than when supervised by a hospitalist only. Regarding the fellow's role, most participants agreed SRs should lead rounds and contact the fellow first with questions. The majority agreed teaching should be a shared responsibility but lacked consensus about how to provide feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Study results reveal preferences about supervising fellows in this new subspecialty. Hospitalists, fellows, and SRs may have differing opinions regarding workflow, communication, and teaching, impacting team leadership and autonomy.

Barriers and Motivators for Smoking Cessation Among Caregivers of Inpatient Pediatric Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine perceived barriers and motivators for smoking cessation among caregivers of inpatient pediatric patients. METHODS: From December 2014 to June 2018, trained tobacco counselors conducted motivational interviews (MI) with caregivers of inpatient pediatric patients ages 0 to 17, who participated in the intervention arm of a smoking cessation randomized controlled trial. By using NVivo 12 software, the first MI session with each caregiver was evaluated by 3 individuals to identify and categorize motivators and barriers; agreement among reviewers was reached. Barriers and motivators were examined in bivariable analysis with χ2 or Fisher's exact tests for categorical factors and with t-tests for continuous factors by using SAS 9.4 software. RESULTS: Of the 124 caregivers randomized to intervention, 99 subjects (80%) completed ≥1 MI sessions. The most prevalent barriers to cessation were stress (57%) and social influence (37%).The most prevalent motivators were desire to lead a healthy life (54%) and desire to improve the child and family's well-being (47%). Older parent age was associated with wanting to lead a healthy life, and younger child age was associated with wanting to improve the child and family's well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding barriers and motivators to cessation among caregivers is crucial in reducing pediatric secondhand smoke (SHS). When developing caregiver cessation programs in an inpatient clinic encounter, caregiver barriers and motivators may help in targeting education and strategies to help counselors and clinicians better identify and support caregivers who wish to quit smoking.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training in Pediatric Residency: A National Needs Assessment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) evolves into a standard tool for the care of children, pediatric residency programs need to develop POCUS training programs. Few POCUS training resources exist for pediatric residents, and little is known about POCUS training in pediatric residencies. We aim to describe pediatric residency leadership perspectives regarding the value of POCUS and to elucidate the current state of POCUS training in pediatric residency programs. METHODS: A group of pediatric educators and POCUS experts developed a novel survey followed by cognitive interviews to establish response-process validity. The survey was administered electronically to pediatric residency associate program directors between December 2019 and April 2020. Program characteristics, including region, setting, and size, were used to perform poststratification for analyses. We performed comparative analyses using program and respondent characteristics. RESULTS: We achieved a 30% (58 of 196) survey response rate. Although only a minority of respondents (26%) used POCUS in clinical practice, a majority (56%) indicated that all pediatric residents should be trained in POCUS. A majority of respondents also considered 8 of 10 POCUS applications important for pediatric residents. Only 37% of programs reported any POCUS training for residents, primarily informal bedside education. Most respondents (94%) cited a lack of qualified instructors as a barrier to POCUS training. CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatric residency programs do not provide residents with POCUS training despite its perceived value and importance. Numerous POCUS applications are considered important for pediatric residents to learn. Future curricular and faculty development efforts should address the lack of qualified POCUS instructors.

How Attendings Can Help Residents Navigate Moral Distress: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore how pediatric hospitalist attendings can recognize, prevent, and mitigate moral distress among pediatric residents. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study, utilizing a deductive approach, from August 2019 to February 2020 at 4 university-affiliated, freestanding children's hospitals in the United States using semistructured, one-on-one interviews with pediatric residents and pediatric hospitalist attendings. All transcripts were coded by pairs of research team members. Using constant comparative analysis, codes were categorized into themes and subsequently grouped into domains. We then conceptualized the relationships between the domains. RESULTS: We interviewed 40 physicians (18 residents, 22 attendings) and identified specific strategies for attendings to help residents navigate moral distress, which were categorized into 4 proactive and 4 responsive themes. The proactive themes included strategies employed before morally distressing events to minimize impact: ensuring attendings' awareness of residency factors influencing residents' moral distress; knowing available support resources; creating a learning environment that lays the foundation for mitigating distress; and recognizing moral distress in residents. The responsive themes included strategies that help mitigate the impact of morally distressing situations after they occur: partnering with the senior resident to develop a team-specific plan; consideration of who will participate in, the timing of, and content of the debrief. CONCLUSIONS: We present multiple strategies that attendings can implement to learn to recognize, prevent, and mitigate moral distress among residents. Our findings highlight the need for both proactive and reactive strategies and offer a possible roadmap for attending physicians to help their residents navigate moral distress.

