Greater cervical kyphosis during flexion increases the risk of kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Kyphotic deformity following the loss of cervical lordosis can lead to unfavourable neurological recovery after cervical laminoplasty (CLP); therefore, it is essential to identify its risk factors. Recent studies have demonstrated that the dynamic parameters of the cervical spine, based on baseline flexion/extension radiographs, are highly useful to estimate the loss of cervical lordosis after CLP. However, it remains unclear whether such dynamic parameters can predict kyphotic deformity development after CLP. Hence, the present study aimed to investigate whether the dynamic parameters could predict kyphotic deformity in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) after CLP. This retrospective study included 165 patients, consisting of 10 and 155 patients with and without cervical kyphosis of C2-C7 angle ≤ -10° at the final follow-up period, respectively. Among the static and dynamic parameters of the cervical spine, greater cervical kyphosis during flexion (fC2-C7 angle) demonstrated the best discrimination between these two cohorts, with an optimal cutoff value of -27.5°. Meanwhile, greater gap range of motion (gROM = flexion ROM - extension ROM ) had the highest ability to predict a loss of ≥ 10° in C2-C7 angle after CLP, with an optimal cutoff value of 28.5°. This study suggests that in patients with CSM, fC2-C7 angle ≤ -25° on baseline radiographs is a potential risk for kyphotic deformity after CLP. In clinical practice, the patients with this criterion (fC2-C7 angle ≤ -25°) along with gROM ≥ 30° are at high risk of developing significant kyphotic deformity after CLP.

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Upper Esophageal Sphincter for Dysphagia During the Acute Postoperative Phase of Anterior Cervical Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To verify the pathophysiology of dysphagia during the acute postoperative phase of anterior cervical surgery and to identify its predictive features, using ultrasonographic (US) examination for upper esophageal sphincter (UES). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are no clinical studies investigating dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery, using US examination for UES. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery between August 2018 and March 2022. Dysphagia was evaluated using the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) questionnaires. The US examination was performed preoperatively and 2 weeks postoperatively. Three US parameters for morphologic measurements (outer diameter, inner diameter, and muscle thickness) and 4 for functional measurements (displacement, time to relax, passing duration, and time to contract) were assessed. To verify the pathophysiology of postoperative dysphagia, we examined the change in the ratios of US parameters (=US parameter 2 weeks postoperatively /US parameter at baseline ) and the existence of significant correlations with change in the EAT-10 score (=EAT-10 2 weeks postoperatively -EAT-10 at baseline ). To identify the predictive features, the baseline US parameters were compared between dysphagia (+) and dysphagia (-) groups. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients (mean age, 61.3 y; 78.3% male) were included for analysis. A greater increase of the EAT-10 score after surgery was positively correlated with change ratios of the muscle thickness and time to contract and negatively with change ratio of the inner diameter. The dysphagia (+) group exhibited significantly greater inner diameter and smaller muscle thickness at baseline than the dysphagia (-) group. CONCLUSION: Dysphagia during the acute postoperative phase of anterior cervical surgery is caused by the physical narrowing of the inner lumen due to muscle thickening of the UES and sphincter contractile dysfunction. In addition, a baseline UES morphology characterized by a greater inner diameter and a thinner muscle layer is predictive of postoperative dysphagia.

Studies in the Falls Efficacy Scale-International for patients with cervical compressive myelopathy: Reliability, validity, and minimum clinically important difference.

CONTEXT: Patients with cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM) often complain of body balance problems, such as fear of falling and bodily unsteadiness. However, no accepted patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for this symptomatology exist. The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) is one of the most widely used PROMs for evaluating impaired body balance in various clinical fields. OBJECTIVE: To examine reliability, validity, and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the FES-I for the evaluation of impaired body balance in patients with CCM. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for CCM were retrospectively reviewed. The FES-I was administered preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Further, cJOA-LE score (subscore for lower extremities in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for cervical myelopathy) and stabilometric data, obtained at the same time points of the FES-I administration, were analyzed. Reliability was examined through internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha. Convergent validity was studied using correlation analysis. The MCID was estimated using anchor- and distribution-based methods. RESULTS: Overall, 151 patients were included for analysis. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was the acceptable value of 0.97 at both baseline and 1 year postoperatively. As for convergent validity, the FES-I had significant correlations with the cJOA-LE score and stabilometric parameters both at baseline and 1 year postoperatively. The MCID calculated using anchor- and distribution-based methods was 5.5 and 10, respectively. CONCLUSION: FES-I is a reliable and valid PROM to evaluate body balance problems for the CCM population. The established thresholds of MCID can help clinicians recognize the clinical significance of changes in patient status.

