Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy conversion to gastric bypass: conversion rate over time, predictors of conversion, and weight loss outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common Bariatric procedure in the United States; however, the frequency of conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to determine the conversion rate over time from LSG to RYGB. The secondary objectives were to evaluate factors associated with conversion and postconversion weight loss outcomes. SETTING: Single Academic Institution, Center of Bariatric Excellence. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all LSG from 2011 to 2020 was done. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to estimate the conversion rate over time after LSG. Cox regression was utilized to identify predictors of future conversion. RESULTS: Of 875 LSGs, 46 were converted to RYGB from 2011 to 2020. Median follow-up was 2.6 years, and 7-year follow-up rate was 59.9%. The 1-year conversion rate was 1.4%, increasing to 3.8%, 9.0%, and 12.6% at 3, 5, and 7 years respectively. Female gender (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.2, P = .05) and age <55 (HR = 3.5, P = .04) were associated with greater chance of conversion. Preoperative asthma (HR = 1.7, P = .14) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (HR = 1.5, P = .18) trended toward higher conversion but were not significant. Of those with body mass index (BMI) >35 at time of conversion, the mean total body weight loss (TBWL) was 13.0% at the time of conversion. This subgroup had additional 13.6% of TBWL 1-year after conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion of LSG to RYGB increased with time to 12.6% conversion rate at 7-years. Patients with GERD prior to LSG had a nonsignificant trend toward conversion, while younger patients and females had significantly higher rates of conversion. There may be additional weight loss benefit for patients converted to RYGB.

Rates of Recurrent Marginal Ulcer in Gastric Bypass Patients Undergoing Revisional Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of marginal ulcer (MU) following primary Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) is approximately .6-16%. Few studies have evaluated recurrence rates following surgical revision for MU. The primary aim of this study was to determine the rate of MU recurrence following revision. The secondary aim was to evaluate the impact of truncal vagotomy (TV) on the recurrence rates and analyze potential risk factors associated with the recurrence of MU after revision. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining data at a single tertiary academic medical center. Adult patients with a history of RYGB who underwent gastrojejunostomy revision for recurrent MU between the years of 2003-2020 were included. We sought to determine our overall rate of MU following revision, with and without TV. Additionally, we examined the association of risk factors with MU recurrence. Fisher's exact test was used to determine the statistical significance of recurrence rates between the groups. RESULTS: We included 90 patients in the study. The overall recurrence rate for MU was 16.7%. Of the 90 patients, 35 (35.4%) patients underwent TV at the time of revision. The recurrence rate of MU after GJ revision with TV was 14.3% in comparison to those without TV, 18.2% (P = .775). Smoking, steroid, alcohol use, history of cardiac surgery/intervention, and helicobacter pylori were not significantly associated with recurrent MU following revision. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of recurrence after revision for MU is high. Adding TV trended towards decreased MU recurrence after revisional surgery, however not significant. Larger studies are needed to evaluate risk factors associated with recurrent MU after revision.

Bariatric revisional surgery for gastrogastric fistula following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass positively impacts weight loss.

BACKGROUND: Gastrogastric fistula (GGF) is a rare complication from Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). It is a known risk factor associated with weight recidivism and an indication for Bariatric Revisional Surgery (BRS). OBJECTIVES: The primary outcome of this study is to evaluate perioperative outcomes and the long-term total body weight loss (TBWL) outcomes following revision. SETTING: Single Academic Institution, Center of Bariatric Excellence. METHODS: We selected patients who had primary bariatric surgery and BRS from 2003 to 2020, followed by BRS for GGF. Patients' demographics, perioperative outcomes, and TBWL were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred five patients underwent BRS for GGF. Mean body mass index (BMI) at index operation and revision was 51.6 ± 10.1, and 42.4 ± 11.2 respectively. Ninety percent of patients had open primary RYGB, and 69% had open revisional surgery. The median length of stay after BRS was 3 days. The 30-day reintervention rate was 19%. The 30-day readmission rate was 34%. Of the 77 patients included for weight loss analysis, the mean %TBWL after primary RYGB was 34% ± 14. The total mean %TBWL at the time of revision was 18.8%, translating into a weight regain of 13.6% ± 9.5. The total mean %TBWL after revision was 37.6% ± 11.4, translating into TBWL of 18.8% ± 9.4 after revision when compared to TBWL at revision time. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that revision for GGF can be safely performed, however is associated with higher morbidity than primary bariatric surgery. Revision for GGF results in significant long-term weight loss.