Moral Distress in Pediatric Residents and Pediatric Hospitalists: Sources and Association With Burnout.

OBJECTIVE: Moral distress is increasingly identified as a major problem affecting healthcare professionals, but it is poorly characterized among pediatricians. Our objective was to assess the sources of moral distress in residents and pediatric hospitalist attendings and to examine the association of moral distress with reported burnout. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey from January through March 2019 of pediatric residents and hospital medicine attending physicians affiliated with 4 free-standing children's hospitals. Moral distress was measured using the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP). Burnout was measured using 2 items adapted from the Maslach Burnout Inventory. RESULTS: Respondents included 288 of 541 eligible pediatric residents (response rate: 53%) and 118 of 168 pediatric hospitalists (response rate: 70%; total response rate: 57%). The mean MMD-HP composite score was 93.4 (SD = 42.5). Residents reported significantly higher frequency scores (residents: M = 38.5 vs. hospitalists: M = 33.3; difference: 5.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-7.5) and composite scores (residents: M = 97.6 vs hospitalists: M = 83.0; difference:14.6, 95% CI, 5.7-23.5) than hospitalists. The most frequent source of moral distress was "having excessive documentation requirements that compromise patient care," and the most intense source of moral distress was "be[ing] required to work with abusive patients/family members who are compromising quality of care." Significantly higher mean MMD-HP composite scores were observed among participants reporting that they felt burned out at least once per week (M= 114.6 vs M= 82.3; difference: 32.3, 95% CI, 23.5-41.2). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric residents and hospitalists report experiencing moral distress from a variety of patient-, team-, and system-level sources, and this distress is associated with burnout.

Qualitative Study to Understand Pediatric Hospitalists and Emergency Medicine Physicians' Perspectives of Clinical Pathways.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare costs are rising, and clinical pathways (CPW) are one means to promote high-value care by standardizing care and improving outcomes without compromising cost or quality. However, providers do not always follow CPW, and our understanding of their perceptions is limited. Our objective was to examine pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physician perspectives of CPW. METHODS: We conducted semistructured, in-depth, one-on-one qualitative interviews with PHM and PEM physicians between February 2017 and August 2017. Interviews were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and accuracy verified. Using an inductive analytic strategy, we systematically coded the data to identify themes. RESULTS: We interviewed 15 PHM and 15 PEM physicians. These providers identified many benefits and limitations of CPW, which positively or negatively impact resource utilization, communication, education of personnel, patients, and families, as well as practice behaviors and attitudes. Perceived benefits included (1) reduction of unnecessary utilization, (2) standardization of care, (3) improved communication, (4) education of oneself and others, and (5) confidence and validation when actions align with CPW. Limitations of CPW were (1) resource utilization for revisions, updates, and dissemination; (2) "tunnel vision" and cognitive biases; (3) loss of autonomy; (4) prescriptive medicine; (5) information overload; (6) pressure to adhere; and (7) guilt if actions do not align with CPW. CONCLUSIONS: CPW are tools with advantages and disadvantages that are used and viewed differently by providers. Such insight into how physicians perceive CPW may help to optimize hospital improvement work and enhance high-value care.

Interventions to Reduce Over-Utilized Tests and Treatments in Bronchiolitis.

OBJECTIVES: The American Academy of Pediatrics published bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelines in 2014 recommending against the routine use of bronchodilators, chest radiographs, or respiratory viral testing in children with a clinical diagnosis of bronchiolitis. Our aim in this project was to align care with the American Academy of Pediatrics clinical practice guidelines by decreasing the overuse of these interventions. METHODS: This study included patients who were admitted to a non-ICU setting with a primary or secondary diagnosis of bronchiolitis. The team used a multidisciplinary kickoff event to understand the problem and develop interventions, including sharing provider-specific data and asking providers to sign a pledge to reduce use. We used a novel, real-time data dashboard to collect and analyze data. RESULTS: Special cause variation on control charts indicated improvement for all outcomes for inpatients during the intervention season. Pre- and postanalyses in which we compared baseline to intervention values for all admitted patients and patients who were discharged from the emergency department or urgent care revealed a significant reduction in the ordering of chest radiographs (from 22.7% to 13.6%; P ≤ .001), respiratory viral testing (from 12.5% to 9.8%; P = .001), and bronchodilators (from 17.5% to 10.3%; P = .001) without changes in balancing measures (eg, hospital readmission within 7 days [1.7% (preanalysis) and 1.0% (postanalysis); P = .21]) for bronchiolitis. CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary improvement initiative resulted in a significant reduction in use for bronchiolitis care at our institution. Our approach, which included a novel, real-time data dashboard and interventions such as individual providers pledging to reduce use, may have the potential to reduce overuse in other settings and diseases.

