ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Falls in older adults remain a pressing health concern. With advancements in data analytics and increasing uptake of electronic health records, developing comprehensive predictive models for fall risk is now possible. We aimed to systematically identify studies involving the development and implementation of predictive falls models which used routinely collected electronic health record data in home-based, community and residential aged care settings. METHODS: A systematic search of entries in Cochrane Library, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in July 2020 using search terms relevant to aged care, prediction, and falls. Selection criteria included English-language studies, published in peer-reviewed journals, had an outcome of falls, and involved fall risk modelling using routinely collected electronic health record data. Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program for Clinical Prediction Rule Studies were conducted. Study content was synthesised and reported narratively. RESULTS: From 7,329 unique entries, four relevant studies were identified. All predictive models were built using different statistical techniques. Predictors across seven categories were used: demographics, assessments of care, fall history, medication use, health conditions, physical abilities, and environmental factors. Only one of the four studies had been validated externally. Three studies reported on the performance of the models. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting predictive modelling in aged care services for adverse events, such as falls, is in its infancy. The increased availability of electronic health record data and the potential of predictive modelling to document fall risk and inform appropriate interventions is making use of such models achievable. Having a dynamic prediction model that reflects the changing status of an aged care client is key to this moving forward for fall prevention interventions.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Electronic Health Records , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Aged , Humans , Mass ScreeningABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: There is a clear need for improved care quality and quality monitoring in aged care. Aged care providers collect an abundance of data, yet rarely are these data integrated and transformed in real-time into actionable information to support evidence-based care, nor are they shared with older people and informal caregivers. This protocol describes the co-design and testing of a dashboard in residential aged care facilities (nursing or care homes) and community-based aged care settings (formal care provided at home or in the community). The dashboard will comprise integrated data to provide an 'at-a-glance' overview of aged care clients, indicators to identify clients at risk of fall-related hospitalisations and poor quality of life, and evidence-based decision support to minimise these risks. Longer term plans for dashboard implementation and evaluation are also outlined. METHODS: This mixed-method study will involve (1) co-designing dashboard features with aged care staff, clients, informal caregivers and general practitioners (GPs), (2) integrating aged care data silos and developing risk models, and (3) testing dashboard prototypes with users. The dashboard features will be informed by direct observations of routine work, interviews, focus groups and co-design groups with users, and a community forum. Multivariable discrete time survival models will be used to develop risk indicators, using predictors from linked historical aged care and hospital data. Dashboard prototype testing will comprise interviews, focus groups and walk-through scenarios using a think-aloud approach with staff members, clients and informal caregivers, and a GP workshop. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received ethical approval from the New South Wales (NSW) Population & Health Services Research Ethics Committee and Macquarie University's Human Research Ethics Committee. The research findings will be presented to the aged care provider who will share results with staff members, clients, residents and informal caregivers. Findings will be disseminated as peer-reviewed journal articles, policy briefs and conference presentations.
Subject(s)
Health Services for the Aged , Quality of Life , Aged , Caregivers , Health Services , Humans , Quality of Health CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Meningococcal infection causes severe, rapidly progressing illness and reporting of cases is mandatory in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The NSW Department of Health operates near real-time Emergency Department (ED) surveillance that includes capture and statistical analysis of clinical preliminary diagnoses. The system can provide alerts in response to specific diagnoses entered in the ED computer system. This study assessed whether once daily reporting of clinical diagnoses of meningococcal infection using the ED surveillance system provides an opportunity for timelier public health response for this disease. METHODS: The study involved a prospective and retrospective component. First, reporting of ED diagnoses of meningococcal infection from the ED surveillance system prospectively operated in parallel with conventional surveillance which requires direct telephone reporting of this scheduled medical condition to local public health authorities by hospitals and laboratories when a meningococcal infection diagnosis is made. Follow-up of the ED diagnoses determined whether meningococcal infection was confirmed, and the time difference between ED surveillance report and notification by conventional means. Second, cases of meningococcal infection reported by conventional surveillance during 2004 were retrospectively matched to ED visits to determine the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of ED surveillance. RESULTS: During the prospective evaluation, 31 patients were diagnosed with meningococcal infection in participating EDs. Of these, 12 had confirmed meningococcal disease, resulting in a PPV of 38.7%. All confirmed cases were notified earlier to public health authorities by conventional reporting.Of 149 cases of notified meningococcal disease identified retrospectively, 130 were linked to an ED visit. The sensitivity and PPV of the ED diagnosis for meningococcal infection was 36.2% and 36.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on prospective evaluation, it is reassuring that existing mechanisms for reporting meningococcal infection perform well and are timely. The retrospective evaluation found low sensitivity and PPV of ED diagnoses for meningococcal disease. Even if more rapid forwarding of ED meningococcal diagnoses to public health authorities were possible, the low sensitivity and PPV do not justify this. In this study, use of an ED surveillance system to augment conventional surveillance of this scheduled medical condition did not demonstrate a benefit.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Meningococcal Infections/diagnosis , Population Surveillance/methods , Public Health , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Meningococcal Infections/epidemiology , New South Wales/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young AdultABSTRACT
The Hereditary Cancer Registers (HCR) offer registration to individuals at risk of hereditary bowel cancer. Most families are registered to the HCR via Familial Cancer Clinics (FCC)s. The FCCs work together with the HCR to inform family members that they may be at increased risk of hereditary bowel cancer. In 2002, The Hunter Family Cancer Service (HFCS) and the HCR developed a system to ensure at risk family members become informed of their risk. Evaluation of this system is presented. The system involves tracking which family members are informed of their risk using a rating system. Being informed is graded numerically, from 5 (not informed) through to 1(definitely informed). Changes in score are brought about through staff and the FCC and HCR working with registrants to contact at risk family members. This study analyses data collected for a subgroup of 21 families registered with the HCR by the HFCS. Baseline and resulting scores indicated whether the 738 at risk family members had become better informed of their risk. One hundred and sixty eight individuals changed to a score of "definitely informed" and 230 individuals score changed from "not informed" to being better informed. The results demonstrate significant change in these family members towards becoming better informed (z = -13.88, P < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed ranks test). These data suggest that the system for informing family members of their risk has resulted in significant positive change towards these individuals becoming more informed. The system has the potential to reach over 2,800 at risk family members, of registered families, resulting in improved surveillance and better health outcomes.