Clinical and financial outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy compared to laparoscopic heller myotomy for treatment of achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies analyzing short-term outcomes for per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) have shown excellent clinical response rates and shorter operative times compared to laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). Despite this, many payors have been slow to recognize POEM as a valid treatment option. Furthermore, comparative studies analyzing long-term outcomes are limited. This study compares perioperative and long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and reimbursement for POEM and LHM at a single institution. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent POEM or LHM between 2014 and 2021 and had complete preoperative data with at least one complete follow up, were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, success rate, operative time, myotomy length, length of stay, pre- and postoperative symptom scores, anti-reflux medication use, cost and reimbursement were compared. RESULTS: 58 patients met inclusion with 25 undergoing LHM and 33 undergoing POEM. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics. Treatment success (Eckardt ≤ 3) for POEM and LHM was achieved by 88% and 76% of patients, respectively (p = 0.302). POEM patients had a shorter median operative time (106 min. vs. 145 min., p = 0.003) and longer median myotomy length (11 cm vs. 8 cm, p < 0.001). All LHM patients had a length of stay (LOS) ≥ 1 day vs. 51.5% for POEM patients (p < 0.001). Both groups showed improvements in dysphagia, heartburn, regurgitation, Eckardt score, GERD HRQL, RSI, and anti-reflux medication use. The improvement in dysphagia score was greater in patients undergoing POEM (2.30 vs 1.12, p = 0.003). Median hospital reimbursement was dramatically less for POEM ($3,658 vs. $14,152, p = 0.002), despite median hospital costs being significantly lower compared to LHM ($2,420 vs. $3,132, p = 0.029). RESULTS: POEM is associated with a shorter operative time and LOS, longer myotomy length, and greater resolution of dysphagia compared to LHM. POEM costs are significantly less than LHM but is poorly reimbursed.

Revision paraesophageal hernia repair outcomes in patients with typical and atypical reflux.

BACKGROUND: Revision laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (RLARS) is effective in alleviating the typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). RLARS outcomes in patients with atypical GERD symptoms has not been well established. A composite Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) score greater than 13 indicates extraesophageal manifestation of pathological reflux. In this study, we analyzed the differences in quality-of-life (QOL) and perioperative outcomes between patients with atypical versus typical GERD who underwent RLARS. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively maintained database of patients with pathologic reflux who underwent RLARS from February 2003 to October 2019. The cohort was divided into two groups, those with typical versus atypical manifestations of GERD, as defined by their RSI score. Patients with a RSI score of  > 13 were assigned to the Atypical group and those ≤ 13 were assigned to the Typical group. Patient QOL outcomes were prospectively followed using the RSI survey. Significance was defined by p-value less than 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients (Typical 61, Atypical 72) were included in the final analysis. The two groups were similar (p > 0.05) in mean age (58.1 ± 13.3 vs. 55.3 ± 15.5 years), body mass index (29.6 ± 5.0 vs. 30.3 ± 5.4), female sex distribution (60.7% vs. 59.7%) and age adjusted Charlson score (1.76 ± 1.58 vs. 1.98 ± 1.94). The Typical group had a higher frequency of type III hiatal hernia (62.3% vs. 29.2%) and Collis gastroplasty (29.5% vs. 5.6%). The groups had similar rates of partial and complete fundoplication with similar median length of stay (Typical: 3.0 ± 3.4 days vs. Atypical: 2.4 ± 1.7 days). After a mean follow-up of 30.2 ± 33.6 months, both groups reported similar rates of improvement in RSI outcome from baseline (58.1% vs 43.3%, p = .149). However, the RSI outcome at the latest follow-up for the Typical group was significantly better than the Atypical group after RLARS (2.8 ± 5.3 vs. 15.9 ± 11.1, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo revision paraesophageal hernia repair with objective findings of GERD and subjective complaints of atypical reflux symptoms may show long-term improvement in QOL outcomes. However, these results are contingent on proper patient selection and a thorough work-up for pathological reflux in this population. Further research is needed to determine universal diagnostic criteria to assist in the early detection and surgical treatment of patients with atypical GERD.