Segmental cervical instability does not drive the loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

BACKGROUND/CONTEXT: Kyphotic deformity after cervical laminoplasty (CLP) often leads to unfavorable neurological recovery due to insufficient indirect decompression of the spinal cord. Existing literature has described that segmental cervical instability is a contraindication for CLP because it is a potential risk factor for kyphotic changes after surgery; however, this has never been confirmed in any clinical studies. PURPOSE: To confirm whether segmental cervical instability was an independent risk factor for postoperative kyphotic change and to examine whether segmental cervical instability led to poor neurological outcomes after CLP for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective study PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent CLP for CSM between January 2013 and January 2021 with a follow-up period of ≥1 year were enrolled. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cervical radiographic measurements including C2-C7 lordosis (C2-7 angle), cervical sagittal vertical axis, C7 slope, flexion range of motion (fROM) and extension ROM (eROM) were assessed using neutral and flexion-extension views. Segmental cervical instability was classified into anterolisthesis (AL) of ≥2 mm displacement, retrolisthesis (RL) of ≥2 mm displacement, and translational instability (TI) of ≥3 mm translational motion. The amount of C2-7 angle loss at the follow-up period compared to the preoperative measurements was defined as cervical lordosis loss (CLL). Neurological outcomes were assessed using the recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA-RR). METHODS: CLL was compared among patients with and without segmental cervical instability. Further, multiple linear regression model for CLL was built for the evaluation with adjustment of the reported risks, including cervical sagittal vertical axis, C7 slope, fROM, eROM, and patient age together with AL, RL, and TI, as independent variables. The JOA-RR was also compared between patients with and without segmental cervical instability. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients (mean age, 68.7 years; 65.9% male) were included in the analysis. AL, RL, and TI were found in 12 (8.7%), 33 (23.9%), and 16 (11.6%) patients, respectively. Comparisons among the groups showed that AL led to greater CLL; however, RL and TI did not. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that greater CLL is significantly associated with greater fROM and smaller eROM (regression coefficient [ß]=0.328, 95% confidence interval: 0.178 to 0.478, p<.001; ß=-0.372, 95% confidence interval: -0.591 to -0.153, p=.001, respectively). However, there were no significant statistical associations in the AL, RL, and TI. Whereas, patients with AL tended to exhibit lower JOA-RR than those without AL (37.8% vs. 52.0%, p=.108). CONCLUSIONS: Segmental cervical instability is not the definitive driver for loss of cervical lordosis after CLP in patients with CSM; thus, is not a contraindication in and of itself. However, it is necessary to consider the indications for CLP, according to individual cases of patients with AL on baseline radiograph, which is a sign of poor neurological recovery.

The Effects of Surgery on Postural Instability in Patients With Cervical Compressive Myelopathy: Evaluating Subjective Perceptions and Objective Measurements.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of surgery on the subjective perception of bodily unsteadiness and the objective measurements of postural instability in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies have demonstrated that CCM patients have impaired postural stability and investigated its surgical outcomes. However, these studies have only objectively measured postural stability by using a stabilometer or three-dimensional motion capture system. There have been no studies examining the subjective perception of postural instability in CCM patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent decompressive surgery for CCM. The Fall Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) and a self-prepared questionnaire were used to evaluate subjective perception of bodily unsteadiness. To objectively assess postural instability, a stabilometric analysis was performed with the following parameters: sway area (SwA, cm2), sway velocity (SwV, cm/s), and sway density (SwD, /cm). The evaluations were performed preoperatively, during the early postoperative period (3-6 mo postoperatively), and at 1-year postoperatively in patients with CCM. The evaluation results were compared with age-matched, sex-matched, and body mass index-matched healthy subjects. RESULTS: We included 70 CCM patients and 36 healthy subjects in this study. In both the FES-I and self-prepared questionnaire, CCM patients reported significantly milder postoperative bodily unsteadiness. The stabilometric parameters were significantly improved during the postoperative period when compared with preoperative values. Nevertheless, neither the self-reported outcome measures nor stabilometric parameters of CCM patients reached the levels of those in healthy controls in the postoperative period. CONCLUSION: This was the first study to examine CCM surgical outcomes in terms of both subjective perception and objective postural instability. While both objective postural stability and subjective perception improved following decompressive surgery, they did not reach the levels seen in healthy participants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Impact of morphological restoration of the spinal cord from the preoperative to early postoperative periods on C5 palsy development.

