Functional impact of multi-omic interactions in lung cancer.

Lung tumors are a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Lung cancers are highly heterogeneous on their phenotypes, both at the cellular and molecular levels. Efforts to better understand the biological origins and outcomes of lung cancer in terms of this enormous variability often require of high-throughput experimental techniques paired with advanced data analytics. Anticipated advancements in multi-omic methodologies hold potential to reveal a broader molecular perspective of these tumors. This study introduces a theoretical and computational framework for generating network models depicting regulatory constraints on biological functions in a semi-automated way. The approach successfully identifies enriched functions in analyzed omics data, focusing on Adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and Squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC, a type of NSCLC) in the lung. Valuable information about novel regulatory characteristics, supported by robust biological reasoning, is illustrated, for instance by considering the role of genes, miRNAs and CpG sites associated with NSCLC, both novel and previously reported. Utilizing multi-omic regulatory networks, we constructed robust models elucidating omics data interconnectedness, enabling systematic generation of mechanistic hypotheses. These findings offer insights into complex regulatory mechanisms underlying these cancer types, paving the way for further exploring their molecular complexity.

Molecular mechanisms of multi-omic regulation in breast cancer.

Breast cancer is a complex disease that is influenced by the concurrent influence of multiple genetic and environmental factors. Recent advances in genomics and other high throughput biomolecular techniques (-omics) have provided numerous insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying breast cancer development and progression. A number of these mechanisms involve multiple layers of regulation. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the role of multiple omics in the regulation of breast cancer, including the effects of DNA methylation, non-coding RNA, and other epigenomic changes. We comment on how integrating such diverse mechanisms is envisioned as key to a more comprehensive understanding of breast carcinogenesis and cancer biology with relevance to prognostics, diagnostics and therapeutics. We also discuss the potential clinical implications of these findings and highlight areas for future research. Overall, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of multi-omic regulation in breast cancer is rapidly increasing and has the potential to inform the development of novel therapeutic approaches for this disease.

Drug repurposing for Basal breast cancer subpopulations using modular network signatures.

Breast cancer is characterized as being a heterogeneous pathology with a broad phenotype variability. Breast cancer subtypes have been developed in order to capture some of this heterogeneity. Each of these breast cancer subtypes, in turns retains varied characteristic features impacting diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutics. Basal breast tumors, in particular have been challenging in these regards. Basal breast cancer is often more aggressive, of rapid evolution and no tailor-made targeted therapies are available yet to treat it. Arguably, epigenetic variability is behind some of these intricacies. It is possible to further classify basal breast tumor in groups based on their non-coding transcriptome and methylome profiles. It is expected that these groups will have differences in survival as well as in sensitivity to certain classes of drugs. With this in mind, we implemented a computational learning approach to infer different subpopulations of basal breast cancer (from TCGA multi-omic data) based on their epigenetic signatures. Such epigenomic signatures were associated with different survival profiles; we then identified their associated gene co-expression network structure, extracted a signature based on modules within these networks, and use these signatures to find and prioritize drugs (in the LINCS dataset) that may be used to target these types of cancer. In this way we are introducing the analytical workflow for an epigenomic signature-based drug repurposing structure.

Functional impact of multi-omic interactions in breast cancer subtypes.

Multi-omic approaches are expected to deliver a broader molecular view of cancer. However, the promised mechanistic explanations have not quite settled yet. Here, we propose a theoretical and computational analysis framework to semi-automatically produce network models of the regulatory constraints influencing a biological function. This way, we identified functions significantly enriched on the analyzed omics and described associated features, for each of the four breast cancer molecular subtypes. For instance, we identified functions sustaining over-representation of invasion-related processes in the basal subtype and DNA modification processes in the normal tissue. We found limited overlap on the omics-associated functions between subtypes; however, a startling feature intersection within subtype functions also emerged. The examples presented highlight new, potentially regulatory features, with sound biological reasons to expect a connection with the functions. Multi-omic regulatory networks thus constitute reliable models of the way omics are connected, demonstrating a capability for systematic generation of mechanistic hypothesis.

An Information Theoretical Multilayer Network Approach to Breast Cancer Transcriptional Regulation.

Breast cancer is a complex, highly heterogeneous disease at multiple levels ranging from its genetic origins and molecular processes to clinical manifestations. This heterogeneity has given rise to the so-called intrinsic or molecular breast cancer subtypes. Aside from classification, these subtypes have set a basis for differential prognosis and treatment. Multiple regulatory mechanisms-involving a variety of biomolecular entities-suffer from alterations leading to the diseased phenotypes. Information theoretical approaches have been found to be useful in the description of these complex regulatory programs. In this work, we identified the interactions occurring between three main mechanisms of regulation of the gene expression program: transcription factor regulation, regulation via noncoding RNA, and epigenetic regulation through DNA methylation. Using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we inferred probabilistic multilayer networks, identifying key regulatory circuits able to (partially) explain the alterations that lead from a healthy phenotype to different manifestations of breast cancer, as captured by its molecular subtype classification. We also found some general trends in the topology of the multi-omic regulatory networks: Tumor subtype networks present longer shortest paths than their normal tissue counterpart; epigenomic regulation has frequently focused on genes enriched for certain biological processes; CpG methylation and miRNA interactions are often part of a regulatory core of conserved interactions. The use of probabilistic measures to infer information regarding theoretical-derived multilayer networks based on multi-omic high-throughput data is hence presented as a useful methodological approach to capture some of the molecular heterogeneity behind regulatory phenomena in breast cancer, and potentially other diseases.

Multi-Omic Regulation of the PAM50 Gene Signature in Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes.

