Catalytic reaction mechanism of goose egg-white lysozyme by molecular modelling of enzyme-substrate complex.

Despite the low similarity between their amino acid sequences, the core structures of the fold between chicken-type and goose-type lysozymes are conserved. However, their enzymatic activities are quite different. Both of them exhibit hydrolytic activities, but the goose-type lysozyme does not exhibit transglycosylation activity. The chicken-type lysozyme has a retaining-type reaction mechanism, while the reaction mechanism of the goose-type lysozyme has not been clarified. To clarify the latter mechanism, goose egg-white lysozyme (GEL)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc)6 complexes were modelled and compared with hen egg-white lysozyme (HEL)-(GlcNAc)6 complexes. By systematic conformational search, 48 GEL-(GlcNAc)6 complexes were modelled. The right and left side, and the amino acid residues in subsites E-G were identified in GEL. The GlcNAc residue D could bind towards the right side without distortion and there was enough room for a water molecule to attack the C1 carbon of GlcNAc residue D from alpha-side in the right side and not for acceptor molecule. The result of molecular dynamics simulation suggests that GEL would be an inverting enzyme, and Asp97 would act as a second carboxylate and that the narrow space of the binding cleft at subsites E-G in GEL may prohibit the sugar chain to bind alternative site that might be essential for transglycosylation.

Construction of enzyme-substrate complexes between hen egg-white lysozyme and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine hexamer by systematic conformational search and molecular dynamics simulation.

We constructed the complexes between HEWL and (GlcNAc)6 oligomer in order to investigate the amino acid residues related to substrate binding in the productive and nonproductive complexes, and the relationship between the distortion of the GlcNAc residue D and the formation of the productive complexes. We obtained 49 HEWL-(GlcNAc)6 complexes by a systematic conformational search and classified the each one to the three binding modes; left side, center, or right side. Furthermore we performed the molecular dynamics simulation against 20 HEWL-(GlcNAc)6 complexes (8: chair model, 12 : half-chair model) selected from the 49 complexes to investigate the interaction between HEWL and (GlcNAc)6. As results, we confirmed that it is necessary for GlcNAc residue D to be half-chaired form to bind toward the right side to form productive complexes. We found newly that eight amino acid residues interact with the (GlcNAc)6 oligomer, as follows, Arg73, Gly102, Asn103 for GlcNAc residue A; Asn103 for GlcNAc residues B and C; Leu56, Ala107, Val109 for GlcNAc residue D; Ala110 for GlcNAc residue E; and Lys33 for GlcNAc residue F. We also indicated that GlcNAc residue F does not interact with Thr47 and rarely interacts with Phe34 and Asn37.