Is Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery Justified? An MBSAQIP Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic approach is utilized in greater than 90% of bariatric surgeries. With the growing prevalence of robotic-assisted surgery in bariatrics, there has been limited consensus on the superiority of either laparoscopic or robotic approaches, especially in revisional procedures (conversion from sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of the MBSAQIP PUF database of patients who underwent conversion from SG to RYGB procedures in either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted approaches. The groups underwent 2:1 propensity matching and primary outcomes included post-conversion days until discharge (POD), conversion operation length, total and major morbidity, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, 30-day reintervention, and 30-day mortality after conversion. RESULTS: After 2:1 propensity score matching, 3411 patients (2274 laparoscopic vs 1137 robotic) were included in the study. Intraoperatively, no significant difference was found in total morbidity (6.5% lap vs 5.9% robotic) or major morbidity (1.9% lap vs 1.7% robotic); however, the operative times were significantly longer robotically (126 min vs 164 min). Post-operatively, no significant differences were found in discharge day (1.8 lap vs 1.8 robotic), 30-day readmission (7.6% lap vs 8.6% robotic), reoperation rate (2.9% lap vs 3.7% robotic), additional intervention rate (2.5% lap vs 3.3% robotic), or 30-day mortality (0.1% vs 0.1%). CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in perioperative or intraoperative outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted SG to RYGB conversion procedures other than a longer operative time in the robotic approach, suggesting increased efficiency with the laparoscopic approach.

Drain amylase value as an early predictor of pancreatic fistula after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy.

AIM: To determine predictors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas (CRPF) by measuring drain fluid amylase (DFA) in the early postoperative period. METHODS: This prospective clinical study included 382 patients with periampullary tumors that were surgically resected at our department between March 2005 and October 2012. A cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (DP) was performed on all patients. Two closed suction drains were placed at the end of the surgery. The highest postoperative DFA value was recorded and analyzed during the first three postoperative days and on subsequent days if the drains were kept longer. Pancreatic fistula (PF) was classified according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) criteria. Postoperative complications were defined according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. All data were statistically analyzed. The optimal thresholds of DFA levels on the first, second and third postoperative days were estimated by constructing receiver operating curves, generated by calculating the sensitivities and specificities of the DFA levels. The DFA level limits were used to differentiate between the group without PF and the groups with biochemical pancreatic fistula (BPF) and CRPF. RESULTS: Pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy was performed on 289 (75.6%) patients, while the remaining patients underwent a classic Whipple procedure (CW). The total incidence of PF was 37.7% (grade A 22.8%, grade B 11.0% and grade C 3.9%). Soft pancreatic texture (SPT) was present in 58.3% of patients who developed PF. Mortality was 4.2%. The median DFA value on the first postoperative day (DFA1) in patients who developed PF was 4520 U/L (range 350-99000 U/L) for grade A fistula (BPF) with a SPT and a diameter of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) of ≤ 3 mm. For grade B/C (CRPF), the median DFA1 value was 8501 U/L (range 377-92060 U/L) with a SPT and MPD of ≤ 3 mm. These values were significantly higher when compared to the patients who did not have PF (122; range 5-37875 U/L). The upper limit of DFA values for the first 3 postoperative days in the examined stages of PF were: DFA1 1200 U/L for the BPF and CRPF; DFA3 350 U/L for BPF and DFA3 800 U/L for CRPF. The determined values were highly significant and demonstrated a reliable diagnostic test for both BPF and CRPF. CONCLUSION: DFA1 ≥ 1200 U/L is an important predictive factor for PF of any degree. The trend of DFA3 (decrease of < 50%) compared to DFA1 is a significant factor in the differentiation of CRPF from transient BPF.

Increased complication rate in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the standard of care for resection of adrenal masses, with extremely low morbidity and mortality. This study investigates the difference in outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy, comparing obese with healthy weight patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy between January 2000 and February 2010. Intraoperative and postoperative complications in the patients were compared. A patient with a body mass index >30kg/m(2) was considered obese. RESULTS: Eighty patients underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy between January 2000 and February 2010. Forty-nine patients (61%) were considered obese based on the body mass index criteria. Operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay did not differ significantly between the 2 cohort groups. There was no 30-day mortality in the population. There were 9 complications in the obese population and no complications in the healthy weight population (P<.011). Four obese patients had intraoperative complications, and 5 obese patients had postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase occurred in intraoperative and postoperative complications for obese individuals undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy compared with healthy weight individuals. However, high body mass index should not preclude elective laparoscopic adrenalectomy.