Breast cancer is a disease that exhibits heterogeneity that goes from the genomic to the clinical levels. This heterogeneity is thought to be captured (at least partially) by the so-called breast cancer molecular subtypes. These molecular subtypes were initially defined based on the unsupervised clustering of gene expression and its correlate with histological, morphological, phenotypic and clinical features already known. Later, a 50-gene signature, PAM50, was defined in order to identify the biological subtype of a given sample within the clinical setting. The PAM50 signature was obtained by the use of unsupervised statistical methods, and therefore no limitation was set on the biological relevance (or lack of) of the selected genes beyond its predictive capacity. An open question that remains is what are the regulatory elements that drive the various expression behaviors of this set of genes in the different molecular subtypes. This question becomes more relevant as the measurement of more biological layers of regulation becomes accessible. In this work, we analyzed the gene expression regulation of the 50 genes in the PAM50 signature, in terms of (a) gene co-expression, (b) transcription factors, (c) micro-RNAs, and (d) methylation. Using data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for the Luminal A and B, Basal, and HER2-enriched molecular subtypes as well as normal tumor adjacent tissue, we identified predictors for gene expression through the use of an elastic net model. We compare and contrast the sets of identified regulators for the gene signature in each molecular subtype, and systematically compare them to current literature. We also identified a unique set of predictors for the expression of genes in the PAM50 signature associated with each of the molecular subtypes. Most selected predictors are exclusive for a PAM50 gene and predictors are not shared across subtypes. There are only 13 coding transcripts and 2 miRNAs selected for the four subtypes. MiR-21 and miR-10b connect almost all the PAM50 genes in all the subtypes and normal tissue, but do it in an exclusive manner, suggesting a cancer switch from miR-10b coordination in normal tissue to miR-21. The PAM50 gene sets of selected predictors that enrich for a function across subtypes, support that different regulatory molecular mechanisms are taking place. With this study we aim to a wider understanding of the regulatory mechanisms that differentiate the expression of the PAM50 signature, which in turn could perhaps help understand the molecular basis of the differences between the molecular subtypes.

The Many Faces of Gene Regulation in Cancer: A Computational Oncogenomics Outlook.

Cancer is a complex disease at many different levels. The molecular phenomenology of cancer is also quite rich. The mutational and genomic origins of cancer and their downstream effects on processes such as the reprogramming of the gene regulatory control and the molecular pathways depending on such control have been recognized as central to the characterization of the disease. More important though is the understanding of their causes, prognosis, and therapeutics. There is a multitude of factors associated with anomalous control of gene expression in cancer. Many of these factors are now amenable to be studied comprehensively by means of experiments based on diverse omic technologies. However, characterizing each dimension of the phenomenon individually has proven to fall short in presenting a clear picture of expression regulation as a whole. In this review article, we discuss some of the more relevant factors affecting gene expression control both, under normal conditions and in tumor settings. We describe the different omic approaches that we can use as well as the computational genomic analysis needed to track down these factors. Then we present theoretical and computational frameworks developed to integrate the amount of diverse information provided by such single-omic analyses. We contextualize this within a systems biology-based multi-omic regulation setting, aimed at better understanding the complex interplay of gene expression deregulation in cancer.

Comutation and exclusion analysis in human tumors: A tool for cancer biology studies and for rational selection of multitargeted therapeutic approaches.

Malignant tumors originate from somatic mutations and other genomic and epigenomic alterations, which lead to loss of control of the cellular circuitry. These alterations present patterns of co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity that can influence prognosis and modify response to drugs, highlighting the need for multitargeted therapies. Studies in this area have generally focused in particular malignancies and considered whole genes instead of specific mutations, ignoring the fact that different alterations in the same gene can have widely different effects. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of co-dependencies of individual somatic mutations in the whole spectrum of human tumors. Combining multitesting with conditional and expected mutational probabilities, we have discovered rules governing the codependencies of driver and nondriver mutations. We also uncovered pairs and networks of comutations and exclusions, some of them restricted to certain cancer types and others widespread. These pairs and networks are not only of basic but also of clinical interest, and can be of help in the selection of multitargeted antitumor therapies. In this respect, recurrent driver comutations suggest combinations of drugs that might be effective in the clinical setting, while recurrent exclusions indicate combinations unlikely to be useful.

Increased rates of protein evolution and asymmetric deceleration after the whole-genome duplication in yeasts.

BACKGROUND: Whole-genome duplication (WGD) events have shaped the genomes of eukaryotic organisms. Relaxed selection after duplication along with inherent functional constraints are thought to determine the fate of the paralogs and, ultimately, the evolution of gene function. Here, we investigated the rate of protein evolution (as measured by dN/dS ratios) before and after the WGD in the hemiascomycete yeasts, and the way in which changes in such rates relate to molecular and biological function. RESULTS: For most groups of orthologous genes (81%) we observed a change in the rates of evolution after genome duplication. Genes with atypically-low dN/dS ratio before the WGD were prone to increase their rates of evolution after duplication. Importantly, the paralogs were often different in their rates of evolution after the WGD (50% cases), however, this was more consistent with an asymmetric deceleration in the protein-evolution rates, rather than an asymmetric increase of the initial rates. Functional-category analysis showed that regulatory proteins such as protein kinases and transcription factors were enriched in genes that increase their rates of evolution after the WGD. While changes in the rate of protein-sequence evolution were associated to protein abundance, content of disordered regions, and contribution to fitness, these features were an attribute of specific functional classes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that strong purifying selection in ancestral pre-duplication sequences is a strong predictor of increased rates after the duplication in yeasts and that asymmetry in evolution rate is established during the deceleration phase. In addition, changes in the rates at which paralogous sequences evolve before and after WGD are different for specific protein functions; increased rates of protein evolution after duplication occur preferentially in specific protein functions.