OBJECTIVE: C5 palsy (C5P) is a known complication of cervical decompression surgery. The tethering effect of the C5 nerve root following the posterior shift of the spinal cord is the most accepted pathologic mechanism for C5P development; however, this mechanism cannot fully explain C5P by itself in clinical practice. Separately, some studies have suggested that preoperative severe spinal cord compression and postoperative morphological changes in the spinal cord affect C5P development; however, no previous study has quantitatively addressed these possibilities. The aim of this study was to examine whether spinal cord morphology and morphological restoration after surgery affect C5P development. METHODS: The authors reviewed consecutive patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy who underwent laminoplasty including the C3-4 and C4-5 intervertebral disc levels. All participants underwent MRI both preoperatively and within 4 weeks postoperatively. To assess the severity of spinal cord compression, the compression ratio (CR; spinal cord sagittal diameter/transverse diameter) was calculated. As an index of morphological changes in the spinal cord during the early postoperative period, the change rate of CR (CrCR, %) was calculated as CRwithin 4 weeks postoperatively/CRpreoperatively × 100. These measurements were performed at both the C3-4 and C4-5 intervertebral disc levels. The study cohort was divided into C5P and non-C5P (NC5P) groups; then, CR and CrCR, in addition to other radiographic variables associated with C5P development, were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients (mean age 67.6 years, 58.8% men) were included in the study, with 5 and 109 patients in the C5P and NC5P groups, respectively. Preoperative CR at both the C3-4 and C4-5 levels was significantly lower in the C5P group than in the NC5P group (0.35 vs 0.44, p = 0.042 and 0.27 vs 0.39, p = 0.021, respectively). Patients with C5P exhibited significantly higher CrCR at the C3-4 level than those without (139.3% vs 119.0%, p = 0.046), but the same finding was not noted for CrCR at the C4-5 level. There were no significant differences in other variables between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that severe compression of the spinal cord and its greater morphological restoration during the early postoperative period affect C5P development. These findings could support the involvement of segmental cord disorder theory, characterized as the reperfusion phenomenon, in the pathomechanism of C5P, in addition to the tethering effect.

Gap between flexion and extension ranges of motion: a novel indicator to predict the loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE: Kyphotic deformity resulting from the loss of cervical lordosis (CL) is a rare but serious complication after cervical laminoplasty (CLP), and it is essential to recognize the risk factors. Previous studies have demonstrated that a greater flexion range of motion (fROM) and smaller extension ROM (eROM) in the cervical spine are associated with the loss of CL after CLP. Considering these facts together, one can hypothesize that an indicator representing the gap between fROM and eROM (gROM) is highly useful in predicting postoperative CL loss. In the present study, the authors aimed to investigate the risk factors of marked CL loss after CLP for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), including the gROM as a potential predictor. METHODS: Patients who had undergone CLP for CSM were divided into those with and those without a loss of more than 10° in the sagittal Cobb angle between C2 and C7 at the final follow-up period compared to preoperative measurements (CL loss [CLL] group and no CLL [NCLL] group, respectively). Demographic characteristics, surgical information, preoperative radiographic measurements, and posterior paraspinal muscle morphology evaluated with MRI were compared between the two groups. fROM and eROM were examined on neutral and flexion-extension views of lateral radiography, and gROM was calculated using the following formula: gROM (°) = fROM - eROM. The performance of variables in discriminating between the CLL and NCLL groups was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: This study included 111 patients (mean age at surgery 68.3 years, 61.3% male), with 10 and 101 patients in the CLL and NCLL groups, respectively. Univariate analyses showed that fROM and gROM were significantly greater in the CLL group than in the NCLL group (40.2° vs 26.6°, p < 0.001; 31.6° vs 14.3°, p < 0.001, respectively). ROC curve analyses revealed that both fROM and gROM had excellent discriminating capacities; gROM was likely to have a higher area under the ROC curve than fROM (0.906 vs 0.860, p = 0.094), with an optimal cutoff value of 27°. CONCLUSIONS: The gROM is a highly useful indicator for predicting a marked loss of CL after CLP. For CSM patients with a preoperative gROM exceeding 30°, CLP should be carefully considered, since kyphotic changes can develop postoperatively.