A review of orthostatic blood pressure regulation and its association with mood and cognition.

AIMS: This paper will review literature that examines the psychological and neuropsychological correlates of orthostatic blood pressure regulation. RESULTS: The pattern of change in systolic blood pressure in response to the shift from supine to upright posture reflects the adequacy of orthostatic regulation. Orthostatic integrity involves the skeletal muscle pump, neurovascular compensation, neurohumoral effects and cerebral flow regulation. Various physiological states and disease conditions may disrupt these mechanisms. Clinical and subclinical orthostatic hypotension has been associated with impaired cognitive function, decreased effort, reduced motivation and increased hopelessness as well as dementia, diabetes mellitus, and Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, inadequate blood pressure regulation in response to orthostasis has been linked to increased depression and anxiety as well as to intergenerational behavioral sequalae. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying possible causes and consequences of subclinical and clinical OH are critical in improving quality of life for both children and older adults.

Subsyndromal orthostatic blood pressure regulation correlates with motor skills in head start children.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the functional relationship between subsyndromal orthostatic blood pressure regulation and motor skills in 3-5 year old children. It is known that the efficiency of orthostatic blood pressure regulation is affected by a variety of processes, most especially neurohumoral as well as sympathetic nervous system function. Using the DIAL-3 to evaluate gross motor (jump, hop, skip), fine motor (building) and copying abilities, we found a significant curvilinear association between the difference in systolic blood pressure following an orthostatic challenge and the DIAL-3 composite motor skills score. This relationship indicated that up to a point an increase in systolic blood pressure upon standing was associated with the highest composite motor score; further, the association was stronger in females (R(2)=0.12). This study illustrates that in response to an orthostatic challenge, a moderate increase in orthostatic systolic blood pressure serves as a marker for those processes such as dopamine and sympathetic nervous system function that provide the resources for orthostatic blood pressure regulation and cognition in young children. Thus, by identifying individuals with orthostatic systolic dysregulation early, one may attenuate problematic physiological and psychological effects associated with subsyndromal orthostatic blood pressure regulation.

ABCB1 (MDR1) genetic variants are associated with methadone doses required for effective treatment of heroin dependence.

Methadone is a mu-opioid receptor agonist used for treating opiate dependence. The range of effective methadone doses is broad. Part of the large inter-individual variability in efficacy may be accounted for by genetic factors. Methadone is a substrate of the transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) 170 that is encoded by the ABCB1 (MDR1) gene. Thus, P-gp variants may play a role in methadone absorption and distribution. We assessed the association between ABCB1 polymorphisms and methadone dose requirements in 98 methadone-maintained patients. The stabilizing methadone doses were normally distributed with a mean and median dose of 160 mg/day (range 30-280 mg/day). Statistical analysis showed significant difference in genotype frequencies between the 'higher' (>150 mg/day) and 'lower' (< or =150 mg/day) methadone dose groups for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) 1236C>T (rs1128503) (experiment-wise P = 0.0325). Furthermore, individuals bearing the 3-locus genotype pattern TT-TT-TT (rs1045642, rs2032582 and rs1128503) have an approximately 5-fold chance of requiring the 'higher' methadone dose, while individuals heterozygous for these three SNPs have an approximately 3-fold chance of stabilizing at the 'lower' methadone dose (point-wise P-value = 0.026). These data suggest that specific ABCB1 variants may have clinical relevance by influencing the methadone dose required to prevent withdrawal symptoms and relapse in this population.

Improved malar projection with transconjunctival hydroxyapatite granules.

BACKGROUND: Augmentation of the zygomatic body enhances appearance and provides a more youthful look. Porous hydroxyapatite granules offer an alternative to alloplastic implants. METHODS: Hydroxyapatite granules were placed by means of a transconjunctival approach into subperiosteal malar pockets (n = 8). From the preoperative, postoperative, and 1-year follow-up lateral views, malar projection was measured as the right angle distance from the point of malar prominence to the nasale-subnasale line. RESULTS: Patients were either very satisfied (six of eight) or satisfied (two of eight). Malar projection was significantly improved postoperatively and was maintained after 1 year. CONCLUSION: This technique, performed for cosmetic and reconstructive indications, resulted in measurable improvement in malar projection, minimal complications, and optimal patient satisfaction.