Preoperative Cyst Formation as a Predictive Feature of Spontaneous Regression of Retro-Odontoid Pseudotumor After Posterior Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Although the spontaneous regression of pseudotumors after posterior fusion has been reported, the predictive factors remain unclear. We examined the radiological features that predict for the regression of retro-odontoid pseudotumors after posterior fusion, with a specific focus on cyst formation. METHODS: We included 28 patients with a diagnosis of retro-odontoid pseudotumor using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. The radiographic parameters and pseudotumor thickness were measured pre- and postoperatively. The regression rate for each pseudotumor was calculated. The presence of a cyst around the retro-odontoid pseudotumor was investigated. If present, the cyst thickness was measured. To elucidate the predictors for the postoperative regression of pseudotumors, the patients were divided into 2 cohorts: the regression group with a regression rate >40% and the no-regression group with a regression rate of <40%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, including the demographic data and preoperative radiographic parameters as independent variables, was performed. RESULTS: The mean pseudotumor size had decreased significantly from 8.8 ± 3.6 mm preoperatively to 5.3 ± 2.0 mm postoperatively (P < 0.0001). The mean regression rate was 35.9% during a magnetic resonance imaging follow-up period of 8.6 months (range, 6-12 months). Cystic lesions were noted in 10 patients (35.7%) preoperatively. The mean cyst size was 4.7 ± 1.9 mm. All cysts were located dorsal to the pseudotumors and were involved at the maximum spinal compression levels. Nevertheless, all the cysts had disappeared postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the pseudotumor regression group had had a significantly greater proportion of cysts (57.1% vs. 14.3%; odds ratio, 11.7; P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of cystic lesions protruding from retro-odontoid pseudotumors might serve as a predictive factor for the spontaneous regression of pseudotumors after posterior fusion.

Biologic Agents Preserve the C-2 Pedicle in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comparative Imaging Study Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether biologic agents (BAs) reduce a narrow C-2 pedicle screw trajectory, which is often a key stabilizer in surgical treatment, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A total of 100 patients with RA treated with and without BAs (BA [+] group [n = 50] and BA [-] group [n = 50]), respectively, were included in the present study. Computed tomography (CT) images of their cervical spine, including C-2, were analyzed. The maximum screw diameter at C-2 that could be inserted without breaching the cortex, measured on 3-dimensional images using a CT-based navigation system, was compared between the groups with and without BA administration. Furthermore, the destruction of the atlantoaxial joint was examined using CT images. The risk factors for a narrow C-2 pedicle were elucidated among the patients treated with BAs. RESULTS: The pedicle in the BA (+) group had a significantly larger C-2 maximum screw diameter than the BA (-) group (6.00 mm vs. 5.13 mm, P < 0.001), with less destruction of the atlantoaxial joint. Among the BA (+) group, a longer period until the initial administration of BAs and RA disease duration were associated with a narrow C-2 pedicle. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that BAs can maintain the trajectory for C-2 pedicle screws, which acts as a key stabilizer in surgical management for the rheumatoid cervical spine, by halting the destruction of the atlantoaxial joint. Early introduction of BAs can be especially important to prevent the narrowing of the C-2 pedicle.

Assessing the Intraoperative Risk of Esophageal Perforation during Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Study Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography.

INTRODUCTION: Using intraoperative computed tomography (iCT), we aimed to clarify the course of the esophagus and pharynx during anterior cervical spine surgery to estimate the risk of intraoperative injury. METHODS: Sixteen patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery with intraoperative CT for registration of a navigation system without release of blade retraction were included. To investigate the status of the retracted esophagus and pharynx, the distance between the nasogastric tube and center of the vertebra (NVD) was measured at each disc and vertebral level (C4-7) using axial CT. The location of the cricoid cartilage, which may affect the shift of the esophagus and pharynx, was noted. Presence or absence of contact between the esophagus and the edge of the surgical blade was investigated. RESULTS: The NVDs were 28.0, 28.3, 28.9, 27.2, 24.7, 19.9, and 13.8 mm at C4, C4/5, C5, C5/6, C6, C6/7, and C7, respectively; NVDs at C6/7 or more caudal levels were significantly shorter than those at C6 or more cranial levels (P < 0.001). The cricoid cartilage was observed at the C4-C5/6 level. Esophageal contact with the edge of the blade was observed in nine cases at C6 or more caudal levels. CONCLUSIONS: The esophagus, which was placed at C6 or more caudal levels, was directly retracted by the blade. Nevertheless, the pharynx, which was placed at C6 or more cranial levels, was mostly retracted with the cricoid cartilage. Thus, the risk of direct esophageal injury was higher at C6 or more caudal levels than at cranial levels.

Surgical Outcomes of Postural Instability in Patients With Cervical Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the surgical outcomes of postural instability and its predictors in patients with cervical myelopathy (CM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although several studies have shown impaired postural stability in CM patients, there remains a paucity of literature examining its surgical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Postural stability was assessed using a stabilometer preoperatively, at the early phase (3-6 months postoperatively), and 1-year postoperatively, employing 2 stabilometric parameters: sway area [SwA (cm): the amount of sway of gravity center assessed by the outer peripheral area of the stabilogram] and sway density [SwD (/cm): the indicator of proprioceptive reflexes calculated by the locus length of the stabilogram per SwA]. Twenty-seven healthy age-matched, sex-matched, and body mass index-matched subjects were recruited as controls. To investigate the predictors of postoperative postural instability, univariate, and multivariate analyses were performed, including demographic data, preoperative neurological symptom severity, radiographic findings, and preoperative stabilometric parameters as independent variables. RESULTS: Altogether, 54 CM patients were included in the present study. SwA was 7.89±0.84, 4.78±0.68, and 4.85±0.49, and SwD was 14.63±0.85, 20.41±1.23, and 19.36±1.40 preoperatively, at the early phase, and 1-year postoperatively, respectively, and significant improvement was found in both parameters postoperatively. However, at all timepoints, these parameters were significantly worse in CM patients than in the healthy subjects (SwA: 2.68±0.24, SwD: 24.91±1.83). Multivariate analyses showed that worse preoperative stabilometric parameters were significantly related to worse postoperative stabilometric parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery significantly improved postural stability in CM patients; however, it did not reach the level observed in healthy controls, even postoperatively. A predictor of greater residual postoperative postural instability was a greater level of preoperative postural instability. In CM patients, to achieve better surgical outcome of postural stability, surgical intervention is recommended before the symptoms related to bodily imbalance deteriorate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Evaluation of Indirect Neural Decompression After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography Myelogram.

BACKGROUND: The effect of indirect decompression after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is widely acknowledged; however, its details remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of indirect decompression just after LLIF cage placement but just before posterior instrumentation, using intraoperative computed tomography myelogram (iCTM). METHODS: Fifty-three levels from 28 patients undergoing LLIF with iCTM, were included in this retrospective study. Radiographic parameters were obtained from preoperative computed tomography myelogram and iCTM. Segmental correction, cross-sectional areas of the spinal canal, and bilateral foramen were compared preoperatively and intraoperatively to assess the neural decompression just after LLIF cage placement. Canal stenosis status during axial computed tomography myelogram was classified into 3 grades according to modified Schizas's grading to determine the necessity of additional posterior decompression procedures. The Oswestry Disability Index was obtained before and 3 months after the operation. RESULTS: Significant improvements in all radiological parameters of segmental correction, cross-sectional areas of the spinal canal, and bilateral foramen were observed just after LLIF cage placement. However, 11 (21%) levels had insufficient neural decompression status with iCTM grade (10 central canal and 1 lateral recess stenosis), requiring further direct posterior decompression. The difference in the improvement of Oswestry Disability Index between the decompression and nondecompression group was not significant, suggesting the validity of our decision. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed evaluation with iCTM revealed that adequate indirect decompression with LLIF was not always obtained, validating the intraoperative decision of further posterior decompression. This procedure, LLIF with iCTM, may reduce the risk of unnecessary direct decompression and reoperation after insufficient indirect decompression.